Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Accuracy of Biopsy Techniques for Limb and Limb Girdle Soft Tissue Tumors

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: The biopsy method of choice for soft tissue sarcomas (STS) of the limb and limb girdle is controversial. There have been no randomized controlled trials that compare incision biopsy with Tru-cut biopsy. We present a large series, which includes an analysis of the effectiveness of Tru-cut core biopsy both in a tertiary referral center as well as from many referring hospitals. This is compared with the other methods of biopsy of all soft tissue tumors (STT) referred to this institution.

Methods: A retrospective review of all patients who were referred to Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Trust (RMH) from 1989 to 1998.

Results: There were 570 patients (576 lesions) identified. Overall Tru-cut biopsy differentiated benign from malignant tumors with a sensitivity of 99.4%, specificity 98.7%, positive predictive value 99.4%, and negative predictive value 98.7% with similar results for RMH and referral hospitals. Tru-cut identified both tumor subtype and grade in approximately 80% of STS. Incision biopsy had similar sensitivity and specificity for differentiating benign from malignant STT as well as subtype of STS but was less accurate for grade assessment. Tumors from patients who were referred after enucleation had a median maximum tumor diameter (MTD) of 4.9 cm, whereas median MTD of tumors diagnosed at referring hospitals by Tru-cut biopsy was 10.6 cm. (P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Tru-cut biopsy is highly sensitive and specific in the diagnosis of STT as well as subtyping and grading of STS. It is equally effective as incision biopsy in all these parameters and has a lesser morbidity. The failure to use Tru-cut biopsy is most likely because of the possibility that STS is not suspected in patients with small tumors even when they are deep to the investing fascia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Mankin HJ, Lange TA, Spanier SS. The hazards of biopsy in patients with malignant primary bone and soft-tissue tumors. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1982; 64-A: 1121–7.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Simon MA. Biopsy of musculoskeletal tumors. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1982; 64: 1253–7.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ball ABS, Fisher C, Pittam M, Watkins RM, Westbury G. Diagnosis of soft tissue tumors by Tru-Cut biopsy. Br J Surg 1990; 77: 756–8.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pitcher ME, Fish S, Thomas JM. Management of soft tissue sarcoma. Br J Surg 1994; 81: 1136–9.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Springfield DS, Rosenberg A. Biopsy. Complicated and risky (Editorial). J Bone Joint Surg 1996;78-A:5: 639–43.

  6. Skrzynski MC, Biermann JS, Montag A, Simon MA. Diagnostic accuracy and charge-savings of outpatient core needle biopsy compared with open biopsy of musculoskeletal tumors. J Bone Joint Surg 1996;78-A:5:644–9.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mankin HJ, Mankin CJ, Simon MA. The hazards of the biopsy, revisited. J Bone Joint Surg 1996;78-A:5:656–63.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Heslin MJ, Lewis JJ, Woodruff JM, Brennan MF. Core needle biopsy for diagnosis of extremity soft tissue sarcoma. Ann Surg Oncol 1997; 4: 425–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. de Saint Aubain Somerhausen N, Fletcher CDM. Soft-tissue sarcomas: an update. Eur J Surg Oncol 1999; 25: 215–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hoeber I, Thomas JM. Correspondence. Biopsy methods of choice in soft-tissue sarcomas. Eur J Surg Oncol 1999; 25: 554.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fletcher CDM, de Saint-Aubain Somerhausen N. Correspondence. Reply to Drs. Hoeber and Thomas. Eur J Surg Oncol 1999; 25: 554.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Giuliano AE, Eilber FR. The rationale for planned reoperation after unplanned total excision of soft-tissue sarcomas. J Clin Oncol 1985; 3: 1344–8.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Noria S, Davis A, Kandel R, Levesque J, O’Sullivan B, Wunder J, Bell R. Residual disease following unplanned excision of a soft-tissue sarcoma of an extremity. J Bone Joint Surg 1996;78-A:5:650–5.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Barr LC, Robinson MH, Fisher C, Fallowfield ME, Westbury G. Limb conservation for soft tissue sarcomas of the shoulder and pelvic girdles. Br J Surg 1989; 76: 1198–201.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lewis JJ, Leung D, Espat J, Woodruff JM, Brennan MF. Effect of reresection in extremity soft tissue sarcoma. Ann Surg 2000; 231: 655–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Enzinger FM, Weiss SW. General considerations. In Enzinger FM, Weiss SW eds. Soft Tissue Tumors. 3rd ed. St Louis: CV Mosby, 1995: 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hill S, Dunn A, Thomas JM. Lymphoma presenting as an intramuscular mass. Br J Surg 1997; 84: 1741–3.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Suit HD, Russell WO, Martin RG. Management of patients with sarcoma of soft tissues in an extremity. Cancer 1973; 31: 1247–55.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Suit HD, Russell WO, Martin RG. Sarcoma of soft tissue: Clinical and histopathologic parameters and response to treatment. Cancer 1975; 35: 1478–83.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pisters PWT, Harrison LB, Leung DHY, et al. Long-term results of a prospective randomized trial of adjuvant brachytherapy in soft tissue sarcoma. J Clin Oncol 1996; 14: 859–68.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pisters P, Leung D, Woodruff J, et al. Analysis of prognostic factors in 1041 patients with localized soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities. J Clin Oncol 1996; 14: 1679–89.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fleming ID, Cooper JS, Henson DE, et al., editors: Soft tissue sarcoma. In Fleming ID, Cooper JS, Henson DE, et al., eds. American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual, 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1997,149–56.

  23. Ramanthan RC, A’Hern R, Fisher C, et al. Modified staging system for extremity soft tissue sarcomas. Ann Surg Oncol 1999; 6: 57–69.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hajdu SI. Pathology of Soft Tissue Sarcomas. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1979: 47–7.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sobin LH, Wittekind CH. UICC TNM Classification of malignant tumors. 5th ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1997: 101–109.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Brennan MF. Staging of soft tissue sarcoma (editorial). Ann Surg Oncol 1999; 6: 8–9.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Spillane AJ, Thomas JM. Staging of soft tissue sarcomas. Eur J Surg Oncol 1999; 25: 559–61.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Layfield LF, Anders KH, Glasgow BJ, et al. Fine-needle aspiration of primary soft-tissue lesions. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1986; 110: 420–4.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Costa MJ, Campman SC, Davis RL, Howell LP. Fine-needle aspiration cytology of sarcoma. Retrospective review of diagnostic utility and specificity. Diagn Cytopath 1996; 15: 23–32.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Mandard AM, Petiot JF, Marnay J, et al. Prognostic factors in soft tissue sarcomas –a multivariate analysis of 109 cases. Cancer 1989; 63: 1437–51.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rydholm A, Berg NO, Gullberg B, et al. Prognosis for soft tissue sarcoma in the locomotor system –A retrospective population based follow-up study of 237 patients. Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand (A) 1984; 92: 375–86.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Gaynor JJ, Tan CC, Casper ES, et al. Refinement of clinicopathologic staging for localized soft tissue sarcoma of the extremity: A study of 423 adults. J Clin Oncol 1992; 10: 1317–29.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Meirion Thomas MS, MRCP, FRCS.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hoeber, I., Spillane, A.J., Fisher, C. et al. Accuracy of Biopsy Techniques for Limb and Limb Girdle Soft Tissue Tumors. Ann Surg Oncol 8, 80–87 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10434-001-0080-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10434-001-0080-y

Keywords

Navigation