Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

In-patient rehabilitation of lung cancer patients—a prospective study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

It has not previously been shown whether there is any benefit to multi-morbid patients with lung cancer who participate in complex interdisciplinary rehabilitation programmes after primary therapy. The purpose of this prospective study was to assess changes in exercise capacity and quality of life before and after an in-patient training programme.

Patients and methods

Forty-five patients with lung cancer (WHO I-III after surgery and/or radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy) were enrolled in a 28-day in-patient rehabilitation programme that included standardised aerobic training. Functional status and health-related quality of life (QLQ-C30, QLQ-LC13, SF-36, and MFI-20) were examined at the beginning of the study and at day 28.

Results

A substantial increase in work performance (bicycle ergometry from 68 ± 3 to 86 ± 4 W, p < 0.001, and 6-minute walk test from 322 ± 11 to 385 ± 13 m, p < 0.001) was registered. In addition, heart rate at rest was reduced (from 84 ± 2 to 80 ± 1 beats per minute, p < 0.05) and heart rate variability (indicator of the efficacy of endurance training) was significantly increased (from 9.7 ± 1 to 12.9 ± 1 root mean square of successive differences, p < 0.001). Moreover, there was also a significant improvement in quality of life (48 ± 3 to 62 ± 2, p < 0.001) while fatigue was reduced from 66 ± 3 to 41 ± 4, p < 0.001.

Conclusion

A standardised, aerobic endurance training programme as part of the in-patient oncological rehabilitation of patients with lung cancer results in improvements in both physiological and psychological parameters after therapy. A follow-on study in order to determine to what extent this benefit persists over the long-term, particularly, in comparison with patients who have not participated in a rehabilitation programme, is currently being conducted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nazarian J (2004) Cardiopulmonary rehabiliation after treatment for lung cancer. Curr Treatm Opt Oncol 5:75–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Spruit MA, Janssen PP, Willemsen SCP et al (2006) Exercise capacity before and after an 8-week multidisciplinary inpatient rehabilitation program in lung cancer patients: a pilot study. Lung Cancer 52:257–260

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Thompson E, Sola I, Subirana M (2005) Non-invasive interventions for improving well-being and quality of life in patients with lung cancer—A systematic review of the evidence. Lung Cancer 50:163–176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sola I, Thompson E, Subirana M et al (2004) Non-invasive interventions for improving well-being and quality of life in patients with lung cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev: CD004282

  5. Löllgen H, Goedel-Meinen L, Webering F et al (2000) Vorschlag: Richtlinien für das Belastungs-EKG. Medizin im Dialog 4:19

    Google Scholar 

  6. Guyatt GH, Sullivan MJ, Thompson PJ et al (1985) The 6-minute-walk: a new measure of exercise capacity in patients with chronic heart failure. Can Med Assoc J 132(8):919–923

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Guyatt GH, Pugsley SO, Sullivan MJ et al (1984) Effect of encouragement on walking test performance. Thorax 39:818–822

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Aaronsen NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B et al (1993) The European organisation for research and treatment of cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical studies in oncology. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 85:365–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Löllgen H (1999) Herzfrequenzvariabilität. Neue Methoden in der kardialen Funktionsdiagnostik. Dt Ärztebl 96:2029–2032

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mück-Weymann M (2003) Körperliche und seelische Fitness im Spiegel der Herzfrequenzvariabilität. Hans Jacobs Verlag, Lage

    Google Scholar 

  11. Löllgen D, Jung K, Mück-Weymann M (2004) Herzratenvariabilität (HRV) im Sport – Methodische Überlegungen zur vergleichenden Messung mittels Polar® S810 und Standardmethoden der Medizin. In: Hottenrott K (ed) Herzfrequenzvariabilität im Fitness- und Gesundheitssport. Czwalina Verlag, Hamburg, pp 121–135

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dimeo FC, Tilmann MH, Bertz H et al (1997) Aerobic exercise in the rehabilitation of cancer patients after high dose chemotherapy and autologous peripheral stemm cell transplantation. Cancer 79:1717–1722

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dimeo F, Stieglitz RD, Novelli-Fischer U et al (1999) Effects of physical activity on the fatigue and psychologic status of cancer patients during chemotherapy. Cancer 85:2273–2277

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dimeo F, Rumberger BG, Keul J (1998) Aerobic exercise a therapy for cancer fatigue. Med Sci Sport Exercise 30(4):475–478

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Dimeo F, Thomas F, Raabe-Menssen C et al (2004) Effect of aerobic exercise and relaxation training on fatigue and physical performance of cancer patients after surgery. A randomised controlled train. Support Care Cancer 12(11):774–779

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dimeo F, Thiel E, Böning D (1999) Körperliche Aktivität in der Rehabilitation von onkologischen Patienten. Die Rolle des aeroben Trainings. Dt Ärztebl 96:1340–1345

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schultz K, Bergmann KC, Kenn K et al (2006) Effektivität der pneumologischen Anschluss-Rehabilitation (AHB). Dtsch Med Wochenschr 131:1793–1798

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wilson DJ (1997) Pulmonary rehabilitation exercise program for high-risk thoracic surgical patients. Chest Surg Clin N Am 7(4):697–706

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bozzone A, Romanelli A, Magrone G et al (2004) Pulmonary rehabilitation: pre- and postoperative treatment. Rays 29(4):431–433

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Christman NJ, Cain LB (2004) The effects of concrete objective information and relaxation on maintaining usual activity during radiation therapy. Oncol Nurs Forum 31(2):39–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Doorenbos A, Given B, Given C et al (2006) Physical functioning: effect of behavioural intervention for symptoms among individuals with cancer. Nurs Res 55(3):161–171

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wall LM (2000) Changes in hope and power in lung cancer patients who exercise. Nurs 13(3):234–242

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hendrik Riesenberg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Riesenberg, H., Lübbe, A.S. In-patient rehabilitation of lung cancer patients—a prospective study. Support Care Cancer 18, 877–882 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-009-0727-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-009-0727-y

Keywords

Navigation