Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Minimum Nodal Yield in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Defining the Standard of Care in a Multicenter International Pooled Validation Study

  • Head and Neck Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

There is evidence to suggest that a nodal yield <18 is an independent prognostic factor in patients with clinically node negative (cN0) oral squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) treated with elective neck dissection (END). We sought to evaluate this hypothesis with external validation and to investigate for heterogeneity between institutions.

Patients and Methods

We analyzed pooled individual data from 1,567 patients treated at nine comprehensive cancer centers worldwide between 1970 and 2011. Nodal yield was assessed with Cox proportional hazard models, stratified by study center, and adjusted for age, sex, pathological T and N stage, margin status, extracapsular nodal spread, time period of primary treatment, and adjuvant therapy. Two-stage random-effects meta-analyses were used to investigate for heterogeneity between institutions.

Results

In multivariable analyses of patients undergoing selective neck dissection, nodal yield <18 was associated with reduced overall survival [hazard ratio (HR) 1.69; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.22–2.34; p = 0.002] and disease-specific survival (HR 1.88; 95 % CI 1.21–2.91; p = 0.005), and increased risk of locoregional recurrence (HR 1.53; 95 % CI 1.04–2.26; p = 0.032). Despite significant differences between institutions in terms of patient clinicopathological factors, nodal yield, and outcomes, random-effects meta-analysis demonstrated no evidence of heterogeneity between centers in regards to the impact of nodal yield on disease-specific survival (p = 0.663; I 2 statistic = 0).

Conclusion

Our data confirm that nodal yield is a robust independent prognostic factor in patients undergoing END for cN0 oral SCC, and may be applied irrespective of the underlying patient population and treating institution. A minimum adequate lymphadenectomy in this setting should include at least 18 nodes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ferlay J, et al. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer. 2010;127(12):2893–917.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kademani D. Oral cancer. Mayo Clin Proc. 2007;82(7):878–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Campana JP, Meyers AD. The surgical management of oral cancer. Otolaryngol Clin N Am. 2006;39(2):331–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Clark JR, et al. Established prognostic variables in N0 oral carcinoma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006;135(5):748–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ebrahimi A, Ashford BG, Clark JR. Improved survival with elective neck dissection in thick early-stage oral squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck. 2012;34(5):709–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Huang SH, et al. Predictive value of tumor thickness for cervical lymph-node involvement in squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity: a meta-analysis of reported studies. Cancer. 2009;115(7):1489–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brunocilla E, et al. The number of nodes removed as well as the template of the dissection is independently correlated to cancer-specific survival after radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Int Urol Nephrol. 2013;45(3):711–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wright JL, Lin DW, Porter MP. The association between extent of lymphadenectomy and survival among patients with lymph node metastases undergoing radical cystectomy. Cancer. 2008;112(11):2401–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Weir L, et al. Prognostic significance of the number of axillary lymph nodes removed in patients with node-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20(7):1793–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chang GJ, et al. Lymph node evaluation and survival after curative resection of colon cancer: systematic review. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99(6):433–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Le Voyer TE, et al. Colon cancer survival is associated with increasing number of lymph nodes analyzed: a secondary survey of intergroup trial INT-0089. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(15):2912–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Volpe CM, Driscoll DL, Douglass HO Jr. Outcome of patients with proximal gastric cancer depends on extent of resection and number of resected lymph nodes. Ann Surg Oncol. 2000;7(2):139–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Peyre CG, et al. The number of lymph nodes removed predicts survival in esophageal cancer: an international study on the impact of extent of surgical resection. Ann Surg. 2008;248(4):549–56.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Greenstein AJ, et al. Effect of the number of lymph nodes sampled on postoperative survival of lymph node-negative esophageal cancer. Cancer. 2008;112(6):1239–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ebrahimi A, et al. Nodal yield and survival in oral squamous cancer: defining the standard of care. Cancer. 2011;117(13):2917–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Stukel TA, et al. Two-stage methods for the analysis of pooled data. Stat Med. 2001;20(14):2115–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986;7(3):177–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002;21(11):1539–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Capote A, et al. Elective neck dissection in early-stage oral squamous cell carcinoma: does it influence recurrence and survival? Head Neck. 2007;29(1):3–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sigurdson ER. Lymph node dissection: is it diagnostic or therapeutic? J Clin Oncol. 2003; 21(6):965–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Morris EJ, et al. Identifying stage III colorectal cancer patients: the influence of the patient, surgeon, and pathologist. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(18):2573–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bilimoria KY, et al. Adequacy and importance of lymph node evaluation for colon cancer in the elderly. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;206(2):247–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ardalan Ebrahimi MBBS, MPH.

Additional information

The International Consortium for Outcome Research (ICOR) in Head and Neck Cancer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ebrahimi, A., Clark, J.R., Amit, M. et al. Minimum Nodal Yield in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Defining the Standard of Care in a Multicenter International Pooled Validation Study. Ann Surg Oncol 21, 3049–3055 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-3702-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-3702-x

Keywords

Navigation