Cancer Letters

Cancer Letters

Volume 296, Issue 2, 28 October 2010, Pages 168-177
Cancer Letters

Clinically relevant doses of chemotherapy agents reversibly block formation of glioblastoma neurospheres

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2010.04.005Get rights and content

Abstract

Glioblastoma patients have a poor prognosis, even after surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy with temozolomide or 1,3-bis(2-chloroethy)-1-nitrosourea. We developed an in vitro recovery model using neurosphere cultures to analyze the efficacy of chemotherapy treatments, and tested whether glioblastoma neurosphere-initiating cells are resistant. Concentrations of chemotherapy drugs that inhibit neurosphere formation are similar to clinically relevant doses. Some lines underwent a transient cell cycle arrest and a robust recovery of neurosphere formation. These results indicate that glioblastoma neurospheres can regrow after treatment with chemotherapy drugs. This neurosphere recovery assay will facilitate studies of chemo-resistant subpopulations and methods to enhance glioblastoma therapy.

Introduction

Temozolomide (TMZ) is the most common chemotherapy drug used to treat glioblastomas [1]. 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea (BCNU, carmustine) is an older drug that surgeons now deposit in the tumor bed as dissolvable wafers [2]. Both of these drugs alkylate DNA at multiple sites, including the O6 position of guanine, which can result in futile cycles of DNA repair and, ultimately, cell death [3].

Even after aggressive treatment that eliminates most of the tumor load, these tumors recur in an average of 6.9 months after initial treatment [4]. Tumor regrowth implies that glioblastomas include a population of cells that are resistant to therapy and maintain the ability to proliferate. Recently, a population of cells with stem cell-like properties was identified in brain tumors [5], and several laboratories have reported that these cells are relatively resistant to chemotherapy and radiation [6], [7].

Neurosphere cultures are heterogeneous, and only a fraction of cells are capable of sphere formation. These cells are classified as neurosphere-initiating cells (NICs) [8], [9], [10]. To quantify the NICs, normal or transformed cells are plated at low density in defined medium and after 1–2 weeks, the numbers of neurospheres are scored [11], [12]. For normal neural cells, this assay was developed to assess stem cells [8], but is now thought to also detect early progenitor cells [13], [14], [15]. It is not known whether there is a similar ambiguity for tumor NICs. Spheroid-based drug screens for other tumor types are under development [16].

The glioblastoma cells used for this assay are grown as neurospheres in defined medium to prevent differentiation. Unlike serum-supplemented cultures, glioblastoma neurosphere cells form invasive brain tumors in immunodeficient mice [17]. In addition, based on expression profiling, neurosphere cultures resemble glioblastoma tumors from patients more closely than serum-supplemented cultures [17].

Using the neurosphere-formation assay, we found that clinically relevant doses of BCNU or TMZ inhibit neurosphere formation. For four of five cell cultures, neurosphere formation resumes following a recovery period; dissociation of these initial spheres allows robust formation of secondary spheres. BCNU and TMZ induce S and/or G2/M cell cycle arrest, which partially reverses by 7 days post-treatment. Collectively, these results indicate that neurosphere formation is highly sensitive to chemotherapy drugs, and in some cases, the NICs may enter a reversible cell cycle arrest. This reversible cell cycle arrest may protect the NICs from chemotoxicity [18], [19], [20], [21], allowing regrowth of some cultures after chemotherapy. In addition, an ex vivo TMZ-treated culture that resumes sphere formation is also capable of tumor initiation as subcutaneous xenografts. This model for the survival and recovery of cultured glioblastoma neurosphere cells may provide insights for tumor recurrence in vivo.

Section snippets

Cell culture

In a previous study, PTEN −/− neural precursor cells [22] were infected with a retrovirus bearing the human mutant receptor EGFRvIII, and we refer to these as EGFRvIII PTEN −/− cells [23]. These transformed cells formed glioblastoma-like tumors in immunodeficient mice, and we established the aggressive PET2 line from one of these tumors. As a control, PTEN +/+ neural precursor cells were infected with an empty GFP MSCV-XZ066 virus [24]. We refer to these as GFP PTEN +/+ cells. A major advantage

Neurosphere formation is inhibited at lower concentrations of chemotherapy drugs than those required to inhibit bulk cell proliferation

To determine how chemotherapy drugs affect neurosphere formation, we measured neurosphere formation in non-transformed and glioblastoma neurosphere cultures without or with treatment with BCNU or TMZ. Because of their rapid decay in aqueous solution [1], [30], these drugs likely persist only a few hours, but their effects on the tumor cells last longer [31]. After 7 or 10 days, we counted the number of neurospheres that formed without or with drug treatment. For all of these cultures, BCNU and

Discussion

To more effectively treat glioblastomas, we must target the tumor-initiating cells that are resistant to current therapies. To determine the effects of chemotherapy drugs on normal and glioblastoma neurosphere cells, we measured neurosphere formation and bulk cell proliferation after treatment with BCNU or TMZ. The MTT/MTS IC50s were 2.5–240-fold greater than the neurosphere IC50s, and the MTT/MTS IC90 values for which there was substantial cell death were 16–400-fold greater than the

Conflict of interest

None declared.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Michael Glantz for the gift of the temozolomide and Drs. Stephen Lyle and Lyndon Kim for their comments on this manuscript. The University of Massachusetts Medical School Tumor Bank and Dr. Julian Wu of Tufts University School of Medicine supplied freshly excised glioblastomas. The University of Massachusetts Flow Cytometry Core analyzed marker expression and cell cycle profiles. We thank the National Institutes of Health for support (Grant NS021716).

References (50)

  • H.S. Friedman et al.

    Temozolomide and treatment of malignant glioma

    Clin. Cancer. Res.

    (2000)
  • S.A. Grossman et al.

    The intracerebral distribution of BCNU delivered by surgically implanted biodegradable polymers

    J. Neurosurg.

    (1992)
  • J.N. Sarkaria et al.

    Mechanisms of chemoresistance to alkylating agents in malignant glioma

    Clin. Cancer. Res.

    (2008)
  • R. Stupp et al.

    Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial

    Lancet. Oncol.

    (2009)
  • S.K. Singh et al.

    Identification of human brain tumour initiating cells

    Nature

    (2004)
  • S. Bao et al.

    Glioma stem cells promote radioresistance by preferential activation of the DNA damage response

    Nature

    (2006)
  • D. Hambardzumyan et al.

    PI3K pathway regulates survival of cancer stem cells residing in the perivascular niche following radiation in medulloblastoma in vivo

    Genes Dev.

    (2008)
  • R.L. Rietze et al.

    Purification of a pluripotent neural stem cell from the adult mouse brain

    Nature

    (2001)
  • A. Gritti et al.

    Multipotential stem cells from the adult mouse brain proliferate and self-renew in response to basic fibroblast growth factor

    J. Neurosci.

    (1996)
  • M.F. Clarke

    A self-renewal assay for cancer stem cells

    Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol.

    (2005)
  • B.A. Reynolds et al.

    Neural stem cells and neurospheres – re-evaluating the relationship

    Nat. Methods

    (2005)
  • M.G. Golmohammadi et al.

    Comparative analysis of the frequency and distribution of stem and progenitor cells in the adult mouse brain

    Stem Cells

    (2008)
  • S.A. Louis et al.

    Enumeration of neural stem and progenitor cells in the neural colony-forming cell assay

    Stem Cells

    (2008)
  • J. Friedrich et al.

    Spheroid-based drug screen: considerations and practical approach

    Nat. Protoc.

    (2009)
  • H.R. Mellor et al.

    A model of quiescent tumour microregions for evaluating multicellular resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs

    Br. J. Cancer

    (2005)
  • Cited by (24)

    • Co-encapsulation of superparamagnetic nanoparticles and doxorubicin in PLGA nanocarriers: Development, characterization and in vitro antitumor efficacy in glioma cells

      2019, European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics
      Citation Excerpt :

      On the other hand, as in glioma tumors, neurospheres are a complex group of cells sustained by stem cells [56]. These stem cells are multipotent and have auto-regeneration capabilities; in GBM they are responsible for the initial formation and progression of the tumor, as well as for the treatment resistance and subsequent recurrence [57]. Therefore, the tumor-initiating cells that are resistant to current therapies should be targeted, and therapies that destroy cancer stem cells are potentially curative [58].

    • Inhibitors of GLUT/SLC2A Enhance the Action of BCNU and Temozolomide against High-Grade Gliomas

      2017, Neoplasia (United States)
      Citation Excerpt :

      As a preliminary step for the analysis, we determined experimentally the IC50 dose of BCNU and TMZ that in U87MG and GL261 cell cultures resulted, respectively, 50 μM and 40 μM for BCNU and 400 μM for TMZ. These values are in good agreement with the values reported in the literature [31]. The isobolograms for U87MG and GL261 cells obtained by the simultaneous exposure of the cells to RTV and BCNU or RTV and TMZ demonstrated, at all concentrations tested, a clear synergism of the drug combinations.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text