Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinicopathological characteristics of triple-negative breast cancers

  • Conference Paper
  • Symposium: Triple negative breast cancer
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is defined as a group of breast carcinomas that are negative for expression of hormone receptors and HER2. Although patients with TNBC tend to have a poor prognosis, only chemotherapy is expected to be effective because no therapeutic targets have yet been established. DNA microarray analyses have proved that TNBCs are composed of the basal-like subtype and normal breast (or unclassified) subtype, the former being correlated with an aggressive clinical course. Histological types of TNBCs are reported to be common with those of basal-like subtype, comprising high-grade invasive ductal carcinoma, no special type [solid-tubular carcinoma (or atypical medullary carcinoma), invasive ductal carcinoma with a large central acellular zone], typical medullary carcinoma, and metaplastic carcinomas. The basal-like subtype is characterized by the expression of myoepithelial/basal markers and molecular changes including TP53 gene mutations, BRCA1 inactivation, and many chromosomal alterations. New target molecules for the treatment of TNBCs are under extensive investigation, and their clinical application is awaited.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Goldhirsch A, Wood W, Celber R, Coats A, Thurlimann B, Senn HJ. Progress and promise: highlights of the international expert consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2007. Ann Oncol. 2007;18:1133–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Perou CM, Sorlie T, Eisen MB, van de Rijn M, Jefferey SS, Rees CA, et al. Molecular portraits of human breast tumors. Nature. 2000;406:747–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sorlie T, Perou CM, Tibshirani R, Aas T, Geisler S, Johnsen H, et al. Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:10869–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Nielsen TO, Hsu FD, Jensen K, Cheang M, Karaca G, Hu Z, et al. Immunohistochemical and clinical characterization of the basal-like subtype of invasive breast carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:5367–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sorlie T, Tibshirani R, Parker J, Hastit T, Marron JS, Nobel A, et al. Repeated observation of breast tumor subtypes in independent gene expression data sets. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:8418–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Umemura S, Kurosumi M, Moriya T, Oyama T, Arihiro K, Yamashita H, et al. Immunohistochemical evaluation for hormone receptors in breast cancer: a practically useful evaluation system and handling protocol. Breast Cancer. 2006;13:232–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Allred DC, Harvey JM, Berardo M, Clarl GM. Prognostic and predictive factors in breast cancer by immunohistochemical analysis. Mod Pathol. 1998;11:155–68.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Harvey JM, Clark GM, Osborne CK, Allred DC. Estrogen receptor status by immunohistochemistry is superior to the ligand-binding assay for predicting response to adjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:1474–81.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wolff AC, Hammond ME, Schwartz JN, Hagerty KL, Allred DC, Cote RJ, et al. American society of clinical oncology/college of American pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(1):118–45.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Reis-Filho JS, Tutt ANJ. Triple negative tumors: a critical review. Histopathology. 2008;52:108–18.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Chia S, Norris B, Speers C, Cheang M, Gilks B, Gown AM, et al. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 overexpression as a prognostic factor in a large tissue microarray series of node-negative breast cancers. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:5697–704.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hayes DF, Thor AD, Dressler LG, Weaver D, Edgerton S, Cowan D, et al. HER2 and response to paclitaxel in node-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:1496–506.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hugh J, Hanson J, Cheang MC, Nielsen TO, Perou CM, Dumontet C, et al. Breast cancer subtypes and response to docetaxel in node-positive breast cancer: use of an immunohistochemical definition in the BCIRG 001 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:1168–76.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Liedtke C, Mazouni C, Hess KR, André F, Tordai A, Mejia JA, et al. Response to neoadjuvant therapy and long-term survival in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:1275–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ono M, Tsuda H, Shimizu C, Yamamoto S, Shibata T, Kouno T, et al. Evaluation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) and tumor cell apoptosis as predictive markers for response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2008;45(Part I):559

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schneider BP, Winer EP, Foulkes WD, Garber J, Perou CM, Richardson A, et al. Triple-negative breast cancer: risk factors to potential targets. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:8010–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Rakha EA, Reis-Filho JS, Ellis IO. Basal-like breast cancer: a critical review. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:2568–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ellis IO, Cornelisse CJ, Schnitt SJ, Sasco AJ, Sastre-Garau X, Kaaks R. Invasive breast carcinoma. In: Tavassoli FA, Devilee P, et al., editors. World health organization classification of tumours. Pathology & genetics. Tumours of the breast and female genital organs. Lyon: IARC Press; 2003. p. 13–59.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tsuda H, Takarabe T, Hasegawa T, Murata T, Hirohashi S. Myoepithelial differentiation in high-grade invasive ductal carcinomas with large central acellular zones. Hum Pathol. 1999;30:1134–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Tsuda H, Takarabe T, Hasegawa F, Fukutomi T, Hirohashi S. Large, central acellular zones indicating myoepithelial tumor differentiation in high-grade invasive ductal carcinomas as markers of predisposition to lung and brain metastases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2000;24:197–202.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. The Japanese Breast Cancer Society. General rules for clinical and pathological recording of breast cancer. 16th ed. Tokyo: Kanehara Shuppan; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Smalley M, Ashworth A. Stem cells and breast cancer: a field in transit. Nat Rev Cancer. 2003;3:832–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hennessy BT, Gonzalez-Angulo AM, Stemke-Hale K, Gilcrease MZ, Krishnamurthy S, Lee JS, et al. Characterization of a naturally occurring breast cancer subset enriched in epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and stem cell characteristics. Cancer Res. 2009;69:4116–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Livasy CA, Karaca G, Nanda R, Tretiakova MS, Olopade OI, Moore DT, et al. Phenotypic evaluation of the basal-like subtype of invasive breast carcinoma. Mod Pathol. 2006;19:264–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Rodriguez-Pinilla SM, Sarrio D, Honrado E, Moreno-Bueno G, Hardisson D, Calero F, et al. Vimentin and laminin expression is associated with basal-like phenotype in both sporadic and BRCA1-associated breast carcinomas. J Clin Pathol. 2007;60:1006–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kim MJ, Ro JY, Ahn SH, Kim HH, Kim SB, Gong G. Clinicopathologic significance of the basal-like subtype of breast cancer: a comparison with hormone receptor and HER-2/neu-overexpressing phenotypes. Hum Pathol. 2006;37:1217–26.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Laakso M, Loman N, Borg A, Isola J. Cytokeratin 5/14-positive breast cancer: true basal phenotype confined to BRCA1 tumors. Mod Pathol. 2005;18:1321–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Li H, Cherukuri P, Li N, Cowling V, Spinella M, Cole M, et al. Nestin is expressed in the basal/myoepithelial layer of the mammary gland and is a selective marker of basal epithelial breast tumors. Cancer Res. 2007;67:501–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Lakhani SR, Reis-Filho JS, Fulford L, Penault-Llorca F, van der Vijver M, Parry S, et al. Prediction of BRCA1 status in patients with breast cancer using estrogen receptor and basal phenotype. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;11:5175–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Savage K, Lambros MB, Robertson D, Jones RL, Jones C, Mackay A, et al. Caveolin 1 is overexpressed and amplified in a subset of basal-like and metaplastic breast carcinomas: a morphologic, ultrastructural, immunohistochemical, and in situ hybridization analysis. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:90–101.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Reis-Filho JS, Steele D, Di Palma S, Jones RL, Savage K, James M, et al. Distribution and significance of nerve growth factor receptor (NGFR/p75NTR) in normal, benign and malignant breast tissue. Mod Pathol. 2006;19:307–19.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Herschkowitz J, He X, Fan C, Perou C. The functional loss of the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor is a common event in basal-like and luminal B breast cancers. Breast Cancer Res. 2008;105:R75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Calza S, Hall P, Auer G, Bjohle J, Klaar S, Kronenwett U, et al. Intrinsic molecular signature of breast cancer in a population-based cohort of 412 patients. Breast Cancer Res. 2006;8:R34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Turner NC, Reis-Filho JS, Russell AM, Springall RJ, Ryder K, Steele D, et al. BRCA1 dysfunction in sporadic basal-like breast cancer. Oncogene. 2007;26:2126–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Garber J, Richardson A, Harris L, Miron A, Silver D, Golshan M, et al. Neoadjuvant cisplatin (CDDP) in triple-negative breast cancer (BC). Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2006;100:S149. Abstract 3074.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Bryant HE, Schultz N, Thomas HD, Parker KM, Flower D, Lopez E, et al. Specific killing of BRCA2-deficient tumours with inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase. Nature. 2005;434:913–7.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Fong PC, Boss DS, Yap TA, Tutt A, Wu P, Mergui-Roelvink M, et al. Inhibition of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase in tumors from BRCA mutation carriers. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:189–91.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Adelaide J, Finetti P, Bekhouche I, Repellini L, Geneiy J, Sircoulomb F, et al. Integrated profiling of basal and luminal breast cancers. Cancer Res. 2007;67:11565–75.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Chin K, DeVries S, Fridlyand J, Spellman PT, Roydasgupta R, Kuo WL, et al. Genomic and transcriptional aberrations linked to breast cancer pathophysiologies. Cancer Cell. 2006;10:529–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by a grant-in-aid for cancer research from the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare, Japan, and a research grant from the Princess Takamatsu Cancer Research Fund.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors indicate no conflict of interest in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuka Sasaki.

Additional information

This article is based on a presentation delivered at Symposium 3, “Triple-negative breast cancer,” held on 27 September 2008 at the 16th Annual Meeting of the Japanese Breast Cancer Society in Osaka.

About this article

Cite this article

Sasaki, Y., Tsuda, H. Clinicopathological characteristics of triple-negative breast cancers. Breast Cancer 16, 254–259 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-009-0153-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-009-0153-5

Keywords

Navigation