ReviewEndoscopic therapy in the management of malignant biliary obstruction
Introduction
Common causes of malignant biliary obstruction include pancreatic carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma and metastatic disease, either intrahepatic or lymphadenopathy, usually portal but occasionally distal biliary. The greater majority of patients with such will not undergo surgical resection of the obstructing tumour due to either the advanced nature of the disease or the significant co-morbidity precluding surgery. These patients will therefore require a non-surgical approach to the relief of resulting biliary obstruction usually in the form of endoscopic therapy. This will often be purely palliative but in some cases survival-enhancing therapy may be possible. This review will discuss both technical aspects and outcomes of endoscopic therapy in the management of malignant biliary obstruction. The technique of intrabiliary photodynamic therapy will be considered in detail.
Section snippets
Early studies
Restoring biliary flow with relief of jaundice and pruritus is the primary goal in the palliation of obstructive biliary malignancy. Several studies conducted in the late 1980s confirmed the value of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in this situation. Randomised trials comparing surgical bypass to ERCP placement of plastic drainage tubes (“stents”) demonstrated equivalent success rates in terms of survival and relief of obstruction but lower morbidity and mortality for the
Technique of endoscopic stenting
Careful consideration of prior imaging allows detailed planning and successful execution of the procedure. Whatever stent is to be used, the initial placement of a 0.035-inch wire across the stricture to be stented is a prerequisite. Precut sphincterotomy may be required for access, but sphincterotomy is only necessary for the placement of multiple stents or to guarantee future access where it has been initially difficult. Dilatation is not usually required for distal strictures but is usually
Types of stent
Plastic stents are usually gently curved polyethylene tubes of relatively low cost. A variety of side holes and flanges are formed to aid drainage and prevent migration. Stents of 10–11.5 Fr have patency rates of approximately 3 months but narrower diameter stents have significantly lower patency rates and should not be routinely placed for palliative drainage.4 The major problem with plastic stents is occlusion from bacterial biofilm comprising protein, bilirubin, bacteria and amorphous debris.
Biliary drainage in patients with colorectal liver metastases
Limited data exist about the role of palliation of jaundice in metastatic disease. Benefit has been shown in the successful placement of stents compared to those patients who had unsuccessful attempts in terms of survival, 5 months compared to 1 month, p < 0.01. The control group in this study, however, was the patients in who the stents had been unsuccessful rather than a matched untreated control group, randomised or otherwise.19
Liver metastases due to colorectal cancer seem to have better
Photodynamic therapy for cholangiocarcinoma
The greater majority of patients with cholangiocarcinoma do not undergo resection. The disease has a particularly poor prognosis, especially if the disease is advanced with a median survival time of 62 days if there is bilateral intrahepatic disease.16 Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has emerged as the most promising new modality of treatment for patients who do not undergo resection.
PDT uses the combination of two non-toxic moieties; light and a photosensitising chemical which when combined
Summary
Endoscopic therapy is a cornerstone in the management of the majority of patients who suffer malignant biliary obstruction. For a significant number of patients it will appropriately be the only disease specific therapy used. It is safe and effective, in the overall context of the background disease. Stenting with a plastic stent is appropriate in patients with a short life expectancy and with a metal stent in those with a longer life expectancy.
The role of stenting metastatic disease seems to
Conflict of interest
The author has no conflicts of interest.
References (32)
- et al.
Randomised trial of endoscopic stenting versus surgical bypass in malignant low bileduct obstruction
Lancet
(1994 December 17) - et al.
Randomised trial of endoscopic stenting versus percutaneous stent insertion in malignant obstructive jaundice
Lancet
(11 July 1987) - et al.
Endoscopic management of malignant biliary obstruction: stents of 10 French gauge are preferable to stents of 8 French gauge
Gastrointest Endosc
(1988 Sep–Oct) - et al.
A randomized trial of endoscopic drainage methods for inoperable malignant strictures of the common bile duct
Gastrointest Endosc
(1998) - et al.
Covered metal versus plastic stents for malignant common bile duct stenosis: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial
Gastrointest Endosc
(2006) - et al.
Randomised trial of self-expanding metal stents versus polyethylene stents for distal malignant biliary obstruction
Lancet
(1992) - et al.
Plastic or metal stents for malignant stricture of the common bile duct? Results of a randomized prospective study
Gastrointest Endosc
(2003) - et al.
Comparative costs of metal versus plastic biliary stent strategies for malignant obstructive jaundice by decision analysis
Gastrointest Endosc
(1999) - et al.
Efficacy and complications of covered Wallstents in malignant distal biliary obstruction
Gastrointest Endosc
(2005) - et al.
A comparison of covered and uncovered Wallstents for the management of distal malignant biliary obstruction
Gastrointest Endosc
(2006)
Long-term follow-up of patients with hilar malignant stricture treated by endoscopic internal biliary drainage
Gastrointest Endosc
Outcome in patients with bifurcation tumors who undergo unilateral versus bilateral hepatic duct drainage
Gastrointest Endosc
Unilateral versus bilateral endoscopic hepatic duct drainage in patients with malignant hilar biliary obstruction: results of a prospective, randomized, and controlled study
Gastrointest Endosc
Relief of metastatic biliary obstruction by stent placement: is it worthwhile?
Surg Oncol
Surgical strategies for colorectal liver metastases
Surg Oncol
Palliation of hilar biliary obstruction from colorectal metastases by endoscopic stent insertion
Gastrointest Endosc
Cited by (48)
Endoscopic Management of Malignant Biliary Obstruction
2024, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinics of North AmericaReview of brachytherapy complications – Upper gastrointestinal tract
2021, BrachytherapyCitation Excerpt :Palliative biliary brachytherapy is used in the management of malignant biliary tract obstruction (MBTO), a common complication of both primary and metastatic gastrointestinal malignancies (33,34) . The first step in the management of cancers presenting with an MBTO is typically decompression of the biliary tree with endoscopic (ERCP) and/or percutaneous transhepatic (PTC) stent insertion, with their own risks and benefits (35–39). Stents can be bare metal, covered metal, or plastic, with varied indications and benefits (35,40); metal stents tend to reocclude while plastic and covered stents tend to migrate, frequently requiring retrieval procedures (41,42).
Feasibility and safety of percutaneous transhepatic endobiliary radiofrequency ablation as an adjunct to biliary stenting in malignant biliary obstruction
2018, Diagnostic and Interventional ImagingEndoscopic Evaluation in the Workup of Pancreatic Cancer
2016, Surgical Clinics of North AmericaCitation Excerpt :Published data have shown that self-expanding biliary metal stents have a longer patency, have a lower incidence of occlusion and cholangitis, are associated with a shorter duration of hospital stay, and are more cost effective, especially in patients with an expected of survival more than 3 to 6 months without any difference in overall short-term mortality.55,57–59 The average patency of metal biliary stents approaches 1 year compared with 3 to 4 months for the plastic bile duct stents.60 The superiority and cost effectiveness of metal stents have been confirmed by metaanalyses as well.61,62
A comparison of uncovered metal stents for the palliation of patients with malignant biliary obstruction: Nitinol vs. stainless steel
2012, Digestive and Liver DiseaseCitation Excerpt :The endoscopic insertion of self-expandable metal stents (SEMSs) is widely recognised as the best option for the palliative treatment of patients with unresectable malignant biliary obstructions with an expected survival of more than 4 months [1–4].