Abstract
Background
Determining the optimum algorithm for diagnostic procedure in suspected acute appendicitis (AA) may not only reduce the number of unnecessary operations, but also the frequency of complications, and may contribute measurably to reducing the costs of treating patients with acute abdominal conditions.
Objective
The aim of the study was to assess the value of standard diagnostic methods and measurement of selected biochemical and hematological parameters (C-reactive protein, CRP; interleukin-6, IL-6; procalcitonin, PCT; total count of white blood cell, WBC) in the accuracy of preoperative AA diagnosis.
Material and methods
The prospective study included 132 patients (female: 52.3%, male: 47.7%) emergency admitted to the Surgical Department, aged 15 to 74 years (mean 36 years), with a suspicion of appendicitis. Measurement of PCT concentration was carried out by immunoluminometric assay, IL-6 concentration by micro enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and CRP concentration by immunonephelometric assay. Statistical analysis was done by the chi-square test and Fisher's exact test for categorized discrete variables, and the Mann–Whitney U and Kruskal–Wallis tests for continuous variables. In order to assay the diagnostic utility of tests, the receiver operating characteristic model of curve analysis was used.
Results
AA was confirmed in 89 (67.5%) of the patients operated on (group A). Twenty-six (19.7%) of the patients were not operated on and did not require surgery (group C); in 13 patients (9.8%) operated with a preliminary diagnosis of AA, no changes in the appendix were found during the course of the operation (group B). Four (3%) of the patients treated conservatively for periappendicular infiltration were excluded from the following analysis (group D). The mean count of WBC in AA was 13.22 ± 4.45 × 103/μL, with no statistical significance between groups, which does not allow the patients requiring surgery to be distinguished. The highest elevation of IL-6 concentration was observed in the group with the AA and the periappendicular infiltration: 101.5 ± 355.9 vs. 173.6 ± 228.33 pg/mL, respectively; p < 0.05. No surgery patients of group C showed considerably lower CRP concentrations than those of group D: CRP: 2.05 ± 3.6 vs. 6.36 ± 4.74 mg/L; p < 0.05. In cases of advanced forms of AA, the gangrenous with perforation, higher marker values are obtained than those in the phlegmonose form (186.60 ± 541.2 vs. 40.08 ± 48.3 pg/mL; (p < 0.05) for IL-6 and 8.88 ± 7.45 vs. 2.84 ± 3.83 mg/L; (p < 0.001) for CRP, respectively).
Conclusions
1. AA diagnosis based only on an assessment of clinical status may lead to an increase in the number of people operated with false-positive diagnoses of AA. 2. Applying additional diagnostic methods such as IL-6 determination seems to be useful in reducing the numbers of false-positive diagnoses of AA. 3. Laboratory tests, i.e., CRP, IL-6, and PCT are much more useful in assessing the risk of complications during the course of AA.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Tzanakis NE, Efstathion SP, Danulidis K, Rallis GE, Tsioulos DI, Chatzivasiliou A, Peros G, Nikiteas NI (2005) A new approach to accurate diagnosis of acute appendicitis. World J Surg 29(9):1151–1156, discussion 1157
Amalesh T, Shankar M, Shankar R (2004) CRP in acute appendicitis—is it a necessary investigation? Int J Surg 2(2):88–89
Weyant MJ, Eachempati SR, Maluccio MA, Rivadeneira DE, Grobmyer SR, Hydo LJ, Barie PS (2000) Interpretation of computed tomography does not correlate with laboratory or pathologic findings in surgically confirmed acute appendicitis. Surgery 128(2):145–152
Anielski R, Barczyński M, Cichoń S, Kostka A, Hładki W (2001) Acute appendicitis in Cracow population [Ostre zapalenie wyrostka robaczkowego w populacji Krakowa]. Przegl Lek 58(12):1034–1037
Yildirim O, Solak C, Kocer B, Unal B, Karabeyoglu M, Bozkurt B, Aksaray S, Cengiz O (2006) The role of serum inflammatory markers in acute appendicitis and their success in preventing negative laparotomy. J Invest Surg 19(6):345–352
Khan MN, Davie E, Irshad K (2004) The role of white cell count and C-reactive protein in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 16(3):17–19
Zimmerman MA, Selzman CH, Cothren C, Sorensen AC, Raeburn CD, Harken AH (2003) Diagnostic implications of C-reactive protein. Arch Surg 138(2):220–224
Andersson M, Andersson RE (2008) The appendicitis inflammatory response score: a tool for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis that outperforms the Alvorado score. World J Surg 32(8):1843–1849
Shakhatreh HS (2000) The accuracy of C-reactive protein in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis compared with that of clinical diagnosis. Med Arch 54(2):109–110
Asfar S, Safar H, Khoursheed M, Dashti H, al-Bader A (2000) Would measurement of C-reactive protein reduce the rate of negative exploration for acute appendicitis? J R Coll Surg Edinb 45(1):21–24
Erkasap S, Ates E, Ustuner Z, Sahin A, Yilmaz S, Yasar B, Kiper H (2000) Diagnostic value of interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein in acute appendicitis. Swiss Surg 6(4):169–172
Groselj-Grenc M, Repse S, Dolenc-Strazar Z, Hojker S, Derganc M (2007) Interleukin-6 and lipopolysaccharide-binding protein in acute appendicitis in children. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 67(2):197–206
Almagor M, Mintz A, Sibirsky O, Durst A (2005) Preoperative and postoperative levels of interleukin-6 in patients with acute appendicitis. Surg Endosc 19(3):331–333
Sengupta A, Bax G, Paterson-Brown S (2009) White cell count and C-reactive protein measurement in patients with possible appendicitis. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 91(2):113–115
Kafetzis DA, Velissariou IM, Nikolaides P, Sklavos M, Maktabi M, Spyridis G, Kafetzis DD, Androulakakis E (2005) Procalcitonin as a predictor of severe appendicitis in children. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 24(7):484–487
Chakhunashvili L, Samkharadze J, Chkhaidze I (2005) Procalcitonin as the biomarker of inflammation in diagnostics of pediatric appendicitis and for prevention of unnecessary appendectomy. Ann Biomedical Res Edu 5(1):6–9 http://abre.tsmu.edu//2005/v5is1_03.htm
Kang JY, Hoare J, Majeed A, Williamson RCN, Maxwell JD (2003) Decline in admission rates for acute appendicitis in England. Br J Surg 90(12):1586–1592
Johansson EP, Rydh A, Riklund KA (2007) Ultrasound, computed tomography, and laboratory findings in the diagnosis of appendicitis. Acta Radiol 48(3):267–273
Birkhahn RH, Briggs M, Datillo PA, Van Deusen SK, Gaeta TJ (2006) Classifying patients suspected of appendicitis with regard to likelihood. Am J Surg 191(4):497–502
Wysocki A, Panek J, Krzywoń J (1999) Causes of acute surgical abdominal diseases and age in a 60-year period [Przyczyny ostrych chirurgicznych chorób jamy brzusznej i wiek chorych w ostatnich 60 latach]. Pol Przegl Chir 71(4):368–376
Yang HR, Wang YC, Chung PK, Chen WK, Jeng LB, Chen RJ (2006) Laboratory tests in patients with acute appendicitis. ANZ J Surg 76(1-2):71–74
Yang HR, Wang YC, Chung PK, Chen WK, Jeng LB, Chen RJ (2005) Role of leukocyte count, neutrophil percentage, and C-reactive in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in the elderly. Am Surg 71(4):344–347
Semm K (1993) Stellenwert der Laparoskopie der Appendizitis: Beantwortung des Fragenkatalogs. Chir Gastroenterologie 9:266
Horton MD, Counter SF, Florence MG, Hart MJ (2000) A prospective trial of computed tomography and ultrasonography for diagnosing appendicitis in the atypical patient. Am J Surg 179(5):379–381
Schwerk WB (2000) Ultrasound first in acute appendix? Unnecessary laparotomies can often be avoided. MMW Fortschr Med 142(26–27):29–32
Douglas CD, Macpherson NE, Davidson PM, Gani JS (2000) Randomised controlled trial of ultrasonography in diagnosis of acute appendicitis, incorporating the Alvarado score. BMJ 321(7266):919–922
Kessler N, Cyteval C, Gallix B, Lesnik A, Blayac PM, Pujol J, Bruel JM, Taourel P (2004) Appendicitis: evaluation of sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of US, Doppler US, and laboratory findings. Radiology 230(2):472–478
Josephson T, Styrud J, Eriksson S (2000) Ultrasonography in acute appendicitis. Body mass index as selection factor for US examination. Acta Radiol 41(5):486–488
Arendt J, Zygmunt J, Heinrich G, Niemiec A, Podwiński A (1999) Evaluation of the validity of laparoscopy in diagnostic management of patients presenting with clinical symptoms of acute appendicitis [Ocena przydatności techniki laparoskopowej w diagnostyce chorych z objawami klinicznymi ostrego zapalenia wyrostka robaczkowego]. Pol Przegl Chir 71(12):1234–1243
Tytgat SH, Bakker XR, Butzelaar RM (1998) Laparoscopic evaluation of patients with suspected acute appendicitis. Surg Endosc 12(9):918–920
Prabhudesai SG, Gould S, Rekhraj S, Tekkis PP, Glazer G, Ziprin P (2008) Artificial neural network: useful aid in diagnosing acute appendicitis. World J Surg 32(2):305–309; discussion 310-1
Andersson RE (2008) Artificial neural network: useful aid in diagnosing acute appendicitis. World J Surg 32(8):310–311
Wu HP, Lin CY, Chang CF, Chang YJ, Huang CY (2005) Predictive value of C-reactive protein at different cutoff levels in acute pancreatitis. Am J Emerg Med 23(4):449–453
Kim E, Subhas G, Mittal VK, Golladay ES (2009) C-reactive protein estimation does not improve accuracy in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in pediatric patients. Int J Surg 7(1):74–77
Kuśnierz-Cabala B, Galicka-Latała D (2004) Diagnostic value of procalcitonin (PCT) determination [Wartość diagnostyczna oznaczeń prokalcytoniny]. Przeg Lek 61(9):978–980
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Anielski, R., Kuśnierz-Cabala, B. & Szafraniec, K. An evaluation of the utility of additional tests in the preoperative diagnostics of acute appendicitis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 395, 1061–1068 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-009-0565-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-009-0565-x