Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Is Routine Intraoperative Frozen-Section Examination of Sentinel Lymph Nodes in Breast Cancer Worthwhile?

Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: Routine intraoperative frozen section (FS) of sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) can detect metastatic disease, allowing immediate axillary dissection and avoiding the need for reoperation. Routine FS is also costly, increases operative time, and is subject to false-negative results. We examined the benefit of routine intraoperative FS among the first 1000 patients at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center who had SLN biopsy for breast cancer.

Methods: We performed SLN biopsy with intraoperative FS in 890 consecutive breast cancer patients, none of whom had a back-up axillary dissection planned in advance. Serial sections and immunohistochemical staining for cytokeratins were performed on all SLN that proved negative on FS. The sensitivity of FS was determined as a function of (1) tumor size and (2) volume of metastatic disease in the SLN, and the benefit of FS was defined as the avoidance of a reoperative axillary dissection.

Results: The sensitivity of FS ranged from 40% for patients with T1a to 76% for patients with T2 cancers. The volume of SLN metastasis was highly correlated with tumor size, and FS was far more effective in detecting macrometastatic disease (sensitivity 92%) than micrometastases (sensitivity 17%). The benefit of FS in avoiding reoperative axillary dissection ranged from 4% for T1a (6 of 143) to 38% for T2 (45 of 119) cancers.

Conclusions: In breast cancer patients having SLN biopsy, the failure of routine intraoperative FS is largely the failure to detect micrometastatic disease. The benefit of routine intraoperative FS increases with tumor size. Routine FS may not be indicated in patients with the smallest invasive cancers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Krag DN, Weaver DL, Alex JC, Fairbank JT. Surgical resection and radiolocalization of the sentinel lymph node in breast cancer using a gamma probe. Surg Oncol 1993;2:335–340.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Galimberti V, et al. Sentinel node biopsy to avoid axillary dissection in breast cancer with clinically negative lymph-nodes. Lancet 1997;349:1864–1867.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pijpers R, Hoekstra OS, Collet GJ, et al. Impact of lymphoscintigraphy on sentinel node identification with technetium-99mcolloidal albumin in breast cancer. J Nucl Med 1997;38:366–368.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Roumen RMH, Valkenburg JGM, Geuskens LM. Lymphoscintigraphy and feasibility of sentinel node biopsy in 83 patients with primary breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 1997;23:495–502.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Galimberti V, Zurrida S, Zucali P, Luini A. Can sentinel node biopsy avoid axillary dissection in clinically node-negative breast cancer patients? Breast J 1998;7:8–10.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Borgstein PJ, Pijpers R, Comans EF, van Diest PJ, Boom RP, Meijer S. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer: guidelines and pitfalls of lymphoscintigraphy and gamma probe detection. J Am Coll Surg 1998;186:275–283.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Krag DN, Ashikaga T, Harlow SP, Weaver DL. Development of sentinel node targeting technique in breast cancer patients. Breast J 1998;4:67–74.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Offodile R, Hoh C, Barsky SH, et al. Minimally invasive breast cancer staging using lymphatic mapping with radiolabeled dextran. Cancer 1998;82:1704–1708.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Krag D, Weaver D, Ashikaga T, et al. The sentinel node in breast cancer: a multicenter validation study. N Engl J Med 1998;339:941–946.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Crossin JA, Johnson AC, Stewart PB, Turner WW. Gamma-probeguided resection of the sentinel lymph node in breast cancer. Am Surgeon 1998;64:666–669.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rubio IT, Kogourian S, Cowan C, Krag DN, Colvert M, Klimberg S. Sentinel lymph node biopsy for staging breast cancer. Am J Surg 1998;176:532–537.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Snider H, Dowlatshahi K, Fan M, Bridger WM, Rayudu G, Oleske D. Sentinel node biopsy in the staging of breast cancer. Am J Surg 1998;176:305–310.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Winchester DJ, Sener SF, Winchester DP, et al. Sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast cancer: experience with 180 consecutive patients: efficacy of filtered technetium 99m sulphur colloid with overnight migration time. J Am Coll Surg 1999;188:597–603.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Feldman SM, Krag DN, McNally RK, Moor BB, Weaver DL, Klein P. Limitation in gamma probe localization of the sentinel node in breast cancer patients with large excisional biopsy. J Am Coll Surg 1999;188:248–254.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Moffat FL, Gulec SA, Sittler SY, et al. Unfiltered sulfur colloid and sentinel node biopsy for breast cancer: technical and kinetic considerations. Ann Surg Oncol 1999;6:746–755.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Viale G, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy and axillary dissection in breast cancer: results in a large series. J Natl Cancer Inst 1999;91:368–373.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Miner TJ, Shriver CD, Jaques DP, Maniscalco-Theberge ME, Krag DN. Sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer: the role of previous biopsy on patient eligibility. Am Surg 1999;65:493–499.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Giuliano AE, Kirgan DM, Guenther JM, Morton DL. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast cancer. Ann Surg 1994;220:391–401.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Giuliano AE, Jones RC, Brennan M, Statman R. Sentinel lymphadenectomy in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 1997;15:2345–2350.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Guenther JM, Krishnamoorthy M, Tan LR. Sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast cancer in a community managed care setting. Cancer J Sci Am 1997;3:336–340.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Flett MM, Going JJ, Stanton PD, Cooke TG. Sentinel node localization in patients with breast cancer. Br J Surg 1998;85:991–993.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kern KA. Sentinel lymph node mapping in breast cancer using subareolar injection of blue dye. J Am Coll Surg 1999;189:539–545.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Morgan A, Howisey RL, Aldape HC, et al. Initial experience in a community hospital with sentinel lymph node mapping and biopsy for evaluation of axillary lymph node status in palpable invasive breast cancer. J Surg Oncol 1999;72:24–31.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Morrow M, Rademaker AW, Bethke KP, et al. Learning sentinel node biopsy: results of a prospective randomized trial of two techniques. Surgery 1999;126:714–722.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Albertini JJ, Lyman GH, Cox C, et al. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy in the patient with breast cancer. JAMA 1996;276:1818–1822.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Borgstein PJ, Meijer S, Pijpers R. Intradermal blue dye to identify sentinel lymphnode in breast cancer. Lancet 1997;349:1668–1669.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. O’Hea BJ, Hill ADK, El-Shirbiny A, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer: initial experience at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. J Am Coll Surg 1998;186:423–427.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Barnwell JM, Arredondo MA, Kollmorgen D, et al. Sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 1998;5:126–130.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Bass SS, Cox CE, Ku NN, Berman C, Reintgen DS. The role of sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer. J Am Coll Surg 1999;189:183–194.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Burak WE, Walker MJ, Yee LD, et al. Routine preoperative lymphoscintigraphy is not necessary prior to sentinel node biopsy for breast cancer. Am J Surg 1999;177:445–449.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Nwariaku FE, Euhus DM, Beitsch PD, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy, an alternative to elective axillary dissection for breast cancer. Am J Surg 1998;176:529–531.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Jaderborg JM, Harrison PB, Kiser JL, Maynard SL. The feasibility and accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast carcinoma. Am Surg 1999;65:699–705.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Hill ADK, Tran KN, Akhurst T, et al. Lessons learned from 500 cases of lymphatic mapping for breast cancer. Ann Surg 1999;229:528–535.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Dixon JM, Mamman U, Thomas J. Accuracy of intraoperative frozen-section analysis of axillary lymph nodes. Br J Surg 1999;86:392–395.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Rubio IT, Kourourian S, Cowan C, Krag DN, Colvert M, Klimberg VS. Use of touch preps for intraoperative diagnosis of sentinel lymph node metastases in breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 1998;5:689–694.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Turner RR, Giuliano AE. Intraoperative pathologic examination of the sentinel lymph node. Ann Surg Oncol 1998;5:670–672.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Gibbs JF, Huang PP, Zhang PJ, Kraybill WG, Cheney R. Accuracy of pathologic techniques for the diagnosis of metastatic melanoma in sentinel lymph nodes. Ann Surg Oncol 1999;6:699–704.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Clary BM, Lewis JJ, Brady MS, Busam K, Coit DG. Should frozen section analysis of the sentinel node be performed in patients with melanoma? Eur J Nucl Med 1999;26(Suppl):S68.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Turner RR, Ollila DW, Stern S, Giuliano AE. Optimal histopathologic examination of the sentinel lymph node for breast carcinoma staging. Am J Surg Pathol 1999;23:263–267.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Weiser MR, Montgomery LL, Tan LK, et al. Lymphovascular invasion enhances the prediction of non-sentinel node metastases in breast cancer patients with positive sentinel nodes. Ann Surg Oncol (in press).

  41. McNeil C. Four large studies aim to resolve sentinel node debate. JNCI 1998;90:729.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiram S. Cody III MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weiser, M.R., Montgomery, L.L., Susnik, B. et al. Is Routine Intraoperative Frozen-Section Examination of Sentinel Lymph Nodes in Breast Cancer Worthwhile?. Ann Surg Oncol 7, 651–655 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10434-000-0651-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10434-000-0651-3

Key Words

Navigation