Surgery in metastatic breast cancer: Patients with a favorable profile seem to have the most benefit from surgery

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2011.10.004Get rights and content

Abstract

Introduction

About 3–10% of breast cancer patients have distant metastases (Stage IV) at initial presentation; standard treatment (in the Netherlands) of these patients consists of palliative systemic therapy. However, retrospective studies have shown an improved survival in patients who received surgery for their primary tumor. The aim of this study was to assess characteristics associated with surgical treatment and to determine the impact on survival in women with stage IV breast cancer.

Methods

A cohort of women with a diagnosis of breast cancer and concomitant distant metastases was retrospectively studied. Patient characteristics, treatment and survival distilled from medical files were evaluated using univariate and multivariable analysis.

Results

Of 171 patients included in this analysis, 59 underwent surgery. In multivariable analysis lower age, no medication use, lower clinical T-stage and lower grade were associated with receiving surgery. In 21 of the 59 patients (35%) who received surgery it was unknown at the time of surgery that the patient had metastatic disease. Stratified survival analyses showed an association between surgery and improved survival for young patients (HR 0.3; p = 0.02), without comorbidity (HR 0.4; p = 0.002), with no medication use (HR 0.5; p = 0.009), with a small tumor (HR 0.4; p = 0.01), no regional lymph node involvement (HR 0.4; p = 0.01), with positive Estrogen (HR 0.6; p = 0.02) or Progesterone receptor (HR 0.4; p = 0.03) and with only visceral metastases (HR 0.5; p = 0.03). In multivariable analyses, younger patients and patients without comorbidity that received surgery had an increased survival (HR 0.3; p = 0.03 and HR 0.5; p = 0.03, respectively).

Conclusion

This study showed that patients with the most favorable profile receive local surgery and that a survival gain for operated patients was seen in young patients and in patients without comorbidity.

Introduction

With an increasing incidence, breast cancer is still the number one cancer affecting women in the western world. In 2008, 13,097 women were diagnosed with invasive breast cancer in the Netherlands.1 Of all these women, 3–10% had distant metastases at initial presentation. The median survival of these patients is 18–24 months.2 Standard treatment in the Netherlands for metastatic breast cancer consists of palliative systemic therapy with hormonal therapy, chemotherapy and biological therapy. Tumor resection in the breast or axilla is, according to guidelines, only indicated in the palliative setting to prevent skin ulceration, infection or bleeding and to improve quality of life. Recent retrospective studies, however, have shown improved survival in patients who received surgery of the primary tumor, with a hazard ratio ranging from 0.47 to 0.71. Even after adjustment for (among others) age, number of metastatic sites, systemic treatment and receptor status, survival advantages were present.3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 A meta-analysis performed in 2010 showed a pooled hazard ratio for overall mortality of 0.65 (95%CI 0.59–0.72) in favor of the patients undergoing surgery.18

These surgery-favoring results in stage IV disease are not fully understood. One hypothesis is that resection of the primary tumor will result in restoration of the immune system with eradication of cancer stem cells, that are believed to be responsible for the initiation of tumor development, growth, metastatic properties and tumor recurrence. Most retrospective studies, however, do not give detailed information about the timing of surgery and presence of comorbidity. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess characteristics associated with receiving surgery and to determine the impact of surgery on survival in women with stage IV breast cancer.

Section snippets

Patients and methods

In this retrospective study we included all women with stage IV breast cancer at time of diagnosis from two Dutch hospitals (Leiden University Medical Centre and HAGA hospital, a large inner-city hospital) in the period 1989–2009. Staging was based on clinical TNM classification.19 The histology grade was grouped in well and moderately differentiated, poorly differentiated and unknown. Metastatic site involvement was categorized as one or more and in the following categories: only bone, only

Results

Overall, 171 patients with stage IV breast cancer at time of diagnoses were included in this study. Table 1 shows the patient characteristics. Of the 171 patients 59 (35%) received surgery of the primary tumor and 112 (65%) did not. Missing data were imputed for ER receptor, PgR receptor, size of the tumor, lymph node status, grade and margins. Of the 59 patients who had surgery of the primary tumor, 21 (35%) were operated with curative intent as the distant metastases were not apparent before

Discussion

The present study shows that younger patients with smaller tumors or a single metastasis who use no medication more often receive surgery for breast cancer with distant metastases. Survival gain was observed in operated patients with a more favorable general health profile; adjusted for potential confounders a survival gain for operated patients was seen in young patients and in patients without comorbidity.

Conclusion

In conclusion, in this retrospective cohort, women with better prognostic characteristics were more often operated. Moreover, in stratified analyses women with the best prognostic characteristics had the best survival. Further research is needed to assess the value of upfront surgery in stage IV disease. Initiatives are now taken in the Netherlands and the United States that hopefully will result in solid conclusions.

References (25)

  • S.A. Khan et al.

    Does aggressive local therapy improve survival in metastatic breast cancer?

    Surgery

    (2002)
  • G.V. Babiera et al.

    Effect of primary tumor extirpation in breast cancer patients who present with stage IV disease and an intact primary tumor

    Ann Surg Oncol

    (2006)
  • Cited by (74)

    • Metastatic pattern discriminates survival benefit of primary surgery for de novo stage IV breast cancer: A real-world observational study

      2019, European Journal of Surgical Oncology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Interestingly, we found that patients with simultaneous liver and lung metastases suffered from local surgery, suggesting the importance to select subsets in surgical procedure. A Netherlandish study performed disease specific survival analysis of surgery versus no surgery stratified by type of metastasis, patients after surgery with only visceral type referring to metastasis to brain, lung, pleura, liver yielded survival advantage in univariate analysis, but not in multivariate analysis [49]. Moreover, prior clinical trail MF07-01 also suggested that patients with visceral involvement may suffer from surgery [14,42].

    • Survival impact of primary site surgery on metastatic breast cancer patients at diagnosis

      2019, Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text