Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Comparison of POSSUM and GPS Models in the Prediction of Post-operative Outcome in Patients Undergoing Oesophago-gastric Cancer Resection

  • Gastrointestinal Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

There is some evidence that a patient’s pre-operative condition influences short-term and long-term post-operative outcomes. The aim of the present study is to compare the physiological and operative severity score for the enumeration of mortality and morbidity (POSSUM) and modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS) models in the prediction of post-operative outcome, both short term and long term, in patients undergoing resection of oesophago-gastric cancer.

Patients and Methods

Patients who underwent curative resection for oesophago-gastric cancer from January 2005 to May 2009 and who had data to score the POSSUM, P-POSSUM, O-POSSUM and mGPS models were included in the study. Observed morbidity and mortality rates were compared with predicted outcome in different risk groups. Both short-term outcome and long-term survival were recorded.

Results

Observed morbidity was 49%, whereas POSSUM predicted post-operative morbidity in 60%, giving an overall standardised morbidity ratio of 0.82. Only male sex [hazard ratio (HR) 3.61, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.38–9.46, P = 0.009] and POSSUM physiology score (HR 2.13, 95% CI 1.11–4.08, P = 0.023) were independently associated with post-operative morbidity. The post-operative mortality rates predicted by POSSUM, P-POSSUM and O-POSSUM were 16.5, 5.8 and 9.9%, respectively, giving a standardised mortality ratio of 0.25, 0.71 and 0.42. Only mGPS (HR 1.96, 95% CI 1.09–3.54, P = 0.025) and tumour–node–metastasis (TNM) stage (HR 2.21, 95% CI 1.44–3.38, P < 0.001) were independently associated with cancer-specific survival.

Conclusions

The POSSUM physiology score was useful in predicting post-operative morbidity, and the mGPS was useful in predicting cancer-specific survival, in patients undergoing surgery for oesophago-gastric cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zafirellis KD, Fountoulakis A, Dolan K, Dexter SP, Martin IG, Sue-Ling HM. Evaluation of POSSUM in patients with oesophageal cancer undergoing resection. Br J Surg. 2002;89:1150–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sah BK, Zhu ZG, Chen MM, Yan M, Yin HR, Zhen LY. Gastric cancer surgery and its hazards: post operative infection is the most important complication. Hepatogastroenterology. 2008;55:2259–63.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hulscher JB, Tijssen JG, Obertop H, van Lanschot JJ. Transthoracic versus transhiatal resection for carcinoma of the esophagus: a meta-analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;72:306–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lagarde SM, Reitsma JB, Maris AK, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Busch OR, Obertop H, et al. Preoperative prediction of the occurrence and severity of complications after esophagectomy for cancer with use of a nomogram. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;85:1938–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sah BK, Chen MM, Yan M, Zhu ZG. Reoperation for early postoperative complications after gastric cancer surgery in a Chinese hospital. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16:98–103.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Copeland GP, Jones D, Walters M. POSSUM: a scoring system for surgical audit. Br J Surg. 1991;78:355–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Whiteley MS, Prytherch DR, Higgins B, Weaver PC, Prout WG. An evaluation of the POSSUM surgical scoring system. Br J Surg. 1996;83:812–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tekkis PP, McCulloch P, Poloniecki JD, Prytherch DR, Kessaris N, Steger AC. Risk-adjusted prediction of operative mortality in oesophagogastric surgery with O-POSSUM. Br J Surg. 2004;91:288–95.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dutta S, Horgan PG, McMillan DC. POSSUM and its related models as predictors of postoperative mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing surgery for gastro-oesophageal cancer: a systematic review. World J Surg. 2010;34:2076–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Deans DA, Tan BH, Wigmore SJ, Ross JA, de Beaux AC, Paterson-Brown S, et al. The influence of systemic inflammation, dietary intake and stage of disease on rate of weight loss in patients with gastro-oesophageal cancer. Br J Cancer. 2009;100:63–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Crumley AB, Stuart RC, McKernan M, McMillan DC. Is hypoalbuminemia an independent prognostic factor in patients with gastric cancer? World J Surg. 2010;34:2393–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gockel I, Dirksen K, Messow CM, Junginger T. Significance of preoperative C-reactive protein as a parameter of the perioperative course and long-term prognosis in squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12:3746–50.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. McMillan DC. Systemic inflammation, nutritional status and survival in patients with cancer. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2009;12:223–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Moyes LH, Leitch EF, McKee RF, Anderson JH, Horgan PG, McMillan DC. Preoperative systemic inflammation predicts postoperative infectious complications in patients undergoing curative resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer. 2009;100:1236–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ishizuka M, Nagata H, Takagi K, Horie T, Kubota K. Inflammation-based prognostic score is a novel predictor of postoperative outcome in patients with colorectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2007;246:1047–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. McMillan DC, Crozier JE, Canna K, Angerson WJ, McArdle CS. Evaluation of an inflammation-based prognostic score (GPS) in patients undergoing resection for colon and rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007;22:881–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Brosens RP, Oomen JL, Glas AS, van Bochove A, Cuesta MA, Engel AF. POSSUM predicts decreased overall survival in curative resection for colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;49:825–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jenkins JT, O’Neill G, Morran CG. The relationship between patient physiology and cancer-specific survival following curative resection of colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer. 2007;96:213–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Richards CH, Leitch EF, Horgan PG, Anderson JH, McKee RF, McMillan DC. The relationship between patient physiology, the systemic inflammatory response and survival in patients undergoing curative resection of colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer. 2010;103:1356–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Rizk NP, Bach PB, Schrag D, Bains MS, Turnbull AD, Karpeh M, et al. The impact of complications on outcomes after resection for esophageal and gastroesophageal junction carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg. 2004;198:42–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lagarde SM, de Boer JD, ten Kate FJ, Busch OR, Obertop H, van Lanschot JJ. Postoperative complications after esophagectomy for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus are related to timing of death due to recurrence. Ann Surg. 2008;247:71–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tsujimoto H, Ichikura T, Ono S, Sugasawa H, Hiraki S, Sakamoto N, et al. Impact of postoperative infection on long-term survival after potentially curative resection for gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:311–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sobin LH, Wittekind C, editors. TNM classification of malignant tumours. 6th edn, Hoboken: Wiley; April 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Siewert JR, Stein HJ. Adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction. Classification, pathology and extent of resection. Dis Esophagus. 1996;9:173–82.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lai F, Kwan TL, Yuen WC, Wai A, Siu YC, Shung E. Evaluation of various POSSUM models for predicting mortality in patients undergoing elective oesophagectomy for carcinoma. Br J Surg. 2007;94:1172–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Nagabhushan JS, Srinath S, Weir F, Angerson WJ, Sugden BA, Morran CG. Comparison of P-POSSUM and O-POSSUM in predicting mortality after oesophagogastric resections. Postgrad Med J. 2007;83:355–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. McMillan DC. An inflammation-based prognostic score and its role in the nutrition-based management of patients with cancer. Proc Nutr Soc. 2008;67:257–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Carstairs V, Morris R. Deprivation and health in Scotland. Health Bull (Edinb). 1990;48:162–75.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Hole DJ, McArdle CS. Impact of socioeconomic deprivation on outcome after surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2002;89:586–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Morgan MY, Ritson B. Alcohol and health: a handbook for students and medical practitioners, 4th edn, London: Medical Council on Alcohol; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Richards CH, Leitch EF, Horgan PG, Anderson JH, McKee RF, McMillan DC. The relationship between patient physiology, the systemic inflammatory response and survival in patients undergoing curative resection of colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer. 2010;103:1356–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Owens WD, Felts JA, Spitznagel EL, Jr. ASA physical status classifications: a study of consistency of ratings. Anesthesiology. 1978;49:239–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Haynes SR, Lawler PG. An assessment of the consistency of ASA physical status classification allocation. Anaesthesia. 1995;50:195–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Steyerberg EW, Neville BA, Koppert LB, Lemmens VE, Tilanus HW, Coebergh JW, et al. Surgical mortality in patients with esophageal cancer: development and validation of a simple risk score. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:4277–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Internullo E, Moons J, Nafteux P, Coosemans W, Decker G, De Leyn P, et al. Outcome after esophagectomy for cancer of the esophagus and GEJ in patients aged over 75 years. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008;33:1096–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Daley J, Khuri SF, Henderson W, Hur K, Gibbs JO, Barbour G, et al. Risk adjustment of the postoperative morbidity rate for the comparative assessment of the quality of surgical care: results of the National Veterans Affairs Surgical Risk Study. J Am Coll Surg. 1997;185:328–40.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Luna A, Rebasa P, Navarro S, Montmany S, Coroleu D, Cabrol J, et al. An evaluation of morbidity and mortality in oncologic gastric surgery with the application of POSSUM, P-POSSUM, and O-POSSUM. World J Surg. 2009;33:1889–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Vashist YK, Loos J, Dedow J, Tachezy M, Uzunoglu G, Kutup A, et al. Glasgow prognostic score is a predictor of perioperative and long-term outcome in patients with only surgically treated esophageal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:1130–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Roxburgh CS, McMillan DC. Role of systemic inflammatory response in predicting survival in patients with primary operable cancer. Future Oncol. 2010;6:149–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Proctor MJ, Morrison DS, Talwar D, Balmer SM, O’Reilly DS, Foulis AK, et al. An inflammation-based prognostic score (mGPS) predicts cancer survival independent of tumour site: a Glasgow Inflammation Outcome Study. Br J Cancer. 2011;104:726–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sumanta Dutta MRCS.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dutta, S., Al-Mrabt, N.M., Fullarton, G.M. et al. A Comparison of POSSUM and GPS Models in the Prediction of Post-operative Outcome in Patients Undergoing Oesophago-gastric Cancer Resection. Ann Surg Oncol 18, 2808–2817 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-011-1676-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-011-1676-5

Keywords

Navigation