Skip to main content
Log in

Poor prognosis in esophageal cancer patients with postoperative complications

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigated the relationship between postoperative complications and prognosis in esophageal cancer patients. Two hundred five patients with esophageal cancer were divided into three case groups. Group A (n = 100) consisted of cases without postoperative complications. Groups B (n = 58) and C (n = 47) consisted of cases with minor and major postoperative complications. The 5-year survival rates were 41.8%, 21.3%, and 20.2% in groups A, B, and C, respectively. There was a significant difference in the prognosis between groups A and B, and also between groups A and C. Any patients who died within 5 years without a relapse their cases were excluded from the study; the 5-year survival rates were 46.7%, 32.3%, and 22.5% in groups A, B, and C, respectively, with a significant difference between groups A and B. There were no significant differences between the three groups regarding the patient characteristics. These results therefore indicate that postoperative complications might contribute to a poor prognosis in cancer patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hafstrom L, Holmin T (1978) Relatioship between postoperative temperature and survival in patients resected for colorectal cancer. Am J Surg 135:312–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Liechty RD, Vanourny SE, Ziffren SE (1968) Intraperitoneal infection and cancer of the colon and rectum. Arch Surg 96:599–603

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Nowacki MP, Szymendera JJ (1983) The strongest prognostic factors in colorectal carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 26:263–268

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. DerHagopian RP, Sugarbaker EV, Ketcham A (1978) Inflammatory oncotaxis. JAMA 240:374–375

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Yamaguchi Y, Toge T (1996) The immunological response of SIRS patients (in Japanese). Surg Trauma Immunol Responses 5:19–21

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hattori T, Hamai Y, Takiyama W, Hirai T, Ikeda T (1980) Enhancing effect of thoracotomy on tumor growth in rats with special reference to the duration and timing of the operation. Gann (Cancer) 71:280–284

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hirai T, Yoshimoto A, Iwata T, Yamashita Y, Kuwahara M, Toge T (1997) Enhancing effect of thoraco-laparotomy on liver metastasis and the role played by active oxygens in its mechanism. Surg Today 27:1040–1045

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jackson RM, Rice DH (1990) Wound infections and recurrence in head and neck cancer. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 102:331–333

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Grandis JR, Snyderman CH, Johnson JT, Yu VL, D’Amico F (1992) Postoperative wound infection. Cancer 70:2166–2170

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sensenig DM, Rossi NP, Ehrenhaft JL (1963) Results of the surgical treatment of bronchogenic carinoma. Surg Gynecol Obstet 116:279–284

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ruckdeschel JC, Codish SD, Stranahan A, Mackneally MF (1972) Post-operative empyema improves survival in lung cancer. N Engl J Med 287:1013–1017

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Weissmann G, Smolen JE, Korchak HM (1980) Release of inflammatory mediators from stimulated neutrophils. N Engl J Med 303:27–34

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Babior BM, Kipnes RS, Curnutte JT (1973) Biological defense mechanisms: the production by leukocytes of superoxide, a potential bactericidal agent. J Clin Invest 52:741–744

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Orr FW, Adamson IYR, Warner D, Leroyer V, Werner L, Shaughnessey S, Young L (1988) The effect of oxygen radicalmediated pulmonary endothelial damage on cancer metastasis. Mol Cell Biochem 84:189–198

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Orr FW, Warner DJA (1987) Effects of neutrophil-mediated pulmonary endothelial injury on the localization and metastasis of circulating Walker carcinosarcoma cells. Invas Metast 7:183–196

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Weiss SJ, Young J, Lobuglio AF, Slivka A, Nimen N (1981) Role of hydrogen peroxide in neutrophil-mediated destruction of cultured endothelial cells. J Clin Invest 68:714–721

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Van Zee KJ, Deforge LE, Fisher E, Marano MA, Kenny JS, Remick DG, Lowry SF, Moldawer LL (1991) IL-8 in septic shock, endotoxemia, and after IL-1 administration. J Immunol 146:3478–3482

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sakamoto K, Arakawa H, Mita S, Ishiko T, Ikei S, Egami H, Hisano S, Ogawa M (1994) Elevation of circulating Interleukin 6 after surgery: factors influencing the serum level. Cytokine 6:181–186

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bevilacqua MP, Pober JS, Wheeler ME, Cotran RS, Gimbrone MA Jr (1985) Interleukin 1 acts on cultured human vascular endothelium to increase the adhesion of polymorphonuclear leukocytes, monocytes, and related leukocyte cell lines. J Clin Invest 76:2003–2001

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ogawa M (1994) Activation of neutrophils by cytokines is closely related to the development of organ dysfunction (in Japanese). Igaku No Ayumi 169:845–849

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sameshima H, Ikei S, Mori K, Yamaguchi Y, Egami H, Misumi M, Moriyasu M, Ogawa M (1993) The role of tumor necrosis factor-α in the aggravation of cerulein-induced pancreatitis in rats. Int J Pancreatol 14:107–115

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hirai, T., Yamashita, Y., Mukaida, H. et al. Poor prognosis in esophageal cancer patients with postoperative complications. Surg Today 28, 576–579 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/s005950050187

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s005950050187

Key Words

Navigation