You are here

Article Text

Article menu

Download PDFPDF

Review
An update on molecular genetics of gastrointestinal stromal tumours
  1. L Tornillo,
  2. L M Terracciano
  1. Institute of Pathology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
  1. Correspondence to:
    Dr Luigi Tornillo
    Institute of Pathology, University of Basel, Schönbeinstrasse 40, CH-4003 Basel, Switzerland; tornillol{at}uhbs.ch

Abstract

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) are the most common primary mesenchymal tumours of the gastrointestinal tract. Most of them show activating mutations of the genes coding for KIT or platelet-derived growth factor receptor α (PDGFRα), two receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs). The RTK inhibitor Imatinib (Gleevec®, Novartis, Switzerland), induces regression of the tumour. The level of response to treatment, together with other clinicopathological parameters is related to the type and site of the activating mutation, thus suggesting that these tumours should be classified according to the molecular context. This is confirmed also by the phenomenon of the resistance to treatment, which arises because of different mechanisms (second mutation, amplification, activation of other RTKs) and can be fought only by specific RTK inhibitors, that are at present under development. RTK activation involves an homogeneous transduction pathway whose components (MAPK, AKT, PI3K, mTOR and RAS) are possible targets of new molecular treatment. A new paradigm of classification integrating the classic pathological criteria with the molecular changes will permit personalised prognosis and treatment.

  • GIST, gastrointestinal stromal tumours
  • ICC, interstitial cells of Cajal
  • PDGFR, Platelet-derived growth factor receptor
  • PI3K, phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase
  • RTK, receptor tyrosine kinases

https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.2005.031112

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST), although relatively rare, are the most common primary mesenchymal tumours of the gastrointestinal tract, with an incidence of nearly 20/1 000 000/year.1–5 Their biological behaviour is difficult to predict, ranging from benign to malignant. The most reliable prognostic factors are size and mitotic index. On the basis of these factors (and to some extent on anatomical location), two risk classifications are proposed (tables 1 and 2).5,6

    View this table:
    Table 1

     Risk assessment categories of gastrointestinal stromal tumours based on size and mitotic index

    View this table:
    Table 2

     Risk assessment categories of gastrointestinal stromal tumours based on size, mitotic index and anatomical location

    Stromal tumours of the gastrointestinal tract were regarded as smooth-muscle tumours (leiomyoma, leiomyoblastoma) until electron microscopy and immunohistochemistry analysis showed that only a small fraction of these tumours showed smooth-muscle differentiation. Therefore, in 1983 Mazur and Clark9 proposed the non-committal designation, stromal tumour, which now encompasses tumours with schwannian or neuronal differentiation (gastrointestinal autonomic nerve tumours,10). We now know that GISTs may have either a well-developed or an incomplete myoid, neural, autonomic nerve or mixed phenotype, or may remain undifferentiated.5,11 In the late 1990s, it was shown that GISTs share morphological, immunophenotypical and genetic characteristics with the interstitial cells of Cajal (ICCs), the pacemaker cells of the gut.2,12,13 They have immunophenotypical and ultrastructural features of both smooth muscle and neuronal differentiation, and regulate peristalsis. Most GISTs express the tyrosin kinase KIT oncoprotein2,14 that is also the immunohistochemical marker of ICC. The expression of KIT is so strong and specific that it was claimed to be required for the diagnosis,3–5,15,16 whereas it is now clear that a small, but significant fraction of GISTs (5–10%) are indeed KIT negative.17–20

    KIT is normally expressed in several cell types other than ICC.21,22 In particular, KIT expression has a crucial role in embryogenesis, encouraging differentiation of primitive mesenchymal progenitor cells towards ICC and is essential to the formation of a functional ICC network.12 It belongs to the type III receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) subfamily, whose members include platelet-derived growth factor receptors α and β (PDGFRα and PDGFRβ). All RTKIII contain five immunoglobulin-like domains in their extracellular ligand-binding region followed by a single transmembrane domain and a cytoplasmic tyrosine kinase domain interrupted by a large kinase insert. The ligand of KIT is known as stem cell factor. 22 As in other RTK, stem cell factor induces dimerisation of KIT followed by transautophosphorylation of the cytoplasmic tyrosine kinase domain, leading to activation of multiple signalling pathways, such as the PI3K/AKT and c-Jun N-terminal kinase/STAT pathways23 (fig 1). The constitutive activation of KIT is one of the earliest transforming events in GISTs and occurs mainly through activating mutations in the kit gene,2,8,14,18,21,24–28 but there is evidence of alternate activating mechanisms in a subset of tumours. Activating mutations of kit gene in GIST occur in exons 11, 9, 13 and 17 (fig 1), corresponding to the juxtamembrane intracellular regulatory domain, the extramembrane domain and the two intracytoplasmic tyrosine kinase domains, respectively.18,29,30 In the first phase, the presence of activating mutations seemed to be related to a malignant behaviour.31,32 Subsequently, it was shown that most GISTs, even the tumours <1 cm in size that were found incidentally, do harbour KIT mutations.24,33–35 The meaning of KIT activation is highlighted by the recent introduction of an inhibitor of RTKs, STI-571 (Imatinib, Gleevec, Novartis, Switzerland), which can induce regression of GISTs. Even advanced disease has been stabilised, with a return of quality of life.36–42 The proper application of STI-571 is currently being investigated to identify the patients most likely to benefit from the treatment. So far, it is indicated for the treatment of metastatic inoperable disease or for cytoreduction in cases not amenable to macroscopically complete resection.43 Many trials are in course which are, however, considering the possibility of using the drug in an adjuvant or neoadjuvant setting.44

    Figure 1
    Figure 1

     A simplified scheme of the signal transduction pathways activated by KIT or platelet-derived growth factor receptor α(PDGFRα) (PI3K/AKT, Ras/mitogen activated protein kinase, JAK/STAT, sarcoma inducing gene with indication of the sites of activating mutations described in gastrointestinal stromal tumours. Actual and future drug targets are shown in bold. RTK, receptor tyrosine kinase; Lig, ligand; JM, juxtamembrane regulatory domain; TK, tyrosine kinase domain.

    Another member of the RTK family, PDGFRα, is associated with the pathogenesis of GIST and mutations in c-kit are mutually exclusive with those in pdgfra.45 Interestingly, these two genes are located in the same chromosomal region (4q12).46,47 The most frequent mutations in pdgfra are observed in exons 18 (second tyrosine kinase domain), 12 (regulatory juxtamembrane domain) or 14 (tyrosine kinase domain) (fig. 1). Both in vitro48 and in vivo49 studies have shown that the type of mutation in c-kit or pgdfra genes may predict the response to treatment with imatinib. It is now well known that a mutation in exon 11 of kit is associated with a better response to treatment with inhibitors of RTK, with a decreasing response for mutation in exons 9, 13, 17 and wild-type tumours. Depending on the mutation, some cells expressing the PDGFRα exon 18 mutant were sensitive to imatinib, whereas others were resistant. Mutants in exons 14 and 12 are sensitive to the drug. 14,49,50 Moreover, tumours with mutations in the pdgfra gene are prevalently epithelioid.51 Some specific RTK mutations are also correlated with clinicopathological parameters, such as histological type, overall survival, localisation and risk classification.48,49,52,53 Table 3 shows a brief summary of this correlation.

    View this table:
    Table 3

     Summary of most frequent kit and pdgfra mutations in sporadic gastrointestinal stromal tumours

    MUTATIONS OF THE KIT GENE

    Exon 11 (juxtamembrane domain)

    The juxtamembrane region of KIT inhibits receptor dimerisation in the absence of stem cell factor. Small in-frame deletions and insertions or point mutations on this domain affect this function.54,55 The reported frequency of mutations in exon 11 varies from 20% to 92%, depending on the type of material (frozen or formalin fixed) and the technique used.8,14,18,31–33,51,56,57 Most of the mutations are located between codons 556 and 560, with deletions and insertions prevalently affecting codons 557–559 and point mutations affecting codons 559 and 560.8,24,49,51–53,58–60 Internal tandem duplications are prevalently found towards the end of the exon (codons 576–580).52 The type of mutation is apparently related to the prognosis, with deletions behaving more aggressively in comparison with insertions and point mutations,8,18,29,58,61–63 and to the risk classification.

    Exon 9 (extracellular domain)

    The frequency of this mutation is described in 5–18% of cases, depending on the series.18,24,28,49,53,64–72 It occurs mainly at codons 501–502 and is represented by duplication–insertion. It is associated with small intestinal localization and aggressive behaviour.18,24 Its mechanism probably affects an antidimerisation motif in the extracellular domain.

    Exon 13 (kinase I domain)

    This rare mutation, affecting codon 642, occurs in 0.8–4.1% of cases.1,3,35,49,64–66,70,71,73,74 It is associated with resistance to treatment with imatinib.

    Exon 17 (activation loop)

    The activating mechanism of these rare mutations (0.6% of cases)18,33 affecting codons 820 and 822, is unclear. A mutation occuring at codon 817, highly activating and frequently observed in other tumours (mastocytosis, acute myelogenous leukaemia), was never observed in GISTs, implying that the transforming mechanisms in the genesis of GIST are different from those of other tumours.18,23

    MUTATION IN THE PDGFRA GENE

    They are observed in 7–12% of cases,18,20,29,45,49–51 occurring more often in exon 18 (activation loop) and rarely in exons 12 (juxtamembrane domain) and 14 (kinase I domain). pdgfra Mutants are prevalently epithelioid, located in the stomach and show weak or no immunohistochemical reactivity for KIT,18,20,29,45,49–51,75,76 but are functionally similar to kit mutants. The mutations occur in homologous domains, and activation of the downstream signalling pathways seem to be largely similar in the two mutant subtypes.77 Some degree of difference in gene expression may exist, but these data need confirmation in larger series.78

    Exon 18 (activation loop)

    Mutations occur at codons 842–849. Some of them (D842V, RD841–842KI and DI842–843IM) have shown considerable resistance to treatment with imatinib.45,48,49,79

    Exon 12 (juxtamembrane domain)

    Mutations occur at codons 561–571 and are associated with good response to imatinib.18,48–50

    Exon 14 (kinase I domain)

    A single rare mutation is described (N659K). It showed in vitro sensitivity to imatinib that is comparable to that observed in kit exon 13 mutants.20,50

    GISTS IN THE PAEDIATRIC AGE GROUP

    Most GISTs (95%) arise in adults over 40 years of age.80,81 Some GISTs in children (6–14 years) and young adults (15–24 years) occur in connection with Carney’s triad or neurofibromatosis type 1.82–84 Rare cases of familial GISTs are described, which carry a kit or pdgfra germline mutation.57,85–93

    Sporadic paediatric GISTs

    Two series of paediatric GISTs 6,72 showed that these tumours occur without mutations in both kit and pdgfra. They show mainly an indolent course, with treatable recurrence. A specific gene expression signature was found in five cases, including overexpression of phosphate kinase alpha 1 (PHKA1), previously reported in a subset of acute myelogenous leukaemia in elderly women.72

    Paediatric GISTs associated with syndromes

    GISTs associated with neurofibromatosis type 1 do not have mutations in the kit or pdgfra gene, except in rare cases, not corresponding to the hot spots of sporadic GISTs.82,94–96 They show an indolent course, preferential location in the small bowel and the colon and a tendency for multiple tumours.82,94–96

    Carney’s triad97 is an association of GIST, paraganglioma and pulmonary chordoma. The genetic basis is unknown. In all, 85% of patients are women. The diagnosis is generally made at a young age or in infancy. GISTs associated with Carney’s triad do not harbour mutations in the kit or pdgfra genes.18,98

    Familial GISTs are rare.57,85–93 Most affected families carry a kit germline mutation, inherited as autosomal dominant. One family showed a mutation is the pdgfra gene. Tumours are usually multiple and multifocal and arise at earlier ages than sporadic GISTs. They are associated with urticaria pigmentosa, melanocytic nevi, melanomas, achalasia or neuronal hyperplasia of the myenteric plexus.57,85–93 Genetic mechanisms of progression are similar in familial and sporadic GISTs in adults.93

    Cytogenetic changes in GISTs

    The cytogenetic changes in GISTs were extensively studied by using different techniques (table 4).99–108

    View this table:
    Table 4

     Summary of cytogenetic changes in gastrointestinal stromal tumours

    A correlation between the number and type of chromosomal changes and biological behaviour of GISTs was suggested.21 Karyotypes from about 60% of GISTs show a partial or total loss of chromosome 14.21,45,104,109 In particular, 14q11.1–12 and 14q22–24 are frequently deleted and can therefore represent sites for tumour suppressor genes participating early in the genesis of GISTs.104,110 Loss of 22q is observed in about half of GISTs, with a higher frequency in advanced tumours.77,111 It is possible therefore that an unknown gene on 22q may be responsible in the early stages of tumorigenesis and in tumour progression.18,45,111 Intermediate-risk and high-risk GISTs show loss of chromosomes 1p, 9p, 9q, 11p100,102,104,106,108,111 and gains of 8q and 17q.100,102,105,108 A sort of molecular pathway in the acquisition of genetic aberrations may parallel the progressive acquisition of malignancy.18 The precise role of single changes and their prognostic impact was not elucidated. Probably, cytogenetic changes in GISTs, above all in those with intermediate- and high-risk, are more complex.35,53,61,77,112,113 For instance, 8q gains were described in as many as 57% of metastatic GISTs.100 Gains of c-myc, a well-known oncogene located on 8q24.12–13, in only 3 of 100 GISTs,61 implies that the target of this amplification are other, still unknown, oncogenes.

    Cell cycle network and GIST

    One possible target on chromosome 9p is the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (cdkn2a) gene, located on 9p21, with its two transcripts, p16INK4a and p14ARF, which results from an alternative reading frame on the first exon.114cdkn2a has a central role in the control of cell cycle and apoptosis. p14ARF inhibits mouse double minute 2 (MDM2) from degrading p53.115 p16INK4A binds to the cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and blocks the phosphorylation of RB1 protein, with consequent binding of the RBI to E2F1, which may influence the expression of thousand genes responsible for the control of proliferation, transcription and apoptosis.116–118 Inactivation of p16INK4 may occur through mutation or promoter hypermethylation.116,117 Molecular genetics and immunohistochemistry showed 113,119,120 that a loss of p16 may have an independent value in identifying a subset of tumours with adverse prognosis. These results are supported by the observation that dysregulation of other members of the CDKN2a network may be linked to adverse prognosis.116 We61 analysed a series of 100 GISTs by fluorescent in situ hybridisation (FISH) and found amplifications of CyclinD1 (ccnd1) and mdm2 genes in a subset of high-risk tumours. Mouse double minute 2 interacts with Raf/methyl-ethyl ketone /mitogen activated protein kinase121 and phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase/AKT/c-Jun N-terminal kinase122,123 pathways, both of which are triggered by KIT-activation.18,21,124 We also found three cases of coamplifications of ccnd1 and mdm2.61,125 An immunohistochemical study attempted to relate the cell cycle machinery and prognosis in 80 GISTs.126 Cyclin A, cyclin B1, cdc2 and Ki-67 were associated with a high risk of malignant behaviour and short disease-free survival.

    EXPRESSION STUDIES

    The first study of gene expression in GISTs34 showed that the presence of kit mutations (at that time, the presence of pdgfra mutations was not known) could identify a homogeneous expression profile, distinguishing GISTs from other mesenchymal tumours. In particular, genes that probably participated in the pacemaker function of the ICC (ion channels, receptors, transduction molecules) had a highly discriminant value. One of these protein kinase Cθ (prkcθ) is constitutively activated in GISTs and could therefore be a therapeutic target such as KIT.127 Another marker that has been identified by gene expression analysis is DOG-1, and it has been proposed also as a possible diagnostic marker.128 Subsequently gene expression in GISTs may differ according to the presence of mutation in kit or pdgfra,77 to the type of mutations in kit or pdgfra78,129 or to the anatomical location of the tumour.129 Differentially expressed genes included ezrin, p70S6k, map2k1, akt, stat3, all of which were in the activating pathways downstream of kit or pdgfra. Koon et al130 described by real-time RT-PCR an association between the expression of cell cycle proteins (cyclinB1, centromere protein-F kinetochore protein) and tyrosine kinases with the biological behaviour in a small series of GISTs.

    Take-home messages

    • Specific receptor tyrosine kinases (RTK) mutation is correlated with response-to-therapy and other clinicopathological parameters.

    • The prognostic impact of single cytogenetic alterations has not been elucidated.

    • Factors different from RTK may regulate signalling in gastrointestinal stromal tumours.

    • We need a new paradigm of classification that combines pathological criteria and molecular changes.

    SIGNALLING PATHWAYS

    KIT and PDGFRα in GISTs show a homogeneous transduction pathway consisting of mitogen-activate protein kinase, AKT, p70, STAT1, STAT3, PI3K, mammalian target of rapamydin and RAS.18,21,45 In particular, oncogenic signalling in these tumours differs from haematological diseases, and selective inhibition of the PI3K/mammalian target of rapamydin pathways reduces proliferation and inhibits apoptosis.25,26 The degree of activation differs from tumour to tumour, thus suggesting that factors different from KIT may regulate signalling in these neoplasias.26 The development of new targeted molecular treatments is aimed at selectively blocking these pathways.

    MOLECULAR CHANGES AND RESISTANCE TO IMATINIB

    Many patients with advanced GISTs develop resistance after variable degrees of initial response to treatment.131 Two kinds of resistance should be distinguished:44 (a) primary resistance: evidence of progression within the first 6 months of imatinib treatment, frequently associated with a wild-type KIT protein, mutation in exon 9 of kit or a D842V mutation in pdgfra; (b) secondary resistance: progression of disease after 6 months of treatment. The mechanisms of secondary resistance are heterogeneous: (a) acquisition of a secondary mutation in the kit or pdgfra genes;69,132–135 (b) genomic amplification of kit and overexpression of the protein;133 and (c) activation of other RTKs.18 A new generation of tyrosine kinase inhibitors are presently under evaluation to solve this problem.132,136

    CONCLUSIONS

    GISTs probably do not constitute a single group of tumours; their biological behaviour (the prognosis and above all the response to treatment) depends both on classic clinicopathological parameters (ie, location, size, mitotic activity) and on the molecular changes that are detected in a given tumour (type of mutation in RTK, chromosomal alterations, expression of cell cycle proteins, activation and control of pathways downstream of the RTK, amplification or loss of genes, etc). Moreover, a relationship was found between some pathological characteristics and molecular alterations (for instance, tumours of the small intestine are associated with epithelioid morphology and mutation in exon 9 of kit). This underlines the need for a new paradigm of classification that can combine the old pathological criteria with the molecular changes.18 In the era of targeted treatments (imatinib is one of the most successful examples), we are forced to change our point of view from the microscopic to the molecular level and to integrate all the data in a coherent schema.

    REFERENCES

    1. ↵
      Nilsson B, Bumming P, Meis-Kindblom JM, et al. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: the incidence, prevalence, clinical course, and prognostication in the preimatinib mesylate era—a population-based study in western Sweden. Cancer 2005;103:821–9.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    2. ↵
      Kindblom LG, Remotti HE, Aldenborg F, et al. Gastrointestinal pacemaker cell tumor (GIPACT): gastrointestinal stromal tumors show phenotypic characteristics of the interstitial cells of Cajal. Am J Pathol 1998;152:1259–69.
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    3. ↵
      Miettinen M, Lasota J. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors—definition, clinical, histological, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic features and differential diagnosis. Virchows Arch2001;438:1–12.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    4. Miettinen M, El-Rifai W, Sobin HL, et al. Evaluation of malignancy and prognosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a review. Hum Pathol 2002;33:478–83.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    5. ↵
      Fletcher CD, Berman JJ, Corless C, et al. Diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a consensus approach. Hum Pathol 2002;33:459–65.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    6. ↵
      Miettinen M, Lasota J, Sobin LH. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach in children and young adults: a clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic study of 44 cases with long-term follow-up and review of the literature. Am J Surg Pathol2005;29:1373–81.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    7. ↵
      Miettinen M, Kopczynski J, Makhlouf HR, et al. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors, intramural leiomyomas, and leiomyosarcomas in the duodenum: a clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic study of 167 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 2003;27:625–41.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    8. ↵
      Miettinen M, Sobin LH, Lasota J. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach: a clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic study of 1765 cases with long-term follow-up. Am J Surg Pathol2005;29:52–68.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    9. ↵
      Mazur MT, Clark HB. Gastric stromal tumors. Reappraisal of histogenesis. Am J Surg Pathol1983;7:507–19.
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    10. ↵
      Lauwers GY, Erlandson RA, Casper ES, et al. Gastrointestinal autonomic nerve tumors. A clinicopathological, immunohistochemical, and ultrastructural study of 12 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 1993;17:887–97.
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    11. ↵
      Suster S. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Semin Diagn Pathol1996;13:297–313.
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    12. ↵
      Huizinga JD, Thuneberg L, Kluppel M, et al. W/kit gene required for interstitial cells of Cajal and for intestinal pacemaker activity. Nature 1995;373:347–9.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    13. ↵
      Sircar K, Hewlett BR, Huizinga JD, et al. Interstitial cells of Cajal as precursors of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Am J Surg Pathol 1999;23:377–89.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    14. ↵
      Hirota S, Isozaki K, Moriyama Y, et al. Gain-of-function mutations of c-kit in human gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Science 1998;279:577–80.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    15. ↵
      Fletcher CD, Fletcher JA. Testing for KIT (CD117) in gastrointestinal stromal tumors: another Herceptest? Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol2002;10:197–8.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    16. ↵
      Miettinen M, Majidi M, Lasota J. Pathology and diagnostic criteria of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs): a review. Eur J Cancer2002;38 (Suppl 5) :S39–51.
      OpenUrl
    17. ↵
      Adachi Y, Yamamoto H, Nosho K, et al. Gigantic gastrointestinal stromal tumor in the pelvis. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2005;20 :196–8.
    18. ↵
      Corless CL, Fletcher JA, Heinrich MC. Biology of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. J Clin Oncol2004;22:3813–25.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    19. Debiec-Rychter M, Wasag B, Stul M, et al. Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) negative for KIT (CD117 antigen) immunoreactivity. J Pathol 2004;202:430–8.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    20. ↵
      Medeiros F, Corless CL, Duensing A, et al. KIT-negative gastrointestinal stromal tumors: proof of concept and therapeutic implications. Am J Surg Pathol 2004;28:889–94.
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    21. ↵
      Heinrich MC, Rubin BP, Longley BJ, et al. Biology and genetic aspects of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: KIT activation and cytogenetic alterations. Hum Pathol 2002;33:484–95.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    22. ↵
      Ashman LK. The biology of stem cell factor and its receptor C-kit. Int J Biochem Cell Biol1999;31:1037–51.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    23. ↵
      Longley BJ, Reguera MJ, Ma Y. Classes of c-KIT activating mutations: proposed mechanisms of action and implications for disease classification and therapy. Leuk Res2001;25:571–6.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    24. ↵
      Corless CL, McGreevey L, Haley A, et al. KIT mutations are common in incidental gastrointestinal stromal tumors one centimeter or less in size. Am J Pathol 2002;160:1567–72.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    25. ↵
      Duensing A, Heinrich MC, Fletcher CD, et al. Biology of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: KIT mutations and beyond. Cancer Invest 2004;22:106–16.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    26. ↵
      Duensing A, Medeiros F, McConarty B, et al. Mechanisms of oncogenic KIT signal transduction in primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). Oncogene 2004;23:3999–4006.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    27. Hirota S, Isozaki K, Nishida T, et al. Effects of loss-of-function and gain-of-function mutations of c-kit on the gastrointestinal tract. J Gastroenterol 2000;35 (Suppl 12) :75–9.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    28. ↵
      Hirota S, Nishida T, Isozaki K, et al. Gain-of-function mutation at the extracellular domain of KIT in gastrointestinal stromal tumours. J Pathol 2001;193:505–10.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    29. ↵
      Corless CL. Assessing the prognosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a growing role for molecular testing. Am J Clin Pathol2004;122:11–3.
      OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    30. ↵
      Sihto H, Sarlomo-Rikala M, Tynninen O, et al. KIT and platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha tyrosine kinase gene mutations and KIT amplifications in human solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:49–57.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    31. ↵
      Lasota J, Jasinski M, Sarlomo-Rikala M, et al. Mutations in exon 11 of c-Kit occur preferentially in malignant versus benign gastrointestinal stromal tumors and do not occur in leiomyomas or leiomyosarcomas. Am J Pathol 1999;154:53–60.
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    32. ↵
      Taniguchi M, Nishida T, Hirota S, et al. Effect of c-kit mutation on prognosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Cancer Res 1999;59:4297–300.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    33. ↵
      Rubin BP, Singer S, Tsao C, et al. KIT activation is a ubiquitous feature of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Cancer Res 2001;61:8118–21.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    34. ↵
      Allander SV, Nupponen NN, Ringner M, et al. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors with KIT mutations exhibit a remarkably homogeneous gene expression profile. Cancer Res 2001;61:8624–8.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    35. ↵
      Andersson J, Sjogren H, Meis-Kindblom JM, et al. The complexity of KIT gene mutations and chromosome rearrangements and their clinical correlation in gastrointestinal stromal (pacemaker cell) tumors. Am J Pathol 2002;160:15–22.
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    36. ↵
      Tuveson DA, Willis NA, Jacks T, et al. STI571 inactivation of the gastrointestinal stromal tumor c-KIT oncoprotein: biological and clinical implications. Oncogene 2001;20:5054–8.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    37. Levitzki A. Tyrosine kinases as targets for cancer therapy. Eur J Cancer2002;38 (Suppl 5) :S11–8.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    38. Joensuu H. Treatment of inoperable gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) with imatinib (Glivec, Gleevec). Med Klin2002;97 (Suppl 1) :28–30.
      OpenUrlWeb of Science
    39. Joensuu H, Roberts PJ, Sarlomo-Rikala M, et al. Effect of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor STI571 in a patient with a metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor. N Engl J Med 2001;344:1052–6.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    40. Demetri GD. Targeting c-kit mutations in solid tumors: scientific rationale and novel therapeutic options. Semin Oncol2001;28 (5 Suppl 17) :19–26.
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    41. Demetri GD. Targeting the molecular pathophysiology of gastrointestinal stromal tumors with imatinib. Mechanisms, successes, and challenges to rational drug development. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am2002;16:1115–24.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    42. ↵
      Demetri GD, von Mehren M, Blanke CD, et al. Efficacy and safety of imatinib mesylate in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors. N Engl J Med 2002;347:472–80.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    43. ↵
      Dagher R, Cohen M, Williams G, et al. Approval summary: imatinib mesylate in the treatment of metastatic and/or unresectable malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Clin Cancer Res 2002;8:3034–8.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    44. ↵
      Blay JY, Bonvalot S, Casali P, et al. Consensus meeting for the management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Report of the GIST Consensus Conference of 20–21 March 2004, under the auspices of ESMO. Ann Oncol 2005;16:566–78.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    45. ↵
      Heinrich MC, Corless CL, Duensing A, et al. PDGFRA activating mutations in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Science 2003;299:708–10.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    46. ↵
      Hsieh CL, Navankasattusas S, Escobedo JA, et al. Chromosomal localization of the gene for AA-type platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFRA) in humans and mice. Cytogenet Cell Genet 1991;56:160–3.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    47. ↵
      d’Auriol L, Mattei MG, Andre C, et al. Localization of the human c-kit protooncogene on the q11–q12 region of chromosome 4. Hum Genet 1988;78:374–6.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    48. ↵
      Hirota S, Ohashi A, Nishida T, et al. Gain-of-function mutations of platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha gene in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Gastroenterology 2003;125:660–7.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    49. ↵
      Heinrich MC, Corless CL, Demetri GD, et al. Kinase mutations and imatinib response in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor. J Clin Oncol 2003;21:4342–9.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    50. ↵
      Corless CL, Schroeder A, Griffith D, et al. PDGFRA mutations in gastrointestinal stromal tumors: frequency, spectrum and in vitro sensitivity to imatinib. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:5357–64.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    51. ↵
      Lasota J, Dansonka-Mieszkowska A, Sobin LH, et al. A great majority of GISTs with PDGFRA mutations represent gastric tumors of low or no malignant potential. Lab Invest 2004;84:874–83.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    52. ↵
      Lasota J, Dansonka-Mieszkowska A, Stachura T, et al. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors with internal tandem duplications in 3′ end of KIT juxtamembrane domain occur predominantly in stomach and generally seem to have a favorable course. Mod Pathol 2003;16:1257–64.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    53. ↵
      Lasota J, Kopczynski J, Sarlomo-Rikala M, et al. KIT 1530ins6 mutation defines a subset of predominantly malignant gastrointestinal stromal s of intestinal origin. Hum Pathol 2003;34:1306–12.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    54. ↵
      Chan PM, Ilangumaran S, La Rose J, et al. Autoinhibition of the kit receptor tyrosine kinase by the cytosolic juxtamembrane region. Mol Cell Biol 2003;23:3067–78.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    55. ↵
      Kitayama H, Kanakura Y, Furitsu T, et al. Constitutively activating mutations of c-kit receptor tyrosine kinase confer factor-independent growth and tumorigenicity of factor-dependent hematopoietic cell lines. Blood 1995;85:790–8.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    56. ↵
      Ernst SI, Hubbs AE, Przygodzki RM, et al. KIT mutation portends poor prognosis in gastrointestinal stromal/smooth muscle tumors. Lab Invest 1998;78:1633–6.
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    57. ↵
      Li SQ, O’Leary TJ, Sobin LH, et al. Analysis of KIT mutation and protein expression in fine needle aspirates of gastrointestinal stromal/smooth muscle tumors. Acta Cytol 2000;44:981–6.
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    58. ↵
      Corless CL, McGreevey L, Town A, et al. KIT gene deletions at the intron 10-exon 11 boundary in GI stromal tumors. J Mol Diagn 2004;6:366–70.
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    59. Miettinen M, Furlong M, Sarlomo-Rikala M, et al. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors, intramural leiomyomas, and leiomyosarcomas in the rectum and anus: a clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic study of 144 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 2001;25:1121–33.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    60. ↵
      Miettinen M, Sobin LH. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the appendix: a clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of four cases. Am J Surg Pathol2001;25:1433–7.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    61. ↵
      Tornillo L, Duchini G, Carafa V, et al. Patterns of gene amplification in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). Lab Invest 2005;85:921–31.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    62. Wardelmann E, Losen I, Hans V, et al. Deletion of Trp-557 and Lys-558 in the juxtamembrane domain of the c-kit protooncogene is associated with metastatic behavior of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Int J Cancer 2003;106:887–95.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    63. ↵
      Martin J, Poveda A, Llombart-Bosch A, et al. Deletions affecting codons 557–558 of the c-KIT gene indicate a poor prognosis in patients with completely resected gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a study by the Spanish Group for Sarcoma Research (GEIS). J Clin Oncol 2005;23:6190–8.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    64. ↵
      Sakurai S, Oguni S, Hironaka M, et al. Mutations in c-kit gene exons 9 and 13 in gastrointestinal stromal tumors among Japanese. Jpn J Cancer Res 2001;92:494–8.
      OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    65. Lux ML, Rubin BP, Biase TL, et al. KIT extracellular and kinase domain mutations in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Am J Pathol 2000;156:791–5.
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    66. ↵
      Debiec-Rychter M, Dumez H, Judson I, et al. Use of c-KIT/PDGFRA mutational analysis to predict the clinical response to imatinib in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours entered on phase I and II studies of the EORTC Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group. Eur J Cancer 2004;40:689–95.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    67. Kim TW, Lee H, Kang YK, et al. Prognostic significance of c-kit mutation in localized gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Clin Cancer Res 2004;10:3076–81.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    68. Yamamoto H, Oda Y, Kawaguchi K, et al. c-kit and PDGFRA mutations in extragastrointestinal stromal tumor (gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the soft tissue). Am J Surg Pathol 2004;28:479–88.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    69. ↵
      Chen LL, Trent JC, Wu EF, et al. A missense mutation in KIT kinase domain 1 correlates with imatinib resistance in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Cancer Res 2004;64:5913–9.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    70. ↵
      Willmore C, Holden JA, Zhou L, et al. Detection of c-kit-activating mutations in gastrointestinal stromal tumors by high-resolution amplicon melting analysis. Am J Clin Pathol 2004;122:206–16.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    71. ↵
      Antonescu CR, Sommer G, Sarran L, et al. Association of KIT exon 9 mutations with nongastric primary site and aggressive behavior: KIT mutation analysis and clinical correlates of 120 gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Clin Cancer Res 2003;9:3329–37.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    72. ↵
      Prakash S, Sarran L, Socci N, et al. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors in children and young adults: a clinicopathologic, molecular, and genomic study of 15 cases and review of the literature. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2005;27:179–87.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    73. ↵
      Kinoshita K, Isozaki K, Hirota S, et al. c-kit gene mutation at exon 17 or 13 is very rare in sporadic gastrointestinal stromal tumors. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2003;18:147–51.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    74. ↵
      Joensuu H, Kindblom LG. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors—a review. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl2004;75:62–71.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    75. ↵
      Pauls K, Merkelbach-Bruse S, Thal D, et al. PDGFRalpha- and c-kit-mutated gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) are characterized by distinctive histological and immunohistochemical features. Histopathology 2005;46:166–75.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    76. ↵
      Penzel R, Aulmann S, Moock M, et al. The location of KIT and PDGFRA gene mutations in gastrointestinal stromal tumours is site and phenotype associated. J Clin Pathol 2005;58:634–9.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    77. ↵
      Subramanian S, West RB, Corless CL, et al. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) with KIT and PDGFRA mutations have distinct gene expression profiles. Oncogene 2004;23:7780–90.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    78. ↵
      Kang HJ, Nam SW, Kim H, et al. Correlation of KIT and platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha mutations with gene activation and expression profiles in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Oncogene 2005;24:1066–74.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    79. ↵
      Ohashi A, Kinoshita K, Isozaki K, et al. Different inhibitory effect of imatinib on phosphorylation of mitogen-activated protein kinase and Akt and on proliferation in cells expressing different types of mutant platelet-derived growth factor receptor-alpha. Int J Cancer 2004;111:317–21.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    80. ↵
      DeMatteo RP, Lewis JJ, Leung D, et al. Two hundred gastrointestinal stromal tumors: recurrence patterns and prognostic factors for survival. Ann Surg 2000;231:51–8.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    81. ↵
      Tran T, Davila JA, El-Serag HB. The epidemiology of malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumors: an analysis of 1,458 cases from 1992 to 2000. Am J Gastroenterol2005;100:162–8.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    82. ↵
      Andersson J, Sihto H, Meis-Kindblom JM, et al. NF1-associated gastrointestinal stromal tumors have unique clinical, phenotypic, and genotypic characteristics. Am J Surg Pathol 2005;29:1170–6.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    83. Carney JA, Stratakis CA. Familial paraganglioma and gastric stromal sarcoma: a new syndrome distinct from the Carney triad. Am J Med Genet2002;108:132–9.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    84. ↵
      Kinoshita K, Hirota S, Isozaki K, et al. Absence of c-kit gene mutations in gastrointestinal stromal tumours from neurofibromatosis type 1 patients. J Pathol 2004;202:80–5.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    85. ↵
      Beghini A, Tibiletti MG, Roversi G, et al. Germline mutation in the juxtamembrane domain of the kit gene in a family with gastrointestinal stromal tumors and urticaria pigmentosa. Cancer 2001;92:657–62.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    86. Chen H, Hirota S, Isozaki K, et al. Polyclonal nature of diffuse proliferation of interstitial cells of Cajal in patients with familial and multiple gastrointestinal stromal tumours. Gut 2002;51:793–6.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    87. Chompret A, Kannengiesser C, Barrois M, et al. PDGFRA germline mutation in a family with multiple cases of gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Gastroenterology 2004;126:318–21.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    88. Hirota S, Nishida T, Isozaki K, et al. Familial gastrointestinal stromal tumors associated with dysphagia and novel type germline mutation of KIT gene. Gastroenterology 2002;122:1493–9.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    89. Hirota S, Okazaki T, Kitamura Y, et al. Cause of familial and multiple gastrointestinal autonomic nerve tumors with hyperplasia of interstitial cells of Cajal is germline mutation of the c-kit gene. Am J Surg Pathol 2000;24:326–7.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    90. Maeyama H, Hidaka E, Ota H, et al. Familial gastrointestinal stromal tumor with hyperpigmentation: association with a germline mutation of the c-kit gene. Gastroenterology 2001;120:210–5.
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    91. Nishida T, Hirota S, Taniguchi M, et al. Familial gastrointestinal stromal tumours with germline mutation of the KIT gene. Nat Genet 1998;19:323–4.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    92. Hartmann K, Wardelmann E, Ma Y, et al. Novel germline mutation of KIT associated with familial gastrointestinal stromal tumors and mastocytosis. Gastroenterology 2005;129:1042–6.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    93. ↵
      Li FP, Fletcher JA, Heinrich MC, et al. Familial gastrointestinal stromal tumor syndrome: phenotypic and molecular features in a kindred. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:2735–43.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    94. ↵
      Cheng SP, Huang MJ, Yang TL, et al. Neurofibromatosis with gastrointestinal stromal tumors: insights into the association. Dig Dis Sci 2004;49:1165–9.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    95. Takazawa Y, Sakurai S, Sakuma Y, et al. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors of neurofibromatosis type I (von Recklinghausen’s disease). Am J Surg Pathol 2005;29:755–63.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    96. ↵
      Yantiss RK, Rosenberg AE, Sarran L, et al. Multiple gastrointestinal stromal tumors in type I neurofibromatosis: a pathologic and molecular study. Mod Pathol 2005;18:47–84.
      OpenUrl
    97. ↵
      Carney JA. Gastric stromal sarcoma, pulmonary chondroma, and extra-adrenal paraganglioma (Carney triad): natural history, adrenocortical component, and possible familial occurrence. Mayo Clin Proc1999;74:543–52.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    98. ↵
      Diment J, Tamborini E, Casali P, et al. Carney triad: case report and molecular analysis of gastric tumor. Hum Pathol 2005;36:112–6.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    99. ↵
      Kim NG, Kim JJ, Aha JY, et al. Putative chromsomal deletions on 9P, 9Q and 22Q occur preferentially in maligrant gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Int J Cancer 2000;85:633–8.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    100. ↵
      El-Rifai W, Sarlomo-Rikala M, Andersson LC, et al. DNA sequence copy number changes in gastrointestinal stromal tumors: tumor progression and prognostic significance. Cancer Res 2000;60:3899–03.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    101. Sarlomo-Rikala M, El-Rifai W, Lahtinen T, et al. Different patterns of DNA copy number changes in gastrointestinal stromal tumors, leiomyomas, and schwannomas. Hum Pathol 1998;29:476–81.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    102. ↵
      Debiec-Rychter M, Pauwels P, Lasota J, et al. Complex genetic alterations in gastrointestinal stromal tumors with autonomic nerve differentiation. Mod Pathol 2002;15:692–8.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    103. Debiec-Rychter M, Sciot R, Pauwels P, et al. Molecular cytogenetic definition of three distinct chromosome arm 14q deletion intervals in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2001;32:26–32.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    104. ↵
      Debiec-Rychter M, Lasota J, Sarlomo-Rikala M, et al. Chromosomal aberrations in malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumors: correlation with c-KIT gene mutation. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 2001;128:24–30.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    105. ↵
      Derre J, Lagace R, Terrier P, et al. Consistent DNA losses on the short arm of chromosome 1 in a series of malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 2001;127:30–3.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    106. ↵
      Breiner JA, Meis-Kindblom J, Kindblom LG, et al. Loss of 14q and 22q in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (pacemaker cell tumors). Cancer Genet Cytogenet 2000;120:111–6.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    107. ↵
      Gunawan B, Bergmann F, Hoer J, et al. Biological and clinical significance of cytogenetic abnormalities in low-risk and high-risk gastrointestinal stromal tumours. Hum Pathol 2002;33:316–21.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    108. ↵
      Gurchan B, Schulten HJ, von Heydebreck A, et al. Site-independent prognostic value of chromosome 9q loss in primary gastrointestinal stromal tumours. J Pathol 2004;2002:421–9.
      OpenUrl
    109. ↵
      Fukasawa T, Chong JM, Sakurai S, et al. Allelic loss of 14q and 22q, NF2 mutation, and genetic instability occur independently of c-kit mutation in gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Jpn J Cancer Res 2000;91:1241–9.
      OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    110. ↵
      El-Rifai W, Sarlomo-Rikala M, Andersson LC, et al. High-resolution deletion mapping of chromosome 14 in stromal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract suggests two distinct tumor suppressor loci. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2000;27:387–91.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    111. ↵
      Lasota J, Wozniak A, Kopczynski J, et al. Loss of heterozygosity on chromosome 22q in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs): a study on 50 cases. Lab Invest 2005;85:237–47.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    112. ↵
      Lasota J, Wozniak A, Kopczynski J, et al. Loss of heterozygosity on chromosome 22q in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs): a study on 50 cases. Lab Invest 2005;85:237–47.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    113. ↵
      Schneider-Stock R, Boltze C, Lasota J, et al. Loss of p16 protein defines high-risk patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a tissue microarray study. Clin Cancer Res 2005;11 (2 Pt 1) :638–45.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    114. ↵
      Quelle DE, Zindy F, Ashmun RA, et al. Alternative reading frames of the INK4a tumor suppressor gene encode two unrelated proteins capable of inducing cell cycle arrest. Cell 1995;83:993–1000.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    115. ↵
      Pomerantz J, Schreiber-Agus N, Liegeois NJ, et al. The ink4a tumor supppressor gene product, p19Arf, interacts with MDM2 and neutralizes MDM2’s inhibition of p53. Cell 1998;92:713–23.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    116. ↵
      Haller F, Gunawan B, von Heydebreck A, et al. Prognostic role of E2F1 and members of the CDKN2A network in gatrointestinal stromal tumors. Clin Cancer Res 2005;11:6589–97.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    117. ↵
      Müller H, Bracken AP, Vernell R, et al. E2Fs regulate the expresion of genes involved in differentiation, development, proliferation and apoptosis. Genes Dev 2001;15:267–85.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    118. ↵
      Serrano M, Hannon GJ, Beach D. A new regulatory motif in cell cycle control causing specific inhibition of cyclin/CDK4. Nature1993;366:704–7.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    119. ↵
      Ricci R, Arena V, Castri F, et al. Role of p16/INK4a in gastrointestinal stromal tumor progression. Am J Clin Pathol 2004;122:35–43.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    120. ↵
      Schneider-Stock R, Boltze C, Lasota J, et al. High prognostic value of p16ink4 alterations in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. J Clin Oncol 2003;21:1688–97.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    121. ↵
      Ries S, Biederer C, Woods D, et al. Opposing effects of Ras on p53: transcriptional activation of mdm2 and induction of p19ARF. Cell 2000;103:321–30.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    122. ↵
      Mayo LD, Donner DB. A phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt pathway promotes translocation of Mdm2 from the cytoplasm to the nucleus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA2001;98:11598–603.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    123. ↵
      Mayo LD, Donner DB. The PTEN, Mdm2, p53 tumor suppressor-oncoprotein network. Trends Biochem Sci2002;27:462–7.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    124. ↵
      Linnekin D. Early signaling pathways activated by c-Kit in hematopoietic cells. Int J Biochem Cell Biol1999;31:1053–74.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    125. ↵
      Xiao ZX, Chen J, Levine AJ, et al. Interaction between the retinoblastoma protein and the oncoprotein MDM2. Nature 1995;375:694–8.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    126. ↵
      Nakamura N, Yamamoto H, Yao T, et al. Prognostic significance of expressions of cell-cycle regulatory proteins in gastrointestinal stromal tumor and the relevance of the risk grade. Hum Pathol 2005;36:828–37.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    127. ↵
      Duensing A, Joseph NE, Medeiros F, et al. Protein kinase C theta (PKCtheta) expression and constitutive activation in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). Cancer Res 2004;64:5127–31.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    128. ↵
      West RB, Corless CL, Chen X, et al. The novel marker, DOG1, is expressed ubiquitously in gastrointestinal stromal tumors irrespective of KIT or PDGFRA mutation status. Am J Pathol 2004;165:107–13.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    129. ↵
      Antonescu CR, Viale A, Sarran L, et al. Gene expression in gastrointestinal stromal tumors is distinguished by KIT genotype and anatomic site. Clin Cancer Res 2004;10:3282–90.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    130. ↵
      Koon N, Zaika A, Moskaluk CA, et al. Clustering of molecular alterations in gastroesophageal carcinomas. Neoplasia 2004;6:143–9.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    131. ↵
      Verweij J, Casali PG, Zalcberg J, et al. Progression-free survival in gastrointestinal stromal tumours with high-dose imatinib: randomised trial. Lancet 2004;364:1127–34.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    132. ↵
      Antonescu CR, Besmer P, Guo T, et al. Acquired resistance to imatinib in gastrointestinal stromal tumor occurs through secondary gene mutation. Clin Cancer Res 2005;11:4182–90.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    133. ↵
      Debiec-Rychter M, Cools J, Dumez H, et al. Mechanisms of resistance to imatinib mesylate in gastrointestinal stromal tumors and activity of the PKC412 inhibitor against imatinib-resistant mutants. Gastroenterology 2005;128:270–9.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    134. Tamborini E, Bonadiman L, Greco A, et al. A new mutation in the KIT ATP pocket causes acquired resistance to imatinib in a gastrointestinal stromal tumor patient. Gastroenterology 2004;127:294–9.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    135. ↵
      Tamborini E, Gabanti E, Lagonigro MS, et al. KIT/Val654 Ala receptor detected in one imatinib-resistant GIST patient. Cancer Res 2005;65:1115 author reply 1115.
      OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    136. ↵
      Growney JD, Clark JJ, Adelsperger J, et al. Activation mutations of human c-KIT resistant to imatinib mesylate are sensitive to the tyrosine kinase inhibitor PKC412. Blood 2005;106:721–4.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text

    Footnotes

    • Competing interests: LT received a fee from Novartis for speaking. LT participated in 2004–5 in a study on gastrointestinal stromal tumours, which was funded by Novartis.