Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Gender Differences in Breast Cancer: Analysis of 13,000 Breast Cancers in Men from the National Cancer Data Base

  • Breast Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To examine gender-specific differences in breast cancer utilizing the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB).

Methods

Breast cancer patients entered in the NCDB from 1998 through 2007 were compared by gender for demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment, and outcomes.

Results

A total of 13,457 men were compared to 1,439,866 women. Men were older, more often African American, less often Hispanic, had larger tumors, less often had low-grade disease, less often had stage 0 or I disease, and were more likely to have metastases to lymph nodes and/or distantly. Cancers in men were less likely lobular and more likely estrogen receptor and/or progesterone receptor positive. Men were more likely to have total mastectomy and less likely to receive radiotherapy. There was no difference in chemotherapy and little difference in hormone therapy rates. Differences in overall survival (OS) were highly significant (p < 0.0001): 83 % 5-year OS for women with breast cancer (median survival 129 months) versus 74 % for men (median survival 101 months). Women had better 5-year OS (p < 0.0001) for stage 0 (94 vs. 90 %), stage I (90 vs. 87 %), and stage II (82 vs. 74 %) breast cancer. There were no differences in 5-year OS for stage III (56.9 vs. 56.5 %, p = 0.99) or stage IV (19 vs. 16 %, p = 0.20) disease.

Conclusions

At first glance, this large study demonstrated numerous gender-specific differences. However, after accounting for differences in presentation, absence of data on disease-specific survival, and inherent deficiencies in reporting cancer registry data, breast cancer in men and women appears more alike than different.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Miao H, Verkooljen HM, Chia K, et al. Incidence and outcome of male breast cancer: an international population-based study. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:4381–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Scott-Connor CEH, Jochimsen PR, Menck HR, Winchester DJ. An analysis of male and female breast cancer treatment and survival among demographically identical pairs of patients. Surgery. 1999;126:775–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. National Cancer Data Base. http://www.facs.org/cancer/ncdb/index.html.

  4. Commission on Cancer. http://www.facs.org/cancer/.

  5. American College of Surgeons. http://www.facs.org/.

  6. American cancer society. http://www.cancer.org/.

  7. NCDB Alpha participant use file (NCDB alpha-PUF). http://www.facs.org/cancer/ncdb/pufgettingstarted.pdf.

  8. World Health Organization ICD-O-3. http://www.who.int/classifications/icd/adaptations/oncology/en/index.html.

  9. American Joint Committee on Cancer. http://www.cancerstaging.org/.

  10. Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) rules and regulations. http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/privacy/hipaa/administrative/privacyrule/adminsimpregtext.pdf.

  11. Weaver DL, Ashikaga T, Krag DN, et al. Effect of occult metastases on survival in node-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:412–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kiluk JV, Lee MC, Park CK, et al. Male breast cancer: management and follow-up recommendations. Breast J. 2011;17:503–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Surveillance, epidemiology and end results (SEER). http://seer.cancer.gov/.

  14. Mettlin CJ, Menck HR, Winchester DP, Murphy GP. A comparison of breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancers reported to the National Cancer Data Base and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. Cancer. 1997;79:2052–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. O’Malley CD, Prehn AW, Shema SJ, Glaser SL. Racial/ethnic differences in survival rates in a population-based series of men with breast carcinoma. Cancer. 2002;94:2836–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Giordano SH, Cohen DS, Buzdar AU, et al. Breast carcinoma in men: a population-based study. Cancer. 2004;101:51–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nahleh ZA, Srikantiah R, Safa M, Jazieh AR, Muhleman A, Komrokji R. Male breast cancer in the veterans affairs population: a comparative analysis. Cancer. 2007;109:1471–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Acs G, Lawton TJ, Rebbeck TR, LiVolsi VA, Zhang PJ. Differential expression of E-cadherin in lobular and ductal neoplasms of the breast and its biologic and diagnostic implications. Am J Clin Pathol. 2001;115:85–98.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cancer Programs Practice Profile Reports (CP3R), version 2. http://www.facs.org/cancer/ncdb/cp3rv2_overview-1211.pdf.

  20. Rapid Quality Reporting System (RQRS). http://www.facs.org/cancer/ncdb/rqrs.html.

  21. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). http://www.nccn.org/index.asp.

  22. Gamel JW, Vogel RL. Non-parametric comparison of relative versus cause-specific survival in surveillance, epidemiology and end results (SEER) programme breast cancer patients. Stat Methods Med Res. 2001;10:393–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts or other disclosures.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jon M. Greif DO, FACS.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Greif, J.M., Pezzi, C.M., Klimberg, V.S. et al. Gender Differences in Breast Cancer: Analysis of 13,000 Breast Cancers in Men from the National Cancer Data Base. Ann Surg Oncol 19, 3199–3204 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2479-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2479-z

Keywords

Navigation