Point of view
Neural–endocrine–immune complex in the central modulation of tumorigenesis: Facts, assumptions, and hypotheses

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroim.2006.07.003Get rights and content

Abstract

For the precise coordination of systemic functions, the nervous system uses a variety of peripherally and centrally localized receptors, which transmit information from internal and external environments to the central nervous system. Tight interconnections between the immune, nervous, and endocrine systems provide a base for monitoring and consequent modulation of immune system functions by the brain and vice versa. The immune system plays an important role in tumorigenesis. On the basis of rich interconnections between the immune, nervous and endocrine systems, the possibility that the brain may be informed about tumorigenesis is discussed in this review article. Moreover, the eventual modulation of tumorigenesis by central nervous system is also considered. Prospective consequences of the interactions between tumor and brain for diagnosis and therapy of cancer are emphasized.

Introduction

The central nervous system (CNS) provides a precise coordination of all body functions utilizing the signals from internal environments (Ádám, 1998). To aid such coordination in organisms, highly differentiated systems of visceral receptors have been developed. Visceral receptors are able to monitor a wide range of biological parameters (e.g. concentration of chemical compounds in plasma, osmotic pressure, mechanical pressure, etc.). Therefore, visceral receptors are important components of internal conveying systems that participate in the maintenance of homeostasis (Berthoud, 2004).

A plethora of evidence, accumulated mainly during the first half of the 20th century, indicates that the endocrine and nervous systems integrate and regulate different body functions. In addition, many studies demonstrate that immune mechanisms may also be influenced by these systems (Besedovsky and del Rey, 1996). Lastly, rich interconnections take place between neural, endocrine, and immune systems (Andersson, 2005, Blalock, 2002, Downing and Miyan, 2000),which may constitute a neural–endocrine–immune functional complex (Kvetnoy, 2002). The hypothalamus with its paraventricular nucleus represents an important anatomical link in this complex, which integrates the activities of all three systems (Turnbull and Rivier, 1999).

The nervous and immune systems can bi-directionally communicate by using a common chemical language employing neurotransmitters, neurohormones, hormones, cytokines and the common respective receptors (Savino and Dardenne, 1995, Blalock, 2005). The immune system may work as a complex of sensors informing the nervous system about changes in the immune function of organism and about internal threats (Blalock, 1984). The genesis and progression of tumors are intimately interconnected with the immune system. The cells and molecules of the immune system are highly involved in tumorigenesis, on one hand playing an important role in eliminating and annihilating a wide scale of pathogens and transformed cells (Chaplin, 2003, Delves and Roitt, 2000a, Delves and Roitt, 2000b, Parkin and Cohen, 2001) and on the other hand in some cases facilitating tumorigenesis at various stages (Pikarsky et al., 2004, Balkwill and Mantovani, 2001). Tumorigenesis evokes both humoral and cellular responses of the immune system (Chiplunkar, 2001).

In this review, an attempt was done to extend and summarize the recent data supporting the hypothesis that the central nervous system can monitor and modulate tumorigenesis, beyond the role of the vagus nerve alone (Gidron et al., 2005). This assumption was based on a complex of anatomical and functional interrelationships between nervous, endocrine and immune systems, which in the future might open new avenues in cancer research with a possible impact on prevention, diagnosis and therapy of cancer.

Section snippets

Messages conveying pathways from the immune system to the brain

The CNS can monitor activities of the immune system mainly via two pathways: humoral and neural (Fig. 1; Dantzer et al., 2000, Elmquist et al., 1997, Goehler et al., 2000, Pavlov et al., 2003). While the humoral pathways are relatively slow and less informative regarding the location or source of the immune signals, the neural pathways, on the contrary, are fast and location specific.

Messages conveying pathways from the brain to the immune system

The CNS has the capacity to deliver neurotransmitters and neuropeptides to all tissues in the body. For a long time, the immune system was considered an exception to this rule. However, it is now clear that the thymus, spleen, and other lymphoid organs are also innervated by the nervous system. Therefore the nervous system, including the brain and the peripheral nervous system, can stimulate or inhibit activities of the innate and adaptive immune systems via two ways, neural and humoral (Fig. 2

Factors modulating tumorigenesis

Cancer progression is modulated by tumor-related factors and also by characteristics of the host. Tumor-related factors include the aggressiveness of a tumor that is determined by the source tissue, the degree of dedifferentiation, the functionality of apoptosis, DNA repair mechanisms, loss of contact inhibition, and ability to induce a vascular supply and to metastasize. Resistance of the host depends on immune competence and neuroendocrine regulation, which are subjected to the influence of

The tight interconnection between immune and nervous systems elicits a question whether the brain might modulate the process of tumorigenesis and if yes, at which level of the nervous system and in which stage of the tumorigenesis

The following hypotheses have emerged regarding this issue. It has been suggested that the immune system might realize sensory functions that can monitor besides infectious agents also tumor cells (Blalock, 2005). While Blalock has only indirectly approached the problem of interconnections between tumor cells, immune system, and the brain, Gidron et al. (2005) have delineated this relationship more clearly. Gidron et al. have hypothesized that the brain is informed about the process of

Conclusion

In this review, an attempt was made to highlight certain facts indicating that deeper understanding of the immunoregulatory role of the brain and sensory functions of the immune system might dramatically modify our knowledge regarding the neural–endocrine–immune interactions relevant to the pathophysiology of tumorigenesis, with clinical implications for medicine.

While the classical five senses inform us about the changes in the external world, it is under the speculation that the information

Acknowledgement

The authors thank MD. Peter Ujhazy, PhD for valuable contributions. This work was supported by Grant of Comenius University UK/40/2006.

References (152)

  • G.T. Cottrell et al.

    Sensory circumventricular organs: central roles in integrated autonomic regulation

    Regul. Pept.

    (2004)
  • R. Dantzer et al.

    Neural and humoral pathways of communication from the immune system to the brain: parallel or convergent?

    Auton. Neurosci.

    (2000)
  • M. Dardenne et al.

    Control of thymus physiology by peptidic hormones and neuropeptides

    Immunol. Today

    (1994)
  • A. Denes et al.

    Central autonomic control of the bone marrow: multisynaptic tract tracing by recombinant pseudorabies virus

    Neuroscience

    (2005)
  • J.E. Downing et al.

    Neural immunoregulation: emerging roles for nerves in immune homeostasis and disease

    Immunol. Today

    (2000)
  • I.J. Elenkov et al.

    Modulation of lipopolysaccharide-induced tumor necrosis factor-alpha production by selective alpha- and beta-adrenergic drugs in mice

    J. Neuroimmunol.

    (1995)
  • J.K. Elmquist et al.

    Mechanisms of CNS response to systemic immune challenge: the febrile response

    Trends Neurosci.

    (1997)
  • A.V. Ferguson et al.

    Electrophysiology of the circumventricular organs

    Front. Neuroendocrinol.

    (1996)
  • Y. Gidron et al.

    Does the vagus nerve inform the brain about preclinical tumours and modulate them?

    Lancet Oncol.

    (2005)
  • L.E. Goehler et al.

    Vagal paraganglia bind biotinylated interleukin-1 receptor antagonist: a possible mechanism for immune-to-brain communication

    Brain Res. Bull.

    (1997)
  • L.E. Goehler et al.

    Interleukin-1 induces c-Fos immunoreactivity in primary afferent neurons of the vagus nerve

    Brain Res.

    (1998)
  • L.E. Goehler et al.

    Vagal immune-to-brain communication: a visceral chemosensory pathway

    Auton. Neurosci.

    (2000)
  • M.K. Hansen et al.

    Subdiaphragmatic vagotomy does not block intraperitoneal lipopolysaccharide-induced fever

    Auton. Neurosci.

    (2000)
  • G. Hasko et al.

    Regulation of cytokine and chemokine production by transmitters and co-transmitters of the autonomic nervous system

    Biochem. Pharmacol.

    (1998)
  • K.L. Heffner et al.

    Examining psychosocial factors related to cancer incidence and progression: in search of the silver lining

    Brain Behav. Immun.

    (2003)
  • D.M. Hodgson et al.

    Intracerebral HIV glycoprotein (gp120) enhances tumor metastasis via centrally released interleukin-1

    Brain Res.

    (1998)
  • S.J. Hopkins et al.

    Cytokines and the nervous system. I: expression and recognition

    Trends Neurosci.

    (1995)
  • J.R. Infante et al.

    Catecholamine levels in practitioners of the transcendental meditation technique

    Physiol. Behav.

    (2001)
  • Y. Katayama et al.

    Signals from the sympathetic nervous system regulate hematopoietic stem cell egress from bone marrow

    Cell

    (2006)
  • K. Kawashima et al.

    The lymphocytic cholinergic system and its biological function

    Life Sci.

    (2003)
  • J.K. Kiecolt-Glaser et al.

    Psychoneuroimmunology and cancer: fact or fiction?

    Eur. J. Cancer

    (1999)
  • J.P. Konsman et al.

    Cytokine-induced sickness behaviour: mechanisms and implications

    Trends Neurosci.

    (2002)
  • K. Kowalska et al.

    Direct antimicrobial properties of substance P

    Life Sci.

    (2002)
  • S.F. Maier et al.

    Intracerebroventricular interleukin-1 receptor antagonist blocks the enhancement of fear conditioning and interference with escape produced by inescapable shock

    Brain Res.

    (1995)
  • A. Mantovani

    The chemokine system: redundancy for robust outputs

    Immunol. Today

    (1999)
  • S. Nadeau et al.

    Effects of circulating tumor necrosis factor on the neuronal activity and expression of the genes encoding the tumor necrosis factor receptors (p55 and p75) in the rat brain: a view from the blood–brain barrier

    Neuroscience

    (1999)
  • G. Ádám

    Theoretical considerations

  • W.Y. Almawi et al.

    An alternate mechanism of glucocorticoid anti-proliferative effect: promotion of a Th2 cytokine-secreting profile

    Clin. Transplant.

    (1999)
  • J. Andersson

    The inflammatory reflex—introduction

    J. Intern. Med.

    (2005)
  • M.H. Antoni et al.

    The influence of bio-behavioural factors on tumour biology: pathways and mechanisms

    Nat. Rev., Cancer

    (2006)
  • M. Argaman et al.

    Interleukin-1 may link helplessness–hopelessness with cancer progression: a proposed model

    Int. J. Behav. Med.

    (2005)
  • M. Arya et al.

    Chemokines: key players in cancer

    Curr. Med. Res. Opin.

    (2003)
  • M.B. Atkins et al.

    A phase I study of CNI-1493, an inhibitor of cytokine release, in combination with high-dose interleukin-2 in patients with renal cancer and melanoma

    Clin. Cancer Res.

    (2001)
  • F. Balkwill et al.

    Cancer: an inflammatory link

    Nature

    (2004)
  • J. Banchereau et al.

    Dendritic cells and the control of immunity

    Nature

    (1998)
  • L.A.M. Bayon et al.

    Colonic carcinogenesis in vagotomyzed rats

    Rev. Esp. Enferm. Dig.

    (2001)
  • S. Ben-Eliyahu et al.

    Suppression of NK cell activity and of resistance to metastasis by stress: a role for adrenal catecholamines and beta-adrenoceptors

    Neuroimmunomodulation

    (2000)
  • I. Berczi

    The role of the growth and lactogenic hormone family in immune function

    Neuroimmunomodulation

    (1994)
  • I. Berczi

    Pituitary hormones and immune function

    Acta Paediatr.

    (1997)
  • L. Bernardi et al.

    Effect of rosary prayer and yoga mantras on autonomic cardiovascular rhythms: comparative study

    BMJ

    (2001)
  • Cited by (25)

    • Stress and cancer. Part I: Mechanisms mediating the effect of stressors on cancer

      2020, Journal of Neuroimmunology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Norepinephrine, epinephrine, and glucocorticoids released in response to stressors affect the entire spectrum of physiological and pathological processes in the body (Chrousos, 2009). Data accumulated in last decades show that mediators of neuroendocrine stress response affect also initiation and progression of cancer (for review see Mravec et al., 2006; Recio, 2019; Tang et al., 2013). Behavioral stress response is highly heterogeneous.

    • The time-course of hindbrain neuronal activity varies according to location during either intraperitoneal or subcutaneous tumor growth in rats: Single Fos and dual Fos/dopamine β-hydroxylase immunohistochemistry

      2013, Journal of Neuroimmunology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Bidirectional transmission of signals between the nervous and immune system enables the brain to monitor and modulate processes related to activation of immune responses in peripheral tissues (Besedovsky and del Rey, 1996; Hopkins, 2007; Haddad, 2008). Accordingly, we suggest that the brain may play also a role in the monitoring and modulation of tumor cell proliferation (Mravec et al., 2006). Proliferation of tumor cells is accompanied by the release of various signaling molecules from immune cells, as well as the tumor cells themselves (Hanahan and Weinberg, 2000; Maltby et al., 2009; Bissell and Hines, 2011).

    • The relationship between heart rate variability and time-course of carcinoembryonic antigen in colorectal cancer

      2012, Autonomic Neuroscience: Basic and Clinical
      Citation Excerpt :

      Inflammatory markers play pivotal roles in early tumorigenesis (Pikarsky et al., 2004) and in late stages of tumor progression (Voronov et al., 2003; Mantovani et al., 2008). Based on converging evidence, investigators have hypothesized that the vagus nerve may modulate and slow down tumor progression, (Gidron et al., 2005; Mravec et al., 2006), since vagal activity informs the brain about, and modulates, peripheral inflammation (Tracey, 2002), since vagotomy predicts cancer death in humans (Ekbom et al., 1998) and promotes peripheral tumors in animals (Erin et al., 2008). In addition, vagal activity modulates sympathetic tone (Vlcek et al., 2008) and oxidative stress, (Pavithran et al., 2008; Tsutsumi et al., 2008), the latter a key trigger of cancer onset and prognosis (Faux et al., 2009).

    • Neurobiology of cancer: Interactions between nervous, endocrine and immune systems as a base for monitoring and modulating the tumorigenesis by the brain

      2008, Seminars in Cancer Biology
      Citation Excerpt :

      It has been suggested that the immune system might realize sensory functions that can in addition to infectious agents monitor tumor cells [14]. While Blalock has only indirectly approached the problem of interconnections between tumor cells, the immune system, and the brain, others have delineated this relationship more clearly [9,11,12]. Information about cancer might reach brain indirectly, using the immune system as a transducer.

    • APPLIED EPIGENOMIC EPIDEMIOLOGY ESSENTIALS: A Guide to Study Design and Conduct

      2023, Applied Epigenomic Epidemiology Essentials: A Guide to Study Design and Conduct
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Point of view

    View full text