Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prognostic Impact of Perioperative Serum CA 19-9 Levels in Patients with Resectable Pancreatic Cancer

  • Pancreatic Tumors
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Pancreatic cancer is one of the most deadly cancers, and serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) level has been reported to be a useful prognostic marker in pancreatic cancer. The purpose of this study was to determine which prognostic factor (preoperative or postoperative serum CA19-9 level) is more useful.

Methods

Pre- and postoperative serum CA19-9 levels were measured in 109 patients who underwent surgical resection for pancreatic cancer between 1998 and 2009, and their relationships to clinicopathological factors and overall survival were analyzed with univariate and multivariate methods.

Results

In univariate analysis, tumor location (P = 0.019), postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (P < 0.001), residual tumor factor status (P < 0.001), UICC pT stage (P = 0.004), lymph node metastasis (P = 0.015), and UICC final stage (P = 0.015) were significantly associated with overall survival. Differences in overall survival were significant between groups divided on the basis of four postoperative CA19-9 cutoff values (37, 100, 200, and 500 U/ml) but not significant between groups divided on the basis of the same four preoperative CA19-9 cutoff values. Pre- to postoperative increase in CA19-9 level also was significantly associated with poor prognosis. In multivariate analysis, postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (hazard ratio, 1.59; P = 0.004) and postoperative CA19-9 cutoff value of 37 U/ml (HR, 1.64; P = 0.004) remained independent predictors of prognosis.

Conclusions

Postoperative CA19-9 level is a better prognostic factor than preoperative CA19-9 level, and curative surgery for resectable pancreatic cancer should be tried regardless of the preoperative CA19-9 level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Winter JM, Cameron JL, Campbell KA, et al. 1423 pancreaticoduodenectomies for pancreatic cancer: a single-institution experience. J Gastrointest Surg. 2006;10:1199–210; discussion 210–1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Shimada K, Sakamoto Y, Sano T, Kosuge T. Prognostic factors after distal pancreatectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for invasive pancreatic adenocarcinoma of the body and tail. Surgery. 2006;139:288–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Moon HJ, An JY, Heo JS, Choi SH, Joh JW, Kim YI. Predicting survival after surgical resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Pancreas. 2006;32:37–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Brown KM, Domin C, Aranha GV, Yong S, Shoup M. Increased preoperative platelet count is associated with decreased survival after resection for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Am J Surg. 2005;189:278–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wagner M, Redaelli C, Lietz M, Seiler CA, Friess H, Buchler MW. Curative resection is the single most important factor determining outcome in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Br J Surg. 2004;91:586–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kuhlmann KF, de Castro SM, Wesseling JG, et al. Surgical treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma; actual survival and prognostic factors in 343 patients. Eur J Cancer. 2004;40:549–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Traverso LW. Pancreatic cancer: surgery alone is not sufficient. Surg Endosc. 2006;20(Suppl 2):S446–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Oettle H, Post S, Neuhaus P, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine vs observation in patients undergoing curative-intent resection of pancreatic cancer: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2007;297:267–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Neoptolemos JP, Stocken DD, Friess H, et al. A randomized trial of chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy after resection of pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:1200–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kosuge T, Kiuchi T, Mukai K, Kakizoe T. A multicenter randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effect of adjuvant cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil therapy after curative resection in cases of pancreatic cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2006;36:159–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Takada T, Amano H, Yasuda H, et al. Is postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy useful for gallbladder carcinoma? A phase III multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial in patients with resected pancreaticobiliary carcinoma. Cancer. 2002;95:1685–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Murakami Y, Uemura K, Sudo T, et al. Impact of adjuvant gemcitabine plus S-1 chemotherapy after surgical resection for adenocarcinoma of the body or tail of the pancreas. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13:85–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Murakami Y, Uemura K, Sudo T, et al. Adjuvant gemcitabine plus S-1 chemotherapy after surgical resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg. 2008;195:757–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Murakami Y, Uemura K, Sudo T, et al. Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy improves survival after surgical resection for pancreatic carcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12:534–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Berger AC, Meszoely IM, Ross EA, Watson JC, Hoffman JP. Undetectable preoperative levels of serum CA 19-9 correlate with improved survival for patients with resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2004;11:644–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Berger AC, Garcia M Jr, Hoffman JP, et al. Postresection CA 19-9 predicts overall survival in patients with pancreatic cancer treated with adjuvant chemoradiation: a prospective validation by RTOG 9704. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:5918–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ferrone CR, Finkelstein DM, Thayer SP, Muzikansky A, Fernandez-del Castillo C, Warshaw AL. Perioperative CA19-9 levels can predict stage and survival in patients with resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:2897–902.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kang CM, Kim JY, Choi GH, et al. The use of adjusted preoperative CA 19-9 to predict the recurrence of resectable pancreatic cancer. J Surg Res. 2007;140:31–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kinsella TJ, Seo Y, Willis J, et al. The impact of resection margin status and postoperative CA19-9 levels on survival and patterns of recurrence after postoperative high-dose radiotherapy with 5-FU-based concurrent chemotherapy for resectable pancreatic cancer. Am J Clin Oncol. 2008;31:446–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Murakami Y, Uemura K, Ohge H, Hayashidani Y, Sudo T, Sueda T. Intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasms and mucinous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas differentiated by ovarian-type stroma. Surgery. 2006;140:448–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Steinberg W. The clinical utility of the CA 19-9 tumor-associated antigen. Am J Gastroenterol. 1990;85:350–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tempero MA, Uchida E, Takasaki H, Burnett DA, Steplewski Z, Pour PM. Relationship of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 and Lewis antigens in pancreatic cancer. Cancer Res. 1987;47:5501–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. (UICC) International Union Against Cancer. TMN classification of malignant tumors. 6th ed. New York: Wiley-Liss; 2002.

  24. Waraya M, Yamashita K, Katagiri H, et al. Preoperative serum CA19-9 and dissected peripancreatic tissue margin as determiners of long-term survival in pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:1231–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Fujioka S, Misawa T, Okamoto T, et al. Preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels for the evaluation of curability and resectability in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2007;14:539–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ong SL, Garcea G, Thomasset SC, et al. Surrogate markers of resectability in patients undergoing exploration of potentially resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12:1068–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Smith RA, Bosonnet L, Ghaneh P, et al. The platelet-lymphocyte ratio improves the predictive value of serum CA19-9 levels in determining patient selection for staging laparoscopy in suspected periampullary cancer. Surgery. 2008;143:658–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ko AH, Hwang J, Venook AP, Abbruzzese JL, Bergsland EK, Tempero MA. Serum CA19-9 response as a surrogate for clinical outcome in patients receiving fixed-dose rate gemcitabine for advanced pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer. 2005;93:195–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wong D, Ko AH, Hwang J, Venook AP, Bergsland EK, Tempero MA. Serum CA19-9 decline compared to radiographic response as a surrogate for clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer receiving chemotherapy. Pancreas. 2008;37:269–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lundin J, Roberts PJ, Kuusela P, Haglund C. The prognostic value of preoperative serum levels of CA 19-9 and CEA in patients with pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer. 1994;69:515–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Nakao A, Oshima K, Nomoto S, et al. Clinical usefulness of CA-19-9 in pancreatic carcinoma. Semin Surg Oncol. 1998;15:15–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Beretta E, Malesci A, Zerbi A, et al. Serum CA 19-9 in the postsurgical follow-up of patients with pancreatic cancer. Cancer. 1987;60:2428–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Montgomery RC, Hoffman JP, Riley LB, Rogatko A, Ridge JA, Eisenberg BL. Prediction of recurrence and survival by post-resection CA 19-9 values in patients with adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Ann Surg Oncol. 1997;4:551–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ni XG, Bai XF, Mao YL, et al. The clinical value of serum CEA, CA19-9, and CA242 in the diagnosis and prognosis of pancreatic cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2005;31:164–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhang S, Wang YM, Sun CD, Lu Y, Wu LQ. Clinical value of serum CA19-9 levels in evaluating resectability of pancreatic carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14:3750–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Maithel SK, Maloney S, Winston C, et al. Preoperative CA 19-9 and the yield of staging laparoscopy in patients with radiographically resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:3512–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Schlieman MG, Ho HS, Bold RJ (2003) Utility of tumor markers in determining resectability of pancreatic cancer. Arch Surg 138:951–5; discussion 5–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Safi F, Schlosser W, Falkenreck S, Beger HG. Prognostic value of CA 19-9 serum course in pancreatic cancer. Hepatogastroenterology. 1998;45:253–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Yoshimasu T, Maebeya S, Suzuma T, et al. Disappearance curves for tumor markers after resection of intrathoracic malignancies. Int J Biol Markers. 1999;14:99–105.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naru Kondo MD.

Additional information

Disclosure of commercial interest: None of the authors have any commercial interest in the subject of this study and received any financial or material support for this study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kondo, N., Murakami, Y., Uemura, K. et al. Prognostic Impact of Perioperative Serum CA 19-9 Levels in Patients with Resectable Pancreatic Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 17, 2321–2329 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-010-1033-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-010-1033-0

Keywords

Navigation