Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Predictive value of seven preoperative prognostic scoring systems for spinal metastases

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Predicting prognosis is the key factor in selecting the proper treatment modality for patients with spinal metastases. Therefore, various assessment systems have been designed in order to provide a basis for deciding the course of treatment. Such systems have been proposed by Tokuhashi, Sioutos, Tomita, Van der Linden, and Bauer. The scores differ greatly in the kind of parameters assessed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of each score. Eight parameters were assessed for 69 patients (37 male, 32 female): location, general condition, number of extraspinal bone metastases, number of spinal metastases, visceral metastases, primary tumour, severity of spinal cord palsy, and pathological fracture. Scores according to Tokuhashi (original and revised), Sioutos, Tomita, Van der Linden, and Bauer were assessed as well as a modified Bauer score without scoring for pathologic fracture. Nineteen patients were still alive as of September 2006 with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. All other patients died after a mean period of 17 months after operation. The mean overall survival period was only 3 months for lung cancer, followed by prostate (7 months), kidney (23 months), breast (35 months), and multiple myeloma (51 months). At univariate survival analysis, primary tumour and visceral metastases were significant parameters, while Karnofsky score was only significant in the group including myeloma patients. In multivariate analysis of all seven parameters assessed, primary tumour and visceral metastases were the only significant parameters. Of all seven scoring systems, the original Bauer score and a Bauer score without scoring for pathologic fracture had the best association with survival (P < 0.001). The data of the present study emphasize that the original Bauer score and a modified Bauer score without scoring for pathologic fracture seem to be practicable and highly predictive preoperative scoring systems for patients with spinal metastases. However, decision for or against surgery should never be based alone on a prognostic score but should take symptoms like pain or neurological compromise into account.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bauer H (2002) Surgical strategy for spinal metastases. Spine 27:1124–1125

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bauer HC, Wedin R (1995) Survival after surgery for spinal and extremity metastases. Prognostication in 241 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 66:143–146

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Falicov A, Fisher CG, Sparkes J, Boyd MC, Wing PC, Dvorak MF (2006) Impact of surgical intervention on quality of life in patients with spinal metastases. Spine 31:2849–2856

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Finkelstein JA, Zaveri G, Wai E, Vidmar M, Kreder H, Chow E (2003) A population-based study of surgery for spinal metastases. Survival rates and complications. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85:1045–1050

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Frankel HL, Hancock DO, Hyslop G, Melzak J, Michaelis LS, Ungar GH, Vernon JD, Walsh JJ (1969) The value of postural reduction in the initial management of closed injuries of the spine with paraplegia and tetraplegia. I. Paraplegia 7:179–192

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hirabayashi H, Ebara S, Kinoshita T, Yuzawa Y, Nakamura I, Takahashi J, Kamimura M, Ohtsuka K, Takaoka K (2003) Clinical outcome and survival after palliative surgery for spinal metastases: palliative surgery in spinal metastases. Cancer 97:476–484

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jansson KA, Bauer HC (2006) Survival, complications and outcome in 282 patients operated for neurological deficit due to thoracic or lumbar spinal metastases. Eur Spine J 15:196–202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Karnofsky DA (1967) Clinical evaluation of anticancer drugs. GANN Monograph 2:223–231

    Google Scholar 

  9. King GJ, Kostuik JP, McBroom RJ, Richardson W (1991) Surgical management of metastatic renal carcinoma of the spine. Spine 16:265–271

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Medical Research Council (1976) Aids to the examination of the peripheral nervous system. HMSO, London

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pavlidis N (2007) Forty years experience of treating cancer of unknown primary. Acta Oncol 46:592–601

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sciubba DM, Gokaslan ZL, Suk I, Suki D, Maldaun MV, McCutcheon IE, Nader R, Theriault R, Rhines LD, Shehadi JA (2007) Positive and negative prognostic variables for patients undergoing spine surgery for metastatic breast disease. Eur Spine J 16:1659–1667

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sioutos PJ, Arbit E, Meshulam CF, Galicich JH (1995) Spinal metastases from solid tumors. Analysis of factors affecting survival. Cancer 76:1453–1459

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Tokuhashi Y, Matsuzaki H, Oda H, Oshima M, Ryu J (2005) A revised scoring system for preoperative evaluation of metastatic spine tumor prognosis. Spine 30:2186–2191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tokuhashi Y, Matsuzaki H, Toriyama S, Kawano H, Ohsaka S (1990) Scoring system for the preoperative evaluation of metastatic spine tumor prognosis. Spine 15:1110–1113

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Tomita K, Kawahara N, Kobayashi T, Yoshida A, Murakami H, Akamaru T (2001) Surgical strategy for spinal metastases. Spine 26:298–306

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ulmar B, Huch K, Naumann U, Catalkaya S, Cakir B, Gerstner S, Reichel H (2007) Evaluation of the Tokuhashi prognosis score and its modifications in 217 patients with vertebral metastases. Eur J Surg Oncol 33:914–919

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ulmar B, Naumann U, Catalkaya S, Muche R, Cakir B, Schmidt R, Reichel H, Huch K (2007) Prognosis scores of Tokuhashi and Tomita for patients with spinal metastases of renal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 14:998–1004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ulmar B, Richter M, Cakir B, Muche R, Puhl W, Huch K (2005) The Tokuhashi score: significant predictive value for the life expectancy of patients with breast cancer with spinal metastases. Spine 30:2222–2226

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. van der Linden YM, Dijkstra SP, Vonk EJ, Marijnen CA, Leer JW (2005) Prediction of survival in patients with metastases in the spinal column: results based on a randomized trial of radiotherapy. Cancer 103:320–328

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wai EK, Finkelstein JA, Tangente RP, Holden L, Chow E, Ford M, Yee A (2003) Quality of life in surgical treatment of metastatic spine disease. Spine 28:508–512

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Walker MP, Yaszemski MJ, Kim CW, Talac R, Currier BL (2003) Metastatic disease of the spine: evaluation and treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 415:S165–S175

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Reinhard Windhager.

Additional information

A reviewer’s comment on this original article is available at doi:10.1007/s00586-008-0773-z.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leithner, A., Radl, R., Gruber, G. et al. Predictive value of seven preoperative prognostic scoring systems for spinal metastases. Eur Spine J 17, 1488–1495 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-008-0763-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-008-0763-1

Keywords

Navigation