Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Microwave ablation of malignant renal tumours: intermediate-term results and usefulness of RENAL and mRENAL scores for predicting outcomes and complications

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Medical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate intermediate-term results after microwave ablation (MWA) of renal tumours and determine the association of RENAL and modified RENAL (mRENAL) scores with oncological outcomes and complications. In May 2008–September 2014, 58 patients affected by early-stage RCC (renal cell carcinoma; T1a or T1b) were judged unsuitable for surgery and treated with percutaneous MWA. Follow-up was performed with contrast-enhanced computed tomography at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after the procedure. Technical success (TS), primary technical effectiveness (PTE), secondary technical effectiveness (STE), the local tumour progression rate (LTPR), the cancer-specific survival rate (CSSR), disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and safety were recorded. All lesions were evaluated using RENAL and mRENAL scores, and complications were assessed with RENAL scores. The TS rate was 100%, PTE was 93%, STE was 100%, LTPR was 15.7% at 1 year, CSSR was 96.5%, DFS was 87.9% at 5 years, and OS was 80.6%. Mean follow-up was 25.7 months (range 3–72). The mean ± standard deviation (SD) RENAL and mRENAL scores of all treated tumours were 6.7 ± 2.05 (range 4–11) and 7 ± 2.3 (range 4–12), respectively. Major complications occurred in two (2/58) and minor complications in three patients (3/58). Overall complications correlated significantly with RENAL scores; in particular, E and L represent negative predictors for safety and effectiveness. MWA is a valuable alternative for treating RCCs. The correlation with outcomes and complications of RENAL and mRENAL scores could help to customise MWA indications in RCC patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rini BI, Campbell SC, Escudier B. Renal cell carcinoma. Lancet. 2009;373(9669):1119–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Katsanos K, Mailli L, Krokidis M, McGrath A, Sabharwal T, Adam A. Systematic review and meta-analysis of thermal ablation versus surgical nephrectomy for small renal tumours. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2014;37(2):427–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Escudier B, Eisen T, Porta C, et al. Renal cell carcinoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2012;23(Suppl 7):65–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bhatt JR, Finelli A. Landmarks in the diagnosis and treatment of renal cell carcinoma. Nat Rev Urol. 2014;11(9):517–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Luciani LG, Cestari R, Tallarigo C. Incidental renal cell carcinoma-age and stage characterization and clinical implications: study of 1092 patients. Urology. 2001;57:206–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Klatte T, Kroeger N, Zimmermann U, et al. The contemporary role of ablative treatment approaches in the management of renal cell carcinoma (RCC): focus on radiofrequency ablation (RFA), high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), and cryoablation. World J Urol. 2014;32(3):597–605. doi:10.1007/s00345-014-1284-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Carrafiello G, Mangini M, Fontana F, et al. Microwave ablation of lung tumours: single-centre preliminary experience. Radiol Med. 2014;119:75–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Brace CL. Microwave tissue ablation: biophysics, technology, and applications. Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 2010;38(1):65–78.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Floridi C, De Bernardi I, Fontana F, et al. Microwave ablation of renal tumors: state of the art and development trends. Radiol Med. 2014;119(7):533–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kutikov A, Uzzo RG. The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth. J Urol. 2009;182:844–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Monn MF, Gellhaus PT, Masterson TA, et al. R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometry scoring: how well correlated are urologist, radiologist, and collaborator scores? J Endourol. 2014;28(8):1006–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Schmit GD, Thompson RH, Kurup AN, et al. Usefulness of R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scoring system for predicting outcomes and complications of percutaneous ablation of 751 renal tumors. J Urol. 2013;189(1):30–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gahan JC, Richter MD, Seideman CA, et al. The performance of a modified RENAL nephrometry score in predicting renal mass radiofrequency ablation success. Urology. 2015;85:125–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Whitson JM, Harris CR, Meng MV. Population-based comparative effectiveness of nephron-sparing surgery vs ablation for small renal masses. BJU Int. 2012;110:1438–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Castle SM, Gorbatiy V, Avallone MA, et al. Cost comparison of nephron-sparing treatments for cT1a renal masses. Urol Oncol. 2013;31:1327–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ljungberg B, Cowan NC, Hanbury DC, et al. EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: the 2010 update. Eur Urol. 2010;58:398–406.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tatli S, Acar M, Tuncali K, et al. Percutaneous cryoablation techniques and clinical applications. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2010;16:90–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tatli S, Tapan U, Morrison PR, et al. Radiofrequency ablation: technique and clinical applications. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2012;18:508–16.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Campbell S, Novick A, Belldegrun A, et al. Guideline for management of the clinical T1 renal mass. J Urol. 2009;182:1271–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Carrafiello G, Laganà D, Mangini M, et al. Microwave tumors ablation: principles, clinical applications and review of preliminary experiences. Int J Surg. 2008;1:S65–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Simon CJ, Dupuy DE, Mayo-Smith WW. Microwave ablation: principles and applications. Radiographics. 2005;25:S69–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sommer CM, Sommer SA, Mokry T, et al. Quantification of tissue shrinkage and dehydration caused by microwave ablation: experimental study in kidneys for the estimation of effective coagulation volume. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013;24(8):1241–8. doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2013.04.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bartoletti R, Meliani E, Simonato A, et al. Microwave-induced thermoablation with Amica-probe is a safe and reproducible method to treat solid renal masses: results from a phase I study. Oncol Rep. 2012;28(4):1243–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang D, Dong B, Wang Y, et al. Percutaneous microwave ablation or nephrectomy for VX-2 carcinoma in rabbit kidney. J Urol. 2009;182(4):1588–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Canter D, Kutikov A, Manley B, et al. Utility of the R.E.N.A.L.nephrometry scoring system in objectifying treatment decision-making of the enhancing renal mass. Urology. 2011;78:1089–94.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Hayn MH, Schwaab T, Underwood W, Kim HL. RENAL nephrometry score predicts surgical outcomes of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. BJU Int. 2011;108:876–81.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Stroup SP, Palazzi K, Kopp RP, et al. RENAL nephrometry score is associated with operative approach for partial nephrectomy and urine leak. Urology. 2012;80:151–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hew MN, Baseskioglu B, Barwari K, et al. Critical appraisal of the PADUA classification and assessment of the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy. J Urol. 2011;186(1):42–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Chang X, Ji C, Zhao X, Zhang F, et al. The application of R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scoring system in predicting the complications after laparoscopic renal radiofrequency ablation. J Endourol. 2014;28(4):424–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Reyes J, Canter D, Putnam S, et al. Thermal ablation of the small renal mass: case selection using the R.E.N.A.L.-Nephrometry Score. Urol Oncol. 2013;31:1292–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lagerveld BW, Brenninkmeijer M, van der Zee JA, et al. Can RENAL and PADUA nephrometry indices predict complications of laparoscopic cryoablation for clinical stage T1 renal tumors? J Endourol. 2014;28(4):464–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Sisul DM, Liss MA, Palazzi KL, et al. RENAL nephrometry score is associated with complications after renal cryoablation: a multicenter analysis. Urology. 2013;81(4):775–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Camacho JC, Kokabi N, Xing M, et al. R.E.N.A.L. (radius, exophytic/endophytic, nearness to collecting system or sinus, anterior/posterior, and location relative to polar lines) nephrometry score predicts early tumor recurrence and complications after percutaneous ablative therapies for renal cell carcinoma: a 5-year experience. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2015;26:686–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Seideman CA, Gahan J, Weaver M, et al. Renal tumour nephrometry score does not correlate with the risk of radiofrequency ablation complications. BJU Int. 2013;112(8):1121–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Crocetti L, Bozzi E, Faviana P, Cioni D, Della Pina C, Sbrana A, Fontanini G, Lencioni R. Thermal ablation of lung tissue: in vivo experimental comparison of microwave and radiofrequency. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2010;33(4):818–27. doi:10.1007/s00270-010-9869.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Park BK, Kim CK, Lee HM. Image-guided radiofrequency ablation of Bosniak category III or IV cystic renal tumors: initial clinical experience. Eur Radiol. 2008;18(7):1519–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mario Petrillo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Human and animal rights

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ierardi, A.M., Puliti, A., Angileri, S.A. et al. Microwave ablation of malignant renal tumours: intermediate-term results and usefulness of RENAL and mRENAL scores for predicting outcomes and complications. Med Oncol 34, 97 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-017-0948-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-017-0948-8

Keywords

Navigation