Elsevier

Urology

Volume 63, Issue 2, February 2004, Pages 333-336
Urology

Adult urology
Invasion of seminal vesicles by adenocarcinoma of the prostate: PSA outcome determined by preoperative and postoperative factors

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2003.09.042Get rights and content

Abstract

Objectives

To determine which preoperative and postoperative factors were predictive of the time to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) failure after radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) for patients with seminal vesicle invasion (SVI). SVI by prostate cancer is associated with high PSA failure rates after RRP and subsequent distant metastases.

Methods

Between 1988 and 2002, 1697 patients with prostate cancer underwent RRP at Brigham and Women's Hospital, of whom 103 (6%) had SVI. Cox regression multivariable analysis was used to determine whether the preoperative PSA level, prostatectomy Gleason score, margin status, or presence of extraprostatic extension was predictive of the time to postoperative PSA failure. Estimates of PSA outcome were made using the actuarial method of Kaplan and Meier for patients who had none, all, or at least one of the factors that predicted for the time to postoperative PSA failure.

Results

The statistically significant categorical predictors of the time to PSA failure after RRP in patients with SVI included prostatectomy Gleason score of 4+3 or greater (P = 0.009), preoperative PSA level greater than 20 ng/dL when evaluated as a categorical or as a continuous variable (P = 0.002 and P = 0.001, respectively), and margin positivity (P = 0.075) which was of borderline significance. The 3-year estimate of PSA control was 52% to 100%, 28%, and 0% for patients with negative margins, preoperative PSA less than 20 ng/dL, and prostatectomy Gleason score of 3+4 or less versus having one to two or all three predictors of the time to postoperative PSA failure.

Conclusions

The PSA outcome after RRP for patients with SVI varies depending on the preoperative PSA level, prostatectomy Gleason score, and margin status.

Section snippets

Patient selection and treatment

Between 1988 and 2002, 1697 patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer (2002) clinical Stage T1 or T2 prostate cancer underwent RRP at the Brigham and Women's Hospital (Table I). Serum PSA levels were drawn within 1 month before surgery. All patients underwent limited bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection. Obturator nodes were sampled from between the external iliac vein and the obturator nerve. The surgical specimens were pathologically examined after removal to evaluate the SVs,

Results

The significant categorical predictors of the time to PSA failure after RRP in patients with SVI included prostatectomy Gleason score of 4+3 or greater (P = 0.009) and preoperative PSA greater than 20 ng/dL (P = 0.002); margin positivity (P = 0.075) was of borderline significance. The presence of extraprostatic extension was not a statistically significant predictor of postoperative PSA failure (P = 0.272). When evaluated as continuous variables, both the preoperative PSA level (P = 0.001) and

Comment

SVI by prostate cancer is becoming less frequently identified in pathologic specimens after RRP given the use of PSA screening and early detection. Historically, involvement of the SVs at the time of RRP had been considered a poor prognostic indicator.5 Blute and colleagues6 found, in a group of 2518 patients treated with RRP, that those who were found to have SVI by tumor cells or micrometastases experienced a lower 5-year progression-free survival (52% in patients with SVI versus 81% in

Cited by (32)

  • A novel imaging based Nomogram for predicting post-surgical biochemical recurrence and adverse pathology of prostate cancer from pre-operative bi-parametric MRI

    2021, EBioMedicine
    Citation Excerpt :

    However, approximately 20% to 40% of patients experience biochemical recurrence (BCR) who may further develop metastasis after definitive treatment [2–4]. In addition, it has been shown that 25% of patients with low PCa volume and biopsy Gleason Grade Group (GG) 2 harbor adverse pathology (AP) [5], which is known to be a predictor for developing BCR and subsequent metastasis [6,7], and thus indicates exclusion of active surveillance [8]. Several tools have been proposed to identify patients at risk of presence of AP at final pathology [8], developing BCR [9,10], and subsequent metastasis [9–11].

  • Lymph node yield during radical prostatectomy does not impact rate of biochemical recurrence in patients with seminal vesicle invasion and node-negative disease

    2018, Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations
    Citation Excerpt :

    In distinction, establishing lymph node invasion is much more variable due to lack of consistency for which men undergo PLND, the number of nodes removed, and the area(s) resected. Similarly, other at-risk characteristics such as positive surgical margins or sites of extraprostatic extension can be misrepresented, simply because seminal vesicles are easier to pathologically assess [23–29]. This is the first report to focus on the potential of reducing BCR in men undergoing PLND with SVI who had no adjuvant therapy. In this highly selected group with SVI (with and without PLND), the unadjusted risk of BCR at 3 years was 61.1%.

  • A contemporary analysis of outcomes of adenocarcinoma of the prostate with seminal vesicle invasion (pT3b) after radical prostatectomy

    2011, Journal of Urology
    Citation Excerpt :

    The factors most likely to predict biochemical recurrence were advanced clinical stage (greater than T2b), intermediate7 or high risk8–10 pathological Gleason sum, and positive SMs. Multiple series have demonstrated that preoperative PSA, Gleason sum and SM positivity predict BFS.1,6,7,17 PSA was not an important predictor of outcome on multivariate analysis, most likely since our approach focused more directly on the PSA era, so that PSA levels were truncated by improved screening and detection.

  • Development and Split-Sample Validation of a Nomogram Predicting the Probability of Seminal Vesicle Invasion at Radical Prostatectomy

    2007, European Urology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Specifically, Korman et al [10] suggested that sparing the distal portion of the SVs at RP may be justified without compromising cancer control. A similar trend appeared in the radiation oncology literature: Bloom et al [11] indicated that, in select patients, the tips of the SVs may be safely excluded from the radiation field. However, exclusion of SVs from the surgical specimen or the radiation field was not universally accepted.

  • Should the Gleason grading system for prostate cancer be modified to account for high-grade tertiary components? A systematic review and meta-analysis

    2007, Lancet Oncology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Extraprostatic extension was seen with similar frequency in patients with Gleason score 4+4 with (77%, 20 of 26) or without (71%, 65 of 91) a tertiary grade. Invasion of the seminal vesicles by prostate cancer is detected in fewer than 10% of patients, and is widely considered an indicator of poor outcome after radical prostatectomy.28 This invasion has traditionally been associated with occult micro-metastases, as depicted by the high incidence of biochemical failure and the subsequent development of metastatic disease, although the 5-year PSA-progression rate for patients with seminal-vesicle invasion varies between 5% and 60%.29

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text