Elsevier

Lung Cancer

Volume 55, Issue 2, February 2007, Pages 187-194
Lung Cancer

Single-arm, open label study of pemetrexed plus cisplatin in chemotherapy naïve patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma: Outcomes of an expanded access program

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2006.09.023Get rights and content

Summary

Background

An expanded access program (EAP) provided patient access to pemetrexed prior to its commercial availability. The current report consists of US patients in the EAP who had chemotherapy naïve pleural mesothelioma.

Methods

Eligible patients had a histologic or cytologic diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma that was not amenable to curative treatment with surgery. Study treatment consisted of pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 in combination with cisplatin 75 mg/m2 once every 21 days. Vitamin B12, folic acid, and dexamethasone were administered as prophylaxis. Serious adverse events (SAEs) were reported by investigators and compiled in a pharmacovigilance database for all patients enrolled in the EAP.

Results

Of 1056 patients receiving at least one dose of pemetrexed in the EAP, 728 had chemotherapy naïve pleural mesothelioma. Median age of this group was 70 years (range 23–89 years) and 84% were male. Among 615 patients, overall response rate was 20.5%, including 12 complete responses (2.0%) and 114 partial responses (18.5%). An additional 290 patients (47.2%) had stable disease. Median survival for all 728 patients was 10.8 months (95% CI = 9.8, 12.3; 60.3% censorship) and 1 year survival was 45.4%. The most commonly reported SAEs in the overall EAP irrespective of causality were dehydration (7.2%), nausea (5.2%), vomiting (4.9%), dyspnea (3.8%), and pulmonary embolism (2.4%).

Conclusions

In this large cohort, 67.7% of patients treated with first-line chemotherapy experienced a response or stable disease. Survival time and toxicity from this EAP were promising for this difficult-to-treat disease.

Introduction

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive and rapidly fatal disease. Global incidence is expected to increase in future decades as a result of widespread use of asbestos during the 20th century and the delayed onset of the disease [1], [2]. Treatment options are limited for patients with unresectable MPM; until recently the absence of any demonstrable survival advantage from single-agent or combination regimens led to the use of chemotherapy with primarily palliative intent. Traditional radiation therapy, as an independent modality, has also failed to influence survival [3].

A new standard of care in first-line MPM was reached following the completion of the largest randomized phase III trial (n = 456) in the disease to date [4]. In this definitive trial, combination treatment with pemetrexed (Alimta®, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN) plus cisplatin resulted in prolonged median survival time (12.1 months versus 9.3 months, p = 0.020) and time to progression (5.7 months versus 3.9 months, p = 0.001), and improved response rates (41.3% versus 16.7%, p < 0.0001) compared with cisplatin alone. This regimen subsequently became the first to achieve regulatory approval by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for advanced MPM [5].

Pemetrexed is a structurally novel multitargeted antifolate that interferes with nucleotide synthesis by potently inhibiting several key folate-dependent enzymes involved in purine and pyrimidine synthesis, including dihydrofolate reductase, thymidylate synthase, and glycinamide ribonucleotide formyltransferase [6], [7]. This cytotoxic agent has broad anti-tumor activity, as demonstrated by a number of investigational studies in colorectal, pancreatic, breast, and bladder tumor types [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13]. Pemetrexed attained its second regulatory approval as a single agent in previously treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) on the basis of a phase III trial showing the agent to have equivalent activity but diminished toxicity when compared to docetaxel [14]. The addition of folic acid and Vitamin B12 has improved the tolerability of pemetrexed.

To ensure pemetrexed access to all prospective patients following the completion of the phase III MPM study, Eli Lilly and Company initiated an expanded access program (EAP). Upon FDA approval and commercial release of pemetrexed, this EAP was terminated. Initially, only chemotherapy naïve patients with pleural disease were included, matching the patient population that was evaluated in the phase III registration study. Later, the EAP was expanded to include patients with previously treated pleural disease and peritoneal disease. Results from these separate cohorts have been detailed previously in other reports [15], [16]. This report focuses on the cohort from the EAP of patients with chemotherapy naïve pleural disease. While not as rigorous as a randomized trial, this EAP did provide the opportunity to collect additional tumor response, survival, and basic toxicity information for pemetrexed in large MPM populations.

Section snippets

Patients and methods

From May 2002 (after the completion of the phase III trial) to February 2004 (upon FDA approval of pemetrexed), 1056 malignant mesothelioma patients were enrolled and received at least one dose of pemetrexed at 462 independent investigative sites in the United States. Of these patients, 728 had chemotherapy naïve malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). This study was performed in accordance with principles of good clinical practices, applicable laws and regulations, and the Declaration of

Results

Enrollment for patients with chemotherapy naïve, pleural disease in the EAP is summarized in Fig. 1. Between 1 May 2002 and 18 February 2004, 1056 patients with malignant mesothelioma were enrolled and received at least one dose of study treatment at 462 investigative sites in the United States. Of these, patients, the subset with chemotherapy naïve, pleural disease consisted of 728 patients, all of whom were analyzed for survival. Response data were recorded for 615 of these patients.

Table 1

Discussion

This report describes the largest group of patients reported to date with chemotherapy naïve MPM. As a result of the pemetrexed EAP, 728 patients with MPM received first-line chemotherapy while the treatment was under consideration by the FDA. As a non-randomized, open-label EAP, the design of this study was not as rigorous as other clinical trials. Nonetheless, in this large cohort, 67.7% of patients treated with first-line chemotherapy experienced a response or stable disease, and median

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all participating investigators who enrolled patients into the pemetrexed EAP, including Louis Fehrenbacher, Paul Helft, Joseph Schulz, Ramaswamy Govindan, Bruno Fang, Lee Zehngebot, Brian Berry, Raymond Taetle, John Cole, Hen-Vai Wu, Norman Rafique, Anthony Jaslowski, Randall Thomas, Suprith Badarinath, Dinesh Kapur, Robert M. Moskowitz, Dave Ettinger, Rogerio Lilenbaum, Dean Tsarwhas, David Decker, Thomas Coyle, Sukumar Ethirajan, Barry Kaplan, Clement Ho,

References (24)

  • N.J. Vogelzang et al.

    Phase III study of pemetrexed in combination with cisplatin versus cisplatin alone in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma

    J Clin Oncol

    (2003)
  • M. Hazarika et al.

    Pemetrexed in malignant pleural mesothelioma

    Clin Cancer Res

    (2005)
  • Cited by (26)

    • Peritoneal Metastases from Malignant Mesothelioma

      2018, Surgical Oncology Clinics of North America
      Citation Excerpt :

      The median survival was 13 months for patients who received the combination regimen and the disease control rate (CR + PR + SD) was 71%. Pemetrexed and cisplatin was also shown to have a favorable safety profile, and this regimen has been widely adopted as the preferred initial chemotherapeutic regimen for patients with MPM with surgically unresectable disease.33 The results of a second phase II trial evaluated the efficacy of pemetrexed and gemcitabine in surgically unresectable and chemotherapy-naïve patients with MPM.5

    • Pemetrexed in the treatment of malignant mesothelioma: Results from an expanded access program in Germany

      2010, Respiratory Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      The US EAP differed from the international trial in that only two treatment options were available, either pemetrexed alone or pemetrexed plus cisplatin. The efficacy data from this program indicated that the combination of pemetrexed with a platinum was more effective in terms of higher response and disease control rates and longer median survival, both in chemonaïve and previously treated patients, compared with single agent pemetrexed.18–20 These data are consistent with our observations suggesting a superiority of PC compared with monotherapy.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    See Acknowledgements. These data were presented in part at the 2004 American Society of Clinical Oncology meeting. This study was sponsored by Eli Lilly and Company.

    View full text