Abstract
Autophagy is a conserved pathway that maintains cellular quality control. Extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) controls various aspects of cell physiology including proliferation. Multiple signalling cascades, including ERK, have been shown to regulate autophagy, however whether autophagy proteins (ATG) regulate cell signalling is unknown. Here we show that growth factor exposure increases the interaction of ERK cascade components with ATG proteins in the cytosol and nucleus. ERK and its upstream kinase MEK localize to the extra-luminal face of autophagosomes. ERK2 interacts with ATG proteins via its substrate-binding domains. Deleting Atg7 or Atg5 or blocking LC3 lipidation or ATG5βATG12 conjugation decreases ERK phosphorylation. Conversely, increasing LC3-II availability by silencing the cysteine protease ATG4B or acute trehalose exposure increases ERK phosphorylation. Decreased ERK phosphorylation in Atg5β/β cells does not occur from overactive phosphatases. Our findings thus reveal an unconventional function of ATG proteins as cellular scaffolds in the regulation of ERK phosphorylation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK1/2)1,2 promotes cellular proliferation in response to growth factors. ERK signalling also regulates expression of autophagy and lysosomal genes3, while ERK8 has recently been shown to stimulate autophagy by interacting with LC3 (ref. 4). Mice knocked out for p62, an adaptor protein that labels cytoplasmic cargo for autophagic degradation5, display ERK hyperphosphorylation6, suggesting bidirectional crosstalk between ERK and autophagy. Whether autophagy components regulate ERK1/2 phosphorylation is largely unknown. ERK signalling and autophagosome (APh) formation initiate at the plasma membrane7; consequently, we envisioned functional associations between components of the ERK signalling cascade and APh. As the spatio-temporal regulation of ERK activity requires scaffold proteins1,2,8, we hypothesized that APh/LC3-II-positive structures serve as scaffolds or cellular platforms regulating ERK phosphorylation. LC3-II has been shown to be nuclear-localized9, however, the function of nuclear LC3 is unclear. Consequently, we investigated whether one of the possible functions of nuclear LC3-II is modulation of nuclear ERK phosphorylation. Recent studies have demonstrated new unconventional functions of autophagy (ATG) proteins in cellular protein secretion10,11; however, whether ATG proteins or APh regulate cell signalling independent of their role in cargo degradation is largely unknown.
Here we show that ERK cascade components display increased association with ATG5βATG12-positive pre-autophagosomal structures and with lipidated ATG8 family proteins, LC3-II and GABARAP12 following growth factor stimulation. MEK, the upstream ERK kinase, and ERK localize to the extra-luminal face of APh. Inhibition of LC3-II formation in Atg7β/β liver and brown adipose tissues, Atg5β/βmouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs), cells silenced for ATG7, ATG5 or Beclin1, and in a LC3 lipidation-defective mutant decreases cellular and nuclear ERK phosphorylation and activity. We further show that ERK2 colocalizes with ATG5βATG12, LC3-II and WIPI1 through its substrate-binding domains, and that ATG5βATG12 conjugation is required for ERK1/2 phosphorylation. Conversely, increasing steady-state LC3-II content by blocking ATG4B-mediated LC3-II delipidation13 or acutely exposing cells to the autophagy activator trehalose14 increases phosphorylated (P)-ERK levels. Our findings suggest that an unconventional function of the ATG7/ATG5βATG12/LC3-II cascade regulates ERK1/2 phosphorylation independent of their canonical role in lysosomal proteolysis.
Results
ERK cascade components colocalize with ATGs
To determine whether ATG proteins regulate ERK phosphorylation, we examined the effect of epidermal growth factor (EGF) treatment on interactions between ERK cascade components and APh/LC3-II. Immunofluorescence in NIH/3T3 cells revealed increased colocalization of ERK cascade components, P-bRAF, P-MEK and P-ERK with LC3-II (Fig. 1a) in response to EGF exposure following brief serum deprivation (scheme in Fig. 1a, right). P-cRAF colocalized with LC3-II in untreated or EGF-treated or serum-fed NIH/3T3 cells (Supplementary Fig. S1a). EGF exposure also increased colocalizations of P-ERK with GABARAP and GATE16 (hereafter collectively referred to as GABARAP) (Supplementary Fig. S1b) but only modestly with the class III PI3K component, vps34 (ref. 15) (Supplementary Fig. S1c). Comparative analysis of EGF-treated NIH/3T3 cells verified that P-ERK colocalized predominantly with autophagosomal (LC3-II) and pre-autophagosomal (ATG5βATG12 and ATG16) structures and with WIPI (WD-repeat protein interacting with phosphoinositides)-1 and -2 (ref. 16) that are effectors of phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate (PI3P) in APh formation, but colocalized only modestly with vps34 and P-ULK1 (Fig. 1b). Colocalizations of P-ERK with LC3-II (Fig. 1c) and GABARAP (Supplementary Fig. S1b) were also detected in 2βh serum-fed NIH/3T3 cells indicating that serum-derived growth factors maintained P-ERK/LC3-II and P-ERK/GABARAP colocalizations. To verify our findings of EGF-induced interactions of ERK cascade components with ATG proteins, we exposed cells to EGF following 20βh of serum deprivation, which depletes serum-derived growth factors (scheme in Supplementary Fig. S2a). Indeed, treatment of serum-starved cells with EGF increased colocalizations of P-bRAF, P-MEK and P-ERK with LC3-II, and that of P-ERK with WIPI1 and -2 (Supplementary Fig. S2a). Intriguingly, EGF exposure of 10βmin or 20βh serum-deprived NIH/3T3 cells also increased colocalization of the ERK scaffold complex protein KSR1 (kinase suppressor of Ras)17,18 with LC3-II (Supplementary Fig. S2b), suggesting a possible role for LC3-II-positive structures in providing scaffolding support to regulate the MEK/ERK pathway. We validated P-ERK/LC3-II colocalizations by using two species-distinct P-ERK and LC3 antibodies in EGF-treated NIH/3T3 cells (Supplementary Fig. S3a). Specificity of P-ERK signal was further determined by analysing for loss of total and nuclear P-ERK fluorescence in U0126 (ERK phosphorylation inhibitor)-pretreated NIH/3T3 cells exposed to EGF (Supplementary Fig. S3b). Antibody specificities for P-bRAF, P-cRAF, P-MEK, P-ERK and LC3, and those for fluorescent-tagged secondary antibodies were ascertained by lack of signal in primary antibody- (Supplementary Fig. S3c) or secondary antibody-only NIH/3T3 controls (Supplementary Fig. S3d). Antibody specificities for P-MEK, P-ERK, LC3, vps34, WIPI1 and WIPI2 were also determined in primary antibody-only RALA rat hepatocyte controls (Supplementary Fig. S3e).
P-MEK and P-ERK colocalized with LC3-II in hypothalamic cells (Supplementary Fig. S4a), in 10βmin or 20βh serum-deprived RALA hepatocytes exposed to EGF (Supplementary Fig. S4b,c), and in 3T3-L1 preadipocytes cultured in adipocyte differentiation medium (Supplementary Fig. S5a) that acutely activates ERK19, reflecting universality of these colocalizations in diverse cells. Agreeing with our findings in NIH/3T3 cells, P-ERK modestly colocalized with vps34 in hypothalamic cells and hepatocytes (Supplementary Fig. S4aβc) but displayed remarkable colocalizations with WIPI1 and WIPI2 in hepatocytes (Supplementary Fig. S4c). Prior phosphorylation of ERK was not required for ERK to colocalize with LC3-II because U0126-pretreatment of NIH/3T3 cells did not decrease EGF-induced ERK/LC3-II colocalization (Supplementary Fig. S5b).
MEK and ERK localize to the cytoplasmic face of APh
To determine whether MEK and ERK associate with LC3-II-positive autophagic structures in vivo we used density-gradient centrifugation to isolate APh, autophagolysosomes (APL), and lysosomes (Lys) from livers of fed mice20. Immunoblot analyses of total homogenates (Hom), APh, APL and Lys fractions revealed remarkable enrichment of P- and total MEK and ERK in APh when contrasted to APL or Lys (Fig. 2a). EGF stimulation increased P-MEK and P-ERK levels in APh compared with corresponding fractions from untreated NIH/3T3 cells (Fig. 2b). Increased P-MEK and P-ERK levels in EGF-treated APh (Fig. 2b) were not secondary to cytoplasmic contamination determined by the absence of cytoplasmic protein IΞΊB in APh fractions or due to differences in APh/LC3-II content (Fig. 2b). EGF treatment modestly increased P-MEK and P-ERK levels in APL; however, these increments were not significantly greater than those in APL fractions from untreated cells (Fig. 2b). To distinguish whether MEK and ERK localized at the extra-luminal surface of APh as opposed to sequestration within APh (cartoon depicted in Fig. 2c), we utilized the LC3-II protease protection assay21, which is based on the notion that proteins sequestered within APh resist digestion when subjected to controlled protease exposure. Indeed, exposure of APh to increasing amounts of trypsin (0.5, 1 and 2βΞΌg) for 15βmin increased the dose-dependent digestion of APh-associated P- and total MEK and ERK and LC3-II levels (Fig. 2c), indicating that MEK and ERK localized to the cytoplasmic surface of APh. Absence of cathepsin B (lysosomal marker) in APh fractions excluded lysosomal contamination of APh fractions (Fig. 2c). Comparative analyses revealed that exposure to trypsin (0.5βΞΌg for 15βmin) led to ~50% reduction in APh-associated P-ERK and total ERK levels, and ~25% reduction in APh-associated P-MEK levels, whereas APL and Lys fractions resisted loss of MEK and ERK (Supplementary Fig. S6a). These results indicate two distinct pools of MEK and ERK: one residing on the extra-luminal surface of APh (~50% of total APH-associated ERK), and a sequestered βprotease-protectedβ pool inside APh, APL and Lys most likely destined for degradation. EGF treatment of NIH/3T3 cells did not increase the net flux of LC3-II or p62 to Lys (Supplementary Fig. S6b), suggesting that ERK cascade components interact with APh generated at basal rates.
ERK cascade components interact with nuclear LC3
As activation of ERK increases its nuclear localization, we next investigated whether exposure to EGF enhanced P-ERK/LC3-II colocalization in the nucleus. EGF-treated RALA hepatocytes (Fig. 3a) and NIH/3T3 cells (Fig. 3b), and 3T3-L1 preadipocytes exposed to an adipogenic medium (Fig. 3c) displayed increased nuclear LC3-II puncta. EGF exposure also increased P-ERK/LC3-II colocalization in the nucleus compared with untreated NIH/3T3 cells (Fig. 3b). Nuclear P-ERK/LC3-II colocalization was also detected in serum-fed NIH/3T3 cells (Fig. 3d). To verify interactions between ERK and LC3, we co-immunoprecipitated LC3 from total Hom and nuclear fractions from fed mice livers and analysed pull-downs for ERK cascade components. Indeed, analyses of Hom and nuclear fractions revealed that LC3 co-immunoprecipitated with ERK1/2 (Fig. 3e). In addition, bRAF and MEK1/2 were also detected in pull-downs of LC3 from homogenates, indicating interactions of ERK cascade components with LC3.
To dissect the dynamics of P-ERK/LC3 interactions in the nucleus, we first investigated whether cytoplasmic LC3-II traverses to the nucleus or whether LC3-II is generated via de novo lipidation in the nucleus. To distinguish between these possibilities, we used wheat germ agglutinin (WGA) to block active protein import into the nucleus22. WGA pretreatment decreased basal or EGF-induced increase in nuclear LC3-II puncta by ~40β50% (Fig. 3f). The partial reduction in levels of nuclear LC3 puncta in WGA-treated cells (Fig. 3f) and detection of LC3-I in nuclear fractions in vivo (Fig. 3e, bottom, and Supplementary Fig. S6c) suggested that de novo LC3 lipidation in the nucleus contributes to the total nuclear LC3-II content, although whether a portion of the nuclear LC3 puncta originates from interaction of LC3 with other proteins remains to be elucidated. In support of the possibility that de novo LC3 lipidation occurs in the nucleus, nuclear fractions from mouse livers revealed the presence of autophagy proteins required for LC3 lipidation, ATG7, ATG5βATG12 and ATG16, as well as ATG4B that recycles LC3-I, and the autophagy inducer, ULK1 (Supplementary Fig. S6c). The purity of the nuclear fractions was validated by enrichment of histone3 and absence of cytosolic marker GAPDH or endosomal marker Rab7 or lysosomal marker Cathepsin B (Supplementary Fig. S6c). Moreover, nuclear fractions from Atg7β/β mouse livers revealed accumulation of soluble LC3-I (Fig. 4d) as typically observed in Atg7β/β total lysates (Fig. 4a). WGA treatment also decreased nuclear ERK levels in response to EGF (Fig. 3g) as reported23; however, WGA treatment did not modify the percentage of P-ERK that colocalized with nuclear LC3-II (Fig. 3h). We next investigated whether ERK gains nuclear entry by βpiggybackingβ onto LC3-II. LC3-II-deficient Atg5β/β MEFs did not display reduced nuclear ERK content (Supplementary Fig. S6d), in fact Atg5β/β MEFs showed increased total ERK levels in the nucleus, indicating that LC3-II per se does not traffic ERK into the nucleus.
Loss of Atg7 decreases ERK phosphorylation
To analyse the functional consequence of ERK/LC3 interactions on ERK signalling, we subjected total Hom and cytosolic (Cyt) fractions from control and autophagy-deficient Atg7β/β mouse livers to immunoblot analyses for levels of P- and total bRAF, cRAF, MEK and ERK. Loss of ATG7 did not modify levels of active P-bRAF and P-cRAF (Supplementary Fig. S6e) or P-MEK in Hom and Cyt (Fig. 4a and Supplementary Fig. S13), however, corresponding fractions from Atg7β/β livers displayed ~50% and ~80β90% reduction in levels of P-ERK1 (p44 isoform) and P-ERK2 (p42 isoform), respectively, when compared with controls (Fig. 4a). Decreases in P-ERK1 and P-ERK2 levels were not secondary to reduced total ERK1 and ERK2 levels; in fact, loss of ATG7 significantly increased total ERK1 levels (Fig. 4a,b) that occurred in part from increased ERK1 expression (Supplementary Fig. S6f). Fresh Atg7β/β liver explants also displayed reduced ERK phosphorylation upon exposure to EGF, whereas basal or EGF-induced increases in STAT3 phosphorylation remained intact (Supplementary Fig. S7a), indicating that loss of autophagy did not lead to a global reduction of growth factor signalling. In support of this notion, a second stimulus, menadione, a superoxide radical generator that typically induces ERK phosphorylation24, failed to increase P-ERK levels in Atg7β/β liver explants (Supplementary Fig. S7b) and Atg5β/β MEFs (Supplementary Fig. S7c). Moreover, reduced ERK phosphorylation occurred independently of any changes in JNK signalling (Supplementary Fig. S7c), as the JNK kinase inhibitor SP600125 (ref. 25) reduced menadione-stimulated c-jun phosphorylation without modifying P-ERK levels in WT cells or rescuing ERK phosphorylation in Atg5β/β cells. Decreased ERK1 and ERK2 phosphorylation were also detected in Atg7β/β brown adipose tissues (Fig. 4c), indicating that ATG7 regulates ERK phosphorylation in multiple tissues. Cytoplasmic ERK2 activity requires ERK2 dimerization that in turn requires ERK2 phosphorylation26, and agreeing with this notion decreased ERK phosphorylation in Atg7β/β livers associated with significantly reduced ERK2 dimer levels (Fig. 4b). Atg7β/β livers also displayed reduced nuclear P-ERK1 and P-ERK2 levels when normalized to corresponding total nuclear ERK levels, independent of changes in nuclear protein loading (equivalent Nopp140 levels) or cytoplasmic contamination (absence of IΞΊB) (Fig. 4d). Decreased ERK phosphorylation in Atg7β/β livers did not occur due to early loss of autophagy during development because transiently silencing ATG7, ATG5 or Beclin1 in NIH/3T3 cells decreased EGF-induced phosphorylation of ERK2 by ~28, ~33 and ~43% respectively (Supplementary Fig. S7d). In addition, ~44% reduction in ERK1 phosphorylation was observed in NIH/3T3 cells silenced for Beclin1 (Supplementary Fig. S7d).
Blocking LC3 lipidation decreases ERK phosphorylation
To determine whether ERK phosphorylation requires LC3-II-positive vesicles and not autonomous functions of ATG7 or Beclin1, we transfected NIH/3T3 cells with wild-type (WT) cyan fluorescent protein (CFP)-LC3 or the lipidation-defective C-terminal glycine-deleted (CFP-LC3ΞG) construct that impairs APh formation27. Equivalent transfection was determined by examining for CFP fluorescence (Supplementary Fig. S7e, left) and CFP-LC3 protein levels in CFP-LC3 and CFP-LC3ΞG-transfected cells (Supplementary Fig. S7e, right)27. Decreased CFP-LC3 puncta verified the previously described reduction of APh content in CFP-LC3ΞG mutants compared with controls27 (Supplementary Fig. S7e, left). As expected, untreated or EGF-treated CFP-LC3ΞG mutants displayed modest albeit significant reduction in ERK phosphorylation independent of changes in MEK phosphorylation (Fig. 4e). Modest reduction (~20β25%) in P-ERK levels in CFP-LC3ΞG mutants suggested that an intact ATG8-lipidation system (E1-, E2- and E3-like ligases) in CFP-LC3ΞG cells likely enabled production of ATG5βATG12-positive pre-autophagosomal structures or GABARAP-positive vesicles12 that allowed residual ERK phosphorylation.
ERK activity in Atg5β/β cells depends on nutrients
To dissect the role of ATG7/ATG5βATG12/LC3-II cascade in ERK phosphorylation, we analysed P-MEK and P-ERK levels in serum-fed or serum-deprived WT and Atg5β/β MEFs, both of which display equivalent ATG7 (Supplementary Fig. S7f) and P (Ser555)- and total ULK1 levels (Supplementary Fig. S7g). In consistency with reduced ERK phosphorylation in Atg7β/βtissues (Fig. 4aβd) and in NIH/3T3 cells silenced for ATG7, ATG5 or Beclin1 (Supplementary Fig. S7d), P-ERK levels in Atg5β/β MEFs rapidly plummeted by 1βh of serum deprivation and remained lower than those in WT MEFs until the end of the experiment at 8βh (Fig. 5a). Serum-deprived Atg5β/β MEFs displayed decreased phosphorylation of p90 ribosomal S6 kinase (p90RSK), a downstream ERK substrate (Fig. 5b), and decreased levels of phosphorylated Elk1 (nuclear ERK substrate) (Fig. 5c) as well as decreased basal and EGF-induced Elk1-driven ZFP36 gene expression28 (Fig. 5d). We next verified that decreased P-ERK levels in serum-starved Atg5β/βMEFs were not due to overactive ERK phosphatases, MKP3 or PP2A, because transiently silencing MKP3 or PP2A in Atg5β/β MEFs (Supplementary Fig. S7h) failed to restore ERK phosphorylation in untreated or EGF-treated cells (Fig. 5e). Decreased ERK activity in serum-starved Atg5β/βMEFs did not correlate with increased nuclear localization of transcription factor EB (TFEB) (Supplementary Fig. S8a, left)3. In fact, 6βh serum-starved Atg5β/βMEFs displayed decreased nuclear TFEB levels (Supplementary Fig. S8a, left), decreased P-ERK levels (Supplementary Fig. S7f) and reduced TFEB-driven LAMP-1 and LC3B gene expression compared with 6βh serum-starved WT MEFs (Supplementary Fig. S8a, right). These results suggest that other kinases in addition to ERK regulate nuclear availability of TFEB, for instance P-mTOR, a recently elucidated regulator of TFEB29, remained unaffected in Atg5β/βMEFs (Supplementary Fig. S7f). In consistency with this idea, rapamycin treatment inhibited mTOR signalling (Supplementary Fig. S8b), and partially restored nuclear TFEB translocation in 6βh serum-starved Atg5β/βMEFs (Supplementary Fig. S8c), without rescuing ERK phosphorylation in Atg5β/β cells (Supplementary Fig. S8b).
In clear contrast to serum-deprived Atg5β/β cells, Atg5β/β MEFs subjected to brief serum deprivation (10βmin) displayed raised P-MEK, P-ERK and P-p90RSK levels that increased further with EGF treatment (Supplementary Fig. S8d). We speculated that although Atg5β/β MEFs do not generate LC3-II (Supplementary Fig. S8d), intact ATG7 in Atg5β/β MEFs allowed production of vesicles positive for GABARAP12,30, a mammalian homologue of yeast ATG8, which facilitated ERK phosphorylation in absence of LC3-II. Consequently, we first examined GABARAP levels in Atg5β/β MEFs. In contrast to Atg7β/β livers that exhibit reduced GABARAP-II levels (Supplementary Fig. S8e), serum-fed Atg5β/β MEFs displayed increased GABARAP puncta compared with WT MEFs (Supplementary Fig. S9a). In fact, GABARAP content in serum-fed Atg5β/β MEFs were comparable to levels detected in 2βh serum-deprived WT MEFs (Supplementary Fig. S9a), indicating that Atg5β/β MEFs generated GABARAP-positive vesicles possibly from preserved ATG7 and redundant E3-like activity. Most notably, serum-fed (Supplementary Fig. S9b) or EGF-treated Atg5β/βcells (Supplementary Fig. S9c) displayed increased colocalization of P-ERK with GABARAP puncta. To determine whether ATG7 E1-like activity regulated ERK phosphorylation in serum-fed Atg5β/βMEFs, we transiently silenced ATG7 in Atg5β/βcells and examined the effect of loss of ATG7 on MEK and ERK phosphorylation. Although silencing ATG7 did not consistently decrease ERK phosphorylation, possibly from residual ATG7 activity, partial loss of ATG7 significantly decreased basal and EGF-induced MEK phosphorylation in Atg5β/βcells (Supplementary Fig. S9d). In totality, these findings in Atg7β/β tissues, Atg5β/β MEFs, ATG7-, ATG5- or Beclin1-silenced cells, and in a LC3 lipidation-defective mutant support our hypothesis that the ATG7/ATG5βATG12/LC3-II cascade is required for ERK phosphorylation.
ERK2 interacts with ATGs via its substrate-binding domains
As distinct kinase-docking domains on ERK2 allow its interaction with substrates, we investigated whether ERK2 utilized these substrate-binding domains to interact with ATG proteins. ERK2 interacts with its substrates via acidic residues in its C terminus (Asp316 and Asp319, termed common docking (CD) domain) that coordinate with Thr157/158 (ED domain) to modulate CD domain-substrate interaction. ERK2 also utilizes its F-site recruitment sites (FRS) that include residues Leu198, Tyr231, Leu232, Leu235 and Tyr261 (ref. 31) to interact with substrates. Intriguingly, ERK2 FRS (L198A/L235A) or CD/ED (T157A/D319N) mutants have been reported to exhibit ~40% reduction in MEK1-mediated phosphorylation with the greatest degree of ERK2 phosphorylation inhibition (~70%) in combined ED/FRS (T157A/L198A/L235A) mutants (ref. 31), leading to the speculation that in all likelihood these mutations compromise MEK1βERK interaction31. Consequently, we sought to determine whether ERK2 utilized FRS or CD substrate-binding domains to interact with ATG proteins, and that decreased interactions of these mutants with ATG proteins contributed, at least in part, to the reported decrease in phosphorylation of these ERK2 mutants31. To test this possibility, we examined the effect of mutations in FRS (L198A, L232A, L198A/L232A and Y261A)32 and CD (D319N)32 domains on colocalization of ERK2 with endogenous ATG5βATG12, LC3-II, WIPI1 and WIPI2 in EGF-treated NIH/3T3 cells. Indeed, while L198A-ERK2 mutants displayed decreased colocalizations with ATG5βATG12 and WIPI1 (Fig. 6a), mutations at both Leu198 and Leu232 were required to significantly decrease colocalization of ERK2 with LC3-II (Fig. 6a). In contrast, Y261A-ERK2 mutants displayed modestly decreased colocalization with WIPI1, but increased colocalizations with ATG5βATG12 (Fig. 6a) and WIPI2 (Supplementary Fig. S10a). Mutations at Leu198 and/or Leu232 did not modify ERK2/WIPI2 colocalization (Supplementary Fig. S10a). ERK2 FRS domain (L198A or L198A/L232A) mutants also displayed decreased colocalization with ATG5βATG12 or LC3-II in the nuclear compartment (Fig. 6b). Decreased interactions of ERK2 FRS domain mutants with ATG5βATG12, LC3-II and WIPI1 correlated with reduced ERK2 phosphorylation reported in these substrate-binding mutants31.
Conversely, ERK substrates interact with ERK2 through substrate D-domains that include basic residues followed by a hydrophobic LXL motif or via substrate F-sites that consist of the FXFP motif33,34. Analyses of ATG5, ATG12, WIPI1, WIPI2, LC3B and GABARAP sequences for FXFP and LXL domains revealed the presence of the bonafide LXL motif only in ATG12 and LC3B (Supplementary Fig. S10b), and absence of these domains in other ATG proteins examined (Supplementary Fig. S10b). The absence of FXFP or LXL domains in ATG5, and the presence of the LXL domain in ATG12 suggest that P-ERKβs interaction with ATG5βATG12 conjugate (Fig. 1b) occurs in all likelihood through ATG12 and not via ATG5. Consequently, to determine the role of ATG5βATG12 conjugation in the regulation of ERK phosphorylation, we examined for levels of EGF-driven ERK1/2 phosphorylation in the conjugation-defective ATG5 K130R mutant35, which fails to bind to ATG12. Indeed, EGF-treated NIH/3T3 cells transfected with the ATG5 K130R mutant displayed decreased ERK phosphorylation compared with WT ATG5-transfected counterparts (Fig. 6c), indicating that activation of autophagy, and consequently, availability of ATG5βATG12 conjugate regulates the degree of ERK phosphorylation. Our findings cannot exclude the possibility that ERK2 may also interact with ATG proteins lacking bonafide ERK-binding sites through alternate yet-unknown binding sites, as observed with the ERK2 substrate stathmin31, which also lacks typical ERK2 binding sites. Overall, these results indicate redundancy in the availability of ATG proteins that could potentially serve as signalling platforms to maintain ERK phosphorylation.
Depleting ATG4B increases LC3-II and ERK phosphorylation
ATG4B modulates LC3-II availability by cleaving LC3 C-terminal glycine and allowing LC3 lipidation36, and delipidates LC3-II to recycle LC3-I. We thus investigated whether depleting ATG4B levels modifies LC3-II content, which affects P-ERK/LC3-II interaction and ERK phosphorylation. Partial loss of ATG4B (~50%) in NIH/3T3 cells did not affect ATG7 or ATG5βATG12 levels, but increased steady-state LC3-II levels (~30%) (Fig. 7a) similar to elevated LC3-II levels in Atg4Bβ/βheart and brain37. We verified increased autophagic vacuolar content in ATG4B-deficient cells by direct visualization of double-membrane vesicular structures containing sequestered cytoplasmic cargo (Fig. 7b), although increased LC3-II content in ATG4B-deficient cells did not translate to increased LC3-II flux in serum-fed conditions (Fig. 7c). ATG4B deficiency also increased nuclear LC3-II to levels comparable to those observed in EGF-treated scrambled siRNA-transfected controls (Fig. 7d). Most notably, EGF treatment increased P-ERK/LC3-II colocalization in ATG4B-deficient cells (Fig. 7e). ATG4B-deficient cells also displayed ~40% increase in nuclear P-ERK/LC3-II colocalization (Fig. 7f), although equivalent P-ERK/LC3-II colocalizations were detected in EGF-treated controls and ATG4B-deficient cells (Fig. 7f). In consistency with our idea that LC3-II is required for ERK phosphorylation, augmenting LC3-II via partial loss of ATG4B increased P-ERK levels in untreated or EGF-treated cells (Fig. 7g and Supplementary Fig. S14). We also observed significantly increased P-ERK levels in the nuclear compartment of ATG4B-deficient cells regardless of EGF exposure (Fig. 7h). In addition, short-term (2βh) exposure of trehalose, which activates autophagy independent of the mTOR pathway14, enhanced ERK1/2 phosphorylation (Supplementary Fig. S11a). Enhanced ERK phosphorylation occurred in an autophagy-dependent manner, as trehalose treatment for 2βh failed to augment ERK phosphorylation in Atg5β/β MEFs (Supplementary Fig. S11a). Although 12βh or 24βh of trehalose treatment robustly increases LC3-II levels compared with 2βh of trehalose treatment (Supplementary Fig. S11b), prolonged trehalose exposure did not increase ERK phosphorylation to levels greater than those observed in untreated controls (Supplementary Fig. S11b). We suspect that robust autophagy activation following prolonged trehalose exposure involves rapid turnover of available LC3-II-positive vesicles, which decreases the availability of LC3-II-positive structures to regulate ERK phosphorylation.
Discussion
In totality, our results demonstrate that the cellular availability of autophagic structures determines the degree of ERK phosphorylation. We speculate that LC3-II-positive membranes and ATG5βATG12-positive preautophagosomes could serve as scaffolds or cellular signalling platforms that would allow efficient spatial coordination of the Raf-MEK-ERK cascade and thus facilitate ERK phosphorylation (modelled in Fig. 8). In support of this notion, we observe that MEK and ERK localize to the cytoplasmic face of APh, and that ERK2 interacts with these structures through its substrate-binding domains. Furthermore, deleting Atg7 or blocking LC3 lipidation or ATG5βATG12 conjugation decreases ERK phosphorylation independent of changes in MEK phosphorylation. We also find that deleting Atg5 modifies ERK phosphorylation depending on the nutrient status of the cell. While serum starvation of Atg5β/βcells for >1βh reduced ERK phosphorylation and its ability to phosphorylate p90RSK, transiently removing serum for 10βmin increased ERK phosphorylation in Atg5β/βcells. Atg5β/β cells are unable to generate LC3-II and are completely deficient in canonical autophagy; however, surprisingly we observed increased basal GABARAP puncta in Atg5β/β cells. Thus, it remains possible that during early nutrient deprivation, Atg5β/β LC3-II-deficient cells utilize GABARAP-positive structures as cellular platforms for ERK phosphorylation, which is supported by our observation of increased GABARAP/P-ERK colocalization in Atg5β/β cells. These results indicate a functional redundancy in the ability of multiple ATG proteins, that is, lipidated LC3-II, ATG5βATG12 conjugate or GABARAP-positive vesicles, to regulate ERK phosphorylation. It is thus not surprising that blocking individual ATG proteins, for instance, LC3 lipidation or ATG5βATG12 conjugation only modestly decreases ERK phosphorylation, whereas deleting the upstream E1-like ligase Atg7 robustly blocks ERK phosphorylation.
It is reasonable to argue that reduced cargo degradation in autophagy-deficient cells decreases ATP production, and this in turn could have limited ERK phosphorylation; however, intact phosphorylation of JNK, mTOR, STAT3 and ULK1 in Atg5β/β cells excludes the possibility that ATP depletion has a role in decreased ERK phosphorylation. Overactivation of phosphatases was also excluded as a factor contributing to decreased ERK phosphorylation in Atg5β/β cells, as silencing bona fide ERK phosphatases, MKP3 or PP2A failed to restore ERK signalling in Atg5β/β cells.
The physiological outcome of changes in ERK phosphorylation in cells with aberrant autophagy remains to be determined. We predict that the previously described increases in cell death in autophagy-deficient cells38 or cellular senescence from reduced autophagy with age39,40 may have occurred, in part, from decreased ERK activity. We also predict that some of the previously reported effects of loss of autophagy on adipocyte mass and differentiation41,42 may occur in part from impaired ERK-regulated adipocyte differentiation19. Hyperactive Raf-MEK-ERK signalling is implicated in hepatocellular cancers, and a recent study has reported increased cell death in Sorafenib (Raf inhibitor)-treated hepatoma cells knocked down for ATG7 (ref. 43), suggesting that therapeutic benefit in Sorafenib-treated ATG7-deficient hepatoma cells may have occurred from a more robust inhibition of ERK signalling. Aberrant autophagy may potentially link ERK hyperphosphorylation to the development of ERK-dependent tumours. In light of these associations, manipulating ATG5βATG12 and LC3-II availability could be a therapeutic strategy against multiple disorders stemming from altered ERK activity.
Methods
Animals and cells
Liver- and BAT-specific Atg7β/βmice were generated by crossing ATG7F/F mice44 (a gift from Drs M. Komatsu and K. Tanaka, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science, Japan) with Albumin-Cre or Myf5-Cre mice (Jackson Laboratories), respectively. Studies were performed in 3β6-month-old male mice using a protocol approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Mice were fed a regular chow diet (5058; Lab Diet, St Louis, MO, USA) and maintained on 12βh light/dark cycles. NIH/3T3 cells were cultured in Dulbeccoβs Modified Eagleβs Medium (DMEM) (Gibco) supplemented with 10% Newborn Calf Serum (Gibco) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (P/S) (Gibco). Wild type and Atg5β/β MEFs (kindly provided by Dr Noboru Mizushima45, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Japan) were cultured in DMEM and 10% FBS. Mouse hypothalamic N41 cells and RALA255-10G rat hepatocyte cells were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% and 4% FBS, respectively. 3T3-L1 preadipocytes were differentiated in DMEM supplemented with 160βnM insulin, 250βnM dexamethasone, 0.5βmM 1-methyl-3-isobutylxanthine and 10% FBS41. For EGF treatment, cells were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) pre-warmed at 37βΒ°C to deplete serum and then cultured in serum-deprived DMEM supplemented with 1% P/S. Cells were treated with EGF (BD Biosciences) at 25βngβmlβ1 for 10βmin.
Chemicals and antibodies
Antibodies (Supplementary Table S1) for ATG7, ATG4B, LC3B, P-bRAF (Ser445), bRAF, P-cRAF (Ser338), cRAF, P-p90RSK (Thr359/Ser363), P-MEK1/2 (Ser217/221), MEK1/2, P-ERK1/2 (Thr202/Tyr204) (rabbit and mouse species-specific), ERK1/2, ERK1, ERK2, P-Elk1 (Ser383), P-mTOR (Ser2448), mTOR and P-ULK1 (Ser555) were from Cell Signaling (Danvers, MA, USA); ATG5βATG12 and ULK1 from Novus Biologicals (Littleton, CO, USA); p62 from Enzo life sciences (Plymouth Meeting, PA, USA); ATG16, Cathepsin B, Cathepsin L, GABARAP and GATE16 (sc-28938), P-c-jun (Ser63/73), c-jun, P-JNK (Thr183/Tyr185), JNK, IΟ°BΞ±, Rab7 and TFEB were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA, USA); Beclin1 from BD Biosciences (San Jose, CA, USA); GAPDH, WIPI1 and WIPI2 antibodies from Abcam (Cambridge, MA, USA); Histone3 from Millipore (Billerica, MA, USA), Ξ²-actin from Sigma-Aldrich and JL-8 for CFP detection from Clontech (Mountain View, CA, USA). Nopp140 antibody was a kind gift from Dr U. Thomas Meier (Albert Einstein College of Medicine). Leupeptin (100βΞΌM) and Rapamycin (100βnM) from Fisher Scientific; ammonium chloride (20βmM) from American Bioanalytical; U0126 (10βΞΌM) from Cell Signaling; menadione (50βΞΌM), trypsin and trehalose (100βmM)14 from Sigma-Aldrich, WGA (5βΞΌgβmlβ1)22 from Invitrogen and SP600125 (ref. 25) (10βΞΌM) from Millipore.
APh isolation and LC3-II protease protection assay
APh, APL and Lys were isolated from mouse livers and NIH/3T3 cells by differential centrifugation using discontinuous density gradients of metrizamide20,46,47. Briefly, cell or tissue homogenates were centrifuged at 2,000βg for 5βmin followed by centrifugation of the supernatant at 17,000βg (12βmin). Pellets were resuspended in 1.9βml 0.25βM sucrose and 2.8βml of metrizamide (85.6%) was added. Samples were centrifuged on a 26β24β20β15% metrizamide gradient at 75,334βg for 3βh. After centrifugation, the APh fraction was collected from the 15β20% interface, APL from the 20β24% interface and Lys from the 24β26% interface. Fractions were centrifuged at 24,000βg and pellets were suspended in 0.25βM sucrose and used for assays. For the LC3-II protease protection assay21, freshly isolated APh, APL and Lys were incubated in presence or absence of increasing amounts (0.5βΞΌg, 1βΞΌg and 2βΞΌg) of trypsin (Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA) at room temperature (RT) for 15βmin. Samples were quickly boiled in 2 Γ SDSβPAGE sample buffer at 95βΒ°C for 5βmin and resolved by SDSβPAGE. APh, APL and Lys samples were analysed for levels of phosphorylated (P) and total MEK and ERK. Extent of loss of P- or total MEK and ERK in trypsin-treated APh, APL or Lys fractions was expressed as a percentage of total levels in corresponding trypsin-untreated control fractions.
Subcellular fractionation
For subcellular fractionation, 80% confluent cells or liver pieces (50βmg) were resuspended in buffer (5βmM Na2HPO4 (pH 7.4), 50βmM NaCl, 150βmM sucrose, 5βmM KCl, 2βmM dithiothreitol, 1βmM MgCl2, 0.5βmM CaCl2 and 0.2% NP40, supplemented with protease/phosphatase inhibitors), and homogenized using a dounce homogenizer (20 strokes/4βΒ°C), and incubated on ice for 5βmin. Cytosolic and nuclear fractions were isolated using ProteoExtract subcellular proteome extraction kit (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) as per manufacturerβs instructions. Equivalent protein loading was verified using antibodies for Ξ²-actin, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase, histone3 or Nopp140.
Autophagy LC3 flux assays
Flux assays were used to quantify autophagy activity wherein accumulation of autophagy substrates, LC3-II or p62, in the presence of inhibitors of lysosomal proteolysis, ammonium chloride (20βmM) and leupeptin (100βΞΌM), reflects activity. Briefly, cells were cultured in the presence or absence of lysosomal proteases for 2βh following which, cells were collected and lysed and subjected to immunoblotting for LC3-II or p62. Autophagy flux was determined by subtracting the densitometric value of inhibitor-untreated LC3-II or p62 from corresponding inhibitor-treated values.
LC3 co-immunoprecipitation
Fresh livers were homogenized in 500βΞΌl of 50βmM Tris/HCl (pH 8.5), 150βmM NaCl, 1% NP40, 5βmM EDTA supplemented with protease/phosphatase inhibitors. Nuclear fractions were obtained as detailed above. Lysates (500βΞΌg of homogenate or 150βΞΌg of nuclear fractions) were incubated overnight in rotation at 4βΒ°C with 100βΞΌl of protein-A sepharose beads (Sigma-Aldrich) crosslinked to LC3 antibody (MBL International, Woburn, MA, USA). For covalent crosslinking, beads were washed (2,500βr.p.m./5βmin at 4βΒ°C) with 0.2βM Borate/3βM NaCl buffer (pH 9.0) and crosslinked with 50βmM dimethyl pimelimidate in Borate buffer (30βmin) in rotation at RT. Coupling reactions were stopped with 0.2βM ethanolamine (pH 8.0) for 2βh RT followed by incubation with 200βmM glycine (pH 2.5). Crosslinked beads were incubated with samples in rotation overnight at 4βΒ°C. Bound proteins were eluted by boiling (95βΒ°C for 5βmin) in 2 Γ SDSβPAGE sample buffer. Immunoprecipitated (IP) proteins and original lysates (input) were resolved on a SDSβPAGE, and membranes were probed for bRAF, MEK, ERK, P-ERK and LC3. P-ERK1, P-ERK2, P-ERK1/2 or P-MEK1/2 bands obtained by immunoblotting were quantified using ImageJ and normalized to corresponding total ERK1, total ERK2, total ERK1/2 or total MEK1/2, respectively. Full scans of western blots are supplied in Supplementary Fig. S12. The antibody concentrations are supplied in Supplementary Table S1.
Electron microscopy
Electron microscopy was performed in NIH/3T3 cells cultured in monolayers. Cells were collected and fixed in a buffer containing 2.5% glutaraldehyde and 2% paraformaldehyde in 100βmM sodium cacodylate (pH 7.43)20. Cells were post-fixed in 1% osmium tetroxide/sodium cacodylate buffer followed by fixation in 1% uranyl acetate. Cells were ethanol-dehydrated and embedded in LX112 resin (LADD Research Industries). Ultrathin sections were sequentially stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate. Grids were visualized using a JEOL 1200CX II transmission electron microscope at 80βkV. Identification of autophagic vacuoles was done using established criteria48.
Fluorescence microscopy
Cells on coverslips were fixed with a 4% paraformaldehyde solution, blocked and incubated with primary and corresponding secondary antibodies (Alexa Fluor 488 and/or Alexa Fluor 647 conjugated) (Invitrogen). Mounting medium contained DAPI (4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) to visualize the nucleus (Invitrogen). Images were acquired on a Leica DMI6000B microscope/ DFC360FX 1.4-megapixel monochrome digital camera (Leica Microsystems, Germany) using Γ 100 objective/1.4 numerical aperture. Images in each experiment were acquired at same exposure times within the same imaging session. Image slices/stacks of 0.2βΞΌm thickness were captured and deconvolved using the Leica MetaMorph acquisition/analysis software. All images were prepared using Adobe Photoshop and subjected to identical post-acquisition brightness/contrast effects. Representative native and/or inverted images are shown. Quantification was performed in individual frames after deconvolution and thresholding using the ImageJ software (NIH) in a minimum of 20 cells per slide and a minimum of 50 cells from two or more experiments. Particle number was quantified with the βanalyse particlesβ function in threshold single sections with size (pixel2) settings from 0.1 to 10 and circularity from 0 to 1. Cellular fluorescence intensity was expressed as mean integrated density as a function of individual cell size. Nuclear fluorescence intensity was expressed as a function of nuclear size after the identification of the nuclear perimeter by the ImageJ βfreehand selection toolβ. Percentage colocalization was calculated using the JACoP plugin in single Z-stack sections of deconvolved images. Colocalization is shown in merged native images and/or as white pixels using the βcolocalization finderβ plugin in ImageJ.
RNA isolation and real-time PCR
Total RNA was isolated using the RNeasy Plus kit (Qiagen, USA) and genomic DNA eliminated via gDNA Eliminator spin columns. Total RNA (1βΞΌg) was reverse transcribed into cDNA using Superscript II (Invitrogen), and real-time PCR (qPCR) was performed using Power SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, UK) on a StepOnePlus Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, UK). Expression of ERK1, ERK2, MEK1, MEK2, MKP3, PP2ACA, GATE16, Atg7, BECLIN1, LC3, LAMP-1 and LAMP-2A were normalized to TATA-binding protein (TBP) and all reactions were in triplicate. The following primers were used: ERK1 (forward (f)), 5β²-TCCAAGGGCTACACCAAATC-3β², (reverse (r)) 5β²-GTTTTCGAGGGCAGAGACTG-3β²; ERK2 (f) 5β²-ACGGCATGGTTTGCTCTGCTTATG-3β², (r) 5β²-TCATTTGCTCAATGGTTGGTGCCC-3β²; MEK1 (f) 5β²-GTGAACTCACGTGGGGAGAT-3β², (r) 5β²-CAGGAGGAGGAATGGGGTAT-3β²; MEK2 (f) 5β²-CCCTACATCGTGGGCTTCTA-3β², (r) 5β²-TGCATGATCTGGTGCTTCTC-3β²; MKP3 (f) 5β²-TTGAATGTCACCCCCAATTT-3β², (r) 5β²-CATCGTTCATGGACAGGTTG-3β²; PP2ACA (f) 5β²-TACTCCGAGGGAATCACGAG-3β², (r) 5β²-TCGGATGTGATCCAGTGTGT-3β²; GATE-16 (f) 5β²-TCTCGGGCTCTCAGATTGTT-3β², (r) 5β²-GTGTTCTCTCCGCTGTAGGC-3β²; ATG7 (f) 5β²-TCCGTTGAAGTCCTCTGCTT-3β², (r) 5β²-CCACTGAGGTTCACCATCCT; BECLIN1 (f) 5β²-GGCCAATAAGATGGGTCTGA-3β², (r) 5β²-GCTGCACACAGTCCAGAAAA-3β²; LC3 (f) 5β²-ACAAAGAGTGGAAGATGTCCGGCT-3β², (r) 5β²-TGCAAGCGCCGTCTGATTATCTTG-3β²; LAMP-1 (f) 5β²-TAGTGCCCACATTCAGCATCTCCA-3β², (r) 5β²-TTCCACAGACCCAAACCTGTCACT-3β²; LAMP-2A (f) 5β²-AGGTGCTTTCTGTGTCTAGAGCGT-3β², (r) 5β²-AGAATAAGTACTCCTCCCAGAGCTGC-3β²; TBP (f) 5β²-GAAGCTGCGGTACAATTCCAG-3β², (r) 5β²-CCCCTTGTACCCTTCACCAAT-3β²; ZFP36 (f) 5β²-TACGAGAGCCTCCAGTCGAT-3β², (r) 5β²-GCGAAGTAGGTGAGGGTGAC-3β².
Gene silencing with small interfering RNA
Cells were transiently transfected with 100βnM of small interfering RNA (siRNA) constructs or a non-related siRNA (siScramble) (Sigma-Aldrich) using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturerβs protocol. Cells were exposed to the silencing mix overnight following which silencing medium was replaced with fresh DMEM containing 10% NCS. The following siRNAs were used: siScramble (sense(s)) 5β²-AAUUCUCCGAACGUGUCACGU-3β², (antisense (as)) 5β²-ACGUGACACGUUCGGAGAAUU-3β²; siATG7 (s) 5β²-CUGUGAACUUCUCUGACGU-3β², (as) 5β²-ACGUCAGAGAAGUUCACAG-3β²; siATG5 (s) 5β²-CCAUCAACCGGAAACUCAU-3β², (as) 5β²-AUGAGUUUCCGGUUGAUGG-3β²; siBeclin1 (s) 5β²-CUGAGAAUGAAUGUCAGAA, (as) 5β²-UUCUGACAUUCAUUCUCAG-3β²; siATG4B (s) 5β²-GAAAUCUUAUCCCUCUGAA-3β², (as) 5β²-UUCAGAGGGAUAAGAUUUC-3β²; siMKP3 (s) 5β²-GUCUCUAGAUCCAGCAAUA-3β², (as) 5β²-UAUUGCUGGAUCUAGAGAC-3β²; siPP2ACA (s) 5β²-CAGUAACUCCAAAGUGUCA-3β², (as) 5β²-UGACACUUUGGAGUUACUG-3β². Silencing efficiency was determined by immunoblotting for the corresponding protein product or qPCR analyses for mRNA expression when the appropriate antibody was unavailable.
Plasmids
Cyan fluorescence protein (CFP)-LC3, mutant CFP-LC3ΞG in which the C-terminal glycine (120) is deleted27, WT ATG5 (Addgene plasmid #13095)35, mutant ATG5 K130R (Addgene plasmid #13096)35, ERK2 plasmidsβWT-ERK2-HA (#8974)32, ERK2-L198A-HA (#8975)32, ERK2-L232A-HA (#8976)32, ERK2-L198A/L232A-HA (#8978)32, ERK2-Y261A-HA (#8977)32 and CD (ERK2-D319N-HA) (#8979)32 and pCGN-Elk1 (#27156)49 were acquired from Addgene (Cambridge, MA, USA) and transiently expressed by transfection with Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) as per the manufacturerβs instructions.
Statistics
All numerical data arising from biochemical and cell fractionation analyses are represented as mean and s.e.m., and are from a minimum of three independent experiments unless otherwise stated. All imaging data are represented as mean and s.e.m, and represent data from at least 50 individual cells from two or more experiments. We determined the statistical significance of the difference between experimental groups in instances of single comparisons by the two-tailed unpaired Studentβs t-test of the means. For multiple means comparisons, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Bonferroni post hoc test was used to determine statistical significance.
Additional information
How to cite this article: Martinez-Lopez, N. et al. Autophagy proteins regulate ERK phosphorylation. Nat. Commun. 4:2799 doi: 10.1038/ncomms3799 (2013).
References
Shaul, Y. D. & Seger, R. The MEK/ERK cascade: from signaling specificity to diverse functions. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1773, 1213β1226 2007.
Murphy, L. O. & Blenis, J. MAPK signal specificity: the right place at the right time. Trends Biochem. Sci. 31, 268β275 (2006).
Settembre, C. et al. TFEB links autophagy to lysosomal biogenesis. Science 332, 1429β1433 (2011).
Colecchia, D. et al. MAPK15/ERK8 stimulates autophagy by interacting with LC3 and GABARAP proteins. Autophagy 8, 1724β1740 (2012).
Pankiv, S. et al. p62/SQSTM1 binds directly to Atg8/LC3 to facilitate degradation of ubiquitinated protein aggregates by autophagy. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 24131β24145 (2007).
Rodriguez, A. et al. Mature-onset obesity and insulin resistance in mice deficient in the signaling adapter p62. Cell Metab. 3, 211β222 (2006).
Ravikumar, B., Moreau, K., Jahreiss, L., Puri, C. & Rubinsztein, D. C. Plasma membrane contributes to the formation of pre-autophagosomal structures. Nat. Cell Biol. 12, 747β757 (2010).
Morrison, D. K. & Davis, R. J. Regulation of MAP kinase signalling modules by scaffold proteins in mammals. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 19, 91β118 (2003).
Karim, M. R. et al. Cytosolic LC3 ratio as a sensitive index of macroautophagy in isolated rat hepatocytes and H4-II-E cells. Autophagy 3, 553β560 (2007).
Duran, J. M., Anjard, C., Stefan, C., Loomis, W. F. & Malhotra, V. Unconventional secretion of Acb1 is mediated by autophagosomes. J. Cell Biol. 188, 527β536 (2010).
Manjithaya, R., Anjard, C., Loomis, W. F. & Subramani, S. Unconventional secretion of Pichia pastoris Acb1 is dependent on GRASP protein, peroxisomal functions, and autophagosome formation. J. Cell Biol. 188, 537β546 (2010).
Kabeya, Y. et al. LC3, GABARAP and GATE16 localize to autophagosomal membrane depending on form-II formation. J. Cell Sci. 117, 2805β2812 (2004).
Kumanomidou, T. et al. The crystal structure of human Atg4b, a processing and de-conjugating enzyme for autophagosome-forming modifiers. J. Mol. Biol. 355, 612β618 (2006).
Sarkar, S., Davies, J. E., Huang, Z., Tunnacliffe, A. & Rubinsztein, D. C. Trehalose, a novel mTOR-independent autophagy enhancer, accelerates the clearance of mutant huntingtin and alpha-synuclein. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 5641β5652 (2007).
Backer, J. M. The regulation and function of Class III PI3Ks: novel roles for Vps34. Biochem. J. 410, 1β17 (2008).
Mauthe, M. et al. Resveratrol-mediated autophagy requires WIPI-1-regulated LC3 lipidation in the absence of induced phagophore formation. Autophagy 7, 1448β1461 (2011).
Casar, B., Pinto, A. & Crespo, P. Essential role of ERK dimers in the activation of cytoplasmic but not nuclear substrates by ERK-scaffold complexes. Mol. Cell 31, 708β721 (2008).
Roskoski, R. Jr ERK1/2 MAP kinases: structure, function, and regulation. Pharmacol. Res. 66, 105β143 (2012).
Prusty, D., Park, B. H., Davis, K. E. & Farmer, S. R. Activation of MEK/ERK signaling promotes adipogenesis by enhancing peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma ) and C/EBPalpha gene expression during the differentiation of 3T3-L1 preadipocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 46226β46232 (2002).
Singh, R. et al. Autophagy regulates lipid metabolism. Nature 458, 1131β1135 (2009).
Nair, U., Thumm, M., Klionsky, D. J. & Krick, R. GFP-Atg8 protease protection as a tool to monitor autophagosome biogenesis. Autophagy 7, 1546β1550 (2011).
Yoneda, Y., Imamoto-Sonobe, N., Yamaizumi, M. & Uchida, T. Reversible inhibition of protein import into the nucleus by wheat germ agglutinin injected into cultured cells. Exp. Cell Res. 173, 586β595 (1987).
Whitehurst, A. W. et al. ERK2 enters the nucleus by a carrier-independent mechanism. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 7496β7501 (2002).
Czaja, M. J., Liu, H. & Wang, Y. Oxidant-induced hepatocyte injury from menadione is regulated by ERK and AP-1 signaling. Hepatology 37, 1405β1413 (2003).
Bennett, B. L. et al. SP600125, an anthrapyrazolone inhibitor of Jun N-terminal kinase. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 13681β13686 (2001).
Khokhlatchev, A. V. et al. Phosphorylation of the MAP kinase ERK2 promotes its homodimerization and nuclear translocation. Cell 93, 605β615 (1998).
Tanida, I. et al. Consideration about negative controls for LC3 and expression vectors for four colored fluorescent protein-LC3 negative controls. Autophagy 4, 131β134 (2008).
Florkowska, M. et al. EGF activates TTP expression by activation of ELK-1 and EGR-1 transcription factors. BMC Mol. Biol. 13, 8 (2012).
Settembre, C. et al. A lysosome-to-nucleus signalling mechanism senses and regulates the lysosome via mTOR and TFEB. EMBO J. 31, 1095β1108 (2012).
Tanida, I., Tanida-Miyake, E., Ueno, T. & Kominami, E. The human homolog of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Apg7p is a Protein-activating enzyme for multiple substrates including human Apg12p, GATE-16, GABARAP, and MAP-LC3. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 1701β1706 (2001).
Burkhard, K. A., Chen, F. & Shapiro, P. Quantitative analysis of ERK2 interactions with substrate proteins: roles for kinase docking domains and activity in determining binding affinity. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 2477β2485 (2011).
Dimitri, C. A., Dowdle, W., MacKeigan, J. P., Blenis, J. & Murphy, L. O. Spatially separate docking sites on ERK2 regulate distinct signaling events in vivo. Curr. Biol. 15, 1319β1324 (2005).
Fantz, D. A., Jacobs, D., Glossip, D. & Kornfeld, K. Docking sites on substrate proteins direct extracellular signal-regulated kinase to phosphorylate specific residues. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 27256β27265 (2001).
Jacobs, D., Glossip, D., Xing, H., Muslin, A. J. & Kornfeld, K. Multiple docking sites on substrate proteins form a modular system that mediates recognition by ERK MAP kinase. Genes Dev. 13, 163β175 (1999).
Hamacher-Brady, A. et al. Response to myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury involves Bnip3 and autophagy. Cell Death. Differ. 14, 146β157 (2007).
Satoo, K. et al. The structure of Atg4B-LC3 complex reveals the mechanism of LC3 processing and delipidation during autophagy. EMBO J. 28, 1341β1350 (2009).
Marino, G. et al. Autophagy is essential for mouse sense of balance. J. Clin. Invest. 120, 2331β2344 (2010).
Wang, Y. et al. Loss of macroautophagy promotes or prevents fibroblast apoptosis depending on the death stimulus. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 4766β4777 (2008).
Cuervo, A. M. Autophagy and aging: keeping that old broom working. Trends Genet. 24, 604β612 (2008).
Kaushik, S. et al. Loss of autophagy in hypothalamic POMC neurons impairs lipolysis. EMBO Rep. 13, 258β265 (2012).
Singh, R. et al. Autophagy regulates adipose mass and differentiation in mice. J. Clin. Invest. 119, 3329β3339 (2009).
Martinez-Lopez, N. et al. Autophagy in Myf5+ progenitors regulates energy and glucose homeostasis through control of brown fat and skeletal muscle development. EMBO Rep. 14, 795β803 (2013).
Shimizu, S. et al. Inhibition of autophagy potentiates the antitumor effect of the multikinase inhibitor sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma. Int. J. Cancer 131, 548β557 (2012).
Komatsu, M. et al. Impairment of starvation-induced and constitutive autophagy in Atg7-deficient mice. J. Cell Biol. 169, 425β434 (2005).
Mizushima, N. et al. Dissection of autophagosome formation using Apg5-deficient mouse embryonic stem cells. J. Cell Biol. 152, 657β668 (2001).
Cuervo, A. M., Palmer, A., Rivett, A. J. & Knecht, E. Degradation of proteasomes by lysosomes in rat liver. Eur. J. Biochem. 227, 792β800 (1995).
Marzella, L., Ahlberg, J. & Glaumann, H. Isolation of autophagic vacuoles from rat liver: morphological and biochemical characterization. J. Cell Biol. 93, 144β154 (1982).
Dunn, W. A. Jr Studies on the mechanisms of autophagy: maturation of the autophagic vacuole. J. Cell Biol. 110, 1935β1945 (1990).
Lee, S. M., Vasishtha, M. & Prywes, R. Activation and repression of cellular immediate early genes by serum response factor cofactors. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 22036β22049 (2010).
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr Ana Maria Cuervo for helpful suggestions, and Bindi Patel for help with electron microscopy. This work was supported by DK087776 (R.S.), AG043517 (R.S.), an Ellison Medical Foundation new scholar award (R.S.), and DK020541 to the Einstein Diabetes Research Center. D.A. is supported by NIH training grant 5T32GM728837.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
N.M.-L. performed the experiments and analysed the data. D.A. assisted with immunofluorescence microscopy. S.S. and P.M. assisted with in vivo experiments. R.S. conceived the idea, designed the experiments, analysed and interpreted the data, and wrote the manuscript. All authors discussed and commented on the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Figures S1-S14 and Supplementary Table S1 (PDF 5985 kb)
Rights and permissions
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence. To view a copy of this licence visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Martinez-Lopez, N., Athonvarangkul, D., Mishall, P. et al. Autophagy proteins regulate ERK phosphorylation. Nat Commun 4, 2799 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3799
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3799
This article is cited by
-
The aging mouse CNS is protected by an autophagy-dependent microglia population promoted by IL-34
Nature Communications (2024)
-
Autophagy and autophagy-related pathways in cancer
Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology (2023)
-
Targeting the RAS/RAF/MAPK pathway for cancer therapy: from mechanism to clinical studies
Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy (2023)
-
Emerging roles of the cellular prion protein (PrPC) and 37/67Β kDa laminin receptor (RPSA) interaction in cancer biology
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences (2023)
-
The dual roles of autophagy and the GPCRs-mediating autophagy signaling pathway after cerebral ischemic stroke
Molecular Brain (2022)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.