Engineering of therapeutic antibodies to minimize immunogenicity and optimize function

Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2006 Aug 7;58(5-6):640-56. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2006.01.026. Epub 2006 May 23.

Abstract

One of the first difficulties in developing monoclonal antibody therapeutics was the recognition that human anti-mouse antibody (HAMA) response limited the administration of murine antibodies. Creative science has lead to a number of ways to counter the immunogenicity of non-human antibodies, primarily through chimeric, humanized, de-immunized, and most recently, human-sequence therapeutic antibodies. Once therapeutic antibodies of low or no immunogenicity were available, the creativity then turned to engineering both the antigen-binding domains (e.g., affinity maturation, stability) and altering the effector functions (e.g. antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, complement-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, and clearance rate).

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Antibodies / chemistry
  • Antibodies / immunology*
  • Antibodies / therapeutic use*
  • Antibodies, Anti-Idiotypic / biosynthesis
  • Antibodies, Anti-Idiotypic / immunology
  • Antibody-Dependent Cell Cytotoxicity
  • Complement C1q / immunology
  • Humans
  • Mice
  • Mice, Transgenic
  • Protein Engineering*
  • Species Specificity

Substances

  • Antibodies
  • Antibodies, Anti-Idiotypic
  • Complement C1q