Review
Prostate cancer chemoprevention: Current status and future prospects

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2006.11.008Get rights and content

Abstract

Chemoprevention is a strategy that aims to reduce the incidence and burden of cancer through the development of agents to prevent, reverse or delay the carcinogenic process. Prostate cancer is a suitable target for prevention because it has a high incidence and prevalence, as well as a long latency and disease-related mortality, and furthermore it is a disease in which lifestyle and environmental factors may play critical roles. The development of chemoprevention strategies against prostate cancer will have a huge impact, both medically and economically. Large-scale clinical trials suggest that some agents such as selenium, lycopene, soy, green tea, vitamins D and E, anti-inflammatory and inhibitors of 5α-reductase are effective in preventing prostate cancer. Although each agent has the potential to affect the natural history of the disease, it is important to develop strategies to strategically proceed for the design and selection of test agents in order to demonstrate clinical benefit with the minimum of adverse effects. Appropriate selection of agent(s), disease stage, trial design and endpoints is critical in selecting the most promising regimens to accomplish these goals. This review highlights the present status of prostate cancer chemoprevention and discusses future prospects for chemopreventive strategies that are safe and clinically beneficial.

Introduction

In recent years, cancer chemoprevention emerged as one of the major approaches for reducing cancer burden. The term ‘chemoprevention’ was first introduced by Michael B Sporn in 1976, referring to the prevention of cancer development by natural forms of vitamin A. This strategy seems to be promising for reducing cancer incidence both in well defined “high-risk” groups and also in the general population with “low-risk” of developing cancer. Chemoprevention, by definition, is a strategy for pharmacological intervention with naturally occurring and/or synthetic compounds that may prevent, inhibit or reverse carcinogenesis or suppress the development of invasive cancer (Sporn and Suh, 2002). The expanded definition of cancer chemoprevention is to inhibit or delay the development of neoplasia by blocking neoplastic inception as well as reversing the progression of transformed cells before the appearance of malignant lesions (Shukla and Gupta, 2005). In recent years, cancer chemoprevention has matured substantially and has been increasingly recognized by National Cancer Institute (NCI) prevention branch, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), American Cancer Society (ACS), American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) and some private foundations such as American Institute for Cancer Research (AICR) and Cancer Research and Prevention Foundation (CRPF). The development of chemopreventive agents is the major objective of the Chemoprevention Branch of the Division of Cancer Prevention (DCP) at NCI. The NCI-DCP aims to develop and implement research through clinical trials, screening and testing of new agents and identification of surrogate endpoint markers or cancer incidence reduction. The NCI also supports small- and large-scale clinical trials for this purpose. The overall goals of these programs are to achieve reduction in cancer incidence and mortality as well as to improve the quality of life in high- and low-risk individuals.

Section snippets

Cancer chemoprevention

Successful implementation of chemoprevention depends on a mechanistic understanding of carcinogenesis at the molecular, cellular and tissue levels. Carcinogenesis is a multi-step, multi-path and multi-focal process which involves a series of epigenetic and genetic alterations that begin with genomic instability and end with the development of cancer. At the molecular level, this process involves activation of oncogenes, loss of function of tumor suppressor genes, modulation in genes related to

Prostate cancer chemoprevention—clinical trials

Prostate cancer represents in many ways an ideal candidate for chemoprevention because of its high incidence and long latency period before the development of clinically evident disease (Klein, 2005). A large group of men who have a negative biopsy for prostate cancer but have rising PSA levels are advised for ‘watchful waiting’ and are turning to clinicians to find out steps to reduce the risk of being affected by the disease. Appropriate evidence-based studies are needed to test the efficacy

Conclusions

In recent years, there has been a great deal of research directed at the prevention of prostate cancer. The recent completed prevention trial on prostate cancer (PCPT) suggests that long-term preventive use of biologically active agents may be associated with unforeseen and possibly adverse biological effects. Clearly the risks and side-effects of chemopreventive agents must be weighed carefully against the potential cancer preventive benefits. The PCPT trial emphasizes that cancer

Future prospects

The future of cancer chemoprevention will be based on continuing progress in discovering and implementing these approaches in the following areas:

  • Development of agents that precisely target molecular events involved in carcinogenesis.

  • The discovery of new agents which are effective, safe, free of undesirable side-effects and usable over relatively long periods of time.

  • The coordinated efforts of scientists, biotechnologist, geneticists and physicians in advancing this area of investigation.

  • Better

Acknowledgments

This review is dedicated to my mentor Dr. Hasan Mukhtar to commemorate his 60th birthday. I will always remain thankful to him for his constant support and encouragement to further my career.

References (30)

  • F. Khachik et al.

    Chemistry, distribution, and metabolism of tomato carotenoids and their impact on human health

    Exp. Biol. Med.

    (2002)
  • V.A. Kirsh et al.

    A prospective study of lycopene and tomato product intake and risk of prostate cancer

    Cancer Epidemiol., Biomarkers Prev.

    (2006)
  • E.A. Klein

    Can prostate cancer be prevented?

    Nat. Clin. Pract. Urol.

    (2005)
  • O. Kucuk et al.

    Phase II randomized clinical trial of lycopene supplementation before radical prostatectomy

    Cancer Epidemiol., Biomarkers Prev.

    (2001)
  • O. Kucuk et al.

    Effects of lycopene supplementation in patients with localized prostate cancer

    Exp. Biol. Med.

    (2002)
  • Cited by (39)

    • Plant derived coumestrol phytochemical targets human skin carcinoma cells by inducing mitochondrial-mediated apoptosis, cell cycle arrest, inhibition of cell migration and invasion and modulation of m-TOR/PI3K/AKT signalling pathway

      2021, Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences
      Citation Excerpt :

      Naturally occurring or semi-synthetic/synthetic compounds that act as chemopreventives inhibit carcinogenesis at advanced stage or at initiation stage of cancer. The process of carcinogenesis is stopped, inhibited or reversed by the application of these chemopreventives (Shukla and Gupta, 2005; Guptam, 2007). Several in vitro and in vivo investigations regarding plant-based compounds, like alkaloids, xanthones, terpenoids, coumarins, flavonoids, anthocyanins as well as phytoestrogens, have reported anticancer cancer behaviour against a wide range of cancers in experimental models.

    • Phenazine-1-carboxylic acid-induced programmed cell death in human prostate cancer cells is mediated by reactive oxygen species generation and mitochondrial-related apoptotic pathway

      2016, Journal of Applied Biomedicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Researchers are now effectively trying to identify a novel natural product that can significantly inhibit the proliferation of tumor cell growth without disturbing normal cells (Krishnan et al., 2003). With regard to PCA chemoprevention, natural products had more interest with chemoprevention (Gupta, 2007; Singh et al., 2002). Phenazines, a group of heterocyclic nitrogenous compounds isolated from the bacteria including actinobacteria and Pseudomonas (Giddens et al., 2002; Mavrodi et al., 2006).

    • Isolation and characterization of flavanols from Anthocephalus cadamba and evaluation of their antioxidant, antigenotoxic, cytotoxic and COX-2 inhibitory activities

      2016, Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia
      Citation Excerpt :

      Identification of natural products with specific molecular and cellular targets can provide an effective approach to cancer chemoprevention. Such an approach can be accomplished through isolation, characterization and preclinical evaluation for their development as chemopreventive agents (Lippman and Hong, 2002; Gupta, 2007). Evaluation of antimutagenic activities of natural products becomes necessary, as there is concordance between antimutagenicity and anticarcinogenicity (Maron and Ames, 1983; El-Sayed et al., 2007).

    • Recent advances in pancreatic cancer: Biology, treatment, and prevention

      2015, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta - Reviews on Cancer
      Citation Excerpt :

      Although the potential use of herbal components for the protection against various cancers began several decades ago, studies to understand the mechanism of their action at biochemical, genomic, and proteomic levels started very recently. Many plant products, such as triterpenes, flavonoids or polyphenols, are now established potent chemopreventive agents [11–15]. The phenolic substances are isolated from the wide range of vascular plants and have the ability to reduce and scavenge free radicals [16,17].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text