Skip to main content
Log in

Differential Presentations, Clinical Courses, and Survivals of Osteosarcomas of the Proximal Humerus over Other Extremity Locations

  • Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcomas
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Although there are controversies about the prognosis of proximal humeral osteosarcoma, our previous study showed poor survival in those patients. In the present study, we undertook to determine why this site is associated with a poor outcome and to identify the clinicopathologic variables involved.

Methods

The study cohort consisted of 36 proximal humeral and 341 other extremity American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage II osteosarcomas. We examined the clinicopathologic differences between these osteosarcomas. The prognostic significances of factors identified for a proximal humoral location were evaluated by survival analysis of all 377 patients.

Results

Patients with a proximal humeral osteosarcoma had the following characteristics: a higher incidence of pathologic fracture (P < 0.01), an osteolytic pattern on plain radiographs (P < 0.01), an unusual pathological subtype (P = 0.01), poor histologic response (P < 0.01), and an increased tumor-volume ratio (TVR) (P < 0.01). Multivariate analysis revealed that a large tumor volume (P < 0.01), an increase in tumor volume (P < 0.01), and a poor histologic response to preoperative chemotherapy (P < 0.01) independently predicted shorter metastasis-free survival.

Conclusions

The association between proximal humeral osteosarcoma and poor survival could be the result of unresponsiveness to chemotherapy, which was expressed by a tumor volume increase in our patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bacci G, Longhi A, Versari M, Mercuri M, Briccoli A, Picci P. Prognostic factors for osteosarcoma of the extremity treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy: 15-year experience in 789 patients treated at a single institution. Cancer. 2006;106:1154–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Carsi B, Rock MG. Primary osteosarcoma in adults older than 40 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;391:53–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bieling P, Rehan N, Winkler P, et al. Tumor size and prognosis in aggressively treated osteosarcoma. J Clin Oncol. 1996;14:848–58.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bielack SS, Kempf-Bielack B, Delling G, et al. Prognostic factors in high-grade osteosarcoma of the extremities or trunk: an analysis of 1,702 patients treated on neoadjuvant cooperative osteosarcoma study group protocols. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:776–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bacci G, Longhi A, Ferrari S, Briccoli A, Donati D, De Paolis M, Versari M. Prognostic significance of serum lactate dehydrogenase in osteosarcoma of the extremity: experience at Rizzoli on 1421 patients treated over the last 30 years. Tumori. 2004;90:478–84.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bacci G, Longhi A, Ferrari S, et al. Prognostic significance of serum alkaline phosphatase in osteosarcoma of the extremity treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy: recent experience at Rizzoli Institute. Oncol Rep. 2002;9:171–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Davis AM, Bell RS, Goodwin PJ. Prognostic factors in osteosarcoma: a critical review. J Clin Oncol. 1994;12:423–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim MS, Lee SY, Cho WH, et al. Effect of increases in tumor volume after neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the outcome of stage II osteosarcoma regardless of histological response. J Orthop Sci. 2009;14:292–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bacci G, Ferrari S, Mercuri M, et al. Predictive factors for local recurrence in osteosarcoma: 540 patients with extremity tumors followed for minimum 2.5 years after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Acta Orthop Scand. 1998;69:230–36.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bramer JA, van Linge JH, Grimer RJ, Scholten RJ. Prognostic factors in localized extremity osteosarcoma: A systematic review. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2009; [Epub ahead of print].

  11. Kim MS, Lee SY, Lee TR, et al. Prognostic nomogram for predicting the 5-year probability of developing metastasis after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and definitive surgery for AJCC stage II extremity osteosarcoma. Ann Oncol. 2009;20:955–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim MS, Lee SY, Cho WH, et al. An examination of the efficacy of the 8 cm maximal tumor diameter cutoff for the subdivision of AJCC stage II osteosarcoma patients. J Surg Oncol. 2008;98:427–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim MS, Cho WH, Song WS, Lee SY, Jeon DG. time dependency of prognostic factors in patients with stage II osteosarcomas. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;463:157–65.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Enneking WF, Spanier SS, Goodman MA. A system for the surgical staging of musculoskeletal sarcoma. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980;153:106–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rosen G, Marcove RC, Huvos AG, et al. Primary osteogenic sarcoma: eight-year experience with adjuvant chemotherapy. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 1983;106(Suppl):55–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim MS, Lee SY, Cho WH, et al. Tumor necrosis rate adjusted by tumor volume change is a better predictor of survival of localized osteosarcoma patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:906–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gobel V, Jurgens H, Etspuler G, Kemperdick H, Jungblut RM, Stienen U, et al. Prognostic significance of tumor volume in localized Ewing’s sarcoma of bone in children and adolescents. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 1987;113:187–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Holscher HC, Bloem JL, Vanel D, Hermans J, Nooy MA, Taminiau AH, et al. Osteosarcoma: chemotherapy-induced changes at MR imaging. Radiology. 1992;182:839–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kawai A, Healey JH, Boland PJ, Lin PP, Huvos AG, Meyers PA. Prognostic factors for patients with sarcomas of the pelvic bones. Cancer. 1998;82:851–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ozaki T, Flege S, Kevric M, et al. Osteosarcoma of the pelvis: experience of the Cooperative Osteosarcoma Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:334–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ozaki T, Flege S, Liljenqvist U, et al. Osteosarcoma of the spine: experience of the Cooperative Osteosarcoma Study Group. Cancer. 2002;94:1069–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fuchs B, Hoekzema N, Larson DR, Inwards CY, Sim FH. Osteosarcoma of the pelvis: outcome analysis of surgical treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:510–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lawrence JA, Babyn PS, Chan HS, Thorner PS, Pron GE, Krajbich IJ. Extremity osteosarcoma in childhood: prognostic value of radiologic imaging. Radiology. 1993;189:43–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Shin KH, Moon SH, Suh JS, Yang WI. Tumor volume change as a predictor of chemotherapeutic response in osteosarcoma. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000;376:200–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kim MS, Lee SY, Lee TR, et al. Prognosticjeon effect of pathologic fracture in localized osteosarcoma: a cohort/case controlled study at a single institute. J Surg Oncol. 2009;100:233–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bramer JA, Abudu AA, Grimer RJ, Carter SR, Tillman RM. Do pathological fractures influence survival and local recurrence rate in bony sarcomas? Eur J Cancer. 2007;43:1944–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Scully SP, Ghert MA, Zurakowski D, Thompson RC, Gebhardt MC. Pathologic fracture in osteosarcoma : prognostic importance and treatment implications. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84-A:49–57.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bacci G, Ferrari S, Longhi A, et al. Nonmetastatic osteosarcoma of the extremity with pathologic fracture at presentation: local and systemic control by amputation or limb salvage after preoperative chemotherapy. Acta Orthop Scand. 2003;74:449–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dae-Geun Jeon MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cho, W.H., Song, W.S., Jeon, DG. et al. Differential Presentations, Clinical Courses, and Survivals of Osteosarcomas of the Proximal Humerus over Other Extremity Locations. Ann Surg Oncol 17, 702–708 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-009-0825-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-009-0825-6

Keywords

Navigation