ReviewInsight opinion to surgically treated metastatic bone disease: Scandinavian Sarcoma Group Skeletal Metastasis Registry report of 1195 operated skeletal metastasis
Introduction
The burden of cancer is increasing in welfare states. In the Nordic countries, the prevalence of cancer has grown steadily over recent years to about 100 cases per 100,000 persons annually. The cancer mortality rate has remained almost the same over the last 10 years, with an increase of only 2% (58 130 in 1999 vs. 59 440 in 2008) while the incidence of cancer has increased 18% (110 629 in 1999 vs. 130 455 in 2008) [1]. Although the treatment of different primary cancers has become very specialized and effective, the disease will eventually disseminate in some patients. Metastasis results from the spread of tumour cells from their site of origin to other organs. The organ distribution of metastases depends on the type and location of the primary tumour and the route of dissemination of metastatic cells; for example, breast and prostate cancer often metastasize to bone [2]. As treatment options for patients with metastases have improved, the number of patients living with disease is growing, which has led to an increase in cancer-induced complications, such as skeletal-related events like pain, pathologic fractures, hypercalcaemia, anaemia, and paraparesis [3].
Destruction of bone by metastatic disease reduces its load-bearing capabilities and results initially in microfractures. Microfractures can cause pain and eventually lead to a complete fracture of the bone. Some bone metastases are painless, but most bone lesions develop symptoms such as load-related pain or pain at rest [4]. Surgery is most commonly needed for mechanical complications, such as impending or existing fracture, or intractable pain [5]. The main advantages of surgery are immediate pain relief, restored function with possible full weight-bearing, and unlimited range of motion, which can help the patient with activities of daily living.
Bone metastasis indicates that the malignant process is incurable. Survival with metastasized cancer has increased and continues to increase especially in some patients, and therefore data about long-term survivors is needed. In oncologic orthopaedics, the choice of surgical treatment varies between prophylactic intramedullary nailing to massive resection prosthesis. The method of choice depends on the site of metastasis and patient survival. The value and predictability of survival in patients with pathologic fractures in the extremities has increased with the number of case studies reported.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate 1195 surgically treated bone metastases to better understand the relationship between primary diagnosis, location of bone metastases and history of cancer disease with survival, disease free interval and complications after surgery and making a simple prognostic scale for survival after operation of skeletal metastases.
Section snippets
Study design
The Scandinavian Sarcoma Group (SSG) was constituted in 1979. The SSG Skeletal Metastases Registry was started in 1999 to improve treatment of patients with bone metastases. It is a multicenter prospective registry of surgically treated non-spinal skeletal metastases in patients treated at one of eight major Scandinavian referral centres. It is the world's largest registry of surgically treated skeletal metastases; a total of 1195 skeletal metastases in 1107 patients. Patients were operated on
Main indication for surgery
Complete fracture was the major reason for surgery in 74.2% of the cases and impending fracture in 18.3% of cases (Table 3). Survival was longer in cases undergoing surgery was pain or impending fracture. In these patients, mean age was lower (63.8 years with impending fracture vs. 67.7 years with complete fracture) and time from metastases to surgery was shorter (11.7 months vs. 15.4 months, respectively) compared to patients with complete fractures. Operations for impending fracture were
Discussion
Survival data and knowledge of the primary tumour causing pathologic fractures are highly relevant to physicians who are confronted with the difficult problem of managing pathologic fractures. Palliative surgery is needed for patients with metastatic bone lesions that cause severe pain with no response to other treatment options. Based on these data comprising over 1100 patients, skeletal metastases complicate a wide range of malignancies and malignant tumours can metastasize in many different
Conflict of interest statement
None declared.
References (31)
- et al.
Histomorphometric evidence for osteoclast-mediated bone resorption in metastatic breast cancer
Bone
(1994) - et al.
Metastatic renal cell carcinoma: results of a population-based study with 25 years follow-up
Eur J Cancer
(2008) - et al.
Bone metastases are infrequent in patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer: analysis of their clinical and pathologic features
Urology
(2006) - et al.
Femoral nailing for metastatic disease of the femur: a comparison of reamed and unreamed femoral nailing
Injury
(2000) - et al.
Nordcan-a nordic tool for cancer information, planning, quality control and research
Acta Oncol
(2010) - et al.
Dissemination and growth of cancer cells in metastatic sites
Nat Rev Cancer
(2002) - et al.
The Scandinavian Sarcoma Group Skeletal Metastasis Registry. Functional outcome and pain after surgery for bone metastases in the pelvis and extremities
Acta Orthop
(2009) Clinical features of metastatic bone disease and risk of skeletal morbidity
Clin Cancer Res
(2006)- et al.
Surgical management of metastatic bone disease
J Bone Jt Surg Am
(2009) Biology of osteoclast activation in cancer
J Clin Oncol
(2001)
Fracture healing in metastatic bone disease
Clin Orthop
Management of pathologic fractures of the proximal femur: state of the art
J Orthop Trauma
Treatment of impending and actual pathological femoral fractures with the long gamma nail in the Netherlands
Eur J Surg
Metastatic disease of the femur: surgical treatment
Clin Orthop Relat Res
Survival in patients operated on for pathologic fracture: implications for end-of-life orthopedic care
J Clin Oncol
Cited by (167)
Treatment of acetabular bone metastasis
2022, Revue de Chirurgie Orthopedique et TraumatologiqueOutcomes and prognostic factors after surgery for bone metastases in the extremities and pelvis: A retrospective analysis of 140 patients
2022, Journal of Bone OncologyCitation Excerpt :Prophylactic stabilisation is both easier to perform and reported to be less complicated [44]. If metastatic cancer is present, imaging of the extremities and pelvis should be considered, particularly of the proximal femur as it is the most commonly affected location [41,45,46]. However, identifying those lesions that would lead to a fracture without surgery can be difficult.
Surgical treatment of bone metastases from osteophilic cancers. Results in 401 peripheral and spinal locations
2022, Revue de Chirurgie Orthopedique et Traumatologique