Recommendations from Gynaecological (GYN) GEC-ESTRO Working Group (I): concepts and terms in 3D image based 3D treatment planning in cervix cancer brachytherapy with emphasis on MRI assessment of GTV and CTV

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2004.12.015Get rights and content

Summary

Background and purpose

Brachytherapy (BT) plays a crucial role in the management of invasive cervix cancer from stage I to IV. Intracavitary techniques are based on afterloading devices, with different types of applicators. CT and/or MRI compatible applicators allow a sectional image based approach with a better assessment of gross tumour volume (GTV) and definition and delineation of target volume (CTV) compared to traditional approaches. Accurate and reproducible delineation of GTV, CTV and PTV, as well as of critical organs has a direct impact on BT treatment planning, especially if it is possible to adapt the pear-shape isodose by optimisation using DVH analysis. When introducing a 3D image based approach for GTV and CTV assessment, there is a need for a common language to describe the concepts and to define the terms which are to be used.

Methods

In 2000, GEC-ESTRO decided to support 3D imaging based 3D treatment planning approach in cervix cancer BT with the creation of a Working Group. The task was to describe basic concepts and terms and to work out a terminology enabling various groups working in this advanced field to use a common language. The recommendations described in this report were proposed based on clinical experience and dosimetric concepts of different institutions (IGR, Leuven, Vienna) and were stepwise validated against the background of different clinical experience.

Conclusions

As GTV and CTV for BT change significantly during treatment, time frame for assessment of GTV and CTV for BT is specified in this report: at time of diagnosis GTVD, CTVD and at time of BT GTVB, CTVB. Furthermore, CTV for BT is defined related to risk for recurrence: high risk CTV and intermediate risk CTV. Beside verbal descriptions detailed examples are given, partly in form of schematic drawings.

Introduction

Brachytherapy (BT) plays a major role in the therapeutic management of patients with cervix cancer from stage I to IV. The rapid dose fall-off allows a very high dose to the central pelvis, while relatively sparing bladder, rectum, sigmoid and small bowel. Concomitant chemoradiation followed by BT represents the standard of care in patients with tumours larger than 4 cm, i.e. from stage IB2 to stage IVA. For stage IB1, BT is a treatment option as part of radical radiotherapy combined with external beam RT, or as a preoperative BT in combination with colpohysterectomy and lymphadenectomy [12]. If radiotherapy is considered, BT is generally a major part of treatment, delivering substantial dose to the tumour in the central pelvis while sparing the surrounding organs at risk [9].

Tumour volume (GTV) is well recognised as one of most important prognostic factors in terms of local control. Therefore, a complete coverage of GTV and the GTV related clinical target volume (CTV) is crucial and is to be expected to be related to a better outcome.

The implementation of treatment planning systems allows an individual adaptation of dose distribution to CTV in high dose-rate or pulsed dose-rate BT but also—however in a less extended procedure—in low dose-rate BT [3], [6], [9], [22], [31].

Target volume assessment is—even nowadays—first based on clinical examination with appropriate documentation in three dimensions [9]. If anterio-posterior and lateral dimensions are well accessible for clinical evaluation, the height of tumour may be clinically unaccessible, especially when the tumour extends to the endocervix and/or the endometrium. Nowadays, sectional imaging gives more valid and reliable information on individual tumour extension and configuration and its topography [2], [4], [7], [10], [13], [20], [23], [29], [35], [36]. By magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) tumour size and configuration have been proven to be more appropriately assessed compared to clinical examination or CT-scan [17], [21], [32], [34].

Accurate delineation of gross tumour volume (GTV), definition and delineation of CTV and PTV, as well as of critical organs has a direct impact on BT procedure, especially if it is possible to adapt the pear-shape isodose by optimisation allowing DVH analysis for a fixed dose and/or a fixed volume. It is clear that to apply these terms to utero-vaginal BT, a common language is needed [8], [14], [24].

Section snippets

Task of GYN GEC-ESTRO group

GEC-ESTRO decided in 2000 to support and promote 3D imaging based 3D treatment planning approach in cervix cancer BT. A Working Group (WG) was founded (Gynaecological (GYN) GEC-ESTRO WG), which was based on contribution of physicians and physicists from different centres actively involved in this field at that time. The task was to describe basic concepts and terms for this approach and to work out a terminology which would enable various groups working in this field to use a common language

3D image based approach: change of GTV during treatment

The development of 3D imaging based 3D treatment planning includes a new comprehensive approach for cervix cancer BT [6], [10].

The procedure is straightforward if BT is the sole method of treatment as in early disease or in a preoperative approach in limited disease. However, most patients are nowadays treated definitely with a combination of external beam therapy with simultaneous chemotherapy and BT. As GTV and topography change significantly during external beam therapy (with or without

Clinical approaches in treatment planning and performance

In promoting research and development of 3D image based BT, historical difficulties in communicating results in cervix cancer BT (‘mgh’-, ‘point A’-, ‘reference volume’-traditions, see in detail [6], [9]) should be overcome by using one terminology based on well understood concepts and terms from the beginning.

From the start of GYN GEC-ESTRO WG, it became clear that major different traditions existed also within this group, which would have a major impact on developing a 3D imaging based

GTV and CTV at diagnosis and at time of brachytherapy

Major difficulties had to be overcome to understand and combine the following ‘two worlds’:

  • *

    ‘CTV according to GTV at time of BT’ (coming from point A dose specification, with 80–90 Gy to this CTV)

  • *

    ‘CTV according to GTV at diagnosis’ (with 60 Gy to this CTV).

There was no way to understand and overcome these difficulties in concept and terminology just by theoretical discussion. Therefore, we decided to study treatment concepts and terminology by constructing a questionnaire and applying the

Protocol development 2001–2002: first steps

The first questionnaire (2001) was designed to prospectively collect information on following (Meeting Vienna 2/2001):

  • Dimensions and volumes of GTV, CTV as defined by clinical examination and by MRI:

    • at time of diagnosis

    • at time of BT (after external irradiation);

  • Dimensions and volumes of reference volume (60, 75, 90, and 120 Gy);

  • Volume of isodose going through point A;

  • Treated volume (prescribed dose);

  • Coverage in percent related to CTV and GTV;

  • DVH analysis for fixed doses and certain coverage

GTV and CTV delineation workshop I: Vienna 7/2003

As experience so far was mainly on certain shortcomings in defining a protocol for CTV and CTV related parameter assessment, it was decided to have an expert meeting (delineation workshop with theoretical and practical aspects) with a joint exercise in delineation process based on comparable clinical cases. Based on this experience, a further specification of the protocol was to be performed and be tested again in a joint evaluation.

A detailed clinical description based on an advanced 3D

Definition and delineation of GTV and CTV: final concept

The following recommendations were proposed based on clinical experience and dosimetric concepts of different institutions (IGR, Leuven, Vienna) and based on validation methodology as described in detail above. These target definitions take into account differences in BT target definition approaches with clinical traditions based on assessment of disease at diagnosis and others more based on extent of disease as it presents at time of BT.

  • *

    The approach derived from using point A as a reference

Terms and concepts definition (GYN GEC-ESTRO protocol version 09/2004)

The target concept as proposed here is based in principle on three CTVs according to tumour load and hence to the risk for recurrence: a high risk CTV with a macroscopic tumour load and an intermediate risk CTV representing significant microscopic disease. In addition, a low risk CTV including potential microscopic tumour spread can be distinguished. The low risk CTV is treated by surgery and/or by external beam radiotherapy and is not dealt with in detail (Fig. 3).

Tumour load (GTV), true

Future considerations

MRI has been clearly demonstrated to be superior to any other imaging procedure in cervix cancer allowing an accurate definition of the tumour. This superiority has also been reported in literature when comparing MRI based treatment planning to radiography based conventional treatment planning approaches [15], [35].

The recommendations on definition and delineation of GTV and CTV are based on clinical experience and different dosimetric concepts. Development of 3D image based 3D treatment

References (36)

  • R. Pötter et al.

    Survey of the use of ICRU 38 in recording and reporting cervical cancer brachytherapy

    Radiother Oncol

    (2001)
  • L.L. Subak et al.

    Cervical carcinoma: computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative staging (Review)

    Obstet Gynecol

    (1995)
  • N. Wachter-Gerstner et al.

    The impact of sectional imaging on dose escalation in endocavitary HDR-brachytherapy of cervical cancer: results of prospective comparative trial

    Radiother Oncol

    (2003)
  • N. Wachter-Gerstner et al.

    Bladder and rectum dose defined from MRI based treatment planning for cervix cancer brachytherapy: comparison of dose-volume histograms for organ contours and organ wall, comparison with ICRU rectum and bladder reference point

    Radiother Oncol

    (2003)
  • J. Dimopoulos et al.

    Systematic evaluation of MRI and clinical findings in cervical cancer at diagnosis and at time of brachytherapy: potential of MRI on delineation of GTV, patho-anatomical structures and organs at risk

    Radiother Oncol

    (2004)
  • J. Dimopoulos et al.

    Combined MRI-based intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer with a modified tandem ring applicator-clinical feasibility and preliminary results

    Radiother Oncol

    (2004)
  • S. Fromm et al.

    Correlation between the treated volume, the GTV and the CTV at the time of brachytherapy and the histopathologic findings in 33 patients with operable cervix carcinoma

    Radiother Oncol

    (2002)
  • A. Gerbaulet et al.

    Cervix cancer

  • Cited by (1304)

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    GYN GEC-ESTRO Working Group has been supported by an unrestricted grant from VARIAN to ESTRO.

    View full text