Elsevier

Lung Cancer

Volume 54, Issue 1, October 2006, Pages 1-9
Lung Cancer

Malignant pleural effusion, current and evolving approaches for its diagnosis and management

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2006.04.016Get rights and content

Summary

Malignant pleural effusion is a common and debilitating complication of advanced malignant diseases. This problem seems to affect particularly those with lung and breast cancer, contributing to the poor quality of life. Approximately half of all patients with metastatic cancer develop a malignant pleural effusion at some point, which is likely to cause significant symptoms such as dyspnea and cough. Evacuation of the pleural fluid and prevention of its re-accumulation are the main goals of management. Optimal treatment is controversial and there is no universally standard approach. Intervention options range from observation in the case of asymptomatic effusions through simple thoracentesis to more invasive methods such as chemical and mechanical pleurodesis, pleur-X catheter drainage, pleuroperitoneal shunting, and pleurectomy. The best results are reported with thoracoscopy and talc insufflation, with an acceptable morbidity. Development of novel methods to control malignant pleural effusion should be a high priority in palliative care of cancer patients. This article reviews the current, as well as, novel approaches that show some promise for the future. The aim is to identify the proper approach for each individual patient.

Introduction

Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is a common and distressing condition seen at the advanced stage of various malignant diseases. There are more than 150,000 new cases of malignant pleural effusion in the United States yearly. The majority of malignant pleural effusions have exsudative character [1]. Pleural effusion might be the first presenting sign of cancer, suggestive of recurrent or advanced disease [2]. Primary or metastatic tumors may invade the visceral pleura, affecting the normal resorptive flow of fluid from the parietal to the visceral pleura [2] or causing increased capillary leaking and increased fluid production [3]. A blockage in lymphatic system anywhere between the parietal pleura and the mediastinal lymph nodes result in accumulation of fluid in the pleural space [4]. Intrapulmonary shunt is the main underlying reason for the arterial hypoxemia associated with a large pleural effusion [5]. Lung cancer including malignant pleural mesothelioma is the most common cause of malignant pleural effusion (MPE). In women it is followed by breast cancer [6]. However, almost all forms of cancer including cancer of ovary and stomach, lymphoma, Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's disease can cause malignant pleural effusion [7]. In a series of 120 patients with malignant pleural effusion 40% of patients were found to have lung cancer and 26% had breast cancer [8]. In a meta-analysis including 811 patients with MPE, 23% of effusions resulted from breast cancer and 35% from lung cancer [9]. In 5–10% of malignant effusions, no primary tumor is identified [10]. The presence of MPE is suggestive of end stage disease with very short life expectancy [12]. However, it also occurs in patients with long survival, such as in breast cancer, Hodgkin's disease, or lymphoma [13]. A hematogenous spread of tumor would likely cause contralateral effusions, while ipsilateral effusions might be caused by hematogenous spread or direct invasion of tumor through the chest wall, as well as tumor recurrence on the chest wall or lymph nodes. Raju and Kardinal [14] reported in a series of 122 patients with breast cancer and pleural effusion that 83% of effusions were ipsilateral, 9% contralateral, and 6% bilateral. On the other hand, in Fentiman et al.'s [13] series 48% of effusions were ipsilateral, 42% contralateral, and 10% bilateral.

Paramalignant effusions are associated with a known malignancy. They are not the direct result of neoplastic involvement of the pleura but are still related to the primary tumor. These effusions include postobstructive parapneumonic effusion caused by tumors compressing bronci, chylothorax following obstruction of the thoracic duct, pulmonary embolism, transudative effusions secondary to postobstruction atelectasis, and effusions due to low plasma oncotic pressures secondary to cachexia. Radiation and chemotherapy with some agents such as methotrexate, procarbazine, cyclophosamide and bleomycin can also cause pleural effusions [15].

Approximately 10% of malignant pleural effusions are due to lymphoma. The incidence of MPE in lymphoma patients ranges between 5 and 33% [16]. The pathogenesis of pleural effusion in these patients is obstruction of the lymphatic drainage by enlarged mediastinal lymph nodes (in Hodgkin's disease) or by direct tumor infiltration of the parietal or visceral pleura (in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma) [17]. Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma is the most common cause of chylothorax [18].

Section snippets

Clinical manifestations and diagnostic studies

The first and most common presenting symptom is dyspnea (96%) [8], [19]. Other bothersome symptoms are cough (44%) and chest pain (56%) [8]. The majority of patients with MPE are symptomatic, while, less than 25% have no respiratory complaints [19]. Other symptoms include sharp pleuritic pain, dull ache with a feeling of pressure, and heaviness in the chest. A physical examination can reveal decreased breath sounds, and dullness to percussion [19].

One of the crucial aspects in management of MPE

Thoracentesis and thoracoscopy

A diagnostic thoracentesis is recommended for any unilateral effusion or bilateral effusion in an individual without obvious evidence of congestive heart failure. Ultrasonography may aid in directing thoracentesis in patients with small effusions to avoid complications [26]. There is a large variation in diagnostic yields of pleural fluid cytology ranging from 62 to 90% [27], [28]. Cytology of MPE in breast cancer has a sensitivity of 47% [29]. Pleural fluid should be evaluated for the cell

Tumor markers

Several tumor markers have been used in diagnosis of MPE, but their clinical role has not been firmly established. CA 549 is a tumor marker, which is found frequently in MPE. In a cohort of 252 patients with pleural effusion (101 malignant and 151 benign diseases) presence of CA 549 in pleural fluid demonstrated an acceptable sensitivity (0.49) and a high specificity (0.99) in detecting the malignancy [41]. A combination of tumor markers (CA 549, CEA, and CA 15-3) has been shown to have a high

Conclusion

Ideally, therapy should minimize patient's discomfort and shorten the hospital stay. Relief of dyspnea remains the primary objective for most patients. Dyspnea, exercise intolerance, and chest discomfort at the time of therapy can influence therapeutic modality. Pain relief is another important quality-of-life issue, which must be addressed. Another important aspect in any treatment is prevention of recurrence. If dyspnea is not relieved by thoracentesis, other causes of dyspnea, such as

References (117)

  • M.F. McKneally et al.

    Statement of the AATS/STS Joint Committee on Thoracoscopy and Video Assisted Thoracic Surgery

    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg

    (1992)
  • J.R. de Campos et al.

    Thoracoscopy talc poudrage: a 15-year experience

    Chest

    (2001)
  • V. Villena et al.

    Diagnostic value of CA 549 in pleural fluid. Comparison with CEA, CA 15.3 and CA 72.4

    Lung Cancer

    (2003)
  • D. Cheng et al.

    Vascular endothelial growth factor level correlates with transforming growth factor-beta isoform levels in pleural effusions

    Chest

    (2000)
  • R.W. Brown et al.

    Multiple-marker immunohistochemical phenotypes distinguishing malignant pleural mesothelioma from pulmonary adenocarcinoma

    Hum Pathol

    (1993)
  • M. Neri et al.

    Serum anti-p53 autoantibodies in pleural malignant mesothelioma, lung cancer and non-neoplastic lung diseases

    Lung Cancer

    (2003)
  • G. Groth et al.

    Intrapleural palliative treatment of malignant pleural effusions with mitoxantrone versus placebo (pleural tube alone)

    Ann Oncol

    (1991)
  • E.F. Patz et al.

    Sclerotherapy for malignant pleural effusions: a prospective randomized trial of bleomycin vs. doxycycline with small-bore catheter drainage

    Chest

    (1998)
  • W. Parulekar et al.

    Use of small-bore vs. large-bore chest tubes for treatment of malignant pleural effusions

    Chest

    (2001)
  • C. Boutin et al.

    Prevention of malignant seeding after invasive diagnostic procedures in patients with pleural mesothelioma. A randomized trial of local radiotherapy

    Chest

    (1995)
  • V. Ukale et al.

    The impact of pleurodesis in malignant effusion on respiratory function

    Respir Med

    (1999)
  • A. Sanchez-Armengol et al.

    Survival and talc pleurodesis in metastatic pleural carcinoma, revisited. Report of 125 cases

    Chest

    (1993)
  • C.M. Dresler et al.

    Phase III intergroup study of talc poudrage vs. talc slurry sclerosis for malignant pleural effusion

    Chest

    (2005)
  • L. Kennedy et al.

    Pleurodesis using talc slurry

    Chest

    (1994)
  • J.R. Viallat et al.

    Thoracoscopic talc poudrage pleurodesis for malignant effusions. A review of 360 cases

    Chest

    (1996)
  • D. Weissberg et al.

    Talc pleurodesis. Experience with 360 patients

    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg

    (1993)
  • J. Ferrer et al.

    Talc preparations used for pleurodesis vary markedly from one preparation to another

    Chest

    (2001)
  • L. Kennedy et al.

    Talc pleurodesis for the treatment of pneumothorax and pleural effusion

    Chest

    (1994)
  • A. Bouchama et al.

    Acute pneumonitis with bilateral pleural effusion after talc pleurodesis

    Chest

    (1984)
  • J.E. Heffner et al.

    Tetracycline pleurodesis. Adios, farewell, adieu

    Chest

    (1992)
  • J.E. Heffner et al.

    Clinical efficacy of doxycycline for pleurodesis

    Chest

    (1994)
  • P.J. Godley et al.

    Major hemorrhage following administration of intrapleural streptokinase

    Chest

    (1984)
  • C.W. Davies et al.

    Intrapleural streptokinase in the management of malignant multiloculated pleural effusions

    Chest

    (1999)
  • S. Ren et al.

    Intrapleural staphylococcal superantigen induces resolution of malignant pleural effusions and a survival benefit in non-small cell lung cancer

    Chest

    (2004)
  • F. Rodriguez-Panadero

    Talc pleurodesis for treating malignant pleural effusions

    Chest

    (1995)
  • A. Bernard et al.

    Early and late mortality after pleurodesis for malignant pleural effusion

    Ann Thorac Surg

    (2002)
  • I. Silverberg

    Management of effusions

    Oncology

    (1970)
  • M. Perpina et al.

    Effect of thoracentesis on pulmonary gas exchange

    Thorax

    (1983)
  • Y.C. Lee et al.

    Comparing transforming growth factor-beta2, talc and bleomycin as pleurodesing agents in sheep

    Respirology

    (2002)
  • S.A. Sahn

    Use of fibrinolytic agents in the management of complicated parapneumonic effusions and empyemas

    Thorax

    (1998)
  • E. Martinez-Moragon et al.

    Malignant pleural effusion: prognostic factors for survival and response to chemical pleurodesis in a series of 120 cases

    Respiration

    (1998)
  • F.H. Hausheer et al.

    Diagnosis and treatment of malignant pleural effusion

    Semin Oncol

    (1985)
  • W.W. Johnston

    The malignant pleural effusion. A review of cytopathologic diagnoses of 584 specimens from 472 consecutive patients

    Cancer

    (1985)
  • R.W. Light

    Management of pleural effusions

    J Formos Med Assoc

    (2000)
  • I.S. Fentiman et al.

    Pleural effusion in breast cancer: a review of 105 cases

    Cancer

    (1981)
  • R.N. Raju et al.

    Pleural effusion in breast carcinoma: analysis of 122 cases

    Cancer

    (1981)
  • C. Aleman et al.

    Polymorphonuclear elastase in the early diagnosis of complicated pyogenic pleural effusions

    Respiration

    (2003)
  • J.C. Hughes et al.

    Pleural effusion in multiple myeloma

    Cancer

    (1979)
  • A. Xaubet et al.

    Characteristics and prognostic value of pleural effusions in non-Hodgkin's lymphomas

    Eur J Respir Dis

    (1985)
  • J.H. Woodring

    Recognition of pleural effusion on supine radiographs: how much fluid is required?

    AJR Am J Roentgenol

    (1984)
  • Cited by (104)

    • The dosage-toxicity-efficacy relationship of kansui and licorice in malignant pleural effusion rats based on factor analysis

      2016, Journal of Ethnopharmacology
      Citation Excerpt :

      MPE is a common and distressing condition seen at the advanced stage of various malignant diseases. Primary or metastatic tumors may invade the visceral pleura, affecting the normal resorptive flow of fluid from the parietal to the visceral pleura or causing increased capillary leaking and increased fluid production (Antony et al., 2001; Siyamek, 2006). In the experiment, the pleural fluid and urine volume and serum TNF-α, IL-2 and IFN-γ contents were used to evaluate the efficacy of kansui-licorice.

    • Predictors of talc slurry pleurodesis success in patients with malignant pleural effusions

      2017, Revista Portuguesa de Pneumologia (English Edition)
      Citation Excerpt :

      Despite management of underlying malignancy with chemo/radiotherapy, MPE may persist or recur and requires palliative interventions in order to control or alleviate the symptoms.2,6,10 Several palliative treatment options are available including thoracentesis or talc pleurodesis.2,6,10 Thoracentesis is easy to perform, but has a 98% recurrence rate at 30 days.6,11

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text