Osteoporosis and bisphosphonates-related osteonecrosis of the jaw: Not just a sporadic coincidence – a multi-centre study

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2010.05.009Get rights and content

Abstract

Introduction

Bisphosphonates (BPs) are powerful drugs that inhibit bone metabolism. Adverse side effects are rare but potentially severe such as bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ). To date, research has primarily focused on the development and progression of BRONJ in cancer patients with bone metastasis, who have received high dosages of BPs intravenously. However, a potential dilemma may arise from a far larger cohort, namely the millions of osteoporosis patients on long-term oral BP therapy.

Patients and methods

This current study assessed 470 cases of BRONJ diagnosed between 2004 and 2008 at eleven different European clinical centres and has resulted in the identification of a considerable cohort of osteoporosis patients suffering from BRONJ. Each patient was clinically examined and a detailed medical history was raised.

Results

In total, 37/470 cases (7.8%) were associated with oral BP therapy due to osteoporosis. The majority (57%) of affected individuals did not have any risk factors for BRONJ as defined by the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. The average duration of BP intake of patients without risk factors was longer and the respective patients were older compared to patients with risk factors, but no statistical significant difference was found. In 78% of patients the duration of oral BP therapy exceeded 3 years prior to BRONJ diagnosis.

Discussion

The results from this study suggest that the relative frequency of osteoporosis patients on oral BPs suffering from BRONJ is higher than previously reported. There is an urgent need to substantiate epidemiological characteristics of BRONJ in large cohorts of individuals.

Introduction

Osteoporosis is a health threat of major public concern. Due to osteoporosis, approximately 50% of women and 20% of men over 50 years of age will suffer from a fragility fracture in their remaining lifetime (Sambrook and Cooper, 2006). Osteoporosis is effectively managed with bisphosphonates (BPs), an antiresorptive drug that can significantly prevent skeletal complications, in particular fractures (Berenson et al., 1996, Black et al., 1996, Black et al., 2006, Cranney et al., 2002, Sambrook and Cooper, 2006). Side effects associated with BP intake are generally rare. However, since 2003 (Marx, 2003, Migliorati, 2003, Wang et al., 2003) bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ) has become a clinical problem of rising importance (Migliorati et al., 2006). BRONJ is defined by (i) trans-mucosal or trans-cutaneous jawbone exposure over a period of 8 weeks, (ii) a positive history of BP administration, and (iii) a negative history for irradiation of the head and neck region (AAOMFS, 2007, Khosla et al., 2007). It is frequently accompanied by a variety of other clinical manifestations such as pain, soft tissue swelling or ulceration, suppuration, intra- or extra-oral sinus tracks, abscess and impairment of nerve functions (Marx, 2003, Abu-Id et al., 2006, Abu-Id et al., 2008, AAOMFS, 2007, Khosla et al., 2007) (Fig. 1). Therapy results of early stages are good (Markose et al., 2009, Otto et al., 2009, Pautke et al., 2009) in particular in cases with oral BP intake (Marx et al., 2007). However, if diagnosis or therapy is delayed, entire parts of the jawbones may have to be removed in severe cases which also necessitate a complex post-surgical rehabilitation (Engroff and Kim, 2007, Mücke et al., 2009, Pautke et al., 2010). This progression has almost exclusively been reported in cancer patients with bone metastasis who received intravenous BP therapy.

Several factors have been suggested to trigger an increased risk of the BRONJ manifestation (AAOMFS, 2007, Khosla et al., 2007), but concrete evidence has been limited to the duration of BP intake, the BP derivate and previous dental procedures (Bamias et al., 2005, Badros et al., 2006, Dimopoulos et al., 2009). Patients subjected to intravenous BP administration are at higher risk of developing a BRONJ with a prevalence of 3–18% (Bamias et al., 2005, Wang et al., 2007, Badros et al., 2008, Boonyapakorn et al., 2008, Kyrgidis et al., 2008, Walter et al., 2008). Preventive dental measures (Dimopoulos et al., 2009) as well as a modified dosing schedule (Corso et al., 2007) can reduce but not eliminate the risk. Dento-alveolar surgeries have been reported to precede a BRONJ manifestation in over 80% of the cases. As a consequence, elective surgical procedures, such as dental implant insertion are contraindicated in these patients (Piesold et al., 2006, Khosla et al., 2007, Ruggiero et al., 2009).

In contrast, studies concerning the risk of BRONJ among users of oral BPs are sparse, limited in total to approximately 200 cases (Abu-Id et al., 2006, Piesold et al., 2006, Marx et al., 2007, Yarom et al., 2007, Hess et al., 2008, King and Umland, 2008, Rizzoli et al., 2008, Hong et al., 2009). Therefore, the association between oral BPs and jaw necrosis has been regarded, by some, as being of negligible clinical significance. For example, neither the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE, 2003), the National Osteoporosis Society (McLeod et al., 2007), nor the Joint Organization of the Scientific Societies of Osteology of Germany, Austria and Switzerland (DVO, 2006) provide a recommendation concerning elective invasive dental procedures (e.g. insertion of osteointegrated implants) in osteoporosis patients on oral BP. Moreover, when the issue is addressed, recommendations can be contradictory. The American Society for Bone and Mineral Research sees no contraindication in performing elective alveolar bone surgery in patients on oral BPs (Khosla et al., 2007) whilst the German Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons recommends to refrain from bone surgery during ongoing oral BP therapy (Piesold et al., 2006). Similarly, the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, explicitly advises to perform invasive dental surgery only if no further risk factors exist when the BP intake exceeds 3 years (AAOMFS, 2007).

Overall, the association between oral BP and BRONJ has been largely neglected (Pazianas et al., 2007, Pazianas et al., 2008, Rizzoli et al., 2008) notwithstanding the characteristics of this large cohort of individuals. Current figures estimate that over 190 million prescriptions for oral BPs are dispensed worldwide each year (AAOMFS, 2007) and more than 15 million (elective) dental implants operations and other (necessary) dento-alveolar surgical procedures are performed worldwide.

This paper describes a large cohort of patients with osteoporosis who developed BRONJ in association with oral BPs. It aims to (i) examine the association between oral BPs and BRONJ and (ii) increase awareness among osteoporosis-treating physicians who are in the position to monitor and specifically educate patients about preventive measures.

Section snippets

Patients and methods

This retrospective multi-centre study incorporates patients treated in eleven different clinical centres of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery or Oral Medicine across Europe including Germany (University of Munich, Technical University of Munich, University of Kiel, University of Marburg, University of Bochum, Asklepios Hospital Hamburg), Austria (Landeskrankenhaus Feldkirch), Switzerland (University of Bern), Great Britain (London Eastman Dental Institute) and Italy (University of Palermo, Second

Results

The data from 470 patients (female n = 300, male n = 170) diagnosed with BP-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (BRONJ) were collected. The vast majority of patients (425/470, 90.5%) received BP medication due to malignancy, including breast cancer (34%), multiple myeloma (33%), prostatic cancer (13%) and other carcinoma (10%). 45 patients (9.6%) suffered from BRONJ following the intake of BPs due to osteoporosis. Among these, 37 (7.8% of the entire patient pool) were treated with oral BP (female n = 

Discussion

BPs are widely used in patients with osteoporosis in order to prevent bone fractures (Sambrook and Cooper, 2006). As the incidence of BRONJ is several magnitudes higher in cancer patients receiving intravenous, rather than oral, BPs, the clinical significance of BRONJ in osteoporosis patients may be under-estimated by clinicians and research institutions. This is underlined by the controversy and contradictions regarding preventive measures and recommendations released by various groups of

Conclusion

This study confirms the association between oral BPs and jaw osteonecrosis in individuals with osteoporosis. There is an urgent need for further investigations aimed at clarifying epidemiological characteristics and preventive measures of BRONJ. We suggest considering the intake duration of oral BPs in excess of 3 years to be classified as an independent risk factor when elective dento-alveolar surgeries are impending, a notion that should be taken into account when designing a prospective case

References (54)

  • R.E. Marx et al.

    Bisphosphonate-induced exposed bone (osteonecrosis/osteopetrosis) of the jaws: risk factors, recognition, prevention, and treatment

    J Oral Maxillofac Surg

    (2005)
  • C.A. Migliorati et al.

    Bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis: a long-term complication of bisphosphonate treatment

    Lancet Oncol

    (2006)
  • T. Mücke et al.

    Bisphosphonate related osteonecrosis of the jaws treated by surgical resection and immediate osseous microvascular reconstruction

    J Craniomaxillofacial Surg

    (2009)
  • S. Otto et al.

    The role of inferior alveolar nerve involvement in bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw

    J Oral Maxillofac Surg

    (2009)
  • C. Pautke et al.

    Tetracycline bone fluorescence: a valuable marker for osteonecrosis characterization and therapy

    J Oral Maxillofac Surg

    (2010)
  • C. Pautke et al.

    Fluorescence-guided bone resection in bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis of the jaws

    J Oral Maxillofac Surg

    (2009)
  • M. Pazianas et al.

    A review of the literature on osteonecrosis of the jaw in patients with osteoporosis treated with oral bisphosphonates: prevalence, risk factors, and clinical characteristics

    Clin Ther

    (2007)
  • R. Rizzoli et al.

    Osteonecrosis of the jaw and bisphosphonate treatment for osteoporosis

    Bone

    (2008)
  • S.L. Ruggiero et al.

    American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons position paper on bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaws – 2009 update

    J Oral Maxillofac Surg

    (2009)
  • S.L. Ruggiero et al.

    Osteonecrosis of the jaws associated with the use of bisphosphonates: a review of 63 cases

    J Oral Maxillofac Surg

    (2004)
  • P. Sambrook et al.

    Osteoporosis

    Lancet

    (2006)
  • S.L. Silverman et al.

    Osteonecrosis of the jaw and the role of bisphosphonates: a critical review

    Am J Med

    (2009)
  • C. Walter et al.

    Prevalence and risk factors of bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis of the jaw in prostate cancer patients with advanced disease treated with zoledronate

    Eur Urol

    (2008)
  • E.P. Wang et al.

    Incidence of osteonecrosis of the jaw in patients with multiple myeloma and breast or prostate cancer on intravenous bisphosphonate therapy

    J Oral Maxillofac Surg

    (2007)
  • J. Wang et al.

    Osteonecrosis of the jaws associated with cancer chemotherapy

    J Oral Maxillofac Surg

    (2003)
  • AACE

    American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists: medical guidelines for clinical practice for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis

  • AAOMFS

    American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons position paper on bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaws

    J Oral Maxillofac Surg

    (2007)
  • Cited by (112)

    • Duration and timing of bisphosphonate treatment as factors determining osteoblast mineralization

      2022, Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Such data in ALN-treated osteoblasts indicate the effect of dose on osteoblast function and viability. An average duration of oral BP therapy for patients with MRONJ is 57.8 months.10 The prevalence of MRONJ in patients increases when receiving oral BPs for more than 4 years.11

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    The study was not supported by research grants or any other sources.

    View full text