Elsevier

Surgical Oncology

Volume 13, Issues 2–3, August–November 2004, Pages 45-53
Surgical Oncology

The immunology of colorectal cancer

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suronc.2004.09.010Get rights and content

Abstract

Despite the fact that the vast majority of differentiated colorectal cancers express tumour-associated antigens (TAA's) such as Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and Ep-CAM, the immune response particularly in advanced disease is often attenuated. This may result from clonal immunocyte energy to oncofetal antigens normally expressed during cell development, immune complex disease where the TAA is repeatedly shed into the circulation and tumour-induced impairments in T cell receptor recognition and stimulation. Commonly used monoclonal anti-TAA antibody therapy is also hampered by human anti-xenogeneic antibody production and by the physical distribution of the antibody into the center of tumour deposits where blood flow is limited and where tumour neovasculature is hyperpermeable. Moreover, animal models of colorectal cancer should be assessed carefully since CEA is not normally expressed, requiring the transduction of CEA cDNA into tumour xenografts or the creation of transgenic species where the mechanisms of tumour rejection are still governed by non-human antigenic histoincompatibility. All of this has resulted in the generation of novel immune constructs designed to enhance the inherent immunogenicity of colorectal cancer, using antigenic viral genomes or cytokine transduction methodology as well as the ex vivo stimulation of dendritic antigen-presenting cells or autologous tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes. Even these powerful strategies may be foiled by intratumoural mechanisms which result in excessive apoptosis of infused cells even when they have been shown in vitro to be immunocompetent and tumour-specific. This review discusses these immune approaches in colorectal cancer and their inherent limitations.

Introduction

Colorectal cancer is one representative model for derangement in immune responses. It is also a prime candidate for specific immunotherapy designed to target the prominent tumour-associated antigens (TAA) expressed on the surface of tumour cells or to potentiate cytotoxic immunocytes within the tumour microenvironment. This field of therapy is emerging in concert with the postulated multi-step model of colorectal tumorigenesis, in which there is the sequential accumulation of a series of genetic mutations in the progression from benign adenoma to malignant invasive carcinoma [1]. Much has been made of the initial results of monoclonal anti-TAA immunotherapy. When utilized as an adjuvant in high-risk Dukes’ C colon cancer, the monoclonal antibody 17-1A (ant-EpCAM) provided a sustainable survival advantage [2] and a reduction in locoregional recurrence rates [3], although this effect has not been reproduced in recent studies of second-generation anti-TAA therapy with purified anti-idiotypic antibodies [4], [5].

These approaches have later been varied, with initially poor results using non-specific immune stimulants [6], [7] and progress toward anti-TAA therapies. The latter include passive and active specific immunotherapies employing attenuated tumour cell vaccines, tumour cell lysates, cancer-specific peptides, carbohydrate antigens, genetic constructs encoding for colorectal tumour antigens and in vitro-stimulated dendritic cell therapies capable of recognizing tumour peptides on the surface of colorectal cancer cells residing in relatively privileged environments [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14]. This review concerns basic immunology as it pertains to colorectal cancer. It will consider the nature of colorectal TAAs that may function as immunological targets and the strategies for immunotherapy. It will also describe some immunological barriers to elimination by the potentially immunocompetent cytotoxic lymphocytes that infiltrate colorectal cancer deposits.

Section snippets

Immune responses towards tumour—carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) as an immunogenic target

That the human immune system is capable of eliminating cancer is an historical concept. It was first suggested by Coley in the late 19th century, who used a ‘vaccine’ composed of killed erysipelas bacterial [15]. This approach extended the earlier work of Paul Ehrlich, who had proposed an anticancer vaccine or Zauberkugel (magic bullet), in which serum-derived Antikorper (antibodies) would be capable of eliminating cancer cells [16]. The expected response towards tumour cells should involve

Immunological tolerance to tumours: barriers to immunotherapy in colorectal cancer

Better understanding of the normal peripheral and central (thymic) induction of T-cell tolerance and T-cell deletion as it applies to ‘self’ and ‘other’ antigen–MHC recognition (in other words, a knowledge of the mechanisms of antigenic tolerance and clonal deletion) could, in theory, provide some clues to overcoming the immune anergy that may result from repeated or prolonged exposure to cancer TAAs such as CEA. In this respect, the entire T-cell repertoire is constructed intrathymically

Summary

The complex mechanisms by which tumours escape immune detection and elimination may be non-specific, antigen related or host related. Tumour antigen-specific mechanisms include loss or heterogeneity of TAA or MHC expression, particularly during metastasis, resulting in poor antigen presentation, and the movement of immunotherapies through tumour deposits based on their size and vasculature. These escape strategies are coupled to B- and T-cell tolerance induced through ‘ignorance’, anergy or

References (82)

  • E.R. Fearon et al.

    A genetic model for colorectal tumorigenesis

    Cell

    (1990)
  • G. Riethmuller et al.

    Witte J and the German Cancer Aid Group. Randomized trial of monoclonal antibody for adjuvant therapy of resected Dukes’ C colorectal carcinoma

    Lancet

    (1994)
  • G. Riethmuller et al.

    Monoclonal antibody therapy for resected Dukes’ C colorectal cancerseven year outcome of a multicenter randomized trial

    J Clin Oncol

    (1998)
  • C.J.A. Punt et al.

    Edrecolomab (17-1A antibody) alone or in combination with 5-fluorouracil based chemotherapy in the adjuvant treatment of stage III colon cancerresults of a phase III study

    Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol

    (2001)
  • C.A. Maxwell-Armstrong et al.

    Randomized double-blind phase II survival study comparing immunization with the anti-idiotypic monoclonal antibody 105AD7 against placebo in advanced colorectal cancer

    Br J Cancer

    (2001)
  • H.C. Hoover et al.

    Delayed cutaneous hypersensitivity to autologous tumour cells in colorectal cancer patients immunized with autologous tumour cellBacillus Calmette-Guerin vaccine

    Cancer Res

    (1984)
  • B.N. Gray et al.

    Controlled clinical trial of adjuvant immunotherapy with BCG and neuraminidase treated-autologous tumour cells in large bowel cancer

    J Surg Oncol

    (1989)
  • D. Herlyn et al.

    Induction of specific immunity to human colon carcinoma by anti-idiotypic antibodies to monoclonal antibody CO 17-1A

    Eur J Immunol

    (1987)
  • R.M. Conry et al.

    Selected strategies to augment polynucleotide vaccination

    Gene Ther

    (1996)
  • R.M. Conry et al.

    Human autoantibodies to carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) induced by a vaccinia-CEA vaccine

    Clin Cancer Res

    (2000)
  • H. Maruyama et al.

    Cancer vaccinessingle-epitope anti-idiotype vaccine versus multiple-epitope antigen vaccine

    Cancer Immunol Immunother

    (2000)
  • M.G. Hanna et al.

    Adjuvant active specific immunotherapy of stage II and stage III colon cancer with autologous tumor cell vaccinefirst randomised phase III trials show promise

    Vaccine

    (2001)
  • W. Chen et al.

    Dendritic cell-based cancer immunotherapypotential for treatment of colorectal cancer?

    J Gastroenterol Hepatol

    (2000)
  • J. Bubenik

    Genetically engineered dendritic cell-based cancer vaccines—review

    Int J Oncol

    (2001)
  • W.B. Coley

    The treatment of malignant tumours by repeated inoculations of erysipelas with a report of 10 original cases

    Am J Med Sci

    (1893)
  • P. Ehrlich

    The collected papers of P Ehrlich

  • L.J. Old et al.

    Antigenic properties of chemically induced tumours

    Ann NY Acad Sci

    (1962)
  • P.B. Chretien et al.

    Correlation of preoperative lymphocyte reactivity with clinical course of cancer patients

    Surg Gynecol Obstet

    (1973)
  • C.M. Pinsky et al.

    Delayed hypersensitivity reactions in patients with cancer

    Rec Results Cancer Res

    (1974)
  • P.J. Guillou et al.

    Phytohaemagglutinin stimulated transformation of peripheral and lymph node lymphocytes in patients with gastrointestinal cancer

    Br J Surg

    (1973)
  • J.R.T. Monson et al.

    Decreased interleukin-2 production in patients with gastrointestinal cancer

    Br J Surg

    (1986)
  • M.G. Whittaker et al.

    Reduced lymphocyte transformation in breast cancer

    Lancet

    (1971)
  • A.P. McLaughlin et al.

    Immunological competence in patients with urologic cancer

    J Urol

    (1974)
  • J.G. Fortner et al.

    Immunologic function in patients with carcinoma of the pancreas

    Surg Gynecol Obstet

    (1980)
  • T. Boon et al.

    Human tumor antigens recognized by T-lymphocytes

    J Exp Med

    (1996)
  • K. Tynan et al.

    Assembly and analysis of cosmid contigs in the CEA-gene family region of human chromosome 19

    Nucleic Acids Res

    (1992)
  • A.F. Williams et al.

    The immunoglobulin superfamily—domains for cell surface recognition

    Annu Rev Immunol

    (1988)
  • J. Thompson et al.

    The carcinoembryonic gene familystructure, expression and evolution

    Tumor Biol

    (1988)
  • A.P. Zbar et al.

    Biological therapyapproaches in colorectal cancer. Strategies to enhance carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) as an immunogenic target

    Br J Cancer

    (1998)
  • R.W. Wilkinson et al.

    Evaluation of a transgenic mouse model for anti-human CEA radioimmunotherapeutics

    J Nucl Med

    (2002)
  • N.K. Jerne

    Towards a network theory of the immune system

    Ann Immunol (Paris)

    (1974)
  • L.G. Durrant et al.

    Low doses of 105 AD7 cancer vaccine preferentially stimulate anti-tumour T-cell immunity

    Human Antibod Hybridoma

    (1997)
  • K.A. Foon et al.

    Clinical and immune responses in advanced colorectal cancer patients treated with anti-idiotype monoclonal antibody vaccine that mimics carcinoembryonic antigen

    Clin Cancer Res

    (1998)
  • N.S. Courtenay-Luck et al.

    Development of anti-idiotypic antibodies against tumour antigens and autoantigens in ovarian cancer patients treated intraperitoneally with mouse monoclonal antibodies

    Lancet

    (1988)
  • A. Merlo et al.

    Comparing monoclonal antibodies and small peptidic hormones for local targeting of malignant gliomas

    Acta Neurochir Suppl

    (2003)
  • L. Durrant

    Anti-idiotypic tumor immunotherapy

    Tumor Targeting

    (1995)
  • K. Kapsopoulou-Dominos et al.

    An approach to the routine estimation of circulating carcinoembryonic antigen immune complexes in patients with carcinomata of the gastrointestinal tract

    Clin Exp Immunol

    (1979)
  • M.M. Konstadoulakis et al.

    The presence of anti-carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) antibodies in the sera of patients with gastrointestinal malignancies

    J Clin Immunol

    (1994)
  • H.J. Staab et al.

    Are circulating CEA immune complexes a prognostic marker in patients with carcinoma of the gastrointestinal tract?

    Br J Cancer

    (1980)
  • T.E. Reichert et al.

    Immune cells in the tumour microenvironmentmechanisms responsible for signaling and functional defects

    J Immunother

    (1998)
  • T.L. Whiteside

    Cell-mediated dysregulation in malignancy and its therapeutic immunopotentiation

  • Cited by (19)

    • Cancer of the gastrointestinal tract results in a restricted T-cell repertoire dependent upon tumor differentiation

      2011, Cellular Immunology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Approximately 95% of circulating mature T cells in the peripheral blood utilize the T cell receptor (TCR), a heterodimer composed of α and β variant chains, for specific recognition of tumor antigens. The diversity of the TCR repertoire can be affected by the clonal expansion of T cells, and is, therefore, reflective of the tumor burden and the status of the patient’s immune function [16]. The anti-tumor immune response has previously been characterized by analysis of clonal expansion of T lymphocytes in patients with solid tumors [17–19], and skewed distributions of CDR3 spectratypes in patients with solid tumors have been reported [20].

    • Recombinant viral vectors: Cancer vaccines

      2006, Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text