Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Factors affecting the number of lymph nodes retrieved in colorectal cancer specimens

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Staging of colorectal cancer is dependent on the number of lymph nodes in a surgical specimen that are positive for metastatic cancer. It is generally recommended that a minimum of 12 lymph nodes be examined to ensure adequate staging. It is unclear which factors specifically contribute to variation in the number of lymph nodes retrieved from surgical specimens. This study aims to understand the factors affecting the number of lymph nodes identified in surgical colorectal cancer specimens.

Methods

A total of 264 retrospectively collected cases of colorectal cancer surgically treated at the University Health Network in Toronto from 2004 to 2006 were analyzed. We used univariate analyses of variance (ANOVA), and univariate and multivariable linear and logistic regression analyses to study variation in the lymph node number associated with a variety of explanatory variables.

Results

The average number of lymph nodes retrieved per case was 18.1, with 70 (26.5%) cases containing fewer than 12. Variation in the lymph node number was greatest between different pathology assistants (p =  < 0.001). The mean number of nodes retrieved by different pathology assistants ranged from 12.6 to 29.7. On average, surgery for recurrent cancer removed 6.0 (95% CI 1.2 to 10.9, p = 0.02) fewer lymph nodes than for primary cancer. Each additional year of patient age was associated with retrieval of 0.1 (95% CI 0.04 to 0.2, p = 0.005) fewer nodes, and rectal cancer specimens had 2.7 (95% CI 0.04 to 5.4, p = 0.05) fewer lymph nodes than colon cancer specimens.

Conclusion

Most of the variation in the number of lymph nodes identified in surgical specimens from colorectal cancer operations was accounted for by differences between pathology assistants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Colorectal Cancer Statistics, Canadian Cancer Society (2006)

  2. American Joint Committee on Cancer (2002) Colon, rectum. In: AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 6th Ed. Springer, New York, NY

  3. Nelson H, Petrelli N, Carlin A, Couture J, Fleshman J, Guillem J, Miedema B, Ota D, Sargent D (2001), National Cancer Institute Expert Panel Guidelines 2000 for colon and rectal cancer surgery. J Natl Cancer Inst 93:583–596

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cancer System Quality Index (2006) Cancer Care Ontario

  5. Swanson RS, Compton CC, Stewart AK, Bland KI (2003) Theprognosis of T3N0 colon cancer is dependent on the number of lymph nodes examined. Ann Surg Oncol 10:65–71

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tepper JE, O’Connell MJ, Niedzwiecki D, Hollis D, Compton C, Benson AB, Cummings B, Gunderson L, Macdonald JS, Mayer RJ (2001) Impact of number of nodes retrieved on outcome in patients with rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 19:157–163

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Scott N, Thorne C, Jayne D (2004) Lymph node retrieval after neoadjuvant radiotherapy for rectal adenocarcinoma. Journal of Clinical Pathology 57:335–336

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Galvis CO, Raab SS, D’Amico F, Grzybicki DM (2001) Pathologists’ assistants practice. A measure of performance. Am J Clin Pathol 116:816–822

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Baxter NN, Morris AM, Rothenberger DA, Tepper JE (2005) Impact of preoperative radiation for rectal cancer on subsequent lymph node evaluation: a population-based analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 61:426–431

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bui L, Rempel E, Reeson D, Simunovic M (2006) Lymph node counts, rates of positive lymph nodes, and patient survival for colon cancer surgery in Ontario, Canada: a population-based study. J Surg Oncol 93:439–445

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Baxter NN, Virnig DJ, Rothenberger DA, Morris AM, Jessurun J, Virnig BA (2005) Lymph node evaluation in colorectal cancer patients: a population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst 97:219–225

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. The Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. The COlon cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6:477–484

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AMH, Heath RM, Brown JM, for the MRC CLASICC trial group (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Milsom JW, Böhm B, Hammerhofer KA, Fazio V, Steiger E, Elson P (1998) A prospective, randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus conventional techniques in colorectal cancer surgery: a preliminary report. J Am Coll Surg 187:46–54

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Leung KL, Kwok SPY, Lam SCW, Lee JFY, Yiu RYC, Ng SSM, Lai PBS, Lau WY (2004) Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomised trial. Lancet 363:1187–1192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Clinical Decision Making and Health Care, Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

    David R. Urbach

  2. Departments of Surgery and Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

    Michelle A. Ostadi, Julie L. Harnish & Stacey Stegienko

Authors
  1. Michelle A. Ostadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Julie L. Harnish
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Stacey Stegienko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. David R. Urbach
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David R. Urbach.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ostadi, M.A., Harnish, J.L., Stegienko, S. et al. Factors affecting the number of lymph nodes retrieved in colorectal cancer specimens. Surg Endosc 21, 2142–2146 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9414-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9414-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation