Cancer Letters

Cancer Letters

Volume 356, Issue 2, Part A, 28 January 2015, Pages 197-203
Cancer Letters

Mini-review
Tumor suppressor p53 and its mutants in cancer metabolism

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2013.12.025Get rights and content

Abstract

Tumor-suppressor p53 plays a key role in tumor prevention. As a transcription factor, p53 transcriptionally regulates its target genes to initiate different biological processes in response to stress, including apoptosis, cell cycle arrest or senescence, to exert its function in tumor suppression. Recent studies have revealed that metabolic regulation is a novel function of p53. Metabolic changes have been regarded as a hallmark of tumors and a key contributor to tumor development. p53 regulates many different aspects of metabolism, including glycolysis, mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation, pentose phosphate pathway, fatty acid synthesis and oxidation, to maintain the homeostasis of cellular metabolism, which contributes to the role of p53 in tumor suppression. p53 is frequently mutated in human tumors. In addition to loss of tumor suppressive function, tumor-associated mutant p53 proteins often gain new tumorigenic activities, termed gain-of-function of mutant p53. Recent studies have shown that mutant p53 mediates metabolic changes in tumors as a novel gain-of-function to promote tumor development. Here we review the functions and mechanisms of wild-type and mutant p53 in metabolic regulation, and discuss their potential roles in tumorigenesis.

Introduction

As the “guardian of the genome”, p53 plays a key role in maintaining genomic stability and tumor prevention, which has been clearly demonstrated by following evidence from both human tumors and mouse models. p53 is frequently mutated in human tumors; somatic p53 mutations occur in almost every type of human tumors and in over 50% of all tumors [1], [2], [3]. In those tumors with low p53 mutation rates, p53 is often inactivated by alternative mechanisms. For instance, p53 can be inactivated and degraded by human papillomavirus E6 protein (HPV-E6) in cervical cancer which has a low p53 mutation rate [4], [5]. The germline p53 mutations in human beings cause a hereditary cancer predisposition syndrome, Li–Fraumeni syndrome, which leads to the development of various types of tumors in 50% of the patients by the age of 30 and 90% of patients by the age of 60 [6]. Similarly, p53 knockout mice are extremely prone to tumor development; most p53−/− mice develop tumors (principally lymphomas and sarcomas) within 6 months of age, and p53+/− mice develop tumors within one year of age [7], [8]. As a transcription factor, p53 mainly exerts its tumor suppressive function through transcriptional regulation of its target genes. In normal unstressed cells, p53 protein is kept at a low level by its negative regulators, such as Mdm2, COP1 and Pirh2, which are E3 ubiquitin ligases for p53 and degrade p53 through the proteasome degradation pathway [9], [10]. In response to a variety of stress signals arising from both intracellular and extracellular environments, including DNA damage, nutrient deprivation, hypoxia and oncogene activation, p53 protein is stabilized mainly through post-translational modifications, which leads to p53 protein activation and accumulation in cells [1], [11], [12]. Once activated, p53 binds to a specific degenerative DNA sequence, termed the p53-responsive element (p53 RE), in its target genes to regulate the expression of these genes [12], [13]. Depending on the cell and tissue types, the type and intensity of stress signals, through the regulation of a group of its target genes, p53 selectively regulates cell cycle arrest, DNA repair, apoptosis, or senescence to maintain genomic integrity and prevent tumor formation. For instance, in response to mild or transient stress signals, p53 induces its target genes involved in cell cycle arrest (e.g. p21, Gadd45, and 14-3-3σ) and DNA repair (e.g. p48, and p53R2) to allow cells to survive until the damage has been repaired or stress has been removed [11], [12], [14]. In response to severe or sustained stress signals, p53 usually induces genes involved in apoptosis (e.g. Puma, Bax, Fas, PIG3, and Killer/DR5) and senescence (e.g. p21), and therefore, prevents the accumulation of damaged cells [11], [12], [14] (Fig. 1).

Metabolic changes are a hallmark of tumor cells, which has been recently regarded as a key contributor to tumor progression [15], [16], [17]. The rapid growth and division of tumor cells requires energy and precursors for macromolecule biosynthesis. To meet the energetic and biosynthetic demands, tumor cells often display fundamental changes in metabolism. Interestingly, recent studies have revealed a novel function of p53 in regulation of metabolism, including the regulation of glycolysis, pentose phosphate pathway, mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation and lipid metabolism, which contributes to the role of p53 in tumor suppression. In this review, we present an overview of the function and mechanism of p53 in regulating metabolism, as well as the gain-of-function oncogenic activity of mutant p53 in mediating metabolic changes in tumors.

Section snippets

p53 and glycolysis

The Warburg effect is the most remarkable and best characterized metabolic change in tumor cells. Unlike majority of normal cells which depend on mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation to provide energy, most tumor cells primarily utilize glycolysis for their energy needs even in the presence of sufficient oxygen, a phenomenon termed aerobic glycolysis or the Warburg effect [18]. Although glycolysis is much less efficient in producing energy compared with mitochondrial oxidative

p53 in metabolic regulation and tumor suppression

With the recent identification of more and more functions of p53, an interesting question has been raised about which functions are critical for the p53’s role in tumor suppression. It has been widely accepted that the functions of p53 in regulating apoptosis, cell cycle arrest and senescence contribute mainly to the tumor suppressive activity of p53. However, this concept is challenged by some recent studies in animal models. For example, whereas p21 plays a critical role in mediating

Mutant p53 gain-of-function in metabolism

p53 is the most-frequently mutated gene in human tumors. Unlike many other tumor suppressors (e.g. RB, APC, and VHL), which are frequently inactivated by deletion or truncation mutations in tumors, majority of p53 mutations are missense mutations, which usually lead to the production of the full-length mutant protein [3]. It has been well-documented that some tumor-associated mutant p53 proteins not only lose the tumor suppressive function of wild-type p53, but also gain new oncogenic functions

Conclusions and future directions

p53 has been extensively studied since its discovery in 1979. Many functions of p53, such as cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, and senescence has been discovered and studied for decades [2]. Despite this intensive effort and massive amount of knowledge that has accumulated about p53, we are only beginning to see the complexity of p53. In the case of metabolism, only recently we started to appreciate the contribution of p53 to metabolic regulation. Many questions remain. For example, it is still

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Grants from the NIH (R01CA143204) and CINJ Foundation (to Z.F.), and by Grants from NIH (R01CA160558) (to W.H.). J.L. was supported by the NJCCR postdoctoral fellowship.

References (75)

  • Y. Zhu et al.

    P53 and metabolism: the GAMT connection

    Mol. Cell

    (2009)
  • W. Assaily et al.

    ROS-mediated p53 induction of Lpin1 regulates fatty acid oxidation in response to nutritional stress

    Mol. Cell

    (2011)
  • N. Yahagi et al.

    P53 activation in adipocytes of obese mice

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2003)
  • D. Crighton et al.

    DRAM, a p53-induced modulator of autophagy, is critical for apoptosis

    Cell

    (2006)
  • M.C. Maiuri et al.

    Autophagy regulation by p53

    Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.

    (2010)
  • Y.G. Zhao et al.

    The p53-induced gene Ei24 is an essential component of the basal autophagy pathway

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2012)
  • C. Deng et al.

    Mice lacking p21CIP1/WAF1 undergo normal development, but are defective in G1 checkpoint control

    Cell

    (1995)
  • C.A. Brady et al.

    Distinct p53 transcriptional programs dictate acute DNA-damage responses and tumor suppression

    Cell

    (2011)
  • L.J. Valente et al.

    P53 efficiently suppresses tumor development in the complete absence of its cell-cycle inhibitory and proapoptotic effectors p21, Puma, and Noxa

    Cell Rep.

    (2013)
  • T. Li et al.

    Tumor suppression in the absence of p53-mediated cell-cycle arrest, apoptosis, and senescence

    Cell

    (2012)
  • G.A. Lang et al.

    Gain of function of a p53 hot spot mutation in a mouse model of Li–Fraumeni syndrome

    Cell

    (2004)
  • K.P. Olive et al.

    Mutant p53 gain of function in two mouse models of Li–Fraumeni syndrome

    Cell

    (2004)
  • W.A. Freed-Pastor et al.

    Mutant p53 disrupts mammary tissue architecture via the mevalonate pathway

    Cell

    (2012)
  • M. Koyuturk et al.

    Simvastatin induces apoptosis in human breast cancer cells: p53 and estrogen receptor independent pathway requiring signalling through JNK

    Cancer Lett.

    (2007)
  • A. Goel et al.

    Glucose metabolism in cancer. Evidence that demethylation events play a role in activating type II hexokinase gene expression

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2003)
  • A.J. Levine et al.

    The first 30 years of p53: growing ever more complex

    Nat. Rev. Cancer

    (2009)
  • M. Olivier et al.

    TP53 mutation spectra and load: a tool for generating hypotheses on the etiology of cancer

    (2004)
  • M. Tommasino et al.

    The role of TP53 in cervical carcinogenesis

    Hum. Mutat.

    (2003)
  • L.C. Strong

    General keynote: hereditary cancer: lessons from Li–Fraumeni syndrome

    Gynecol. Oncol.

    (2003)
  • L.A. Donehower et al.

    Mice deficient for p53 are developmentally normal but susceptible to spontaneous tumours

    Nature

    (1992)
  • S.L. Harris et al.

    The p53 pathway: positive and negative feedback loops

    Oncogene

    (2005)
  • A.J. Levine et al.

    The P53 pathway: what questions remain to be explored?

    Cell Death Differ.

    (2006)
  • T. Riley et al.

    Transcriptional control of human p53-regulated genes

    Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.

    (2008)
  • W.S. el-Deiry et al.

    Definition of a consensus binding site for p53

    Nat. Genet.

    (1992)
  • B. Vogelstein et al.

    Surfing the p53 network

    Nature

    (2000)
  • R.A. Cairns et al.

    Regulation of cancer cell metabolism

    Nat. Rev. Cancer

    (2011)
  • K.H. Vousden et al.

    P53 and metabolism

    Nat. Rev. Cancer

    (2009)
  • Cited by (204)

    • Vitamin D actions in mammary gland and breast cancer

      2023, Feldman and Pike's Vitamin D: Volume Two: Disease and Therapeutics
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text