Skip to main content
Log in

Management of recurrent or metastatic endometrial cancer in Germany: results of the nationwide AGO pattern of care studies from the years 2013, 2009 and 2006

  • Gynecologic Oncology
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The available literature on the treatment options for recurrent or metastatic endometrial cancer (EC) is full of controversies. Therefore, we explore the results of the AGO pattern of care studies from the years 2013, 2009 and 2006.

Methods

A questionnaire was developed and sent to all 682 German gynecological departments in 2013 (775 in 2009, 500 in 2006, respectively). The results of the questionnaires were compared with each other using Fisher’s exact test.

Results

Responses were available in 40.0 % in 2013, 33.3 % in 2009 and 35.8 % in 2006. In 2013 the most preferred endocrine drug was progestin (79.8 %), followed by tamoxifen (42.8 %), aromatase inhibitor (19.8 %), fulvestrant (16.3 %) and a combination (3.9 %) (p < 0.001). 65.3, 59.8, 51.7 and 38.2 % of the participants used platinum, taxane, a combination of cytostatic drugs, anthracycline in metastatic EC, respectively (p = 0.215). 96.2, 92.7, 49.8 and 60.9 % of the participants performed an operation, radiotherapy, endocrine therapy and chemotherapy in 2013 because of a local recurrence, respectively (p < 0.001). Compared to 2009 and 2006 these rates remained stable (no p value <0.05). Because of a distant metastasis 50.4, 64.2, 78.5 and 90.8 % of the participants performed an operation, radiotherapy, endocrine therapy and chemotherapy in 2013, respectively (p < 0.001). Compared to 2009 and 2006 more participants performed an operation or radiotherapy and less an endocrine treatment.

Conclusions

Whereas progestin was the favorite drug, the participants of this study did not prefer a specific cytostatic drug for metastatic EC in 2013. This might have reflected the available literature, which did not provide a real standard of care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gebärmutterkörper (2010) Krebs in Deutschland 80–83. Accessed at http://www.rki.de/Krebs/DE/Content/Publikationen/Krebs_in_Deutschland/kid_2013/kid_2013_c54-55_gebaermutterkoerper.pdf;jsessionid=D687D7570E564374CAB3C53CCABF8F0E.2_cid390?__blob=publicationFile

  2. Creutzberg CL, van Putten WLJ, Koper P et al (2003) Survival after relapse in patients with endometrial cancer: results from a randomized trial. Gynecol Oncol 89:201–209

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fleisch MC, Pantke P, Beckmann MW et al (2007) Predictors for long-term survival after interdisciplinary salvage surgery for advanced or recurrent gynecologic cancers. J Surg Oncol 95:476–484

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Westin SN, Rallapalli V, Fellman B et al (2014) Overall survival after pelvic exenteration for gynecologic malignancy. Gynecol Oncol 134:546–551

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Temkin SM, Fleming G (2009) Current treatment of metastatic endometrial cancer. Cancer Control 16:38–45

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Humber CE, Tierney J, Symonds R (2007) Chemotherapy for advanced, recurrent or metastatic endometrial cancer: a systematic review of Cochrane collaboration. Ann Oncol 18:409–420

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sommeijer DW, Sjoquist KM, Friedlander M (2013) Hormonal treatment in recurrent and metastatic gynaecological cancers: a review of the current literature. Curr Oncol Reports 15:541–548

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bradford LS, Rauh-Hain JA, Schorge J et al (2013) Advances in the management of recurrent endometrial cancer. Am J Clin Oncol, PMID 23764681

    Google Scholar 

  9. Battista MJ, Schmidt M, Rieks N et al (2014) Nationwide analysis on surgical procedures for patients with endometrial cancer in Germany: Results of the AGO pattern of care studies from the years 2013, 2009, and 2006. J Canc Res Clin Oncol 140:2087–2093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Battista MJ, Schmidt M, Rieks N et al (2015) Adjuvant treatment decisions for patients with endometrial cancer in Germany: results of the nationwide AGO pattern of care studies from the years 2013, 2009, and 2006. J Canc Res Clin Oncol 141:555–562

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Battista MJ, Steiner E, Rieks N et al (2013) Nationwide analysis on surgical staging procedures and systemic treatment for patients with endometrial cancer in Germany. Int J Gynecol Canc 23:105–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fiorica JV, Brunetto V, Hanjani P et al (2004) Phase II trial of alternating courses of megestrol acetate and tamoxifen in advanced endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol 92:10–14

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Whitney C, Brunetto V, Zaino R et al (2004) Phase II study of medroxyprogesterone acetate plus tamoxifen in advanced endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol 92:4–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rose PG, Brunetto V, VanLe L et al (2000) A phase II trial of anastrozole in advanced recurrent or persistent endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol 78:212–216

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Thigpen BT, Brady MF, Homesley HD et al (2001) Tamoxifen in the treatment of advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol 19:364–367

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ma B, Oza A, Eisenhauer E et al (2004) The activity of letrozole in patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer and correlation with biological markers–a study of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. Int J Gynecol Canc 14:650–658

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Emons G, Günthert A, Thiel F et al (2013) Phase II study of fulvestrant 250 mg/month in patients with recurrent or metastatic endometrial cancer: a study of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie. Gynecol Oncol 129:495–499

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lissoni A, Zanetta G, Losa G et al (1996) Phase II study of paclitaxel as salvage treatment in advancer endometrial cancer. Ann Oncol 13:861–863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ball HG, Blessing JA, Lentz SS et al (1996) Phase II trial of paclitaxel in patients with advanced or recurrent adenocarcinoma of the endometrium. Gynecol Oncol 281:278–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lincoln S, Blessing JA, Lee RB et al (2003) Activity of paclitaxel as second-line chemotherapy in endometrial carcinoma: a gynecologic oncology group study. Gynecol Oncol 88:277–281

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hirai Y, Hasumi K, Onose R et al (2004) Phase II trial of 3-h infusion of paclitaxel in patients with adenocarcinoma of endometrium: Japanese Multicenter Study Group. Gynecol Oncol 94:471–476

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Obel J, Friberg G, Fleming G (2006) Chemotherapy in endometrial cancer. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol 6:459–468

    Google Scholar 

  23. Fleming GF, Brunetto V, Cella D et al (2004) Phase III trial of doxorubicin plus cisplatin with or without paclitaxel plus filgrastim in advanced endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol 22:2159–2166

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Miller D, Filiaci V, Fleming G et al (2012) Late-Breaking Abstract 1: Randomized phase III noninferiority trial of first line chemotherapy for metastatic or recurrent endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol 125:771

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interests and signed the conflict of interest form.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Johannes Battista.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Battista, M.J., Schmidt, M., Eichbaum, M. et al. Management of recurrent or metastatic endometrial cancer in Germany: results of the nationwide AGO pattern of care studies from the years 2013, 2009 and 2006. Arch Gynecol Obstet 292, 1355–1360 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-015-3786-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-015-3786-y

Keywords

Navigation