Elsevier

Lung Cancer

Volume 44, Issue 3, June 2004, Pages 363-368
Lung Cancer

High incidence of pulmonary toxicity of weekly docetaxel and gemcitabine in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: results of a dose-finding study

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2003.12.004Get rights and content

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the maximum tolerated doses (MTD) and the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of the weekly administration of docetaxel and gemcitabine as first-line treatment in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients and methods: Chemotherapy-naı̈ve patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed unresectable stage IIIB or IV NSCLC were enrolled onto the study. Escalated doses of gemcitabine (starting dose 700 mg/m2 per week) and docetaxel (starting dose 30 mg/m2 per week) were given on a weekly basis for three consecutive weeks in cycles of 4 weeks. Results: Twenty-six patients received a total of 94 chemotherapy cycles. At the doses of docetaxel 40 mg/m2 per week and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 per week, the MTD had not yet been reached. However, the study was prematurely closed because of a high incidence of severe pulmonary adverse events. Six (23%) patients developed fever and pulmonary dysfunction (severe dyspnea, hypoxia in association with diffuse interstitial pneumonitis), which was fatal in two of them. No risk factors were identified contributing to these pulmonary adverse events; four patients had a low absolute number of peripheral blood CD4+ lymphocytes. Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in five (19%) patients and grade 3/4 anemia in two (8%). Conclusion: The weekly administration of gemcitabine and docetaxel in patients with advanced NSCLC is associated with a high incidence of severe pulmonary toxicity, which does not seem to be dose-related. The regimen cannot be used outside a clinical protocol.

Introduction

The development of an effective non-cisplatin (CDDP)-containing regimen is of paramount importance in the treatment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), given the increased toxicity of CDDP and the small, although significant, survival benefit with CDDP-based regimens [1]. During the last decade several new anticancer agents have been developed. Most of them (paclitaxel, docetaxel, vinorelbine, gemcitabine, irinotecan) have shown considerable activity against NSCLC [2]. The combination of two such agents, in two phase III studies, has been shown to be equally effective but more tolerable in comparison with a CDDP-based regimen [3], [4].

Docetaxel and gemcitabine represent good candidates for combination chemotherapy in NSCLC since they have different mechanisms of action and non-overlapping toxicities [2], [5]. In a phase II study, the combination of gemcitabine (given on days 1 and 8) plus docetaxel (given on day 8) (DG regimen) was well tolerated and resulted in a 37.5% objective response rate and a median survival of 13 months [6]; the toxicity of DG regimen was acceptable with grades 3–4 neutropenia occurring in 8% of the patients, grade 3/4 diarrhea in 6% and grade 2/3 asthenia in 20%. Subsequently, in a large multicenter randomized trial we compared the efficacy and toxicity of the DG regimen with that of docetaxel/cisplatin (DC regimen) [3]. That study revealed that there was no difference between the two regimens in terms of response rate, duration of response, time to tumor progression and overall survival. However, the DG regimen was associated with a more favorable toxicity profile than the DC combination since the incidence of grade 3/4 neutropenia, grade 3/4 nausea/vomiting and grade 3/4 diarrhea was significantly lower. In addition, the DG regimen could be administered on an outpatient basis whereas the DC regimen required a prolonged inpatient stay or overnight admission to the hospital for hydration. Similar results have also been reported by other investigators [4].

Recently, several clinical studies have shown a lower incidence of treatment-related side effects, particularly of hematologic toxicity, with the weekly administration of taxanes as compared with the conventional administration every 3 weeks [7], [8], [9]. The decreased hematologic toxicity of taxanes given on a weekly basis favors their combination with other agents. Another anticipated benefit is that the prolonged or increased exposure of neoplastic cells to the taxanes, which are phase-specific agents, may result in increased cytotoxic activity.

Based on these considerations, we conducted a phase I trial to determine the maximum tolerated doses (MTDs) and the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of the weekly administration of docetaxel and gemcitabine as first-line treatment in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Section snippets

Patients

Chemotherapy-naı̈ve patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed unresectable stage IIIB or IV NSCLC were enrolled onto the study. Other inclusion criteria were: performance status (World Health Organization, WHO) 0–2; age δ 75 years; a life expectancy of τ 3 months; adequate renal (serum creatinine concentration δ 1.5 mg/dl), liver (total bilirubin level δ 1.5 mg/dl, transaminases δ 1.5 times the upper limit of normal or δ 3 times if hepatic metastases were present, and alkaline

Results

From March 1998 to September 2001 a total of 26 patients were enrolled. All patients were assessable for toxicity and 17 (65%) for response to treatment (eight patients had no bidimensionally measurable disease while one patient received less than three chemotherapy cycles). Patient characteristics are shown in Table 1.

Six dose levels were evaluated (Table 2) and a total of 94 chemotherapy cycles were delivered. The MTD has not been reached due to the early termination of the study because of

Discussion

The present dose escalation study was prematurely terminated because six of the enrolled patients developed severe and, in two of them fatal, pulmonary toxicity. Therefore the MTD has not been reached.

Pulmonary toxicity has been increasingly recognized and reported with cytotoxic drugs including docetaxel or gemcitabine [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16]. In most cases this toxicity is mild and self-limiting. Dyspnea has been reported in up to 8% of patients treated with single agent

Acknowledgements

This work was partly supported by a research grant from the Cretan Association for Biomedical Research (CABR).

References (28)

  • D Fennelly et al.

    Phase I and pharmacologic study of paclitaxel administrated weekly in patients with relapsed ovarian cancer

    J. Clin. Oncol.

    (1997)
  • J.D Hainsworth et al.

    Phase I trial of docetaxel administered by weekly infusion in patients with advanced refractory cancer

    J. Clin. Oncol.

    (1998)
  • Ch Kouroussis et al.

    A dose escalation study of weekly docetaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors

    Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol.

    (2000)
  • A.B Miller et al.

    Reporting results of cancer research

    Cancer

    (1981)
  • Cited by (67)

    • Pulmonary Complications of Anticancer Treatment

      2013, Abeloff's Clinical Oncology: Fifth Edition
    • Pulmonary complications of cancer therapy and central airway obstruction

      2011, Supportive Oncology: (Expert Consult - Online and Print)
    • Dose-volume analysis of radiation pneumonitis in non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with concurrent cisplatinum and etoposide with or without consolidation docetaxel

      2010, International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
      Citation Excerpt :

      These retrospective studies largely used a variety of systemic agents and a mixture of sequential, concurrent, or induction plus concurrent treatment with thoracic radiation. Docetaxel is known to cause pulmonary toxicity as shown in a dose finding study with gemcitabine (17). In a Phase II trial conducted by the SWOG, patients who received concurrent cisplatin/etoposide with thoracic radiation followed by docetaxel had a Grade 3 or higher RP rate of 7% using the Common Toxicity Criteria and Adverse Events (CTC v2) scoring system (20).

    • The Pulmonary Toxicity of Anticancer Agents

      2010, Comprehensive Toxicology, Second Edition
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text