Elsevier

The Breast

Volume 11, Issue 5, October 2002, Pages 442-448
The Breast

Original Article
Natural history of node-negative breast cancer: are conventional prognostic factors predictors of time to relapse?

https://doi.org/10.1054/brst.2002.0462Get rights and content

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine a subpopulation of node-negative breast cancer patients at high risk of metastases and to analyse the relationship between conventional prognostic factors and the onset of metastatic disease. Patients with node-negative breast cancer, who were not receiving systemic adjuvant therapy, were prospectively enrolled into a multicentre study. We studied the onset of metastatic disease in relation to family history, age, and tumour characteristics of 2683 registered patients, 2213 were available for analysis. Median follow-up was 100 months. Metastatic disease-free survival was 88% at 5 years and 80% at 10 years. The two strongest prognostic factors in a multivariate analysis tumour Scraff, Bloom and Richardson (SBR) grade (P<0.0001) and size (P<0.02), were used to classify patients into three groups with different risks of relapse at 10 years: (1) lowest (8.4%) risk: SBR I and ≤1 cm; (2) intermediate (20%) risk: SBR I and >1 cm or SBR II or SBR III and ≤2 cm; (3) highest (32%) risk: SBR II or SBR III and >2 cm. A peak in the incidence of metastases was noted between 2 and 4 years, and a nadir between 6 and 8 years, after surgery. SBR grade is a highly predictive factor in node-negative breast cancer. The time course of the appearance of metastases is not linear. Prognostic factors are related to the height of an early peak in the occurrence of metastases rather than to the timing of this peak.

References (39)

  • B Fisher et al.

    Relative worth of estrogen or progesterone receptor and pathologic characteristics of differentiation as indicator of prognosis in node negative breast cancer patients: findings from National Surgical adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol B-06

    J Clin Oncol

    (1988)
  • HO Adami et al.

    Age at first primary as a determinant of the incidence of bilateral breast cancer. Cumulative and relative risks in a population based case-control study

    Cancer

    (1985)
  • BL Fowble et al.

    The influence of young age on outcome in early stage breast cancer

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (1994)
  • TG Karrison et al.

    Dormancy of mammary carcinoma after mastectomy

    JNCI

    (1999)
  • P Valagussa et al.

    Patterns of relapse and survival following radical mastectomy. Analysis of 716 consecutive patients

    Cancer

    (1978)
  • F Rank et al.

    Histologic malignancy grading of invasive ductal breast carcinoma. A regression analysis of prognostic factors in low-risk carcinomas from a multicenter trial

    Cancer

    (1987)
  • F Clayton

    Pathological correlates of survival in 378 lymph node-negative infiltrating ductal breast carcinomas. Mitotic count is the best single predictor

    Cancer

    (1991)
  • V Le Doussal et al.

    Nuclear characteristics as indicators of prognosis in node negative breast cancer patients

    Breast Cancer Res Treat

    (1989)
  • RA Huseby et al.

    Node-negative breast cancer treated by modified radical mastectomy without adjuvant therapies: variables associated with disease recurrence and survivorship

    J Clin Oncol

    (1988)
  • Cited by (20)

    • Metastasis-free interval in breast cancer patients: Thirty-year trends and time dependency of prognostic factors. A retrospective analysis based on a single institution experience

      2018, Breast
      Citation Excerpt :

      Among all the variables characterizing node disease, only LNR appeared as a strong independent prognostic factor in our multivariate analysis [6]. Previous studies have already established that positive lymph nodes represent the most important prognostic factor of survival in breast cancer patients and that the worse outcome is directly correlated with the number of positive lymph nodes [30–32]. Even if the number of positive lymph nodes is significant, whenever LNR is also introduced in the model, it is only the LNR that appears as a strong independent prognostic factor [33].

    • Quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient measurement obtained by 3.0 Tesla MRI as a potential noninvasive marker of tumor aggressiveness in breast cancer

      2016, European Journal of Radiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      In LN negative patients, the presence of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) has been reported to adversely impact prognosis because patients with positive LVI had a higher rate of distant metastases, increased local recurrence rate after breast conservation therapy and a higher mortality rate [5,11]. Studies have also reported LVI as a possible independent prognostic factor [12,13]. However, due to limited sampling, preoperative assessment of LVI status of a tumor by core-biopsy is difficult.

    • Minimal and small size invasive breast cancer with no axillary lymph node involvement: The need for tailored adjuvant therapies

      2004, Annals of Oncology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Controversy regarding the clinical algorithm for patients with small tumors is related to the limited information available on their prognosis [17]. Studies published reported a long-term DFS ranging between 79% and 98% [18–21]. Factors related to good prognosis were low grade [19, 20], old age [21, 22] and ER-negative disease [18, 21].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    f1

    Address correspondence to: Dr Thierry Delozier, Service de Radiotherapie, Centre François Baclesse, Route de Lion/mer, B.P. 5026, F-14076 CAEN Cedex 5, France. Tel.: +33 231 45 50 50; Fax: +33 231 45 50 57; E-mail: [email protected]

    View full text