Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Open Access

Peer-reviewed

Research Article

Mesodermal Progenitor Cells (MPCs) Differentiate into Mesenchymal Stromal Cells (MSCs) by Activation of Wnt5/Calmodulin Signalling Pathway

  • Rita Fazzi ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Rita Fazzi, Simone Pacini

    Affiliation Hematology Division, Department of Oncology, Transplants and New Advances in Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy

    ⨯
  • Simone Pacini ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Rita Fazzi, Simone Pacini

    simone.pacini@do.unipi.it

    Affiliation Hematology Division, Department of Oncology, Transplants and New Advances in Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy

    ⨯
  • Vittoria Carnicelli,

    Affiliation Dipartimento di Scienze dell'Uomo e dell'Ambiente, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy

    ⨯
  • Luisa Trombi,

    Affiliation Hematology Division, Department of Oncology, Transplants and New Advances in Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy

    ⨯
  • Marina Montali,

    Affiliation Hematology Division, Department of Oncology, Transplants and New Advances in Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy

    ⨯
  • Edoardo Lazzarini,

    Affiliation Hematology Division, Department of Oncology, Transplants and New Advances in Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy

    ⨯
  • Mario Petrini

    Affiliation Hematology Division, Department of Oncology, Transplants and New Advances in Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy

    ⨯

Abstract

Background

Mesenchymal Stromal Cells (MSCs) remain poorly characterized because of the absence of manifest physical, phenotypic, and functional properties in cultured cell populations. Despite considerable research on MSCs and their clinical application, the biology of these cells is not fully clarified and data on signalling activation during mesenchymal differentiation and proliferation are controversial. The role of Wnt pathways is still debated, partly due to culture heterogeneity and methodological inconsistencies. Recently, we described a new bone marrow cell population isolated from MSC cultures that we named Mesodermal Progenitor Cells (MPCs) for their mesenchymal and endothelial differentiation potential. An optimized culture method allowed the isolation from human adult bone marrow of a highly pure population of MPCs (more than 97%), that showed the distinctive SSEA-4+CD105+CD90neg phenotype and not expressing MSCA-1 antigen. Under these selective culture conditions the percentage of MSCs (SSEA-4negCD105+CD90bright and MSCA-1+), in the primary cultures, resulted lower than 2%.

Methodology/Principal Finding

We demonstrate that MPCs differentiate to MSCs through an SSEA-4+CD105+CD90bright early intermediate precursor. Differentiation paralleled the activation of Wnt5/Calmodulin signalling by autocrine/paracrine intense secretion of Wnt5a and Wnt5b (p<0.05 vs uncondictioned media), which was later silenced in late MSCs (SSEA-4neg). We found the inhibition of this pathway by calmidazolium chloride specifically blocked mesenchymal induction (ID50 = 0.5 µM, p<0.01), while endothelial differentiation was unaffected.

Conclusion

The present study describes two different putative progenitors (early and late MSCs) that, together with already described MPCs, could be co-isolated and expanded in different percentages depending on the culture conditions. These results suggest that some modifications to the widely accepted MSC nomenclature are required.

Citation: Fazzi R, Pacini S, Carnicelli V, Trombi L, Montali M, Lazzarini E, et al. (2011) Mesodermal Progenitor Cells (MPCs) Differentiate into Mesenchymal Stromal Cells (MSCs) by Activation of Wnt5/Calmodulin Signalling Pathway. PLoS ONE 6(9): e25600. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025600

Editor: Dan Kaufman, University of Minnesota, United States of America

Received: June 9, 2011; Accepted: September 6, 2011; Published: September 29, 2011

Copyright: © 2011 Fazzi et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Funding: The work was exclusively supported by institutional funds of the Department of Oncology, Transplants and New Advances in Medicine, University of Pisa. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

The Wnt family of signaling proteins participate in multiple developmental events during embryogenesis [1], [2], [3]. In addition, it has also been implicated in adult tissue homeostasis [4], [5]. Wnt signals are pleiotropic, with effects that include mitogenic stimulation, cell fate specification, and differentiation [6]. Wnts are highly conserved, cysteine-rich secreted ligands which bind the Frizzled (Fzd) receptor family. So far, 19 Wnts have been identified in humans together with 10 Fzd receptors, co-receptors (LRP-5, LRP-6), and inhibitors (Dkks, sFrps and Wif). Binding of Wnt ligands to the Fzds results in the activation of different pathways: the canonical pathway that involves nuclearization and activation of β-catenin [7], and the β-catenin independent non-canonical pathways acting through phosphokinase networks [8], including JNKs, CaMK-II, PKC, and Calmodulin/NF-AT.

The role of Wnt signalling in Mesenchymal Stromal Cell (MSC) fate is still debated. Both canonical and non-canonical pathways have been implicated in mesenchymal differentiation and proliferation. This “dual” role could be related to the specific Wnt ligand responsible for the signalling and/or to the developmental stage at the time of Wnt pathway engagement (reviewed by Ling L. et al. [9]). In cultured MSCs, the canonical Wnt3a activated signalling seems to stimulate proliferation and self-renewal [10], whereas the non-canonical Wnt5a/JNK mediated signalling inhibits proliferation and promotes osteogenic differentiation [11]. Some authors have reported that non-canonical Wnt signalling inhibits MSC proliferation in either autocrine or paracrine fashion [12]. Moreover, ligand concentration in the culture medium could lead to opposite effects [13]. Thus, the role of Wnt signalling in mesenchymal fate is far from clarified and the controversial results could rise from intrinsic variability and heterogeneity of the MSC preparations.

MSCs are still poorly characterized due to the absence of manifest physical, phenotypic, and functional properties in heterogeneous cell culture populations [14], which contain single stem cell-like cells as well as progenitor cells with different lineage commitments [15]. Also, cell origin and culture conditions induce high variability in cell composition that can affect interpretation of the experimental results [16]. A further obstacle to the study of MSCs is the lack of precise knowledge about their in vivo identity. Once established in culture, they express a variety of cell-lineage specific antigens, including adhesion molecules, integrins, and growth factor receptors that are either down- or up-regulated in MSC (sub)populations [17]. Moreover, the number of culture passages required to select a homogenous MSC population may induce loss of immature and multipotent precursor cells.

A number of markers have been proven to be suitable for the prospective isolation of MSCs from primary tissues. They include CD271, SSEA-4, ganglioside GD2, CD146, CD200, and the αvβ5 integrin complex, as well as several antibody-defined molecules [18], [19], [20], [21], [22]. However, none of them represents an ultimate and exclusive MSC marker.

Recently, we identified in MSC cultures a novel cell population characterized by unusual morphology and a unique phenotype [23]. These cells exhibited both mesenchymal and endothelial differentiation potential and therefore we named them Mesodermal Progenitor Cells (MPCs). We optimized a protocol to harvest MPCs from human Bone Marrow Mono-Nucleate Cells (BMMNCs) supplemented with autologous serum [24]. They consisted of a highly homogeneous population identified by phenotype CD105+SSEA-4+CD90neg while lacking many other mesenchymal associated markers, including MSCA-1, CD166, CD271, W5B5 [24], as well as the pericyte marker CD146. MPCs revealed the expression of the pluripotency-associated marker SSEA-4 and of nuclear factors Oct-4 and Nanog [25]. We also demonstrated that different serum supplementations in MSC culture medium led to different percentages of co-cultured MPCs [23], thus contributing to the variability of cell proliferation and differentiation potential [26]. Interestingly, when cultured in appropriate conditions MPCs differentiated to either highly proliferative and clonogenic MSCs or to mature endothelial cells showing tube-like structures in Matrigel® 3D-cultures.

Here we demonstrate that MPCs differentiate to MSCs through an SSEA-4+ early intermediate precursor. Differentiation was paralleled by the activation of the non-canonical Wnt5/Calmodulin signalling pathway. The specificity of the pathway, subsequently silenced during differentiation into mature multipotent SSEA-4neg MSCs, was confirmed by culturing MPCs in the presence of inhibitors. The inhibition of non-canonical Wnt5/Calmodulin signalling impaired MSC differentiation leaving endothelial induction unaffected.

Materials and Methods

Ethical statement

The study protocol was approved by the ethical committee of the Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana. The fundamental principles of ethics in research on human participants were maintained throughout the study period according to the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki. The research procedures were disclosed to all participants and written informed consent was obtained for sample collection.

Primary cell cultures

Bone marrow samples were obtained from 4 patients (2M/2F, median age 69 years) undergoing cardiac surgery. MSC cultures were obtained from bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMMNCs) grown under standard conditions, using DMEM (Invitrogen, Carlsband CA-USA) supplemented with 10% FBS (Invitrogen). MPCs were isolated from BMMNCs cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% pooled human AB serum, obtained from male donors only (PhABS, Lonza, Walkersville MD-USA), as previously described [23]. Media were changed every 48 h and cultures maintained at 37°C and 5% CO2 for 10–12 days, then detached by TrypLE Select® (Invitrogen) digestion and processed for characterization and mRNA extraction.

Cytofluorimetric characterization and validation of primary cultures

Aliquots of the detached cells were washed in PBS/0.5% BSA and stained with anti-SSEA-4 AlexaFluor 488-conjugated (Biolegend), anti-MSCA-1 PE-conjugated (Miltenyi Biotec, Gladbach GER), and anti-CD90 PE/Cy5-conjugated (BectonDickinson, San Jose CA-SA). Samples were acquired using FACSCanto II® (BectonDickinson) and analyzed by Diva Software®. A mesenchymal component (SSEA-4negMSCA-1+CD90+) lower than 2% was the cut off point for MPCs samples to be selected for further analysis.

Molecular characterization and Wnt signalling qPCRArray

Total RNA was extracted using RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden GER) as indicated by the manufacturer's protocol. On-column DNase I digestion was performed. 100 ng RNA samples were retrotranscribed with QuantiTect® Whole Transcriptome Kit (Qiagen). 50-fold cDNA dilutions were analyzed by quantitative Real Time PCR, using an iCycler-iQ5 Optical System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA-USA) and iQ SYBR Green SuperMix (Bio-Rad). All samples were run in duplicate. Primers for OCT4, NANOG, SOX15, SOX9, NESTIN, SPP1, FBX15, and RUNX2 genes were obtained as previously described [24]. Relative quantitative analysis was carried out following the 2−ΔΔCt Livak method [27]. GAPDH and HPRT housekeeping genes were used for normalization. Wnt related genes expression profile analysis was performed using Wnt signalling pathway RT2 Profiler™ PCR array kit from SABioscience (Quiagen) according to manufacturer's instructions. Data were analyzed by SABioscience web-base PCR Array Data Analysis tool and expressed as 2−ΔΔCt. Gene expression was defined “consistent” for values over 0.01, “mild” for values between 0.01 and 0.001, while genes were considered “not expressed” for values lower than 0.001.

MPC mesenchymal differentiation and Slot-Blot analysis

Five bone marrow samples (3M/2F, median age 64) were cultured in PhABS to isolate MPCs, as described above. After cytofluorimetrical validation, cells were detached and plated (10'000 cells/cm2) in MesenPRO™ RS (Invitrogen) tissue culture treated (TC) 6-well plates, to induce mesenchymal differentiation.

After 7 days (T1) conditioned medium was collected, high speed centrifuged and processed for Slot-Blot analysis. The procedure was repeated after further 7 days (T2).

T1 and T2 conditioned media were microfiltrated in quadruplicate, using Bio-Dot® Microfiltration Apparatus (BioRad, Hercules CA-USA) and blotted onto nitrocellulose membranes. Membranes were processed to evaluate secreted proteins using anti-Wnt5a, anti-Wnt5b, and anti-Dkk1 (all antibodies from ABCam, Cambridge UK). Briefly, membranes were blocked in 0.05% Tween20–5% BSA TBS, incubated for 2 hs with 1 µg/ml purified primary antibody, washed three times in 0.05% Tween20 TBS and then incubated with HRP conjugated secondary antibody (ABCam) for 1 h. After three washings, membranes were incubated with chemoluminescent ECL reagent (ABCam) and images immediately acquired by ChemiDoc digital imaging system (Biorad). Densitometric evaluations were performed using Leica QWin image analysis software (Leica, Wetzlar Germany). Data were presented as Net Pixel Density, calculated by subtracting median grey levels of bands. T1 and T2 cultures were also processed for anti-SSEA-4 and CD90 immunofluorescence staining and citofluorimetric characterization for CD105, CD90, and SSEA-4 expression.

Inhibition of MPC mesenchymal differentiation

Mesenchymal differentiation was inhibited by culturing MPCs in the presence of anti-Wnt5a antibody, anti-Wnt5b antibody (ABCam), or a combination of anti-Wnt5a/anti-Wnt5b at 0.5 µg/ml and 2.0 µg/ml respectively. IgG isotype antibody (BectonDickinson) was used as a control. In parallel, inhibitors of downstream phosphokinases in the non-canonical Ca2+-dependent signalling pathways were used. In detail, PKC and CaMK-II were inhibited by adding different doses (5 µl, 10 µl and 50 µl) of the inhibitor cocktail from Millipore (Billerica, MA-USA). Autocamtide-2-related inhibitory peptide (AIP) at 0.5 µM, 3.0 µM, and 5.0 µM concentrations, or calmidazolium chloride (CLMDZ) at 0.5 µM, 1.0 µM, and 2.0 µM concentrations were also used. Differentiation was measured by percentage of reduced AlamarBlue (%ABred). At day 7 of culture 10% v/v AlamarBlue® (Invitrogen) was added to the culture medium and 6 hs after treatment 100 µl samples were photometrically assayed at 570 nm/600 nm, following manufacturer's instructions.

Inhibition of Calmudulin activity in MPC-derived MSC expansion

MPCs from five bone marrow samples (3M/2F, median age 66) were induced to differentiate into MSCs by culturing in MesenPRO™ RS for 7 days in duplicate (T1). MSCs were cultured for further 7 days (T2) in the presence (0.5 µM and 1.0 µM) or absence of CLMDZ and proliferation was assayed. Cells from untreated cultures were detached and replated at 5,000 cells/cm2 with or without CLMDZ. After 7 days of culture (T3) the AlamarBlue® assay was performed. Data were expressed as Inhibition Index calculated according to the formula:

Inhibition of Ca2+-dependent signalling pathways by CLMDZ in MPC endothelial differentiation

Detached MPCs were induced to differentiate toward the endothelial lineage as previously reported [24], [25], in the presence (1.0 µM and 2.0 µM) and absence of CLMDZ. Briefly, MPCs were plated at a density of 10,000 cells/cm2 in fibronectin coated 12-well plates (BectonDickinson) and cultured for 7 days in EndoCult® medium (StemCell, Vancouver Canada). Evaluation of differentiation and the consequent pre-endothelial cell proliferation was performed using AlamarBlue® assay, as reported above. After pre-differentiation, cells were detached by trypsin digestion (Invitrogen) and 50,000 cells seeded on Matrigel™ (BectonDickinson) to perform the tube-like formation assay as previously described [25]. After 24 h of culture in EGM-2 medium (Lonza) supplemented with 50 ng/ml VEGF, phase contrast images of the tube-like network were acquired and 30–50 capillary-like tubes per sample were measured using Qwin software.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using two tailed t-student test. In alternative, for non-parametric series of data, Mann-Whitney test was also performed, p<0.05 was considered to be significant.

Results

We used two culture settings (PhABS vs FBS) that allowed us to specifically separate MPCs from MSCs in primary cultures from whole bone marrow samples. Under those conditions over 98% purity for either population was obtained (Figure 1A). Molecular characterization revealed a distinctive profile for MPCs characterized by the expression of functional pluripotency-associated genes, including OCT4 (isoform A) and NANOG (Figure 1B). SOX15, NESTIN, FBX15 and SPP1, this latest reported as functional Oct-4 homodimer target genes [28], were also expressed at significant levels (p<0.01, Figure 1B) confirming the activation of the peculiar adult Oct-4 circuit, previously reported [25]. MSCs expressed mesenchymal associated genes, including SOX9 and RUNX2 while lacking pluripotency markers (Figure 1B).

thumbnail
Download:
Figure 1. Characterization of MPC and MSC primary cultures.

Culturing BMMNCs in PhABS or FBS resulted in two highly monomorphic cultures of MPCs and MSCs, respectively. (A) MPCs were rounded and highly rifrangent (Leica DM-IRB 100X, phase contrast) expressing SSEA-4, low levels of CD105, and no CD90 and MSCA-1 MSC markers. Cytofluorimetric analysis showed high purity for both cultures. (B) Gene expression profiling confirmed the peculiar molecular signature of MCPs (red dots) characterized by the expression of pluripotency-associated genes. MSC (black squares) profile was significantly different from that of MPC (p<0.01), with the high expression of RUNX2 and SOX9.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025600.g001

RT2 Profile™ PCR arrays revealed 16 different Wnt mRNAs (Figure 2A). MPCs showed mild expression (0.001<2−ΔΔCt≤0.01) of WNT11 only that was not expressed in MSCs (p<0.05). MSCs showed consistent expression (2−ΔΔCt>0.01) of WNT5A and WNT5B and mild expression of WNT3 and WNT7B. Porcupine homolog Drosophila gene (PORCN) was expressed at different levels in both MPCs and MSCs (p<0.01), suggesting that translated Wnt proteins are processed for secretion. Surface receptor Fzd profiles (Figure 2B) were characterized by consistent expression of FZD1 in both MPCs and MSCs. However, MSCs expressed 10 times higher levels of the FZD1 transcript as compared to MPCs (p<0.001) and revealed positive amplification, at different levels, for any of the other FZD receptors investigated. Interestingly, we detected transcripts for LRP-5 and KREMEN1 co-receptors both in MSCs and MPCs, but only MSCs showed consistent expression of dickkopf homolog 1 (DKK1). Our data suggest that Wnt signalling in MPCs was allowed by the expression of FZD1, which binds at high affinity the canonical pathway effectors Wnt3a and β1-catenin as well as the non-canonical ligands Wnt5a, Wnt5b, and Wnt7b [29] (Table S1).

thumbnail
Download:
Figure 2. Quantitative RT-PCR assay for Wnts, Fzd receptors, co-receptors and inhibitors.

(A) No Wnts mRNA were detected in MPCs (red bars) except for WNT11 that showed mild expression. MSCs (black bars) showed consistent expression of WNT5A and WNT5B and mild expression of WNT3 and WNT7B. PORCN was expressed in both populations. (B) MPCs showed consistent expression of FZD1 only, while MSCs expressed a number of FZD receptors and Wnt signalling inhibitors. (* p<0.05, ** p<0.01, *** p<0.001).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025600.g002

To investigate the role of Wnt5, MPCs were induced to differentiate to either MSCs by culturing in MesenPRO™ RS or to endothelial cells by culturing in Endo-Cult™ media. We identified two distinct phases in MPC mesenchymal differentiation: early and late. After seven days of mesenchymal induction (T1) (Figure 3A), cultures revealed a small population of flat multi-branched cells reactive to CD90 and SSEA-4. Flow cytometry confirmed the presence of two distinct cell populations on the basis of CD105 and CD90 expression. Most cells at T1 were MPCs (SSEA-4+CD105dimCD90neg, 76.8%±6.8, n = 3) with a minor population of MSCs (CD105brightCD90bright, 24.3%±3.6, n = 3) (Figure 3A). About 50% percent of the MSCs were SSEA-4 positive (early MSCs) while the remaining MSCs were SSEA-4 negative (late MSCs). After a further 7 days of culture (T2) (Figure 3B) MPCs were fewer than 15% (12.3%±5.6, n = 3) and most of the cells were early MSCs (61.3%±4.7, n = 3) with a few late MSCs (9.3%±2.6, n = 3). At 21 days (T3), more than 95% of the cells were late MSCs (SSEA-4negCD105brightCD90bright, 95.3%±6.6 n = 3, Figure 3C).

thumbnail
Download:
Figure 3. Mesenchymal differentiation of MPCs and Wnt signalling.

(A) After 7 days of culture (T1) in differentiating medium some spindle-shaped cells were detectable (Leica DM-RB, HBO-50W Fluorescence 400X, merging by Leica CW4000 software). SSEA-4 (green) and CD90 (red, blue stain for DAPI) immunofluorescence and flow cytometry allowed the identification of a portion of MSCs as early MSCs (SSEA-4 and CD90 positive). (B) After a further 7 days (T2) cultures showed a reduced population of MPCs alongside an increased population of early MSCs. (C) Confluence of spindle-shaped cells was obtained after 3 weeks of differentiation (T3). Immunofluorescence showed that cells were completely negative for SSEA-4 while expressing CD90. Flow cytometry confirmed the unique phenotype of late MSCs (SSEA-4negCD105brightCD90bright). (D) Slot-Blot of conditioned media revealed intense secretion of Wnt5a and Wnt5b at T1 and very low secretion at T2. Similarly, Dkk1 was highly secreted at T1 and reduced at T2. (E) Autocrine/paracrine actions of Wnt5a and Wnt5b were redundant and differentiation was significantly inhibited with high doses (expressed in µg/ml) of specific antibodies (* p<0.05, ** p<0.01). (F) Immunoblocking of Wnt5a and Wnt5b activity, during differentiation, resulted in the retention of MPC phenotype in about 95% of the cells, after 7 days of induction.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025600.g003

At T1, intense secretion of Wnt5a (p<0.01 vs unconditioned media) and Wnt5b (p<0.01) was detected. Interestingly, at T2 Wnt5a (p<0.01) and Wnt5b (p<0.05) secretion was reduced despite the increased cellular density of mesenchymal cells. In parallel, Dkk1 secretion was higher at T1 (p<0.01) as compared to T2 (p<0.01) (Figure 3D). Mesenchymal differentiation of MPCs was completely abolished by treatment with anti-Wnt5a in combination with anti-Wnt5b (2.0 µg/ml) antibodies. The percentage of reduced Alamar Blue® was similar to unstimulated MPCs (PhABS, see materials and methods) and significantly lower when compared to MesenPRO™ RS cultures (p<0.05) (Figure 3E). Differentiation was not significantly inhibited when a single antibody was added to the culture, regardless of its concentration. Treatment with IgG isotype control antibody had no effect on differentiation (data not shown). These results suggest a redundant role for Wnt5a and Wnt5b in the autocrine/paracrine activation of Wnt signalling pathway, while binding of Wnt5a or Wnt5b on surface receptors was required during the induction of MPC mesenchymal differentiation (T1). Furthermore, morphological and phenotypical studies on mesenchymal differentiation cultures of MPCs (performed in presence of 2.0 µg/ml of both antibodies; anti-Wnt5a and anti-Wnt5b), confirmed that the inhibition of proliferation reported was effectively associated with a block of the mesenchymal differentiation. In fact, after 7 days of culture more than 95% of treated cells retained the expression of MPC phenotype (95.6%±4.1 n = 3, Figure 3F), alongside very low percentage of early MSCs (1.7%±1.5). Phase contrast and fluorescence microscopy revealed the almost exclusive presence of highly rifrangent rounded cells, stained brightly with anti SSEA-4 and negative to CD90 (respectively green and red in Figure 3F).

We also assayed the downstream involvement of PCK, CaMK-II, and Calmodulin. Inhibition of PKC and CaMK-II proved to be toxic both on resting (PhABS) and differentiating MPCs (MesenPRO™ RS) in a dose independent fashion (Figure 4A). On the other hand, highly specific inhibition of CaMK-II with AIP did not interfere with MPC survival or differentiation. Interestingly, blocking Calmodulin specific enzyme activity with calmidazolium chloride (CLMDZ) resulted in a dose dependent inhibition of differentiation (ID50 = 0.5 µM), but had no effect on resting MPCs. Cell vitality and ability to subsequently differentiate toward MSCs were conserved after removing CLMDZ (data not shown). The inhibition by CLMDZ, registered at T1 was significantly reduced at T2 and T3 (Table 1 and Figure 4B). CLMDZ was unable to inhibit MPC endothelial differentiation, even at higher concentrations (4×ID50), as shown by close percentages of reduced AlamarBlue® in control cultures (61.15±4.17, n = 8) vs CLMDZ at 1.0 µM (49,05±4.30, n = 8) and 2.0 µM (49,90±3.34, n = 8) (Figure 5A). Furthermore, endothelial induced cells retained the ability to form tube-like structures in Matrigel®, independently of the treatment and with mild differences in capillary-like tube length (Figure 5B). This set of data confirmed that Wnt5/Calmodulin activation is restricted to the mesenchymal lineage.

thumbnail
Download:
Figure 4. Calmodulin activation during mesenchymal differentiation of MPCs and its involvement restricted to the MPC-early MSC phase.

(A) Treatment with inhibitors of PKC and CaMK-II resulted in a toxic effect both on differentiating (MesenPRO RS™) and resting (PhABS medium) MPCs. Specific inhibition of CaMK-II had no effects on mesenchymal differentiation while CLMDZ exerted a dose-dependent inhibiting effect. (B) The inhibition index measured in the first week of differentiation (T1) was considerably reduced when treatment with CLMDZ at 0.5 µM (ID50, black dots) and 1.0 µM (2×ID50, red dots) were performed from day 7 (T2) or 14 (T3) of differentiation (* p<0.05, ** p<0.01).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025600.g004

thumbnail
Download:
Figure 5. CLMDZ treatment did not affect MPC endothelial differentiation.

(A) Induction toward the endothelial lineage was not inhibited by CLMDZ even at a high concentration. (B) Computer assisted measurement (24 h in Matrigel® 3D-cultures) of distances between cell bodies (red lines) revealed only a mild increase in tube length for CLMDZ treated cultures (Leica DM-IRB 100X, phase contrast, Leica QWin V3 software).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025600.g005

thumbnail
Download:
Table 1. Inhibition of mesenchymal differentiation by Calmidazolium Chloride (CLMDZ).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025600.t001

Discussion

We recently isolated from MSC cultures a population of MPCs that exhibited mesenchymal and endothelial differentiation potential under defined culture conditions [24]. The present report shows evidence of a multi-step model of mesenchymal differentiation. We identified a specific phenotype associated to an intermediate state between MPCs and MSCs (early MSCs). These cells revealed unique morphology (flat multi-branched cells) and distinctive immunophenotype (SSEA-4+CD105brightCD90bright), different from MPCs and from widely accepted MSCs. Higher clonogenic potential of SSEA-4+ MSCs had already been reported in adult mesenchymal stem cell populations [19]. We recognized SSEA-4, a marker previously thought to be specific to very early embryonic development and to hES cells, as a tracer of mesenchymal differentiation. It was highly expressed in MPCs while progressively decreasing during differentiation toward mesenchymal lineage, and it is not expressed by proliferating late MSCs. In parallel, cell expansion rates were very low in the first seven days of MPC differentiation. A second week of culture led to the expansion phase associated to typical MSC cultures with only a homogeneous population of late mature MSCs detectable.

In order to further characterize the multi-step model of MPC differentiation we investigated the possible role of Wnt signalling pathways. Our data showed that at the first step of induction in vitro mesenchymal differentiation of MPCs was regulated by non-canonical pathways through Wnt5a and Wnt5b, with a possible concomitant inhibition of Dkk-1 canonical pathway. Interestingly, Wnt5a and Wnt5b secretion paralleled the differentiation steps, appearing very high when the proliferation rate was low and becoming significantly reduced during the exponential cell growth.

Previous studies on MSC biology led to inconsistent results that may originate from heterogeneity in culture cell populations, characterized by asynchronous steps of differentiation. A decade ago some authors identified significant growing differences within MSC cultures for the presence of cell populations with distinct morphologies and proliferation capacities (RS1 and RS2) and described a lag phase and a log phase of growth [30], [31]. Gregory et al. [32] found that in the early log phase MSCs synthesize and secrete Dkk-1, an inhibitor of the canonical Wnt pathway. Proliferation of undifferentiated and pre-differentiated MSCs appeared to be predominantly regulated by the canonical Wnt3 pathway [10], [11], [13]. A more recent report [33] showed an increased number of CFU-F in MSC cultures exposed to Wnt3 and revealed a significant increase in population doubling time when MSCs were cultured in presence of Wnt5 and Wnt3. The Authors suggested a competitive interaction between canonical Wnt3a and non-canonical Wnt5a in mesenchymal colony formation from BMMNCs, with Wnt3a affecting self-renewal and proliferation while Wnt5a maintained MSC steady-state. In the light of our results the reported Wnt5-mediated increase in the population doubling time may be related to the recruitment of early MSCs, whereas Wnt3 directly stimulates the proliferation of late MSCs. According with this scenario, we reported apparently controversial results in standard primary MSC cultures performed using FBS-containing medium, where canonical (Wnt3) and non-canonical (Wnt5a, Wnt5b) proteins were concomitantly expressed. We hypothesize that the heterogeneity of the MSCs in these kinds of cultures [14], [16], [26], leads to the activation of different signalling pathways in different co-cultured cell populations undergoing asynchronous steps of differentiation. Conversely, the more controlled and less variable MPC differentiation protocol allows us deeply investigating the Wnt signalling activation, resolving the process in its single steps.

MPC fate could be mediated by Fzd1, which was the only Wnt receptor we found consistently expressed. Fzd1 is predicted to bind at high affinity canonical pathway effectors Wnt3a and β-catenin as well as non-canonical ligands Wnt5a, Wnt5b, and Wnt7b (Table S1). Our quantitative analysis for cytoplasmatic Wnt signalling related proteins and nuclear effectors revealed that steady state MPCs are fully equipped with the molecular machinery needed for signal transduction (Figure S1A, Text S1). They seem able to activate different signalling pathways in response to different ligands in a similar fashion to MSCs. We did not detect any expression of Wnt inhibitors in MPCs. Thus, we suggest that no specific Wnt signalling pathway is precluded to this cell population. In contrast, the activation of Wnt5-mediated mesenchymal differentiation parallels the expression of canonical pathway inhibitors as Dkk-1 (or presumably SFRPs) preventing activation of β-catenin in the early phase.

As summerized in Figure 6, we identify MPCs as the hypothetical mesenchymal precursors. Activation of Wnt5/Calmodulin signalling finely tunes Fzd1 mediated induction of MPCs into a newly described intermediate differentiation stage, low proliferating early MSCs. Subsequent maturation to late MSCs (SSEA-4neg) gives rise to exponentially growing cultures possibly regulated by other Wnt signalling pathways.

thumbnail
Download:
Figure 6. MPC mesenchymal differentiation hierarchy.

Homogenous MPC populations can be induced to differentiate to early MSCs by activating the Wnt5/Calmodulin pathway via Fzd1. Terminal differentiation to late MSCs is related to down-regulation of either Wnt5/Calmodulin pathway or Dkk1-mediated inhibition of canonical signalling. Plastic adherence in different culture conditions and timing could lead to the isolation of the three different populations easily distinguishable by morphology, phenotype and proliferation rate.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025600.g006

Interestingly, under appropriate culture conditions MPCs were able to differentiate to endothelial cells giving rise to tube-like structures in Matrigel®. The inhibition of non-canonical Wnt5/Calmodulin pathway did not affect endothelial differentiation, thus underlining the specificity of different Wnt pathways in ruling MPC fate.

Understanding the mechanisms of MPC differentiation and self-renewal in vitro is crucial for future clinical applications of this promising bone marrow derived progenitor cell population. MPCs could sustain both tissue regeneration, by undergoing mesenchymal differentiation, and neo-vascolarization by undergoing endothelial differentiation.

We believe, based on the studies described above, that future studies on multipotent bone marrow stromal cells require careful revision of the widely accepted nomenclature [34], taking into account the discovery of novel phenotypes like early and late MSCs. This is easily achievable introducing routinely the SSEA-4 antigen detection into the MSC characterization panels. Moreover, we previously reported that different MSC culture conditions could lead to different percentages of co-isolated MPCs in low-passaged cells, which are not evaluated by current data analysis methods focused on CD90-positive elements. Thus, evaluation of SSEA-4+CD105+CD90neg cells is also required for a complete interpretation of the results.

Lastly, we believe that many of the unresolved controversies in the field of bone marrow-derived multipotent cells could be overcame using defined number of pure MPCs and chemically defined media (MesenPRO™ RS), providing a novel and highly reproducible mesenchymal culture method, which could be useful to obtain homogeneous and synchronized cell preparations.

Supporting Information

Text S1.

MPCs are fully equipped with the molecular machinery needed for Wnt signal transduction, as well as MSCs.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025600.s001

(RTF)

Figure S1.

Quantitative RT-PCR assay for cytoplasmatic Wnt signalling related proteins and nuclear effectors. (A) No significant difference was reported in the expression of the main phosphokinases involved in Wnt signalling between MPCs (red bars) and MSCs (black bars). (B) Only some canonical nuclear effectors resulted significantly more expressed on MSCs (* p<0.05, ** p<0.01).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025600.s002

(TIF)

Table S1.

STRING Scores of predicted protein-protein interactions. STRING scores for predicted interactions between different Wnts (columns) and Fzd receptors, expressed at consistent (grey filled rows) or mild (unfilled rows) levels, are reported in MPCs and MSCs, respectively. Figures in bold indicate experimentally verified interactions (Source: STRING Database http://string81.embl.de).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025600.s003

(TIF)

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: RF SP MP. Performed the experiments: SP VC MM LT EL. Analyzed the data: RF SP VC. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: RF SP VC MP. Wrote the paper: RF SP MP.

References

  1. 1. Yamaguchi TP (2001) Heads or tails: Wnts and anterior-posterior patterning. Curr Biol 11(17): R713–R724.
  2. 2. Noggle SA, James D, Brivanlou AH (2005) A molecular basis for human embryonic stem cell pluripotency. Stem Cell Rev 1(2): 111–118.
  3. 3. Nusse R (2008) Wnt signaling and stem cell control. Cell Res 18(5): 523–527.
  4. 4. Kim JA, Kang YJ, Park G, Kim M, Park YO, et al. (2009) Identification of a stroma-mediated Wnt/beta-catenin signal promoting self-renewal of hematopoietic stem cells in the stem cell niche. Stem Cells 27(6): 1318–1329.
  5. 5. Blank U, Karlsson G, Karlsson S (2008) Signaling pathways governing stem-cell fate. Blood 111(2): 492–503.
  6. 6. Suda T, Arai F (2008) Wnt signaling in the niche. Cell 132(5): 729–730.
  7. 7. Akiyama T (2000) Wnt/beta-catenin signaling. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 11(4): 273–282.
  8. 8. Pandur P, Maurus D, Kühl M (2002) Increasingly complex: new players enter the Wnt signaling network. Bioessays 24(10): 881–884.
  9. 9. Ling L, Nurcombe V, Cool SM (2009) Wnt signaling controls the fate of mesenchymal stem cells. Gene 433(1–2): 1–7.
  10. 10. Boland GM, Perkins G, Hall DJ, Tuan RS (2004) Wnt3a promotes proliferation and suppresses osteogenic differentiation of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. J Cell Biochem 93(6): 1210–1230.
  11. 11. Baksh D, Tuan RS (2007) Canonical and non-canonical Wnts differentially affect the development potential of primary isolate of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. J Cell Physiol 212(3): 817–826.
  12. 12. Qiu W, Andersen TE, Bollerslev J, Mandrup S, Abdallah BM, et al. (2007) Patients with high bone mass phenotype exhibit enhanced osteoblast differentiation and inhibition of adipogenesis of human mesenchymal stem cells. J Bone Miner Res 22(11): 1720–1731.
  13. 13. De Boer J, Wang HJ, Van Blitterswijk C (2004) Effects of Wnt signaling on proliferation and differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. Tissue Eng 10(3–4): 393–401.
  14. 14. Ho AD, Wagner W, Franke W (2008) Heterogeneity of mesenchymal stromal cell preparations. Cytotherapy 10(4): 320–330.
  15. 15. Barry FP, Boynton RE, Haynesworth S, Murphy JM, Zaia J (1999) The monoclonal antibody SH-2, raised against human mesenchymal stem cells, recognizes an epitope on endoglin (CD105). Biochem Biophys Res Commun 265(1): 134–139.
  16. 16. Wagner W, Ho AD (2007) Mesenchymal stem cell preparations-comparing apples and oranges. Stem Cell Rev 3(4): 239–248.
  17. 17. Pittenger MF, Mackay AM, Beck SC, Jaiswal RK, Douglas R, et al. (1999) Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Science 284(5411): 143–147.
  18. 18. Poloni A, Maurizi G, Rosini V, Mondini E, Mancini S, et al. (2009) Selection of CD271(+) cells and human AB serum allows a large expansion of mesenchymal stromal cells from human bone marrow. Cytotherapy 11(2): 153–162.
  19. 19. Gang EJ, Bosnakovski D, Figueiredo CA, Visser JW, Perlingeiro RC (2007) SSEA-4 identifies mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow. Blood 109(4): 1743–1751.
  20. 20. Martinez C, Hofmann TJ, Marino R, Dominici M, Horwitz EM (2007) Human bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells express the neural ganglioside GD2: a novel surface marker for the identification of MSCs. Blood 109(10): 4245–4248.
  21. 21. Crisan M, Yap S, Casteilla L, Chen CW, Corselli M, et al. (2008) A perivascular origin for mesenchymal stem cells in multiple human organs. Cell Stem Cell 3(3): 301–313.
  22. 22. Bühring HJ, Treml S, Cerabona F, de Zwart P, Kanz L, et al. (2009) Phenotypic characterization of distinct human bone marrow-derived MSC subsets. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1176: 124–134.
  23. 23. Petrini M, Pacini S, Trombi L, Fazzi R, Montali M, et al. (2009) Identification and purification of mesodermal progenitor cells from human adult bone marrow. Stem Cells Dev 18(6): 857–866.
  24. 24. Trombi L, Pacini S, Montali M, Fazzi R, Chiellini F, et al. (2009) Selective culture of mesodermal progenitor cells. Stem Cells Dev 18(8): 1227–1234.
  25. 25. Pacini S, Carnicelli V, Trombi L, Montali M, Fazzi R, et al. (2010) Costitutive expression of pluripotency-associated genes in Mesodermal Progenitor Cells (MPCs). PLoS One 5(3): e9861.
  26. 26. Bieback K, Hecker A, Kocaömer A, Lannert H, Schallmoser K, et al. (2009) Human alternatives to fetal bovine serum for the expansion of mesenchymal stromal cells from bone marrow. Stem Cells 27(9): 2331–2341.
  27. 27. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(−Delta Delta C(T)). Method Methods 25(4): 402–408.
  28. 28. Botquin V, Hess H, Fuhrmann G, Anastassiadis C, Gross MK, et al. (1998) New POU dimer configuration mediates antagonistic control of an osteopontin preimplantation enhancer by Oct-4 and Sox-2. Genes Dev 12(13): 2073–90.
  29. 29. Szklarczyk D, Franceschini A, Kuhn M, Simonovic M, Roth A, et al. (2011) The STRING database in 2011: functional interaction networks of proteins, globally integrated and scored. Nucleic Acids Res 39(Database issue): D561–568.
  30. 30. Prockop DJ, Sekiya I, Colter DC (2001) Isolation and characterization of rapidly self-renewing stem cells from cultures of human marrow stromal cells. Cytotherapy 3(5): 393–396.
  31. 31. Colter DC, Sekiya I, Prockop DJ (2001) Identification of a subpopulation of rapidly self-renewing and multipotential adult stem cells in colonies of human marrow stromal cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98(14): 7841–7845.
  32. 32. Gregory CA, Singh H, Perry AS, Prockop DJ (2003) The Wnt signaling inhibitor dickkopf-1 is required for reentry into the cell cycle of human adult stem cells from bone marrow. J Biol Chem 278(30): 28067–280678.
  33. 33. Baksh D, Tuan RS (2007) Canonical and non-canonical Wnts differentially affect the development potential of primary isolate of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. J Cell Physiol 212(3): 817–826.
  34. 34. Horwitz EM, Le Blanc K, Dominici M, Mueller I, Slaper-Cortenbach I, et al. (2005) Clarification of the nomenclature for MSC: The International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement. Cytotherapy 7(5): 393–395.