Elsevier

Human Pathology

Volume 46, Issue 12, December 2015, Pages 1890-1900
Human Pathology

Original contribution
Molecular characteristics of colorectal neuroendocrine carcinoma; similarities with adenocarcinoma rather than neuroendocrine tumor

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2015.08.006Get rights and content

Summary

To further clarify the molecular features of colorectal neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs), we immunohistochemically examined tumor samples from 25 NECs, including 9 small cell NECs (SCNECs) and 16 large cell NECs (LCNECs), 20 neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), and 21 poorly differentiated adenocarcinomas (PDCs) for the expression of several biomarkers (p53, β-catenin, Bcl-2, Rb, p16, p21, cyclin D1, and cyclin E) and used sequencing analysis to identify gene alterations of TP53, APC, CTNNB1, KRAS, and BRAF. The frequencies of aberrant p53 expression (88%), β-catenin nuclear expression (48%), and high expression of cyclin E (84%) were significantly higher in NECs than in NETs (0%, 5%, and 5%, P < .01, respectively). The immunohistochemical results of NECs and PDCs were similar. TP53, APC, KRAS, and BRAF gene mutations were variously detected in NECs and PDCs but not in any NETs. The frequencies of decreased expression of Rb (56%) and high expression of p16 (56%) and Bcl-2 (64%) were significantly higher in NECs than in PDCs (5%, 19%, and 5%, P < .05, respectively) or NETs (10%, 5%, and 5%, P < .01, respectively). Such immunohistochemical characteristics of NECs were more evident in SCNECs than in large cell NECs (P < .01). In conclusion, the molecular features of colorectal NECs are similar to those of adenocarcinomas and not to those of NETs. Decreased expression of Rb and high expression of p16 and Bcl-2 are characteristics of NECs, suggesting that Rb-p16 pathway disruption may contribute to the promotion of proliferative activity in colorectal NECs. SCNECs may be a prototype of NECs.

Introduction

Colorectal neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) are rare but highly aggressive neoplasms [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]. A recent World Health Organization (WHO) classification [1] graded neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) into 3 groups of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs)—NET G1, NET G2, and NECs—simply based on tumor proliferative activity. Morphologically, colorectal NECs are a heterogeneous group ranging from small cell NECs (SCNECs) to large cell NECs (LCNECs). Some cases of LCNECs are difficult to distinguish from poorly differentiated adenocarcinomas (PDCs) with solid growth patterns [7].

The mechanisms of carcinogenesis and aggressiveness of colorectal NECs are still largely unknown. Although the expression of some biomarkers and the molecular features of NECs were previously analyzed, only a small number of colorectal NECs were included in most of those articles [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13].

There is a hypothesis that they are derived from preceding adenoma/adenocarcinomas. This is supported by combined cases with conventional adenoma/adenocarcinoma and NECs and some molecular features such as the identical loss of heterozygosity [12] or identical mutation [13] of some genes in both components.

Aberrant expression of p53 was observed in approximately 80% of colorectal NECs in the previous reports [5], [6]. The expression of other p53-related proteins, such as p21, cyclin E, and Bcl-2, has not been clearly described yet in colorectal NECs.

Disruption of the Rb-p16 pathway, which is another key role in the cell cycle checkpoint, was previously reported in pulmonary and gastrointestinal NECs [8], [14]. Overexpression of p16 was reported in gastrointestinal NECs, including 6 cases of colorectal NECs [8]. On the other hand, low expression of p16 and the methylation of the CDKN2A gene were reported to be associated with poorer prognosis in some NENs, including colorectal NECs [9].

The Wnt–β-catenin pathway and the expression of cyclin D1 in NENs of various organs have been investigated [8], [10], [15], [16], but colorectal NECs have not been the focus of attention.

In this study, we have attempted to sharpen our understanding of the molecular features of colorectal NECs systematically by analyzing a relatively large number of cases and by directly comparing the characteristics of colorectal NECs with those of NETs and PDCs.

Section snippets

Patient selection

We first searched the institutional database of the Department of Anatomic Pathology of Kyushu University (Fukuoka, Japan) and related facilities to identify cases diagnosed between 1986 and 2013 as colorectal “neuroendocrine carcinoma,” “endocrine cell carcinoma,” “small cell carcinoma,” and “carcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation (or features).” We reviewed hematoxylin-eosin–stained sections of all the cases.

To correctly select NEC cases, we referred to the histologic criteria from the

Patient selection

We identified 25 cases of colorectal NECs (9 cases of SCNECs and 16 cases of LCNECs) (Fig. 1A-D). Twenty-three were surgically resected specimens, and 2 were biopsy specimens.

We also subclassified them, except for the 2 biopsy cases, into 8 combined NECs (Fig. 1C and D), which had additional adenoma and/or adenocarcinoma components, and 15 pure NECs. Among the combined NECs, 4 tumors fulfilled the criteria of mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma defined by the WHO classification [1].

We also

Discussion

In this study, we sharpened our understanding of the molecular features of colorectal NECs by demonstrating their differences from, and similarities to, those of NETs and PDCs.

First, we demonstrated that NECs had certain similarities with PDCs in the immunostaining patterns of several biomarkers, including p53, cyclin E, and β-catenin. We demonstrated that NECs, but not NETs, had high frequencies of aberrant p53 expression, consistent with previous reports [5], [6]. For the first time, we

Supplementary data

The following is the Supplementary data to this article.

. Antibodies used for immunohistochemistry.

. Primers and condition for PCR amplification for the sequence analysis.

Acknowledgment

The English usage in this article was reviewed by KN International (http://www.kninter.com/).

References (23)

  • A.F. Li et al.

    Alterations in the p16INK4a/cyclin D1/RB pathway in gastrointestinal tract endocrine tumors

    Am J Clin Pathol

    (2008)
  • Cited by (75)

    • Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms G3: Novel insights and unmet needs

      2021, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta - Reviews on Cancer
    • Prognostic factors of metastatic neuroendocrine carcinoma under first-line treatment with platinum etoposide with a focus on NEC score and Rb expression: Results from the multicentre RBNEC study of the Groupe d'Etude des Tumeurs Endocrines (GTE) and the ENDOCAN-RENATEN network

      2021, European Journal of Cancer
      Citation Excerpt :

      Recently, concurrent reports have suggested that Rb status might be predictive of the response to chemotherapy in NECs and have hypothesised that the molecular heterogeneity of these tumours has to be taken into account for deciding the most adapted therapeutic strategy [19,24]. The heterogeneity in Rb expression has also been reported in NEC of the digestive tract: Rb loss of expression, indicative of RB1 inactivation, is found in 100% of SCNEC versus 31% of LCNEC of the colon [20]; Rb loss is also found in 89% of SCNEC versus 60% of LCNEC of the pancreas [17]. A retrospective analysis from the Dutch registry of pulmonary NEC has shown that LCNEC without Rb expression loss had a significantly longer median OS of 9.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.4–11.8) when treated with an ‘NSCLC-like’ chemotherapy regimen (with either gemcitabine or paclitaxel) as compared with ‘SCLC-like’ chemotherapy (platinum-etoposide) with a 4.8-month (95% CI, 3.9–5.7) median OS [14].

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Disclosures: The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest or funding disclosures to make.

    View full text