Impact of cell harvesting methods on detection of cell surface proteins and apoptotic markers

Braz J Med Biol Res. 2021 Jan 8;54(2):e10197. doi: 10.1590/1414-431X202010197. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Assays based on the flow cytometry technique allow a convenient analysis of multiple cellular parameters; however, their results should be interpreted cautiously due to a strong impact of confounding factors. Different techniques in cell culturing such as either enzymatic or mechanic detachment of adherent cells can heavily influence the structure of the cell membrane or presence of the surface antigens leading to strong false positive signals, and finally, substantial experimental bias. The aim of our study was to assess and compare the impact of cell harvesting methods (both enzymatic and non-enzymatic) on the apoptosis process and on the surface antigen cytometric analyses. We found significant differences in the quality of analysis in terms of the amount of detected surface markers determined by the detachment method. Our results demonstrated clearly how important it is to carefully choose the appropriate detachment method and may help to avoid mistakes in experiment planning. In conclusion, we recommend to adjust the detachment method to the type of analyzed markers (surface antigens or translocated phosphatidylserine).

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Antigens, Surface*
  • Apoptosis*
  • Cell Line, Tumor
  • Cell Separation / methods*
  • Flow Cytometry
  • Humans
  • Membrane Proteins*

Substances

  • Antigens, Surface
  • Membrane Proteins