Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Single incision laparoscopic surgery for appendicectomy: a retrospective comparative analysis

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) may further reduce the trauma of surgery leading to reduced port site complications and postoperative pain. The improved cosmetic result also may lead to improved patient satisfaction with surgery.

Methods

Data were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed for all patients who underwent SILS appendicectomy at our institution and were compared with those who had undergone conventional laparoscopic appendicectomy during the same time period. This included patient demographic data, intraoperative, and postoperative outcomes.

Results

Thirty-three patients underwent conventional laparoscopic appendicectomy and 40 patients underwent SILS appendicectomy between January 26, 2008 and July 14, 2009. Operative time was shorter with SILS appendicectomy compared with conventional laparoscopic appendicectomy (p < 0.05). No patients in the SILS appendicectomy group required conversion to open surgery compared with two patients in the conventional laparoscopic appendicectomy group. Patients stayed an average of 1.36 days after SILS appendicectomy, and 2.36 days after conventional laparoscopic appendicectomy.

Discussion

SILS appendicectomy seems to be a safe and efficacious technique. Further work in the form of randomized studies is required to investigate any significant advantages of this new and attractive technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Graph 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kuhry E, Schwenk W, Gaupset R, Romild U, Bonjer J (2008) Long-term outcome of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: a Cochrane systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Cancer Treatment Rev 34(6):498–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Keus F, de Jong JA, Gooszen HG, van Laarhoven CJ (2006) Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (Online) (4):CD006231

  3. Kurokawa Y, Katai H, Fukuda H, Sasako M (2008) Phase II study of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage I gastric cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG0703. Jpn J Clin Oncol 38(7):501–503

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Shehzad K, Mohiuddin K, Nizami S, Sharma H, Khan IM, Memon B et al (2007) Current status of minimal access surgery for gastric cancer. Surg Oncol 16(2):85–98

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Carr SR, Luketich JD (2008) Minimally invasive esophagectomy. An update on the options available. Minerva Chir 63(6):481–495

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wheeless CR Jr (1972) Outpatient laparoscope sterilization under local anesthesia. Obstet Gynecol 39(5):767–770

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pelosi MA, Pelosi MA III (1992) Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy using a single-umbilical puncture (mini-laparoscopy). J Reprod Med 37(9):777–784

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Esposito C (1998) One-trocar appendectomy in pediatric surgery. Surg Endosc 12(2):177–178

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rispoli G, Armellino MF, Esposito C (2002) One-trocar appendectomy. Surg Endosc 16(5):833–835

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. MacDonald ER, Ahmed I (2009) Another step toward scarless surgery. Arch Surg 144(6):593–594

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Navarra G, Pozza E, Occhionorelli S, Carcoforo P, Donini I (1997) One-wound laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 84(5):695

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Reavis KM, Hinojosa MW, Smith BR, Nguyen NT (2008) Single-laparoscopic incision transabdominal surgery sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg 18(11):1492–1494

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bucher P, Pugin F, Morel P (2008) Single port access laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. Int J Colorectal Dis 23(10):1013–1016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Leroy J, Cahill RA, Asakuma M, Dallemagne B, Marescaux J (2009) Single-access laparoscopic sigmoidectomy as definitive surgical management of prior diverticulitis in a human patient. Arch Surg 144(2):173–179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rane A, Rao P, Rao P (2008) Single-port-access nephrectomy and other laparoscopic urologic procedures using a novel laparoscopic port (R-port). Urology 72(2):260–263 discussion 263–264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Chow A, Purkayastha S, Aziz O, Paraskeva P (2010) Single-incision laparoscopic surgery for cholecystectomy: an evolving technique. Surg Endosc 24(3):709–714

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Chow A, Purkayastha S, Paraskeva P (2009) Appendicectomy and cholecystectomy using single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS): The first UK experience. Surg Innov 16(3):211–217

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bowrey DJ, Blom D, Crookes PF, Bremner CG, Johansson JL, Lord RV et al (2001) Risk factors and the prevalence of trocar site herniation after laparoscopic fundoplication. Surgical Endosc 15(7):663–666

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Binenbaum SJ, Teixeira JA, Forrester GJ, Harvey EJ, Afthinos J, Kim GJ et al (2009) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy using a flexible endoscope. Arch Surg 144(8):734–738

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Palanivelu C, Rajan PS, Rangarajan M, Parthasarathi R, Senthilnathan P, Praveenraj P (2008) Transumbilical flexible endoscopic cholecystectomy in humans: first feasibility study using a hybrid technique. Endoscopy 40(5):428–431

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zorron R, Maggioni LC, Pombo L, Oliveira AL, Carvalho GL, Filgueiras M (2008) NOTES transvaginal cholecystectomy: preliminary clinical application. Surgical Endosc 22(2):542–547

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Zornig C, Mofid H, Emmermann A, Alm M, von Waldenfels HA, Felixmuller C (2008) Scarless cholecystectomy with combined transvaginal and transumbilical approach in a series of 20 patients. Surg Endosc 22(6):1427–1429

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Palmer R (1984) Why the laparoscopic route for tubal sterilization? Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris) 12(7–8):931–933

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Slim K, Launay-Savary MV (2008) NOTES, the debate continues. Surg Endosc 22(10):2326 author reply 2327

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bucher P, Pugin F, Morel P (2010) From single-port access to laparoendoscopic single-site cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 24(1):234–235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Pugliese R, Forgione A, Sansonna F, Ferrari GC, Di Lernia S, Magistro C (2009) Hybrid NOTES transvaginal cholecystectomy: operative and long-term results after 18 cases. Langenbecks Arch Surg July 9 [Epub ahead of print]

Download references

Disclosures

Andre Chow, Sanjay Purkayastha, Jean Nehme, Ara Darzi, and Paraskevas Paraskeva have no conflicts of interest of financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paraskevas Paraskeva.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chow, A., Purkayastha, S., Nehme, J. et al. Single incision laparoscopic surgery for appendicectomy: a retrospective comparative analysis. Surg Endosc 24, 2567–2574 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1004-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1004-3

Keywords

Navigation