Elsevier

Annals of Oncology

Volume 32, Issue 1, January 2021, Pages 49-57
Annals of Oncology

Original Article
Neoadjuvant paclitaxel/olaparib in comparison to paclitaxel/carboplatinum in patients with HER2-negative breast cancer and homologous recombination deficiency (GeparOLA study)

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2020.10.471Get rights and content
Under an Elsevier user license
open archive

Highlights

  • Randomised phase II GeparOLA study investigated olaparib plus paclitaxel (PO) in early HER2-negative HRD breast cancer.

  • Addition of olaparib to chemotherapy could not exclude pCR ≤55% but was significantly better tolerated than carboplatinum.

  • Stratified subgroup analysis shows higher pCR rates with PO in cohorts <40 years and those with HR-positive tumours.

  • Overall, pCR rate in the gBRCA1/2 carriers was significantly higher than in non-carriers.

  • Combination of olaparib with paclitaxel prompts further investigation of olaparib as part of NACT in primary HRD tumours.

Background

The efficacy and toxicity of olaparib as combination therapy in early breast cancer (BC) patients with homologous recombinant deficiency (HRD) [score high and/or germline (g) or tumour (t) BRCA1/2 mutation] is not well described. GeparOLA (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02789332) investigated olaparib in combination with paclitaxel in HER2-negative early BC with HRD.

Patients and methods

Patients with untreated primary HER2-negative cT2-cT4a-d or cT1c with either cN+ or pNSLN+ or cT1c and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) or cT1c and Ki-67>20% BC with HRD were randomised either to paclitaxel (P) 80 mg/m2 weekly plus olaparib (O) 100 mg twice daily for 12 weeks or P plus carboplatinum (Cb) area under the curve 2 weekly for 12 weeks, both followed by epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (EC). Stratification factors were hormone receptor (HR) status (HR+ versus HR−) and age (<40 versus ≥40 years). The primary endpoint was pathological complete response (pCR; ypT0/is ypN0). A two-sided one-group χ2-test was planned to exclude a pCR rate of ≤55% in the PO-EC arm. Secondary end points were other pCR definitions, breast conservation rate, clinical/imaging response, tolerability and safety.

Results

A total of 107 patients were randomised between September 2016 and July 2018; 106 (PO N = 69; PCb N = 37) started treatment. Median age was 47.0 years (range 25.0-71.0); 36.2% had cT1, 61.0% cT2, 2.9% cT3, and 31.8% cN-positive tumours; grade 3 tumours: 86.8%; Ki-67>20%: 89.6%; TNBC: 72.6%; confirmed gBRCA1/2 mutation: 56.2%. The pCR rate with PO was 55.1% [90% confidence interval (CI) 44.5% to 65.3%] versus PCb 48.6% (90% CI 34.3% to 63.2%). Analysis for the stratified subgroups showed higher pCR rates with PO in the cohorts of patients <40 years and HR+ patients.

Conclusion

GeparOLA could not exclude a pCR rate of ≤55% in the PO arm. PO was significantly better tolerated and the combination merits further evaluation.

Key words

PARP inhibitor
HER2-negative breast cancer
HRD
neoadjuvant therapy
olaparib
carboplatinum

Cited by (0)

This study is a joint study of the German Breast Group and the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie Breast.

Note: This study was previously presented in parts as an oral presentation at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology in Chicago, IL 31 May to 4 June 2019.

Shared first authorship.