Skip to main content
Log in

Hepatic and Extrahepatic Colorectal Metastases: When Resectable, Their Localization Does Not Matter, But Their Total Number Has a Prognostic Effect

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The presence of extrahepatic disease (EHD) is considered a contraindication to hepatectomy in patients with colorectal liver metastases. After resection, the prognosis is based more on the total number of resected metastases (located inside and outside the liver) than on the site of these metastases (only inside the liver or not).

Methods

A total of 308 patients with colorectal cancer underwent hepatectomy, and 84 (27%) also underwent resection of miscellaneous EHD. The study was a prospective data registration and retrospective analysis. When considering the total number of resected metastases, each liver metastasis and each EHD location was counted as one lesion. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed.

Results

The median follow-up was 99 months. The overall 5-year survival rate was 32%. In the multivariate analysis, the total number of metastases (inside or outside the liver) had a greater prognostic value than the criterion “presence or absence of EHD.” Considering the total number of resected metastases (whatever their site), 5-year survival rates were 38% (SD: 4%) in the group with one to three metastases, 29% (SD: 5%) in patients with four to six metastases, and 18% (SD: 5%) in patients with more than six metastases (P = .002). A very simple prognostic score based on sex and the total number of metastases is proposed.

Conclusions

EHD, when resectable, is no longer a contraindication to hepatectomy. More importantly, the total number of the metastases, whatever their location, has a stronger prognostic effect than the site of these metastases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hughes KS, Simon R, Songhorabodi S, et al. Resection of the liver for colorectal carcinoma metastases: a multi-institutional study of indications for resection. Surgery 1988;103:278–88

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nordlinger B, Jaeck D, Guignet M, et al. Résection Chirurgicale des Métastases Hépatiques, Enquête de l’Association Française de Chirurgie. Paris: Springer-Verlag, 1992:141–75

    Google Scholar 

  3. Eckberg H, Transberg KG, Andersson R, et al. Determinants of survival in liver resection for colorectal secondaries. Br J Surg 1986;73:727–31

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cady B, McDermott WV Jr. Major hepatic resection for metachronous metastases from colon cancer. Ann Surg 1985;210:204–9

    Google Scholar 

  5. Foster JH. Survival after liver resection for secondary tumors. Am J Surg 1978;135:389–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Adson MA. The resection of hepatic metastases. Another view. Arch Surg 1989;124:1023–4

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fong Y, Fortner J, Sun RL, Brennan MF, Blumgart LH. Clinical score for predicting recurrence after hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer. Analysis of 1001 consecutive cases. Ann Surg 1999;230:309–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jamison RL, Donohue JH, Nagorney DM, Rosen CB, Harmsen S, Ilstrup DM. Hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer results in cure for some patients. Arch Surg 1997;132:505–11

    Google Scholar 

  9. Scheele J, Stang R, Altendorf-Hofmann A, Paul M. Resection of colorectal metastases. World J Surg 1995;19:59–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Iwatsuki S, Dvorchick I, Madariaga J, et al. Hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma: a proposal of a prognostic scoring system. J Am Coll Surg 1999;189:291–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chu DZ, Lang NP, Thompson C, Osteen PK, Westbrook KC. Peritoneal carcinomatosis in non-gynecologic malignancy. Cancer 1989;63:364–7

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sadeghi B, Arvieux C, Glehen O, et al. Peritoneal carcinomatosis from non-gynecologic malignancies. Multicentric prospective study. Cancer 2000;88:358–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Minagawa M, Makuuchi M, Torzilli G, et al. Extension of the frontiers of surgical indications in the treatment of liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 2000;231:487–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Imamura H, Seyama Y, Kokudo N, et al. Single and multiple resections of multiple hepatic metastases of colorectal origin. Surgery 2004;135:508–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ike H, Shimada H, Ohki S, Togo S, Yamaguchi S, Ichikawa Y. Results of aggressive resection of lung metastases from colorectal carcinoma detected by intensive follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45:468–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Regnard JF, Grunenwald D, Spaggiari L, et al. Surgical treatment of hepatic and pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancers. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;66:214–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Elias D, Ouellet JF, Bellon N, Pignon JP, Pocard M, Lasser P. Extrahepatic disease does not contraindicate hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases. Br J Surg 2003;90:567–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Adam R, Pascal G, Castaing D, et al. Tumor progression while on chemotherapy. A contraindication to liver resection for multiple colorectal metastases? Ann Surg 2004;240:1052–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Elias D, Sideris L, Pocard M, et al. Results of R0 resection for colorectal metastases associated with extrahepatic disease. Ann Surg Oncol 2004;11:274–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sugarbaker PH, Jablonski KH. Prognostic features of 51 colorectal and 130 appendiceal cancer patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis treated by cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Ann Surg 1995;221:124–32

    Google Scholar 

  21. Verwaal VC, van Ruth S, de Bree E, et al. Randomized trial of cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy versus systemic chemotherapy and palliative surgery in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 2003;21:3737–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Elias D, Sideris L, Pocard M, et al. Efficacy of intraperitoneal chemohyperthermia with oxaliplatin in colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis. Preliminary results in 24 patients. Ann Oncol 2004;15:781–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Elias D, Ouellet JF. Intraperitoneal chemohyperthermia: rationale, technique, indications, and results. Surg Oncol Clin North Am 2001;10:915–33

    Google Scholar 

  24. Filder IJ. Seed and soil revisited. Contribution of the organ microenvironment to cancer metastases. Surg Oncol Clin North Am 2001;10:257–69

    Google Scholar 

  25. Imamura H, Shimada R, Kubota M, et al. Preoperative portal vein embolization: an audit of 84 patients. Hepatology 1999;29:1099–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Roche A, Soyer P, Elias D, Breittmayer F, Gad M, Rougier PH. Pre-operative portal vein embolisation for hepatic metastases. J Intervent Radiol 1991;6:63–6

    Google Scholar 

  27. Elias D, Desruennes E, Lasser PH. Prolonged intermittent clamping of the portal triad during hepatectomy. Br J Surg 1991;78:42–4

    Google Scholar 

  28. Elias D, Lasser P, Debaene B, et al. Intermittent exclusion of the liver without vena cava clamping during major hepatectomy. Br J Surg 1995;82:1535–9

    Google Scholar 

  29. Elias D, Delperro JR, Sideris L, et al. Treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer: impact of complete cytoreductive surgery and difficulties in conducting randomised trials. Ann Surg Oncol 2004;11:518–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Elias D, Dube P, Bonvalot S, et al. Treatment of liver metastases with moderate peritoneal carcinomatosis by hepatectomy and cytoreductive surgery followed by immediate postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Feasibility and preliminary results. Hepatogastroenterology 1999;46:360–3

    Google Scholar 

  31. Elias D, Bonnay M, Puizillou JM, et al. Heated intra-operative intraperitoneal oxaliplatin after complete resection of peritoneal carcinomatosis: pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution. Ann Oncol 2002;13:267–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Elias D, El Otmany A, Bonnay M, et al. Human pharmacokinetic study of heated intraperitoneal oxaliplatin in increasingly hypotonic solutions after complete resection of peritoneal carcinomatosis. Oncology 2002;63:346–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Elias D, Matsuhisa T, Sideris L, et al. Heated intra-operative intraperitoneal oxaliplatin plus irinotecan after complete resection of peritoneal carcinomatosis: pharmacokinetics, tissue distribution and tolerance. Ann Oncol 2004;15:1558–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Glehen O, Kwiatkowski F, Sugarbaker PH, et al. Cytoreductive surgery combined with intraperitoneal chemotherapy for management of peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer: a multi-institutional study. J Clin Oncol 2004;22:3284–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Elias D. Peritoneal carcinomatosis or liver metastases from colorectal cancer: similar standards for a curative surgery? Ann Surg Oncol 2004;11:122–3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Tsavellas G, Patel H, Aleen-Mersh TG. Detection and clinical significance of occult tumour cells in colorectal cancer. Review. Br J Surg 2001;88:1307–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Sadahiro S, Suzuki T, Tokunaga N, et al. Detection of tumor cells in the portal and peripheral blood of patients with colorectal carcinoma using competitive reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. Cancer 2001;92:1251–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Pollock RE, Roth JA. Cancer-induced immunosuppression: implications for therapy? Semin Surg Oncol 1989;5:414–9

    Google Scholar 

  39. Kavanaugh DY, Carbone DP. Immunologic dysfunction in cancer. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 1996;10:927–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Muss HB. Chemotherapy of Gynecologic Cancer. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley-Liss, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  41. IMPACT (International Multicentre Pooled Analysis of Colon Cancer Trials). Efficacy of adjuvant fluorouracil and folinic acid in colon cancer. Lancet 1995;345:939–44

    Google Scholar 

  42. Gill S, Loprinzi CL, Sargent DJ, et al. Pooled analysis of fluorouracil-based adjuvant therapy for stage II and III colon cancer: who benefits and by how much? J Clin Oncol 2004;22:1797–806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Allen PJ, Kemeny N, Jarnagin W, et al. Importance of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients undergoing resection of synchronous colorectal liver metastases. J Gastrointest Surg 2003;7:109–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dominique Elias MD, PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Elias, D., Liberale, G., Vernerey, D. et al. Hepatic and Extrahepatic Colorectal Metastases: When Resectable, Their Localization Does Not Matter, But Their Total Number Has a Prognostic Effect. Ann Surg Oncol 12, 900–909 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1245/ASO.2005.01.010

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/ASO.2005.01.010

Keywords

Navigation