Chest
Volume 81, Issue 6, June 1982, Pages 665-671
Journal home page for Chest

Clinical Investigations
Flexible Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy and Percutaneous Needle Lung Aspiration for Evaluating the Solitary Pulmonary Nodule

https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.81.6.665Get rights and content

We reviewed the records and chest roentgenograms of 133 patients who underwent flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FFB) for a solitary pulmonary nodule (SPN), defined as a circumscribed density less than or equal to 4 cm in diameter surrounded by aerated lung with no associated radiologic abnormalities. Each patient had a complete medical examination followed by FFB with collection of bronchial washings and brushings, transbronchial biopsy (when technically possible), and postbronchoscopy sputum collection. Subsequently 50 patients underwent percutaneous needle aspiration (NA) and 32 diagnostic thoracotomy (DT). Eighty-two (62 percent) of the evaluations resulted in a histologic diagnosis. Prebronchoscopy sputum was diagnostic in three patients. Of 143 FFBs performed, 27 (19 percent) were diagnostic, and 26 were the first procedure of the evaluation to provide a diagnosis. Following nondiagnostic FFB, a diagnosis was provided by 50 (36 percent) NA, 32 of 32 (100 percent) DT, and 3 of 3 (100 percent) cervical and mediastinal node biopsy procedures. For both FFB and NA, there was a strong correlation between nodule size and diagnostic yield. FFB visualized a vocal cord lesion in five patients and an endobronchial mass in five. The combination of FFB and NA provided a diagnosis in 45 of 51 (88 percent) patients ultimately proved to have a malignant SPN. Neither procedure was diagnostic in any of the 24 patients with a benign SPN. We conclude that FFB and NA have complementary roles in the evaluation of SPN.

Section snippets

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed the medical records and chest roentgenograms of patients who underwent FFB for a pulmonary density at the University of California San Diego Medical Center between January 1977 and December 1980 and at the Veterans Administration Hospital between January 1978 and December 1980. Of these patients, 113 met the following criteria for inclusion in the study: (1) they had a SPN less than or equal to 4 cm in diameter which did not appear calcified on routine roentgenograms. An SPN was

RESULTS

The 133 patients who had a SPN that fulfilled our criteria underwent 143 FFB procedures. There were 96 men and 37 women, ranging in age from 24 to 83 years. Of the patients studied, 122 had a smoking history of at least one pack per day for five years. The nodules ranged in size from 0.7 to 4.0 cm in greatest diameter. Sixty-two patients had nodules smaller than 2.0 cm; 44 had nodules 2.0 to 2.9 cm; and 27 had nodules 3.0 to 4.0 cm.

DISCUSSION

The patient in whom a SPN is discovered presents a common management dilemma. The ultimate decision is whether a thoracotomy should be done or the patient should be followed up.7 However, the critical antecedent questions are: (1) What is the most appropriate diagnostic sequence? and (2) Can the results of this sequence be used to guide the thoracotomy/follow-up decision?

Criteria such as radiologic appearance (particularly the presence and pattern of calcium deposition) and stability of the

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The authors thank John V. Forrest, M.D., for his critical review of the manuscript.

REFERENCES (20)

  • GA Lillington

    The solitary pulmonary nodule–1974

    Am Rev Respir Dis

    (1974)
  • WB Ford et al.

    “Coin” lesions of the lung

    Am Rev Tuberc

    (1956)
  • EW Davis et al.

    The solitary pulmonary nodule

    J Thorac Surg

    (1956)
  • RJ Jackman et al.

    Survival rates in peripheral bronchogenic carcinomas up to four centimeters in diameter presenting as solitary pulmonary nodules

    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg

    (1969)
  • JF Ray et al.

    The coin lesion story: update 1976

    Chest

    (1976)
  • HM Nathan

    Management of solitary pulmonary nodules

    JAMA

    (1974)
  • KM Moser

    Solitary pulmonary nodules

    JAMA

    (1974)
  • DC Zavala

    Diagnostic fiberoptic bronchoscopy

    Chest

    (1975)
  • AF Lalli et al.

    Aspiration biopsies of chest lesions

    Radiology

    (1978)
  • RG Reich et al.

    Sensitivity and specificity of needle biopsy in lung malignancy

    Am Rev Respir Dis

    (1980)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (141)

  • Establishing the diagnosis of lung cancer: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American college of chest physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines

    2013, Chest
    Citation Excerpt :

    The sensitivity of bronchoscopy for peripheral lesions is most affected by the size of the lesion. Ten studies were identified that reported on the sensitivity of bronchoscopy (brush and/or biopsy) for peripheral lesions with a size < 2 or > 2 cm in diameter (Fig 576,88,105–107,110,121,122,129,130 The sensitivity for peripheral lesions < 2 cm in diameter was 34%. Peripheral tumors with a diameter > 2 cm resulted in a sensitivity of 63%.

View all citing articles on Scopus

Manuscript received August 18; revision accepted October 23.

This study was presented in part at the 47th Annual Scientific Assembly, American College of Chest Physicians, San Francisco, October 25-29, 1981

View full text