Adult urologyInvasion of seminal vesicles by adenocarcinoma of the prostate: PSA outcome determined by preoperative and postoperative factors
Section snippets
Patient selection and treatment
Between 1988 and 2002, 1697 patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer (2002) clinical Stage T1 or T2 prostate cancer underwent RRP at the Brigham and Women's Hospital (Table I). Serum PSA levels were drawn within 1 month before surgery. All patients underwent limited bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection. Obturator nodes were sampled from between the external iliac vein and the obturator nerve. The surgical specimens were pathologically examined after removal to evaluate the SVs,
Results
The significant categorical predictors of the time to PSA failure after RRP in patients with SVI included prostatectomy Gleason score of 4+3 or greater (P = 0.009) and preoperative PSA greater than 20 ng/dL (P = 0.002); margin positivity (P = 0.075) was of borderline significance. The presence of extraprostatic extension was not a statistically significant predictor of postoperative PSA failure (P = 0.272). When evaluated as continuous variables, both the preoperative PSA level (P = 0.001) and
Comment
SVI by prostate cancer is becoming less frequently identified in pathologic specimens after RRP given the use of PSA screening and early detection. Historically, involvement of the SVs at the time of RRP had been considered a poor prognostic indicator.5 Blute and colleagues6 found, in a group of 2518 patients treated with RRP, that those who were found to have SVI by tumor cells or micrometastases experienced a lower 5-year progression-free survival (52% in patients with SVI versus 81% in
References (15)
- et al.
Adenocarcinoma of the prostate invading the seminal vesicleprognostic stratification based on pathologic parameters
Urology
(2000) - et al.
A multivariate analysis of clinical and pathological factors that predict for prostate specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer
J Urol
(1995) - et al.
Prognostic indicators in patients with seminal vesicle involvement following radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer
J Urol
(1998) - et al.
Prostate-specific antigen after anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomypatterns of recurrence and cancer control
Urol Clin North Am
(1997) - et al.
Use of Gleason score, prostate-specific antigen, seminal vesicle and margin status to predict biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy
J Urol
(2001) - et al.
Prognostic factors for survival of patients with pathological Gleason score 7 prostate cancerdifferences in outcome between primary Gleason grades 3 and 4
J Urol
(2001) - et al.
Biochemical and pathological predictors of recurrence of prostatic adenocarcinoma with seminal vesicle invasion
J Urol
(2003)
Cited by (32)
A novel imaging based Nomogram for predicting post-surgical biochemical recurrence and adverse pathology of prostate cancer from pre-operative bi-parametric MRI
2021, EBioMedicineCitation Excerpt :However, approximately 20% to 40% of patients experience biochemical recurrence (BCR) who may further develop metastasis after definitive treatment [2–4]. In addition, it has been shown that 25% of patients with low PCa volume and biopsy Gleason Grade Group (GG) 2 harbor adverse pathology (AP) [5], which is known to be a predictor for developing BCR and subsequent metastasis [6,7], and thus indicates exclusion of active surveillance [8]. Several tools have been proposed to identify patients at risk of presence of AP at final pathology [8], developing BCR [9,10], and subsequent metastasis [9–11].
Lymph node yield during radical prostatectomy does not impact rate of biochemical recurrence in patients with seminal vesicle invasion and node-negative disease
2018, Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original InvestigationsCitation Excerpt :In distinction, establishing lymph node invasion is much more variable due to lack of consistency for which men undergo PLND, the number of nodes removed, and the area(s) resected. Similarly, other at-risk characteristics such as positive surgical margins or sites of extraprostatic extension can be misrepresented, simply because seminal vesicles are easier to pathologically assess [23–29]. This is the first report to focus on the potential of reducing BCR in men undergoing PLND with SVI who had no adjuvant therapy. In this highly selected group with SVI (with and without PLND), the unadjusted risk of BCR at 3 years was 61.1%.
A contemporary analysis of outcomes of adenocarcinoma of the prostate with seminal vesicle invasion (pT3b) after radical prostatectomy
2011, Journal of UrologyCitation Excerpt :The factors most likely to predict biochemical recurrence were advanced clinical stage (greater than T2b), intermediate7 or high risk8–10 pathological Gleason sum, and positive SMs. Multiple series have demonstrated that preoperative PSA, Gleason sum and SM positivity predict BFS.1,6,7,17 PSA was not an important predictor of outcome on multivariate analysis, most likely since our approach focused more directly on the PSA era, so that PSA levels were truncated by improved screening and detection.
Predictive histological parameters of seminal vesicle invasion in prostate cancer
2008, Revista Espanola de PatologiaDevelopment and Split-Sample Validation of a Nomogram Predicting the Probability of Seminal Vesicle Invasion at Radical Prostatectomy
2007, European UrologyCitation Excerpt :Specifically, Korman et al [10] suggested that sparing the distal portion of the SVs at RP may be justified without compromising cancer control. A similar trend appeared in the radiation oncology literature: Bloom et al [11] indicated that, in select patients, the tips of the SVs may be safely excluded from the radiation field. However, exclusion of SVs from the surgical specimen or the radiation field was not universally accepted.
Should the Gleason grading system for prostate cancer be modified to account for high-grade tertiary components? A systematic review and meta-analysis
2007, Lancet OncologyCitation Excerpt :Extraprostatic extension was seen with similar frequency in patients with Gleason score 4+4 with (77%, 20 of 26) or without (71%, 65 of 91) a tertiary grade. Invasion of the seminal vesicles by prostate cancer is detected in fewer than 10% of patients, and is widely considered an indicator of poor outcome after radical prostatectomy.28 This invasion has traditionally been associated with occult micro-metastases, as depicted by the high incidence of biochemical failure and the subsequent development of metastatic disease, although the 5-year PSA-progression rate for patients with seminal-vesicle invasion varies between 5% and 60%.29