International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
Physics contributionA Dosimetric Comparison of Electronic Compensation, Conventional Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy, and Tomotherapy in Patients With Early-Stage Carcinoma of the Left Breast
Introduction
The use of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) to treat the whole breast after breast-conserving surgery has been shown to improve both dose homogeneity and target coverage as well as to reduce dose to normal tissue when compared with conventional treatment (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22). Published techniques defined as IMRT for breast irradiation vary widely, from segmental multileaf collimation to inversely planned treatment using cost constraints for targets and normal structures (23). Reported techniques also vary in the degree to which they achieve target coverage and sparing of normal tissue, the time involved for planning, and the amount of low dose radiation contamination to structures that are routinely spared with standard planning (24).
In addition to advances made in the ability to deliver more conformal radiation doses, recent technologic advances now provide the ability for image-guided therapy providing improved localization of structures and thus more accurate treatment delivery. Image-guided IMRT options such as helical tomotherapy and topotherapy have recently been described as a means of delivering partial breast irradiation and whole-breast irradiation respectively (25, 26).
This dosimetric study of whole breast irradiation utilized three different IMRT techniques: dynamic multileaf collimation electronic tissue compensation (ECOMP), inverse-planned dynamic multileaf collimation IMRT (DMLC), and helical tomotherapy (TOMO), and was performed to compare target coverage and dose homogeneity, normal tissue sparing, low dose spillage to nontarget structures, and plan generation labor cost.
Section snippets
Patient population
Ten patients with early stage (T1N0), left-sided breast cancer, status post-lumpectomy and sentinel lymph node biopsy that had been treated with radiation therapy using standard wedged tangential fields in our department were randomly chosen to compare the three different planning approaches. Patients underwent virtual simulation according to our standard protocol positioned supine on a breast board with the left arm extended above the head, and the head turned to the right. Radioopaque wires
Target coverage
The mean CTV volume was 440 cc (range, 150–874 cc). Average cumulative DVHs for the CTV for each technique are shown in Figure 1. For all plans evaluated, and for all patients, the 95% isodose line covered more than 99% of the CTV. However, the TOMO plans resulted in much greater dose heterogeneity, best seen at CTV V115, where larger volumes received significantly higher doses as compared with ECOMP plans (p = 0.003), and demonstrated a trend when compared with DMLC plans (p = 0.098).
Discussion
This dosimetric study explored three IMRT techniques to determine whether one would provide a clear advantage according to three factors: homogenous coverage of CTV and avoidance of normal tissue, low dose spill to critical structures, and whole-body radiation exposure during treatment, and labor-intensiveness of planning.
Our results demonstrate equivalent target coverage and improved dose homogeneity with ECOMP plans. Tomotherapy additionally resulted in significantly greater dose
Conclusions
In our dosimetric comparison of three IMRT techniques in 10 patients with left-sided early-stage breast cancer, the ECOMP technique provided homogeneous target coverage while maintaining low doses to normal tissue. In addition, delivery of this technique required the fewest number of monitor units reducing total radiation exposure, avoided low dose spill of radiation to structures at risk for second malignancy, and was attractive from a labor standpoint with an average planning time of 12 min.
References (46)
- et al.
The delivery of intensity modulated radiotherapy to the breast using multiple static fields
Radiother Oncol
(2000) Simplified intensity-modulated radiotherapy using pre-defined segments to reduce cardiac complications in left-sided breast cancer
Radiother Oncol
(2004)Reduction of cardiac and lung complication probabilities after breast irradiation using conformal radiotherapy with or without intensity modulation
Radiother Oncol
(2002)- et al.
Node-positive left-sided breast cancer patients after breast-conserving surgery: Potential outcomes of radiotherapy modalities and techniques
Radiother Oncol
(2002) - et al.
Intensity modulated versus non–intensity modulated radiotherapy in the treatment of the left breast and upper internal mammary lymph node chain: A comparative planning study
Radiother Oncol
(2002) - et al.
Intensity-modulated radiotherapy of the female breast
Med Dosim
(2002) - et al.
Hybrid IMRT plans—concurrently treating conventional and IMRT beams for improved breast irradiation and reduced planning time
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(2005) - et al.
Critical appraisal of treatment techniques based on conventional photon beams, intensity modulated photon beams and proton beams for therapy of intact breast
Radiother Oncol
(2002) - et al.
Dosimetric analysis of a simplified intensity modulation technique for prone breast radiotherapy
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(2004) - et al.
An improved breast irradiation technique using three-dimensional geometrical information and intensity modulation
Radiother Oncol
(2001)
Breast-conserving radiation therapy using combined electron and intensity-modulated radiotherapy technique
Radiother Oncol
Cardiac avoidance in breast radiotherapy: A comparison of simple shielding techniques with intensity-modulated radiotherapy
Radiother Oncol
Intensity modulation to improve dose uniformity with tangential breast radiotherapy: Initial clinical experience
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
Significant reductions in heart and lung doses using deep inspiration breath hold with active breathing control and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for patients treated with locoregional breast irradiation
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
Phase III randomized study of intensity modulated radiation therapy versus standard wedging technique for adjuvant breast radiotherapy
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
Clinical aspects of intensity-modulated radiotherapy in the treatment of breast cancer
Semin Radiat Oncol
Intensity-modulated tangential beam irradiation of the intact breast
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
Evaluation of two tomotherapy-based techniques for the delivery of whole-breast intensity-modulated radiation therapy
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
The effects of intrafraction motion on dose homogeneity in a breast phantom with physical wedges, enhanced dynamic wedges, and ssIMRT
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
Optimizing breast cancer treatment efficacy with intensity-modulated radiotherapy
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
The use of intensity modulated radiation therapy in the treatment of breast cancer: Evolving definition, misdirected criticism, and untoward effects
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
Morbidity and mortality of ischaemic heart disease in high-risk breast-cancer patients after adjuvant postmastectomy systemic treatment with or without radiotherapy: Analysis of DBCG 82b and 82c randomised trials
Lancet
The incidence and functional consequences of RT-associated cardiac perfusion defects
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
Cited by (59)
Clinical Experience With Machine Learning-Based Automated Treatment Planning for Whole Breast Radiation Therapy
2021, Advances in Radiation OncologyCitation Excerpt :The irregular surface compensator technique provides good target coverage and homogeneous dose distribution because it uses intensity modulation based on fluence map.4,10 A limitation of this technique is that a planner has to manually and iteratively modify the fluence maps until satisfactory dose distribution is achieved.4,10 This process takes 2 to 3 hours or more for iterative manual fluence modification and dose calculation, and the plan quality is highly dependent on the planner’s experience.6
Breast conservation therapy for invasive breast cancer
2018, The Breast: Comprehensive Management of Benign and Malignant DiseasesDosimetric comparison of left-sided whole-breast irradiation with 3DCRT, forward-planned IMRT, inverse-planned IMRT, helical tomotherapy, and volumetric arc therapy
2015, Physica MedicaCitation Excerpt :Therefore, the risk of secondary breast cancers from a mean contralateral breast dose of 3.08 Gy ± 0.35 might not be significant. Other studies have shown increased low-dose volumes with increasing beam angles [25,33]. Due to the rotational delivery of HT, multiple beams traverse normal tissue regions that were previously unexposed to radiation with fixed angles of 3DCRT and for-IMRT, as well as nine beam inv-IMRT and VMAT with partial single arc.
Breast Cancer: Stages I-II
2015, Clinical Radiation OncologyExposure of the heart in breast cancer radiation therapy: A systematic review of heart doses published during 2003 to 2013
2015, International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
Conflict of interest: none.