A review of self-report scales for the assessment of functional limitation and disability of the shoulder1
References (39)
- et al.
Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments
J Chronic Dis.
(1987) - et al.
American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons. A standardized method for the assessment of shoulder function
J Shoulder Elbow Surg.
(1994) - et al.
Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: an analogy to diagnostic test performance
J Chronic Dis.
(1986) - et al.
Shoulder disability questionnaire: design and responsiveness of a functional status measure
J Clin Epidemiol.
(2000) - et al.
Assessing the reliability and responsiveness of 5 shoulder questionnaires
J Shoulder Elbow Surg.
(1998) - et al.
Measuring health status: What are the necessary measurement properties?
J Clin Epidemiol.
(1992) - et al.
Relative responsiveness of condition-specific and generic health status measures in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis
J Clin Epidemiol.
(1995) - et al.
Choosing measures of health status for individuals in general populations
Am J Public Health.
(1981) - et al.
- et al.
The lower extremity functional scale (LEFS): scale development, measurement properties, and clinical application
Phys Ther.
(1999)
American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form: reliability, validity, and responsiveness [abstract]
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther.
(2000)
Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests
Psychometrika.
(1951)
Measuring health-related quality of life
Ann Intern Med.
(1993)
Methods for assessing condition-specific and generic functional status outcomes after total knee replacement
Med Care.
(1992)
Comparison of five health status instruments for orthopedic evaluation
Med Care.
(1990)
Comparative measurement efficiency and sensitivity of five health status instruments for arthritis research
Arthritis Rheum.
(1985)
Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status
Med Care.
(1989)
Cited by (130)
A systematic review of the measurement properties of the Pennsylvania Shoulder Score
2024, Journal of Hand TherapyCan the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation be used as a stand-alone subjective outcome instrument in patients undergoing rotator cuff repair?
2022, Journal of Shoulder and Elbow SurgeryCan the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) be used as a stand-alone outcome instrument in patients undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty?
2022, Journal of Shoulder and Elbow SurgeryThe American Shoulder and Elbow Score Is Highly Correlated With the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index and Has Less Responder and Administrator Burden
2021, Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, and RehabilitationThe American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score has excellent correlation with the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis score
2021, Journal of Shoulder and Elbow SurgeryCitation Excerpt :The self-assessment section has 3 domains that include a single, numeric-based VAS and a 10-question activities–of–daily living scale.29 The duration required for patients to complete the ASES score ranges from 1.8 to 10 minutes.3,5,7,19,20,21,25,29,30,34 The ease of scoring has been considered easy, with a low burden.3,31
- 1
This work was supported in part by grants from the Foundation for Physical Therapy and the National Athletic Trainers' Association Research and Education Foundation.
Copyright © 2001 Hanley & Belfus, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.