The HVEM network: new directions in targeting novel costimulatory/co-inhibitory molecules for cancer therapy

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coph.2012.03.001Get rights and content

The regulation of the immune system is controlled by many cell surface receptors. A prominent representative is the ‘molecular switch’ HVEM (herpes virus entry mediator) that can activate either proinflammatory or inhibitory signaling pathways. HVEM ligands belong to two distinct families: the TNF-related cytokines LIGHT and lymphotoxin-α, and the Ig-related membrane proteins BTLA and CD160. HVEM and its ligands have been involved in the pathogenesis of various autoimmune and inflammatory diseases, but recent reports indicate that this network may also be involved in tumor progression and resistance to immune response. Here we summarize the recent advances made regarding the knowledge on HVEM and its ligands in cancer cells, and their potential roles in tumor progression and escape to immune responses. Blockade or enhancement of these pathways may help improving cancer therapy.

Highlights

HVEM has five distinct ligands: LIGHT and LTα in the TNF family and BTLA, CD160 and herpesvirus gD in the Ig family. ► HVEM and its ligands are involved in the pathogenesis of autoimmune, inflammatory and neoplastic diseases. ► Recently described alterations of the HVEM network in tumor cells and microenvironment are discussed. ► Models for targeting these co-signaling molecules in cancer therapy are proposed.

Introduction

Co-signaling molecules include positive and negative receptors that allow regulation and fine tuning of the immune response. They consist of two superfamilies, classified based on their structure: the tumor necrosis factor receptor (TNFR) family characterized by cystein-rich domains (CRDs) in the extracellular portion, and the immunoglobulin (Ig) superfamily, or ‘CD28 and B7 family’, whose members contain Ig-variable-like extracellular domains. The TNFR superfamily comprises important players in costimulation and coinhibition, including 4-1BB, OX40, CD27, CD40 and HVEM. Concerning the Ig superfamily, apart from CD28 and ICOS that deliver co-stimulatory signals to T cells, other members of this family are involved in inhibiting or attenuating TCR-mediated activation. These co-inhibitory Ig members include CTLA-4, BTLA, PD1, and the recently discovered molecule CD160.

Here we focus on members of these families that attracted much attention during these past few years: the TNF receptor HVEM (herpes virus entry mediator), a molecular switch between proinflammatory and inhibitory signaling and the HVEM ligands, which are LIGHT (TNFSF14, lymphotoxin-like, exhibits inducible expression, and competes with herpes simplex virus (HSV) glycoprotein D for HVEM, a receptor expressed by T lymphocytes), BTLA (B and T lymphocyte attenuator) and CD160. Given the importance of HVEM and its ligands in the physiopathology of immune regulation, it is now clear that the dysregulation of this network contributes to various diseases. Many reviews have highlighted the interest of manipulating these pathways in the context of autoimmunity and transplantation [1, 2•, 3•]. Recent studies of outstanding interest have also described abnormal expression of these co-stimulatory molecules in tumor cells [4•, 5•, 6••]. Moreover, clinical trials targeting members of these families, the co-inhibitory Ig molecules CTLA-4 and PD-1 (programmed death-1), have already given promising results in patients with melanoma, renal cell and prostate carcinoma, and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma [7]. In the same way, there is clear interest in evaluating the potential role of HVEM and its ligands in cancer therapy.

In this review we focus on (i) the expression patterns and function of HVEM and its ligands on normal tissues, (ii) the expression of these molecules in tumor cells and their involvement in tumor development and resistance to cancer, (iii) and the possible exploitation of these pathways for novel therapies using antibodies or recombinant proteins.

Section snippets

TNF-related and unconventional ligands

HVEM, first discovered as the entry route for HSV has the particularity to connect the two superfamilies. In general, receptor molecules of the Ig and TNF superfamilies interact with ligands within the Ig and TNF superfamilies, respectively, but not outside of their family. HVEM is different, as it interacts with the viral gD protein and the TNF-related cytokines: LIGHT and lymphotoxin-α (LTα) [8]. More surprisingly HVEM was found to interact with two members of the Ig superfamily: BTLA and

Expression patterns in normal cells

Analysis of the HVEM network and the functional outcome of HVEM engagement with its ligands is complicated by the widespread and regulated expression of BTLA, CD160, and LIGHT (Table 1).

HVEM is widely expressed on peripheral T and B cells, and is modulated during the lymphocyte activation: HVEM is strongly present on resting T cells, downregulated upon T cell activation and then re-expressed as the T cells return to a more resting state. HVEM expression is high in naïve and memory B cells, but

Expression patterns in cancers

Recently, some groups have reported abnormal expression of HVEM and its ligands in tumor cells or their microenvironment (Table 1).

Therapeutic perspectives

In the fields of autoimmunity, cell therapy and transplantation, there is great potential for the development of antibody-based and recombinant protein-based therapies to interfere with the stimulatory HVEM/LIGHT pathway and the inhibitory HVEM/BTLA/CD160 pathways. In autoimmunity and transplantation, one needs to attenuate undesirable T cell responses against self-antigens and alloantigens, respectively. In the context of anti-tumor therapy, the goal is to enhance anti-tumor immune responses.

Conclusions

The co-signaling molecules are crucial for regulating and maintaining efficient immune responses. Dysfunctions of the LIGHT-HVEM and BTLA-HVEM pathways are probably implied in the pathogenesis of various autoimmune and inflammatory diseases [28]. Dysregulations of this fine-tuned network are certainly also involved in neoplastic diseases.

The complexity of the HVEM network and the binding sites of the different ligands have to be considered for the development of specific antagonistic or

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References and recommended reading

Papers of particular interest, published within the period of review, have been highlighted as:

  • • of special interest

  • •• of outstanding interest

References (38)

  • L. Derre et al.

    BTLA mediates inhibition of human tumor-specific CD8+ T cells that can be partially reversed by vaccination

    J Clin Invest

    (2010)
  • W.J. Lesterhuis et al.

    Cancer immunotherapy – revisited

    Nat Rev Drug Discov

    (2011)
  • T.L. Murphy et al.

    Slow down and survive: enigmatic immunoregulation by BTLA and HVEM

    Annu Rev Immunol

    (2010)
  • J.L. Bodmer et al.

    The molecular architecture of the TNF superfamily

    Trends Biochem Sci

    (2002)
  • J.R. Sedy et al.

    B and T lymphocyte attenuator regulates T cell activation through interaction with herpesvirus entry mediator

    Nat Immunol

    (2005)
  • L.C. Gonzalez et al.

    A coreceptor interaction between the CD28 and TNF receptor family members B and T lymphocyte attenuator and herpesvirus entry mediator

    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA

    (2005)
  • D.M. Compaan et al.

    Attenuating lymphocyte activity: the crystal structure of the BTLA-HVEM complex

    J Biol Chem

    (2005)
  • G. Cai et al.

    CD160 inhibits activation of human CD4+ T cells through interaction with herpesvirus entry mediator

    Nat Immunol

    (2008)
  • C.F. Ware et al.

    TNF Superfamily Networks: bidirectional and interference pathways of the herpesvirus entry mediator (TNFSF14)

    Curr Opin Immunol

    (2011)
  • Cited by (56)

    • Herpes Virus Entry Mediator (HVEM): A Novel Potential Mediator of Trauma-Induced Immunosuppression

      2020, Journal of Surgical Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      It is speculated that it is the nonspecific nature of these therapeutic strategies that have failed to produce the desired clinical outcomes, and many have called for a more focused, pathway-based approach to modulating immune effects of trauma.28 However, immune checkpoint directed therapy has shown tremendous potential in a range of medical conditions, most notably in mediating the immune response to malignancies.39,40 Checkpoint proteins such as HVEM, BTLA, and PD-1 are capable of regulating either an immunosuppressive or immunostimulatory role depending of the specific stressor.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text