Abstract
The aim of this study was to analyse the impact of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), thymidylate synthase (TS), dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), thymidine phosphorylase (TP), aurora kinase (ARK) A/B, and excision repair cross-complementing gene 1 (ERCC1) on the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin (FP) after curative gastric resection. Normal and cancer tissue were separately obtained from gastrectomy samples of 153 patients with AJCC stage III–IV (M0) who subsequently treated with adjuvant FP chemotherapy. TS, DPD, TP, ERCC1, and ARK proteins were measured by immunohistochemistry (IHC). EGFR expression was investigated using a standardized IHC with the EGFR PharmDx assay. Amplification of EGFR gene was analysed using fluorescent in situ hybridisation (FISH). In multivariate analysis, stage, ratio of positive to removed lymph nodes, and EGFR expression were significant prognostic factors for overall survival. Patients with higher EGFR expression had better overall survival than those with lower expression (relative risk: 0.475 (95% confidence interval, 0.282–0.791, P=0.005). Low EGFR expression might be a predictive marker for relapse in curative resected stage III–IV (M0) gastric cancer patients who received adjuvant FP chemotherapy.
Similar content being viewed by others
Main
The prognostic and predictive roles of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression in gastric cancer remain controversial, and the reported frequencies of EGFR expression are varied in gastric cancer (Gamboa-Dominguez et al, 2004; Matsubara et al, 2008b). In the past, high levels of EGFR were reported as a poor prognostic factor for overall survival (OS) in resectable gastric cancer patients who did not receive chemotherapy (Garcia et al, 2003; Galizia et al, 2007). In contrast, high levels of EGFR were reported as a positive prognostic factor in patient group who received 5-fluorouracil (FU)-containing chemotherapy (Al-Batran et al, 2008a; Matsubara et al, 2008a). Thymidylate synthase (TS), thymidine phosphorylase (TP), and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) are known key enzymes in the metabolism of 5-FU and play a role in resistance to fluoropyrimidines. Thymidylate synthase expression level is presumed to influence response to 5-FU-containing chemotherapy, although TS is not unanimously recognised as a determinant of 5-FU sensitivity (Danenberg, 2004; Park and Lenz, 2006). Thymidine phosphorylase catalyses the reversible phosphorylation of thymidine to thymine 2-deoxyribose-1-phosphate, and increases the conversion of 5-FU to its active metabolites, which play an important role in the inhibition of TS (Tahara et al, 2004). Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase is the initial and rate-limiting enzyme in the catabolism of 5-FU. Although the role of DPD levels in tumours have not been firmly established as a prognostic factor for clinical responsiveness, there is ample evidence that a DPD deficiency is associated with severe toxicity after 5-FU administration (van Kuilenburg, 2004). Expression of the excision repair cross-complementing gene 1 (ERCC1) may play a role in human tumours because it is essential for nucleotide excision repair and influences genomic instability (Chen et al, 2000). For example, low gene expression levels of ERCC1 were associated with a superior response to 5-FU and cisplatin chemotherapy (FP) in primary gastric cancer (Metzger et al, 1998), and ERCC1 protein expression levels were found to be inversely associated with response. Excision repair cross-complementing gene 1 may possibly have a role in the clinical resistance to platinum compounds in gastric cancer patients (Kwon et al, 2007). The Aurora kinases, a family of mitotic regulators, have received much attention as potential targets of new drugs (Warner et al, 2006) and in their association with chemoresistance to platinum agents (Yang et al, 2006). However, none of these markers have previously been evaluated in an adjuvant setting in high-risk gastric cancer patients undergoing potentially curative surgery.
Materials and methods
Study population
From the database of Seoul National University Hospital, we identified a total of 5387 patients who underwent gastrectomy between November 1995 and November 2003. Patients with a diagnosis of histologically proven gastric cancer, who received a curative gastrectomy with D2 dissection and adjuvant chemotherapy consisting of 5-FU and cisplatin were identified. Cisplatin (60 mg m−2 as 15 min i.v. infusion) followed by 5-FU (1200 mg m−2 as 12 h continuous i.v. infusion for 4 days) was given in 21-day cycles. The following eligibility criteria were used for patients’ enrollment: age <75 years; free from distant metastatic disease; stages IIIA, IIIB, and IV (only non-metastatic cases, T4 N1-3 and T1-3 N3; AJCC Cancer Staging, 6th edition); no prior chemotherapy or radiotherapy; World Health Organisation (WHO) performance status ⩽2; adequate baseline organ function, defined as WBC count ⩾4000 cells per ml, platelet count ⩾100 000 cells per ml, serum bilirubin level ⩽1.5 mg ml−1, serum creatinine level ⩽2.0 mg/100 ml, serum albumin level ⩾3.0 mg/100 ml, no severe uncontrolled comorbidities (e.g., myocardial infarction in the last 12 months); no second malignancies; and informed consent.
Patient follow-up
In the absence of symptoms, physical examination was performed every 3–4 months for 5 consecutive years. Follow-up assessment consisted of physical examination, a complete blood count, liver function test, chest radiography, and abdominal ultrasound or CT scan, every 3–6 months for 5 years. Toxicities were graded according to NCI-CTC version 2. The site and date of the first relapse and the date of death, if the patient died, were recorded. Survival was calculated from beginning of surgery until the last follow-up or death from any cause; patients who were alive at the last follow-up were censored at that time. Patients who were taken off study or who died before progression were censored at the time when they were taken off from the study. Survival data were confirmed either by medical records or by the death reports from the Korea Central Cancer Registry.
Tissue sampling
Cancerous and adjacent normal tissues were obtained from the surgically resected and paraffin-embedded primary gastric cancer specimens of the patients. Samples were examined histologically for the presence of tumour cells.
Tissue microarray methods
Core tissue biopsy specimens (2 mm in diameter) were obtained from individual paraffin-embedded gastric tumours (donor blocks) and arranged in a new recipient paraffin block (tissue array block) using a trephine apparatus (Superbiochips Laboratories, Seoul, Korea). Each tissue array block contained up to 60 cases, allowing a total of 153 pairs to be contained in six array blocks. An adequate case was defined as one with a tumour occupying more than 10% of the core area. Each block contained an internal control consisting of non-neoplastic gastric mucosa from adjacent tissue. Sections of 4 μm were cut from each tissue array block, deparaffinised, and dehydrated. As shown earlier, staining results obtained from different intratumoural areas in various cancers correspond with each other (Lee et al, 2007), and a core was sampled in each case.
Immunohistochemistry (IHC)
Immunohistochemical staining for TS, TP, and ERCC1 was performed using an ABC method (labelled biotin) after a microwave antigen retrieval process. Mouse monoclonal antibodies of TS, TP, and ERCC1 were obtained from Neomarkers, Fremont, CA, USA. Staining intensity and stained tumour cell percentages were measured. Stained cell percentage was multiplied by the staining intensity (0–3+), which resulted in an IHC score ranging from 0 to 300 for each cell type, as described previously (Ren et al, 2004). Rabbit polyclonal antibodies to ARK-1 and ARK-2 were obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., CA, USA. Immunohistochemical staining for EGFR was performed on the tissue microarray slides using the EGFR PharmDx kit (DAKO Cytomation) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The positive samples were classified further into 1+, 2+, and 3+, based on their staining intensity. The highest staining intensity of all tissue cores from the same tumour was scored as the final immunohistochemical result. Pathologists unaware of clinical outcomes independently scored the immunohistochemical staining. We determined the appropriate cutoff value for the IHC score of TS, TP, and ERCC1 with the highest sensitivity and specificity by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve method. Typical staining intensities for TS, DPD, ERCC1, TP, ARK-1, and ARK-2 are shown in Figure 1.
EGFR fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis
EGFR (7p12) gene amplification was determined using a DNA probe set (LSI EGFR/CEP 7; Vysis, Downers Grove, IL, USA) consisting of a SpectrumOrange-labelled EGFR (locus)-specific probe and a SpectrumGreen-labelled probe that hybridises to the centromeric region of chromosome 7 according to protocols described elsewhere (Mitsui et al, 2007).
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed on a personal computer using SPSS 12.0K for windows (SPSS Inc. Chicago, IL, USA). The survival rate was calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method, and a statistical analysis was performed using log-rank test. Multivariable analysis of prognostic factors was conducted by Cox proportional hazards model; P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Between 1 November 1995 and 30 November 2003, a total of 153 patients were eligible for the study. The demographic characteristics are outlined in Table 1. The group consisted of 108 men (70.6%) and 48 women (29.4%) with a median age of 52.0 (range: 15–72) years. Median follow-up duration was 72.9 months (range: 2.0–135.0 months). Demographic and clinical data are described in our earlier report in detail.
Expression of EGFR, TS, TP, DPD, and ERCC1 proteins
Epidermal growth factor receptor expression using the PharmDx kit revealed a score of 0 in 29 patients (19.3%), 1+ in 56 patients (37.3%), 2+ in 56 patients (37.3%), and 3+ in 9 patients (6.0%). Epidermal growth factor receptor expression had no significant association with clinicopathologic variables, such as age, gender, stage, PS, Lauren's classification, and Borrmann type and differentiation. Fluorescent in situ hybridization analysis of EGFR was evaluable in a total of 135 patients, which showed high polysomy in three patients (2.2%) and amplification in four patients (3.0%). Epidermal growth factor receptor expression had no significant correlation with FISH positivity. The expression levels of TS, TP, and ERCC1, as determined by IHC, in cancer tissue were not significantly different in relapsed and non-relapsed patients. These expression levels were not different between stages. However, expression of TP and ERCC1 was significantly higher in cancerous tissue than in normal tissue (P<0.0001). No significant correlation between TP and ERCC1 levels was found in cancerous and normal tissues. Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase expression levels in cancerous tissues were not significantly different in relapsed and non-relapsed cases; however, DPD levels were significantly lower in cancerous tissue (P<0.0001). We could not analyse the correlation between cancerous and normal tissue DPD levels, because normal tissues expressed DPD with uniform intensity and distribution; ERCC1 expression was positively correlated with EGFR expression (P=0.047, ANOVA test). Expression of ARK1 and ARK2 were positive in 68.1 and 69.3%, respectively.
Prognostic factors
We performed univariate analyses of biomarkers associated with relapse and survival (Table 2). Epidermal growth factor receptor and TP expressions were significant prognostic factor for OS in univariate analysis (Table 2, Figure 2). However, expression of TS and ARK1 were not significantly associated with relapse and survival. Parameters with P-values of ⩽0.10 were included in the multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazards. The positive LN ratio was an independent prognostic marker for both disease-free survival (DFS) and OS. Relapse and survival were significantly influenced by stage, the ratio of invaded, resected lymph nodes, and by the expression of TP, ERCC1, and EGFR (Table 3). Low EGFR expression was an independent biomarker for predicting poor OS in multivariate analysis. The relationship between the coupled expression of TP and EGFR and clinical outcomes are shown in Figure 3A and B. Patients with higher TP and EGFR expression showed longer DFS (26.0 vs 16.0 months, P=0.05) and OS (45.3 vs 23.6 months, P=0.009) than the other patients. After adjustments for stage, LN ratio, and TP expression, EGFR expression was remained as a significant prognostic factor for both DFS and OS (Figure 4A and B). The DFS and OS were not significantly influenced according to the grade of EGFR expression or EGFR amplification or polysomy detected by FISH.
Discussion
Epidermal growth factor receptor expression was a prognostic factor in our study, but the prognostic role of EGFR in gastric cancer needs to be further elucidated. Some reports showed that high levels of EGFR expression are associated with more distant metastasis, more advanced stage, and poorer OS (Garcia et al, 2003; Gamboa-Dominguez et al, 2004; Galizia et al, 2007). In advanced gastric cancer patients treated mainly with 5-FU or cisplatin-based chemotherapy, lower expression of EGFR mRNA than the cutoff value was a strong predictor of poor survival by multivariate analysis (Matsubara et al, 2008a). Interestingly, the authors also showed that high DPD and ERCC1 expressions were significant predictors of poor survival. Another recent report showed that EGFR expression was a positive prognostic factor in patients with AGC (Al-Batran et al, 2008a), which was a retrospective analysis from the phase III trial comparing 5-FU, folinic acid plus either oxaliplatin vs cisplatin (Al-Batran et al, 2008b). There has also been evidence suggesting that cytotoxic chemotherapy is more effective among patients with high EGFR expression than in those with low EGFR expression (Ceppi et al, 2006; Vallbohmer et al, 2006). The prognostic and predictive roles of EGFR expression in gastric cancer thus remain controversial. Differences in EGFR expression among these studies may also be attributed to the lack of an established immunohistochemical scoring system commonly used to evaluate gastric cancer. Other prognostic variables, such as insulin-like growth factor type 1 receptor (Matsubara et al, 2008c) and class I histone deacetylase expression (Weichert et al, 2008) might also have confounding interactions.
In gastric cancer patients, higher TP expression was reported in cancerous tissues compared with the adjacent normal tissues (Maeda et al, 1996; Tanigawa et al, 1996; Kakeji et al, 1999) by IHC and ELISA. These studies indicated that TP expression is closely correlated with cancer invasion, haematogenous metastasis, lymph node metastasis, venous invasion, lymphatic invasion, and microvascular invasion. In our study, IHC scores from cancerous tissue were significantly higher than those of normal tissue. Higher TP expression might be a prognostic marker for OS, but the role of TP expression in gastric cancer also needs to be further elucidated.
Many reports have indicated that DPD activities are unaltered in gastric cancer (Ishikawa et al, 1999; Terashima et al, 2002). However, it was also reported that gastric carcinomas have significantly higher DPD activities than normal mucosa (Nakata et al, 2004). Another report showed that DPD expression in cancer cells, but not in stromal cells, could predict the efficacy of 5-FU chemotherapy in patients with T3 gastric carcinoma (Hisamitsu et al, 2004). In our study, the IHC scores of cancerous tissues were significantly lower than those of normal tissues, and no significant difference was observed between relapsed and non-relapsed patients in terms of IHC scores.
Decreased ERCC1 expression was associated with a superior response to 5-FU/cisplatin in primary intact gastric cancer patients (Metzger et al, 1998). The degree of ERCC1 protein expression was found to be inversely associated with this response, which is potentially relevant to clinical resistance to platinum compounds (Kwon et al, 2007). In patients with curatively resected gastric cancer, it was shown that increased ERCC1 expression was correlated with improved outcome (Baek et al, 2006). In patients with completely resected non-small-cell lung cancer, ERCC1-negative tumours showed greater benefit from cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy compared with ERCC1-positive tumours (Olaussen et al, 2006). Reports concerning ERCC1 in resected lung cancer suggest that ERCC1 overexpression may improve treatment outcome by reducing DNA mutations during cancer progression (Simon et al, 2005; Lee et al, 2008).
In this study, low ERCC1 expression was associated with poor survival, but ERCC1 expression level was also closely associated with EGFR expression level. After multivariate analysis, the impact of ERCC1 on survival disappeared. To our knowledge, the ERCC1 protein expression between cancer and normal tissues has never been compared, although a report suggested that no significant difference exists in ERCC1 mRNA expression (Warnecke-Eberz et al, 2004). Further prospective studies will be needed to resolve this issue.
Earlier studies evaluated the expression of pharmacogenomic markers as a group. For example, patients with low TS, TP, and DPD gene expression showed prolonged survival over patients expressing high levels of these genes (Salonga et al, 2000). The main differences between this and the current study are (1) analysis of mRNA vs protein, (2) colorectal cancer vs gastric cancer, and (3) a metastatic or disseminated setting vs an adjuvant setting. No study has been conducted on the evolution of these pharmacogenomic markers during cancer progression in an adjuvant setting. Therefore, further pharmacogenomic studies on adjuvant treatments are required.
In conclusion, high expression of EGFR might be a good predictive marker of relapse and survival in curatively resected stage III–IV (M0) gastric cancer patients who received adjuvant 5-FU and cisplatin chemotherapy. Both EGFR expression, the coupled expression of TP and EGFR, and the LN ratio might be useful predictive markers for patient survival. On the other hand, there was no relationship in this study between clinical outcome and the pharmacogenetic markers reported in earlier studies, such as TS, DPD, and ERCC1. This suggests that these markers might not correlate with chemosensitivity to the FP treatment in gastric cancer patients. Further investigation is necessary, using prospective analysis of a larger cohort in a randomised controlled trial of adjuvant chemotherapy consisting of fluoropyrimidine and platinum agents.
Change history
16 November 2011
This paper was modified 12 months after initial publication to switch to Creative Commons licence terms, as noted at publication
References
Al-Batran SE, Hartmann JT, Probst S, Schmalenberg H, Hollerbach S, Hofheinz R, Rethwisch V, Seipelt G, Homann N, Wilhelm G, Schuch G, Stoehlmacher J, Derigs HG, Hegewisch-Becker S, Grossmann J, Pauligk C, Atmaca A, Bokemeyer C, Knuth A, Jager E (2008b) Phase III trial in metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma with fluorouracil, leucovorin plus either oxaliplatin or cisplatin: a study of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie. J Clin Oncol 26: 1435–1442
Al-Batran SE, Pauligk C, Wirtz R, Steinmetz K, Probst S, Hartmann JT, Hofheinz R, Homann N, Altmannsberger HM, Petry C, Jäger E (2008a) The expression of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and related molecules and their impact on survival in patients with metastatic gastric cancer receiving first-line chemotherapy: Results from the FLO versus FLP gastric cancer phase III trial of the AIO. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 112, GI Symposium, Orlando, Florida (abstract number 86)
Baek SK, Kim SY, Lee JJ, Kim YW, Yoon HJ, Cho KS (2006) Increased ERCC expression correlates with improved outcome of patients treated with cisplatin as an adjuvant therapy for curatively resected gastric cancer. Cancer Res Treat 38: 19–24
Ceppi P, Volante M, Novello S, Rapa I, Danenberg KD, Danenberg PV, Cambieri A, Selvaggi G, Saviozzi S, Calogero R, Papotti M, Scagliotti GV (2006) ERCC1 and RRM1 gene expressions but not EGFR are predictive of shorter survival in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer treated with cisplatin and gemcitabine. Ann Oncol 17: 1818–1825
Chen P, Wiencke J, Aldape K, Kesler-Diaz A, Miike R, Kelsey K, Lee M, Liu J, Wrensch M (2000) Association of an ERCC1 polymorphism with adult-onset glioma. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 9: 843–847
Danenberg PV (2004) Pharmacogenomics of thymidylate synthase in cancer treatment. Front Biosci 9: 2484–2494
Galizia G, Lieto E, Orditura M, Castellano P, Mura AL, Imperatore V, Pinto M, Zamboli A, De Vita F, Ferraraccio F (2007) Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression is associated with a worse prognosis in gastric cancer patients undergoing curative surgery. World J Surg 31: 1458–1468
Gamboa-Dominguez A, Dominguez-Fonseca C, Quintanilla-Martinez L, Reyes-Gutierrez E, Green D, Angeles-Angeles A, Busch R, Hermannstadter C, Nahrig J, Becker KF, Becker I, Hofler H, Fend F, Luber B (2004) Epidermal growth factor receptor expression correlates with poor survival in gastric adenocarcinoma from Mexican patients: a multivariate analysis using a standardized immunohistochemical detection system. Mod Pathol 17: 579–587
Garcia I, Vizoso F, Martin A, Sanz L, Abdel-Lah O, Raigoso P, Garcia-Muniz JL (2003) Clinical significance of the epidermal growth factor receptor and HER2 receptor in resectable gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 10: 234–241
Hisamitsu K, Tsujitani S, Yamaguchi K, Fukuda K, Konishi I, Kaibara N (2004) Expression of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase in cancer cells but not in stromal cells predicts the efficacy of fluorouracil treatment in patients with gastric carcinoma. Anticancer Res 24: 2495–2501
Ishikawa Y, Kubota T, Otani Y, Watanabe M, Teramoto T, Kumai K, Takechi T, Okabe H, Fukushima M, Kitajima M (1999) Thymidylate synthetase and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase levels in gastric cancer. Anticancer Res 19: 5635–5640
Kakeji Y, Maehara Y, Shibahara K, Hasuda S, Oshiro T, Baba H, Kohnoe S, Sugimachi K (1999) Heterogeneity and clinical role of thymidine phosphorylase activity in gastric cancer. Oncol Rep 6: 1213–1216
Kwon HC, Roh MS, Oh SY, Kim SH, Kim MC, Kim JS, Kim HJ (2007) Prognostic value of expression of ERCC1, thymidylate synthase, and glutathione S-transferase P1 for 5-fluorouracil/oxaliplatin chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer. Ann Oncol 18: 504–509
Lee HS, Cho SB, Lee HE, Kim MA, Kim JH, Park do J, Yang HK, Lee BL, Kim WH (2007) Protein expression profiling and molecular classification of gastric cancer by the tissue array method. Clin Cancer Res 13: 4154–4163
Lee KH, Min HS, Han SW, Oh DY, Lee SH, Kim DW, Im SA, Chung DH, Kim YT, Kim TY, Heo DS, Bang YJ, Sung SW, Kim JH (2008) ERCC1 expression by immunohistochemistry and EGFR mutations in resected non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 60: 401–407
Maeda K, Chung YS, Ogawa Y, Takatsuka S, Kang SM, Ogawa M, Sawada T, Onoda N, Kato Y, Sowa M (1996) Thymidine phosphorylase/platelet-derived endothelial cell growth factor expression associated with hepatic metastasis in gastric carcinoma. Br J Cancer 73: 884–888
Matsubara J, Nishina T, Yamada Y, Moriwaki T, Shimoda T, Kajiwara T, Nakajima TE, Kato K, Hamaguchi T, Shimada Y, Okayama Y, Oka T, Shirao K (2008a) Impacts of excision repair cross-complementing gene 1 (ERCC1), dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, and epidermal growth factor receptor on the outcomes of patients with advanced gastric cancer. Br J Cancer 98: 832–839
Matsubara J, Yamada Y, Hirashima Y, Takahari D, Okita NT, Kato K, Hamaguchi T, Shirao K, Shimada Y, Shimoda T (2008b) Impact of insulin-like growth factor type 1 receptor, epidermal growth factor receptor, and HER2 expressions on outcomes of patients with gastric cancer. Clin Cancer Res 14: 3022–3029
Matsubara J, Yamada Y, Nakajima TE, Kato K, Hamaguchi T, Shirao K, Shimada Y, Shimoda T (2008c) Clinical significance of insulin-like growth factor type 1 receptor and epidermal growth factor receptor in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Oncology 74: 76–83
Metzger R, Leichman CG, Danenberg KD, Danenberg PV, Lenz HJ, Hayashi K, Groshen S, Salonga D, Cohen H, Laine L, Crookes P, Silberman H, Baranda J, Konda B, Leichman L (1998) ERCC1 mRNA levels complement thymidylate synthase mRNA levels in predicting response and survival for gastric cancer patients receiving combination cisplatin and fluorouracil chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 16: 309–316
Mitsui F, Dobashi Y, Imoto I, Inazawa J, Kono K, Fujii H, Ooi A (2007) Non-incidental coamplification of Myc and ERBB2, and Myc and EGFR, in gastric adenocarcinomas. Mod Pathol 20: 622–631
Nakata B, Muguruma K, Yamagata S, Yukimoto K, Maeda K, Nishiguchi Y, Ohira M, Kato Y, Hirakawa K (2004) Differences in dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase activities between gastric and colorectal cancer. Dig Dis Sci 49: 60–64
Olaussen KA, Dunant A, Fouret P, Brambilla E, Andre F, Haddad V, Taranchon E, Filipits M, Pirker R, Popper HH, Stahel R, Sabatier L, Pignon JP, Tursz T, Le Chevalier T, Soria JC (2006) DNA repair by ERCC1 in non-small-cell lung cancer and cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy. N Engl J Med 355: 983–991
Park DJ, Lenz HJ (2006) Determinants of chemosensitivity in gastric cancer. Curr Opin Pharmacol 6: 337–344
Ren H, Tang X, Lee JJ, Feng L, Everett AD, Hong WK, Khuri FR, Mao L (2004) Expression of hepatoma-derived growth factor is a strong prognostic predictor for patients with early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 22: 3230–3237
Salonga D, Danenberg KD, Johnson M, Metzger R, Groshen S, Tsao-Wei DD, Lenz HJ, Leichman CG, Leichman L, Diasio RB, Danenberg PV (2000) Colorectal tumours responding to 5-fluorouracil have low gene expression levels of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, thymidylate synthase, and thymidine phosphorylase. Clin Cancer Res 6: 1322–1327
Simon GR, Sharma S, Cantor A, Smith P, Bepler G (2005) ERCC1 expression is a predictor of survival in resected patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Chest 127: 978–983
Tahara M, Ochiai A, Fujimoto J, Boku N, Yasui W, Ohtsu A, Tahara E, Yoshida S (2004) Expression of thymidylate synthase, thymidine phosphorylase, dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, E2F-1, Bak, Bcl-X, and Bcl-2, and clinical outcomes for gastric cancer patients treated with bolus 5-fluorouracil. Oncol Rep 11: 9–15
Tanigawa N, Amaya H, Matsumura M, Katoh Y, Kitaoka A, Aotake T, Shimomatsuya T, Rosenwasser OA, Iki M (1996) Tumour angiogenesis and expression of thymidine phosphorylase/platelet derived endothelial cell growth factor in human gastric carcinoma. Cancer Lett 108: 281–290
Terashima M, Irinoda T, Fujiwara H, Nakaya T, Takagane A, Abe K, Yonezawa H, Oyama K, Inaba T, Saito K, Takechi T, Fukushima M (2002) Roles of thymidylate synthase and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase in tumour progression and sensitivity to 5-fluorouracil in human gastric cancer. Anticancer Res 22: 761–768
Vallbohmer D, Iqbal S, Yang DY, Rhodes KE, Zhang W, Gordon M, Fazzone W, Schultheis AM, Sherrod AE, Danenberg KD, Lenz HJ (2006) Molecular determinants of irinotecan efficacy. Int J Cancer 119: 2435–2442
van Kuilenburg AB (2004) Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase and the efficacy and toxicity of 5-fluorouracil. Eur J Cancer 40: 939–950
Warnecke-Eberz U, Metzger R, Miyazono F, Baldus SE, Neiss S, Brabender J, Schaefer H, Doerfler W, Bollschweiler E, Dienes HP, Mueller RP, Danenberg PV, Hoelscher AH, Schneider PM (2004) High specificity of quantitative excision repair cross-complementing 1 messenger RNA expression for prediction of minor histopathological response to neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy in esophageal cancer. Clin Cancer Res 10: 3794–3799
Warner SL, Gray PJ, Von Hoff DD (2006) Tubulin-associated drug targets: Aurora kinases, Polo-like kinases, and others. Semin Oncol 33: 436–448
Weichert W, Roske A, Gekeler V, Beckers T, Ebert MP, Pross M, Dietel M, Denkert C, Rocken C (2008) Association of patterns of class I histone deacetylase expression with patient prognosis in gastric cancer: a retrospective analysis. Lancet Oncol 9: 139–148
Yang H, He L, Kruk P, Nicosia SV, Cheng JQ (2006) Aurora-A induces cell survival and chemoresistance by activation of Akt through a p53-dependent manner in ovarian cancer cells. Int J Cancer 119: 2304–2312
Acknowledgements
This study was supported in part by a grant from the Korean Health 21 R&D Project, Ministry of Health and Welfare and Family Affairs, Republic of Korea (03-PJ10-PG13-GD01-0002). This study was presented in part at the 41st American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting, Orlando, Florida, 13–17 May 2005, and the 2006 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium 26–28 January 2006, San Francisco, CA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, JS., Kim, MA., Kim, T. et al. Biomarker analysis in stage III–IV (M0) gastric cancer patients who received curative surgery followed by adjuvant 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin chemotherapy: epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) associated with favourable survival. Br J Cancer 100, 732–738 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604936
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604936
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Predictive and prognostic value of excision repair cross-complementing group 1 in patients with advanced gastric cancer
BJC Reports (2024)
-
ErbB1 and ErbB3 co-over expression as a prognostic factor in gastric cancer
Biological Research (2019)
-
Gene copy number gain of EGFR is a poor prognostic biomarker in gastric cancer: evaluation of 855 patients with bright-field dual in situ hybridization (DISH) method
Gastric Cancer (2016)
-
Advances in the Management of Gastric and Gastroesophageal Cancers
Current Oncology Reports (2016)
-
The prognostic impact of EGFR, ErbB2 and MET gene amplification in human gastric carcinomas as measured by quantitative Real-Time PCR
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology (2015)