Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Neoadjuvant/Preoperative Gemcitabine for Patients with Localized Pancreatic Cancer: A Meta-analysis of Prospective Studies

  • Pancreatic Tumors
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Long-term prognosis for localized pancreatic cancer remains poor. We sought to assess the benefit of neoadjuvant/preoperative chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy.

Methods

Prospective studies where gemcitabine with or without radiotherapy was provided before surgery in patients with initially resectable or unresectable disease were reviewed by meta-analysis. Primary outcome was survival, and secondary outcomes were tumor response after therapy, toxicity, surgical exploration, and resection rates.

Results

Twenty independent studies with 707 participants were included, 366 with resectable lesions and 341 with unresectable lesions. Seven studies were phase I/II trials, 10 phase II, and 3 prospective cohort studies. Estimated 1- and 2-year survival probabilities after resection were 91.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 75–100) and 67.2% (95% CI 38–87) for initially resectable patients, and 86.3% (95% CI 78–100) and 54.2% (95% CI 25–100) for initially unresectable patients. The complete/partial response rate was 12% (95% CI 4–23) and 27% (95% CI 18–38) in resectable and unresectable lesions, respectively. The rate of treatment-related grade 3–4 toxicity was 31% (95% CI 21–42). Of resectable patients evaluable after restaging, 91% (95% CI 83–97) underwent surgery, and 82% (95% CI 65–95) of explored patients underwent resection. R0 resections amounted to 89% (95% CI 83–94). Of unresectable patients evaluable after restaging, 39% (95% CI 28–50) underwent surgery, and 68% (95% CI 53–82) of explored patients were resected, with 60% (95% CI 50–71) R0 resections.

Conclusions

Current analysis provides marginal support to the assumed benefits of neoadjuvant therapies for patients with resectable cancer, and indicates a potential advantage only for a minority of those with unresectable lesions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hoffman JP. Status of neoadjuvant therapy for resectable pancreatic cancer. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2010;19:411–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Crane CH, Varadhachary G, Wolff RA, et al. The argument for pre-operative chemoradiation for localized, radiographically resectable pancreatic cancer. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2006;20:365–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pendurthi TK, Hoffman JP, Ross E, et al. Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiation for patients with resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Am Surg. 1998;64:686–92.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Pingpank JF, Hoffman JP, Ross EA, et al. Effect of preoperative chemoradiotherapy on surgical margin status of resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas. J Gastrointest Surg. 2001;5:121–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Breslin TM, Hess KR, Harbison DB, et al. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: treatment variables and survival duration. Ann Surg Oncol. 2001;8:123–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cheng TY, Sheth K, White RR, et al. Effect of neoadjuvant chemoradiation on operative mortality and morbidity for pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13:66–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Spitz FR, Abbruzzese JL, Lee JE, et al. Preoperative and postoperative chemoradiation strategies in patients treated with pancreaticoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15:928–37.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gillen S, Schuster T, Meyer zum Büschenfelde C et al. Preoperative/ neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of response and resection percentages. PLoS Med. 2010;7:1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Regine WF, Winter KA, Abrams RA, et al. Fluorouracil vs. gemcitabine chemotherapy before and after fluorouracil-based chemoradiation following resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2008;299:1019–26.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Tempero M, Alasadi R, Arnoletti JP, et al. National Comprehensive Cancer Network: practice guidelines in oncology, v.1.2008. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma. http://www.nccn.org/.

  11. Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, et al. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of reporting of meta-analyses. Lancet. 1999;354:1896–900.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg. 2010;8:336–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Downs SH, Black N. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomized and non-randomized studies of health care interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998;52:377–84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:205–16.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wilson EB. Probable inference, the law of succession, and statistical inference. J Am Stat Assoc. 1927;22:209–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Greenland S. Quantitative methods in the review of epidemiologic literature. Epidemiol Rev. 1987;9:1–30.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Higgings JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002;21:1539–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. van Houwelingen HC, Arends LR, Stijnen T. Advanced methods in meta-analysis: multivariate approach and meta-regression. Stat Med. 2002;21:589–624.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Egger M, Davey SG, Schneider M, et al. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997;315:629–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Begg CB, Mazumdar M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics. 1994;50:1088–101.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Evans DB, Varadhachary GR, Crane CH, et al. Preoperative gemcitabine-based chemoradiation for patients with resectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3496–502.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Heinrich S, Pestalozzi BC, Schäfer M, et al. Prospective phase II trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin for resectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:2526–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Joensuu TK, Kiviluoto T, Kärkkäinen P, et al. Phase I–II trial of twice-weekly gemcitabine and concomitant irradiation in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004;60:444–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Palmer DH, Stocken DD, Hewitt H, et al. A randomized phase 2 trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in resectable pancreatic cancer: gemcitabine alone versus gemcitabine combined with cisplatin. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:2088–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Talamonti MS, Small W Jr, Mulcahy MF, et al. A multi-institutional phase II trial of preoperative full-dose gemcitabine and concurrent radiation for patients with potentially resectable pancreatic carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13:150–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Varadhachary GR, Wolff RA, Crane CH, et al. Preoperative gemcitabine and cisplatin followed by gemcitabine-based chemoradiation for resectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3487–95.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ohigashi H, Ishikawa O, Eguchi H, et al. Feasibility and efficacy of combination therapy with preoperative full-dose gemcitabine, concurrent three-dimensional conformal radiation, surgery, and postoperative liver perfusion chemotherapy for T3-pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg. 2009;250:88–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Landry J, Catalano PJ, Staley C, et al. Randomized phase II study of gemcitabine plus radiotherapy versus gemcitabine, 5-fluorouracil, and cisplatin followed by radiotherapy and 5-fluorouracil for patients with locally advanced, potentially resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 2010;101:587–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Small W Jr, Mulcahy MF, Rademaker A, et al. Phase II trial of full-dose gemcitabine and bevacizumab in combination with attenuated three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in patients with localized pancreatic cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;80:476–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Epelbaum R, Rosenblatt E, Nasrallah S, et al. Phase II study of gemcitabine combined with radiation therapy in patients with localized, unresectable pancreatic cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2002;81:138–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Laurent S, Monsaert E, Boterberg T, et al. Feasibility of radiotherapy with concomitant gemcitabine and oxaliplatin in locally advanced pancreatic cancer and distal cholangiocarcinoma: a prospective dose finding phase I–II study. Ann Oncol. 2009;20:1369–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Marti JL, Hochster HS, Hiotis SP, et al. Phase I/II trial of induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradioherapy and surgery for locoregional advanced pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:3521–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Mattiucci GC, Morganti AG, Valentini V, et al. External beam radiotherapy plus 24-hour continuous infusion of gemcitabine in unresectable pancreatic carcinoma: long-term results of a phase II study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;76:831–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Maximous DW, Abdel-Wanis ME, El-Sayed MI, et al. Preoperative gemcitabine based chemo-radiotherapy in locally advanced non metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Int Arch Med. 2009;2:7.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Wilkowski R, Boeck S, Ostermaier S, et al. Chemoradiotherapy with concurrent gemcitabine and cisplatin with or without sequential chemotherapy with gemcitabine/cisplatin vs. chemoradiotherapy with concurrent 5-fluorouracil in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer—a multi-centre randomised phase II study. Br J Cancer. 2009;101:1853–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Yamazaki H, Nishiyama K, Koizumi M, et al. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer: 1,000 mg/m2 gemcitabine can be administered using limited-field radiotherapy. Strahlenther Onkol. 2007;183:301–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Zimmermann FB, Schuhmacher C, Lersch C, et al. Sequential and/or concurrent hypofractionated radiotherapy and concurrent chemotherapy in neoadjuvant treatment of advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Outcome and patterns of failure. Hepatogastroenterology. 2004;51:1842–6.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Pipas JM, Barth RJ Jr, Zaki B, et al. Docetaxel/gemcitabine followed by gemcitabine and external beam radiotherapy in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2005;12:995–1004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Massucco P, Capussotti L, Magnino A, et al. Pancreatic resections after chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced ductal adenocarcinoma: analysis of perioperative outcome and survival. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13:1201–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Cardenes HR, Moore AM, Johnson CS, et al. A phase II study of gemcitabine in combination with radiation therapy in patients with localized, unresectable, pancreatic cancer: a Hoosier Oncology Group study. Am J Clin Oncol. 2010;34:460–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Abrams RA, Lowry AM, O’Reilly EM, et al. Combined modality treatment of resectable and borderline resectable pancreas cancer: expert consensus statement. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:1751–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Neoptolemos JP, Stocken DD, Friess H, et al. A randomized trial of chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy after resection of pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:1200–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Oettle H, Post S, Neuhaus P, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine vs. observation in patients undergoing curative-intent resection of pancreatic cancer: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2007;297:267–77.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Vento P, Mustonen H, Joensuu T, et al. Impact of preoperative chemoradiotherapy on survival in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13:2945–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Varadhachary GR, Tamm EP, Abbruzzese JL, et al. Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: definitions, management, and role of preoperative therapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13:1035–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The meta-analysis was designed and results were analyzed without financial support from producers of any drugs used in the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Virginia Festa MD.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 4 and 5.

Table 4 Prisma 2009 check-list
Table 5 Quality assessment of selected trials, according to the Downs and Black’ scale

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Andriulli, A., Festa, V., Botteri, E. et al. Neoadjuvant/Preoperative Gemcitabine for Patients with Localized Pancreatic Cancer: A Meta-analysis of Prospective Studies. Ann Surg Oncol 19, 1644–1662 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-011-2110-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-011-2110-8

Keywords

Navigation