Abstract
Background: Targeting pathways regulating survivin expression, which has been implicated in multidrug resistance of cancer cells, is a promising strategy to overcome cancer chemoresistance. To date, the role of rho-associated protein kinases (ROCKs) in survivin expression remains largely unknown. Materials and Methods: The effects of ROCK inhibitors Y-27632 and fasudil on survivin expression and cell viability were determined by immunoblot analysis and dye exclusion, respectively, in PANC-1 CSLC, a cancer stem cell line derived from a serum-cultured, gemcitabine-sensitive pancreatic cancer cell line, PANC-1. Results: siRNA-mediated knockdown of survivin revealed that the gemcitabine resistance of PANC-1 CSLC was dependent on survivin expression. Both Y-27632 and fasudil, reduced survivin expression in PANC-1 CSLC cells and sensitized them to gemcitabine. ROCK inhibition also reduced survivin expression in various other human cancer cell lines. Conclusion: Small molecule inhibitor-mediated targeting of ROCK may be a viable strategy to overcome cancer chemoresistance through down-regulation of survivin.
Chemoresistance is a major obstacle that hampers successful management of cancer. Among cellular factors that contribute to the development of chemoresistance of cancer cells, survivin has been identified as one of the most crucial molecules. Survivin, an anti-apoptotic protein of the inhibitor of apoptosis protein (IAP) family, is not only expressed in a variety of human cancer types but also confers on cancer cells resistance to multiple chemotherapeutic agents including but not limited to gemcitabine, cisplatin, and paclitaxel. Thus, developing measures to inactivate survivin is expected as a pivotal step to overcome chemoresistance. Currently, a number of approaches for targeting survivin are under clinical development, however, small molecule inhibitors of survivin that are or are to be tested in clinical trials are still limited (1-3). In the present study, we aimed to identify novel small molecule drugs capable of targeting survivin expression.
Materials and Methods
Antibodies and reagents. Antibodies against sex determining region Y-box 2 (SOX2), survivin, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), cleaved-caspase 3 (Asp175) and cleaved-poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) (Asp214) were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology, Inc. (Beverly, MA, USA). Anti-E-cadherin (sc-8426) was from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA, USA). Anti-β-actin (A1978) was from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Luis, MO, USA). ROCK inhibitors Y-27632 and fasudil hydrochloride were from Merck Millipore (Darmstadt, Germany) and Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan), respectively. Y-27632 and fasudil were dissolved in water to prepare 10 mM and 100 mM stock solutions, respectively. Gemcitabine was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and dissolved in dimethylsulfoxide to prepare a 1 mM stock solution.
Cell culture. The human pancreatic cancer cell line PANC-1 was obtained from the Cell Resource Center for Biomedical Research, Institute of Development, Aging and Cancer, Tohoku University. PSN-1 was a kind gift from Dr. T. Yoshida at National Cancer Center Research Institute, who originally established this cell line from pancreatic adenocarcinoma tissue (4). A549 (a non-small cell lung cancer cell line) was obtained from the Riken BioResource Center (Tsukuba, Japan). A2780 (an ovarian cancer cell line) was a kind gift from Dr. T. Tsuruo (Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biosciences, University of Tokyo, Japan) and Drs. R.F. Ozols and T.C. Hamilton (the National Institutes of Health, USA) (5). SKOV-3 (an ovarian cancer cell line) and IMR90 normal human fetal lung fibroblasts were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA). RMG-1 (an ovarian cancer cell line) was kindly provided by Dr S. Nozawa and Dr D. Aoki at Keio University, Japan (6). SKOV-3 was maintained in M199:105 medium, a 1:1 mixture of M199 and MCDB105 media supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Sigma) (7-9). A549, RMG-1, A2780 and PSN-1 were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM)/F12 medium supplemented with 10% FBS (4, 8). IMR90 was maintained in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS. These culture media were further supplemented with 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 μg/ml streptomycin.
The establishment of cancer stem cells used in this study (PANC-1 CSLC, A549 CSLC, and GS-Y03) has been described elsewhere (10-12). These cells were maintained under the monolayer stem cell culture condition as previously reported (10-12). Briefly, cells were cultured on collagen-I-coated dishes (IWAKI, Tokyo, Japan) in the stem cell culture medium [DMEM/F12 medium supplemented with 1% B27 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA USA), 20 ng/ml epidermal growth factor (EGF) and fibroblast growth factor (FGF2) (Peprotech Inc., Rocky Hill, NJ, USA), D-(+)-glucose (final concentration, 26.2 mM), L-glutamine (final concentration, 4.5 mM), 100 units/ml penicillin, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin]. Stem cell culture medium was changed approximately every 3 days, and EGF and FGF2 were added to the culture medium every day. The authenticity of the cells used in this study was verified by the genotyping of short tandem repeat (STR) loci (Bio-Synthesis Inc., Lewisville, TX, USA) followed by comparison to the ATCC STR database (http://www.atcc.org/STR_Database.aspx) for Human Cell Lines. All IMR90 experiments were performed using low passage number (<8) cells.
Gene silencing by siRNA. siRNAs against human survivin (BIRC5; #1 HSS HSS179403, #2 HSS179404, #3 HSS179405) and Medium GC Duplex #2 of Stealth RNAi™ siRNA Negative Control Duplexes (as a non-targeting control for siRNA experiments) were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific. PANC-1 CSLC cells were transiently transfected with siRNAs against survivin (siSurvivin) or with a control siRNA (siControl) and were treated on the next day with or without 0.5 μM gemcitabine for 3 days. The cells were then subjected to immunoblot analysis of survivin, caspase-3 and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) at 4 days after transfection and to cell viability assay using propidium iodide (PI). Transfection of siRNAs was performed using Lipofectamine RNAiMAX (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Cell viability assay. Viable and dead cells were identified by their ability and inability to exclude vital dyes, respectively (13-15). Briefly, cells were stained with 0.2% trypan blue for 1 min at room temperature, and the numbers of viable and dead cells were determined using a hemocytometer. The percentage of dead cells was defined as 100 × [number of dead cells/(the number of viable + dead cells)]. Alternatively, cells were incubated in situ with propidium iodide (PI; 1 μg/ml) and Hoechst 33342 (10 μg/ml) for 10 min at 37°C in a CO2 incubator to stain the dead cells and nuclei, respectively. Subsequently, the numbers of PI- and Hoechst-positive cells were scored under a fluorescence microscope (CKX41; OLYMPUS, Tokyo, Japan), and the percentage of PI-positive cells (dead cells) relative to Hoechst-positive cells (total cells) was determined.
Immunoblot analysis. Immunoblot analysis was conducted as previously described (11, 13, 15, 16). Cells were washed with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline and lysed in RIPA buffer [10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), 0.1% sodium deoxycholate, 1% NP-40, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1.5 mM Na3VO4, 10 mM NaF, 10 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 10 mM sodium β-glycerophosphate and 1% protease inhibitor cocktail set III (Merck Millipore)]. After centrifugation for 10 min at 14,000 × g at 4°C, the supernatants were recovered as cell lysates, and the protein concentration of the cell lysates was determined by a BCA protein assay kit (Pierce Biotechnology Inc., Rockford, IL, USA). Cell lysates containing equal amounts of protein were separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane. The membrane was probed with a primary antibody and then with an appropriate horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody, according to the protocol recommended by the manufacturer of each antibody. Immunoreactive bands were visualized using Immobilon Western Chemiluminescent HRP Substrate (Millipore).
Statistical analysis. Results are expressed as means and standard deviation (SD), and differences were compared using the two-tailed Student's t-test. p-Values of less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Results
Survivin overexpression confers gemcitabine resistance on pancreatic cancer stem cells. We previously demonstrated that PANC-1 CSLC, a cancer stem cell line established from a serum-cultured pancreatic cancer cell line PANC-1 (characterized by the expression of epithelial differentiation marker E-cadherin but not SOX2, a stem cell marker) and characterized by the expression of SOX2 but not E-cadherin, is highly resistant to gemcitabine-induced cell death compared to the original PANC-1 from which it was derived (15). While searching for cell death-related molecules that are differentially expressed or activated in these cell lines in an attempt to determine the molecular alterations responsible for the cell death resistance of PANC-1 CSLC, we found that PANC-1 CSLC expressed a much higher level of survivin than PANC-1 did (Figure 1). To determine whether survivin overexpression is involved in the gemcitabine resistance of PANC-1 CSLC, we tested the effect of survivin knockdown on the resistance/sensitivity of PANC-1 CSLC cells to gemcitabine. Although survivin knockdown by itself increased cell death to some extent, gemcitabine-induced cell death was significantly and considerably promoted after survivin knockdown, suggesting that survivin has a role in gemcitabine resistance of PANC-1 CSLC cells (Figure 2).
ROCK inhibitors reduce survivin expression and sensitize pancreatic cancer stem cells to gemcitabine. With the intention of identifying drugs which therapeutically target survivin expression in order to overcome chemoresistance associated with survivin overexpression, we screened a series of small-molecule modulators of signaling pathways against survivin expression in PANC-1 CSLC cells (data not shown). As a result, we discovered that Y-27632, a ROCK inhibitor, efficiently inhibits survivin expression in PANC-1 CSLC cells. Y-27632 reduced the expression of survivin in PANC-1 CSLC cells in a concentration-dependent manner (Figure 3A). At 10 μM, a concentration at which Y-27632 did not impair the viability of normal cells (see Figure 4A), the reduction of survivin expression became evident 3 days after Y-27632 treatment (Figure 3C). Prompted by the identification of Y-27632 as a modulator of survivin expression, we tested another ROCK inhibitor fasudil, which is clinically approved for the treatment of cerebral vasospasm following subarachnoid hemorrhage (17). Similarly to Y-27632, fasudil reduced survivin expression in PANC-1 CSLC cells in a concentration-dependent manner and at a concentration (25 μM) not toxic to normal cells (Figure 3B and D see also Figure 4B).
We then asked whether these ROCK inhibitors capable of inhibiting survivin expression promote gemcitabine-induced cell death in PANC-1 CSLC cells. To determine the non-toxic concentrations of Y-27632, we treated IMR90 normal human fibroblasts with increasing concentrations of Y-27632 and confirmed that IMR90 cells tolerated up to 10 μM (Figure 4A). Having confirmed that Y-27632 alone also does not increase cell death in PANC-1 CSLC cells at this concentration (10 μM) (Figure 4D), we examined the sensitivity of PANC-1 CSLC cells to gemcitabine in the presence and absence of Y-27632 treatment. At 0.5 μM, gemcitabine alone caused only modest (~10%) death of PANC-1 CSLC cells. However, when PANC-1 CSLC cells were first treated with Y-27632 followed by treatment with 0.5 μM gemcitabine, cell death was remarkably increased compared to gemcitabine treatment alone (Figure 4D), demonstrating that Y-27632 sensitizes PANC-1 CSLC cells to gemcitabine. Importantly, the identical combination treatment did not increase death of IMR90 cells, suggesting that the combination is specifically cytotoxic to cancer cells while sparing normal cells (Figure 4C). Of note, the expression of cleavage products of caspase 3 and PARP also increased in parallel with cell death, which suggests that apoptosis may be involved as a cell death mechanism (Figure 4F). Essentially similar results were obtained when fasudil was used in the place of Y-27632 (Figure 4B, C, E and G). Together, these results suggest that ROCK inhibitors sensitize PANC-1 CSLC cells to gemcitabine most likely through down-regulation of survivin, without increasing the toxicity of gemcitabine to normal cells.
ROCK inhibition causes down-regulation of endogenously overexpressed survivin in various human cancer cell lines. Our results thus far suggested that survivin expression in PANC-1 CSLC cells is dependent on ROCK. To determine whether survivin expression is sensitive to ROCK inhibition uniquely in PANC-1 CSLC cells or widely in human cancer cells including non-cancer stem cells, we treated human cancer cell lines derived from different cancer types that overexpress survivin with Y-27632. Strikingly, ROCK inhibition caused significant decrease in survivin expression in all cell lines examined (Figure 5), suggesting that ROCK may be involved in survivin overexpression in a variety of human cancer cells.
Discussion
Survivin, which confers multidrug resistance on cancer cells, is overexpressed in cancer cells and not in terminally differentiated adult tissues. Survivin is therefore an ideal target in oncology therapeutics, and control of the expression or function of survivin has been considered a prerequisite for successful cancer chemotherapy. Currently, methods to therapeutically target survivin are being explored and developed actively, yet are still limited (1-3). In this study, we demonstrated, for the first time to the best of our knowledge, that ROCK inhibition by use of small-molecule inhibitors successfully reduces expression of endogenous survivin overexpressed in pancreatic cancer stem cell line PANC-1 CSLC as well as in a variety of human cancer cell lines.
A previous study demonstrated that RhoC is overexpressed in ovarian cancer and that RhoC knockdown reduced survivin expression in ovarian cancer cell line OVCAR-3 (18). Although the downstream signaling pathway linking RhoC and survivin remained to be shown, our results suggest that ROCK may be involved therein given that ROCK can be activated by RhoC (19). Intriguingly enough, we have shown in this study that survivin expression is reduced upon ROCK inhibition in three ovarian cancer cell lines (SKOV-3, RMG-1, and A2780). It would be interesting to speculate that overexpression of RhoC might be involved in survivin overexpression through ROCK activation in these ovarian cancer cell lines. Another study demonstrated that endothelin-1 (ET1) treatment renders normal human fibroblasts resistant to apoptosis by inducing the expression of survivin in a ROCK-dependent manner (20). To date, the role and mechanism of ET1 signaling in survivin overexpression in cancer cells remain largely unknown. However, since the ET1 pathway is aberrantly activated in various human cancer types (21), our results may give rise to a novel, intriguing possibility that ET1 signaling-dependent activation of ROCK plays a significant role in the overexpression of survivin by cancer cells.
We demonstrated in this study that survivin knockdown sensitizes PANC-1 CSLC cells to gemcitabine on the one hand and that ROCK inhibitors reduce survivin expression in PANC-1 CSLC cells sensitizing them to gemcitabine on the other. While these results strongly suggest that reduced survivin expression contributes to gemcitabine sensitization by ROCK inhibitors, the results do not necessarily exclude the possibility that ROCK inhibitors may sensitize cells to gemcitabine through other mechanisms. Although details of the mechanism remain to be shown, it is clear from our results that ROCK inhibitors are of use in overcoming chemoresistance of cancer cells. Since survivin has been associated with resistance to cisplatin, paclitaxel, mitomycin C, and docetaxel in addition to gemcitabine (1), the combination of ROCK inhibitors with these chemotherapeutic agents may be a rational approach to treat cancer resistant to these agents. In support of this idea, the benefit of combination with Y-27632 was documented for cisplatin in a previous study (22). Our promising data together with those of others thus appear to warrant preclinical animal studies using Y-27632 or fasudil as a chemosensitizer, but it would be important to bear in mind that a large number of novel ROCK inhibitors are being developed with some already in clinical trials for other purposes (17). Further in vitro studies examining other ROCK inhibitors for their efficacy in inhibiting survivin expression and in chemosensitization will help determine which ROCK inhibitor should be chosen and advanced to preclinical animal studies to evaluate its in vivo effect as a chemosensitizer. In this regard, ROCK inhibitors with a known safety profile in humans, such as fasudil, may be preferred.
In conclusion, the present study demonstrated for the first time that ROCK inhibitors are promising chemosensitizers that can target survivin expression in a variety of human cancer cells. ROCK inhibitors in combination with chemotherapeutic agents may become a rational and viable strategy to treat cancer with multidrug resistance associated with survivin overexpression.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research, for Challenging Exploratory Research, and for Young Scientists from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan.
Footnotes
↵* These Authors contributed equally to this work.
Conflicts of Interest
The Authors declare no conflict of interest.
- Received September 19, 2016.
- Revision received October 5, 2016.
- Accepted October 10, 2016.
- Copyright© 2016 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved