Original study
Aldehyde Dehydrogenase 1 Expression in Inflammatory Breast Cancer as Measured by Immunohistochemical Staining

Presented at the 100th Annual Meeting of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, San Antonio, TX, February 26 to March 4, 2011.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2013.12.006Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a rare but aggressive type of breast carcinoma. Despite multimodality approaches, the clinical outcome of patients with IBC remains poor. Tumors arising from cancer stem cells (CSCs) are associated with drug resistance, tumor recurrence, and poor prognosis. This study aimed to evaluate expression of aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 (ALDH1), a putative stem cell marker, in IBC tumors.

Materials and Methods

Tissue microarrays of 74 surgically resected IBC tumors were immunohistochemically stained for ALDH1. The results were correlated with clinicopathologic parameters and survival data and were compared with findings published in the literature.

Results

The median follow-up time of the cohort was 42.1 months, and the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 46%. Twenty-four tumors (32%) were positive for ALDH1 staining. However, ALDH1 expression was not significantly associated with clinicopathologic variables, including lymph node status, tumor grade, and the status of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2. Log-rank testing found that ALDH1 expression was not significantly associated with the OS rate, although there was a trend toward an association with lower OS rate (P = .07). The findings were consistent with some of the published data, but substantial inconsistency among reports was noted.

Conclusion

In this IBC cohort, no significant correlation between ALDH1 expression and prognosis or other clinicopathologic variables was found. Although sample size and selection criteria may be contributory factors, inconsistent results reported in the literature raise concern regarding the reliability of immunohistochemically identified ALDH1 as a sole marker of breast CSCs. Further study is required to elucidate the significance of CSCs in IBC biology.

Introduction

Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a rare but aggressive type of breast cancer.1 It is characterized clinically by early metastasis and inflammatory-appearing changes of the breast owing to florid lymphovascular invasion of the tumor emboli. Despite multimodality treatment approaches, the clinical outcome of patients with IBC remains poor, with an overall survival (OS) rate of 35% to 40%, which is much lower than that of patients with non-IBC breast cancer.1, 2, 3 Gaining biologic insights into IBC and identifying suitable therapeutic targets are highly desirable.

The cancer stem cell (CSC) concept proposes that cancers arise from a small percentage of tumor cells that possess properties of self-renewal, high proliferation potential, multilineage differentiation, and tumorigenicity. Mounting evidence has indicated that CSCs exist in breast cancer, that they are responsible for tumor resistance to conventional chemotherapy and radiotherapy and for recurrence/metastasis, and that they are more frequently seen in aggressive carcinoma.4, 5, 6

Several putative CSC markers have been evaluated in both preclinical and clinical studies, among which aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 (ALDH1) positivity and the CD44-positive/CD24-negative (CD44+/CD24) phenotype are the 2 most commonly used.4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 ALDH1 is a detoxifying enzyme responsible for oxidizing intracellular aldehydes to carboxylic acids. ALDH1 has a role in the conversion of retinol (vitamin A) to retinoic acid, which is important for proliferation, differentiation, and survival.4, 7, 16 Interestingly, there is no significant correlation between ALDH1+ cells and CD44+/CD24 cells within the same breast cancer samples, and the overlap between the 2 populations is poor.4, 8, 9, 11, 17 Several studies have suggested that ALDH1 is a better CSC marker than the CD44+/CD24 phenotype. For example, Ginestier et al4 reported that ALDH1-expressing tumor cells are more tumorigenic than CD44+/CD24 tumor cells in immunodeficient mice. In addition, ALDH1 is also involved in metabolizing chemotherapeutic drugs. Significant resistance to sequential paclitaxel- and epirubicin-based chemotherapy was found in tumor cells expressing ALDH1, but not in cells with the CD44+/CD24 phenotype.11 A higher ALDH1 level was associated with lower frequency of clinical response to cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy.18 Inhibition of ALDH1 activity reduces chemotherapy and radiation resistance in stem-like human breast cancer cell lines.19 Compared with CD44/CD24 testing, ALDH1 expression can be more readily examined using immunohistochemical (IHC) staining, which is amenable to archival formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues.4, 8, 10, 11, 17, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27

To date, little is known about the role of CSCs in the biologic behaviors of IBC tumors. In 2008, stem cell signaling pathways such as Notch3 were found to be active in a human IBC xenograft (MARY-X); MARY-X spheroids frequently expressed CD44+/CD24, ALDH1, and other CSC phenotypes.28 When testing human IBC samples, they found ALDH1 expression in 10% to 100% of tumor cells within lymphovascular emboli, suggesting that the stem cell–like phenotype may contribute to the aggressive nature of IBC. Charafe-Jauffret et al8 reported that ALDH1+ cells mediated invasive and metastatic behavior in both IBC cell line (SUM 149) and xenograft (MARY-X) assays. Moreover, the ALDH1+ phenotype, but not the CD44+/CD24 phenotype, was an independent marker in predicting metastasis in patients with IBC.

If ALDH1 expression is proven to be associated with aggressive clinicopathologic parameters of IBC, therapeutic strategies aimed at targeting ALDH1-expressing cells may be beneficial for these patients. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate ALDH1 expression, using IHC staining, in a cohort of IBC tumors collected at the authors' institution. The results were correlated with clinicopathologic parameters and survival data and were compared with data published in the literature.

Section snippets

Patients

A total of 74 patients with primary IBC who were treated at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center from September 1994 to August 2004 with available tumor tissue and clinical follow-up information were included. The diagnosis, preoperative treatment, and postoperative treatment of these patients have been reported previously,29 as well as information on biomarker studies (encompassing estrogen receptor [ER], progesterone receptor [PR], and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2

Results

Of the 74 patients included in this study, 59 (80%) were white, 10 (14%) were Hispanic, and 5 (7%) were black or Asian. The ages of the patients ranged from 23 to 75 years (median, 49 years). Fifty-four patients had stage IIIb tumors, 11 had stage IIIc, and 8 had stage IV. Lymph node involvement was found in 64 patients (86%). Histologically, 66 tumors (89%) were ductal type, 58 tumors (78%) were high grade, and 60 tumors (81%) demonstrated lymphovascular invasion (Table 1).

Of the 74 tumors, ER

Discussion

ALDH1 expression in breast cancer was originally tested using the Aldefluor flow cytometry–based assay. In 2007, Ginestier et al4 first found that immunohistochemically identified ALDH1 expression was associated with poor clinical outcome in human breast cancer. In that study, 2 separate breast cancer cohorts (136 patients in an American cohort and 345 patients in a French cohort) were analyzed, and ALDH1 positivity was found in 19% and 30% of the patients, respectively. The 5-year OS rates for

Conclusion

In the present study, a significant correlation between ALDH1 expression and prognosis or other clinicopathologic variables in an IBC cohort was not observed. The presence of substantial inconsistency in ALDH1 expression and its clinical/pathologic relevance reported in the literature highlights uncertainties, both theoretical and technical, about the reliability of immunohistochemically identified ALDH1 as a sole marker for CSCs of breast carcinoma. Further studies with large series are

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Sunita Patterson of the Department of Scientific Publications at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center for editing the manuscript.

References (34)

  • J. Douville et al.

    ALDH1 as a functional marker of cancer stem and progenitor cells

    Stem Cells Dev

    (2009)
  • E. Charafe-Jauffret et al.

    Aldehyde dehydrogenase 1-positive cancer stem cells mediate metastasis and poor clinical outcome in inflammatory breast cancer

    Clin Cancer Res

    (2010)
  • E. Resetkova et al.

    Prognostic impact of ALDH1 in breast cancer: a story of stem cells and tumor microenvironment

    Breast Cancer Res Treat

    (2010)
  • T. Tanei et al.

    Association of breast cancer stem cells identified by aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 expression with resistance to sequential paclitaxel and epirubicin-based chemotherapy for breast cancers

    Clin Cancer Res

    (2009)
  • L. Zhou et al.

    The prognostic role of cancer stem cells in breast cancer: a meta-analysis of published literatures

    Breast Cancer Res Treat

    (2010)
  • M. Al-Hajj et al.

    Prospective identification of tumorigenic breast cancer cells

    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

    (2003)
  • B.K. Abraham et al.

    Prevalence of CD44+/CD24-/low cells in breast cancer may not be associated with clinical outcome but may favor distant metastasis

    Clin Cancer Res

    (2005)
  • Cited by (15)

    • Inflammatory breast cancer: Activation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor and its target CYP1B1 correlates closely with Wnt5a/b-β-catenin signalling, the stem cell phenotype and disease progression

      2019, Journal of Advanced Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      CSCs are characterized by self-renewal, resistance to apoptosis, an efficient DNA repair capacity, and the expression of multidrug-resistance proteins [29,30]. CSCs can be distinguished from the cells making up the bulk of the tumour by the surface expression of CD44 and CD24 (as a CD44+/CD24(−/low) subpopulation) and the presence of elevated aldehyde dehydrogenase-1 (ALDH1) activity [26–28]. Given their central role in tumour metastasis and resistance to treatment, it is critical to better understand the mechanisms regulating CSC development, particularly in highly aggressive cancers, such as IBC, and to devise rational strategies for targeting CSCs in IBC [31,32].

    • Breast Cancer Stem Cell Correlates as Predicative Factors for Radiation Therapy

      2015, Seminars in Radiation Oncology
      Citation Excerpt :

      In another study of a TMA from 74 surgically resected IBC tumors, there was no significant correlation between ALDH1 expression by immunohistochemistry and clinicopathologic variables. However, there was a trend toward OS association.38 These conflicting results raise the question of the reliability of ALDH1 antibody staining as a clinical predictor of response to treatment and highlight the need for a standard protocol and evaluation process as well as the need to consider the differences between whole tissue staining vs TMA staining.

    • Inflammatory breast cancer

      2023, Inflammation and Chronic Disorders: The Secret Connection
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text