Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluating local differences in breast cancer incidence rates: A census-based methodology (United States)

  • Published:
Cancer Causes & Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives: We used readily accessible, existing data to assess whether or not geographic variation in breast cancer incidence rates in the San Francisco Bay Area was related to the unequal distribution of known breast cancer risk factors.

Methods: Cancer registry and 1990 census block-group data were used to look at the associations between breast cancer incidence and known risk factors (including parity, urban/rural status, and socioeconomic indicators) in 25 California counties. Average annual age-adjusted invasive breast cancer incidence rates were calculated for the period 1988-1992, and adjusted morbidity ratios were computed.

Results: While breast cancer incidence in Marin County was 9 percent higher than that of the other 24 counties combined (relative risk=1.09, 95 percent confidence interval=1.01-1.18), this increase appeared to be due to the unequal distribution of known risk factors. Block-groups that had a high level of any risk factor had higher incidence rates, regardless of geographic location. After multivariate adjustment, breast cancer incidence no longer differed between Marin and the other counties (adjusted morbidity ratio=1.02).

Conclusions: The results suggest that the unequal distribution of known risk factors was responsible for Marin County's high breast cancer incidence rate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kosary CL, Ries LAG, Miller BA, Hankey BF, Harras A, Edwards BK, eds. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1973-1992: Tables and Graphs, National Cancer Institute. NIH Pub. No. 96-2789. Bethesda, MD, 1995.

  2. Glaser SL, Satariano ER, Leung RW, Prehn AW, Cady CM, West DW, eds. Cancer Incidence by Race/Ethnicity in the San Francisco Bay Area: Twenty years of cancer reporting, 1973-1992. Union City, CA: Northern California Cancer Center, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bureau of the Census. Census of Population and Housing, 1990: Summary Tape File 3 on CD-ROM (machine-readable data files). Washington, DC: Bureau of the Census, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Madigan MP, Ziegler RG, Benichou J, Byrne C, Hoover RN. Proportion of breast cancer cases in the United States explained by well-established risk factors. J Natl Cancer Inst 1995; 87: 1681–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bruzzi P, Green SB, Byar DP, Brinton LA, Schairer C. Estimating the population attributable risk for multiple risk factors using case-control data. Am J Epidemiol 1985; 122: 904–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Robbins AS, Brescianini S, Kelsey JL. Regional differences in known risk factors and the higher incidence of breast cancer in San Francisco. J Natl Cancer Inst 1997; 89: 960–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Krieger N. Overcoming the absence of socioeconomic data in medical records: validation and application of a census-based methodology. Am J Public Health 1992; 82: 703–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kelsey JL. Breast cancer epidemiology: summary and future directions. Epidemiol Rev 1993; 15: 256–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Krieger N. Women and social class; a methodological study comparing individual, household, and census measures as predictors of black/white differences in reproductive history. J Epidemiol Comm Health 1991; 45: 35–42.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Breslow NE, Day NE. Statistical Methods in Cancer Research: Volume 1-The Analysis of Case-Control Studies. IARC Scientific Pub. No. 32. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  11. US Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. Census of Population and Housing, 1970: General Population Characteristics, Final Report PC (1)-B. Washington, DC: The Bureau of the Census.

  12. Dean AG, Imrey HH, Dusich K, Hall WN. Adjusting morbidity ratios in two communities using risk factor prevalence in cases. Am J Epidemiol 1988; 127: 654–62.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sturgeon SR, Schairer C, Gail M, McAdams M, Brinton LA, Hoover RN. Geographic variation in mortality from breast cancer among white women in the United States. J Natl Cancer Inst 1995; 87: 1846–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Laden F, Spiegelman D, Neas LM, et al. Geographic variation in breast cancer incidence rates in a cohort of US women. J Natl Cancer Inst 1997; 89: 1373–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Greenwald HP, Polissar NL, Borgatta EF, McCorkle R. Detecting survival effects of socioeconomic status: problems in the use of aggregate measures. J Clin Epidemiol 1994; 47: 903–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Susser M. The logic in ecological: II. The logic of design. Am J Public Health 1994; 84: 830–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Safe HS. Xenoestrogens and breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1997; 337: 1303–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Northern California Cancer Center, Union City, 32960 Alvarado-Niles Road, Suite 600, Union City, California, 94587, USA

    Angela Witt Prehn & Dee W. West

Authors
  1. Angela Witt Prehn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dee W. West
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Prehn, A.W., West, D.W. Evaluating local differences in breast cancer incidence rates: A census-based methodology (United States). Cancer Causes Control 9, 511–517 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008809819218

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008809819218

Search

Navigation