Skip to main content
Log in

Clinicopathologic Characteristics and Surgical Outcomes of Mucinous Gastric Carcinoma

  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The clinicopathologic characteristics of mucinous gastric carcinoma (MGC), an uncommon subtype of gastric carcinoma, were examined by comparing 45 MGC and 1255 non-MGC (NGC) cases.

Methods

Of 1300 gastric cancer patients, 1184 (early, n = 568; advanced, n = 616) underwent potentially curative or palliative resection. Age, sex, tumor location, tumor diameter, macroscopic appearance, depth of invasion, lymph node metastasis, lymphatic invasion, and venous invasion were monitored.

Results

In all registered patients, MGC patients’ characteristics were as follows: advanced-stage disease (P = .0293), macroscopically ill-defined tumors (P = .0051), deeper invasion (P = .0046), and more lymph node involvement (P = .0008). Although there were no significant differences between curatively resected MGC and NGC advanced-cancer patients, in curatively resected early-cancer patients, depth of invasion (P = .0060) and lymphatic invasion (P = .0374) were significantly different. Survival time in all registered patients was shorter for MGC patients (P = .0489). Survival of curatively resected advanced and early gastric cancer patients was not significantly different. Age, macroscopic appearance, tumor diameter, depth of invasion, lymph node metastasis, and curability, but not histological type, were independent prognostic factors in all registered patients. Histological type also did not influence prognosis after curative resection. MGC patients had significantly more metastatic lymph nodes and lymphatic and venous invasion. Survival was significantly different (P = .0450) between all patients with undifferentiated and differentiated MGC, but not in curatively resected patients.

Conclusions

MGC patients’ poor prognosis correlates with advanced disease at diagnosis. Therapeutic and follow-up plans after curative resected MGC and NGC should remain the same, possibly with alterations according to the former’s histological subtype.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hoerr SO, Hazard JB, Bailey D. Prognosis in carcinoma of the stomach in relation to the microscopic type. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1966;122:485–94

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Brander WL, Heedlam PRG, Morgan AD. Indolent mucoid carcinoma of stomach. J Clin Pathol 1974;27:536–41

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma, 2nd English edition. Gastric Cancer 1998;1:10–24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lauren P. The two histologic main types of gastric carcinoma: diffuse and so-called intestinal-type carcinoma: an attempt at a histo-clinical classification. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand 1965;64:31–49

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ming SC. Gastric carcinoma: a pathobiological classification. Cancer 1977;39:2475–85

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Adachi Y, Mori M, Kido A, Shimono R, Maehara Y, Sugimachi K. A clinicopathological study of mucinous gastric carcinoma. Cancer 1992;69:866–71

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kawamura H, Kondo Y, Osawa S. A clinicopathological study of mucinous adenocarcinoma of the stomach. Gastric Cancer 2001;4:83–6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Woo LS, Kim DY, Kin YJ, Kim SK. Clinicopathological features of mucinous gastric carcinoma. Dig Surg 2002;19:286–90

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yasuda K, Adachi Y, Shiraishi N, Yamaguchi K, Shiromizu A, Kitano S. Pathology and prognosis of mucinous gastric carcinoma. J Surg Oncol 2001;76:272–7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Adachi Y, Yasuda K, Inomata M, Shiraishi N, Kitano S, Sugimachi K. Clinicopathologic study of early-stage mucinous gastric carcinoma. Cancer 2001;91:698–703

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wu CY, Yeh HZ, Shih RTP, Chen GH. A clinicopathological study of mucinous gastric carcinoma including multivariate analysis. Cancer 1998;83:1312–8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Yasuda K, Shiraishi N, Inomata M, Shirosita H, Ishikawa K, Kitano S. Clinicopathologic characteristics of early-stage mucinous gastric carcinoma. J Clin Gastroenterol 2004;38:507–11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chikara Kunisaki MD, PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kunisaki, C., Akiyama, H., Nomura, M. et al. Clinicopathologic Characteristics and Surgical Outcomes of Mucinous Gastric Carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 13, 836–842 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1245/ASO.2006.03.077

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/ASO.2006.03.077

Keywords

Navigation