Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

MR imaging and MR cholangiopancreatography in the preoperative evaluation of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: correlation with surgical and pathologic findings

  • Hepatobiliary-Pancreas
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The primary aim was to evaluate delayed contrast-enhanced MRI in depicting perineural spread of hilar cholangiocarcinoma (CCC) and consequently to determine the capability of MRI/MRCP for staging CCC. Fifteen patients that underwent MRI/MRCP and surgical treatment were retrospectively included. Two radiologists evaluated MR images to assess delayed periductal enhancement, extent of bile duct stenosis, liver parenchymal and vascular involvement and presence of liver atrophy. An agreement between delayed enhancement of the bile duct walls and perineural neoplastic spread showed a very good correlation factor (0.93). The overall accuracy in detecting biliary neoplastic invasion was higher for delayed T1-weighted images (93.3%) than for the MRCP images (80%), and T1-delayed image increased the MR accuracy in assessing the neoplastic resectability (p < 0.05). MRI correctly predicted vascular involvement in 73% and liver involvement in 80% of the cases. The number of overall correctly assessed patients with regard to resectability was 11 true positive, 1 false positive and 3 true negative. The combination of MRI/MRCP is a reliable diagnostic method for staging hilar cholangiocarcinomas. Delayed periductal enhancement is accurate in the evaluation of neoplastic perineural spread, and it can improve diagnostic accuracy to identify resectable and unresectable tumours.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Klatskin G (1965) Adenocarcinoma of the hepatic ducts at its bifurcation with the porta hepatis: an unusual tumor with distinctive clinical and pathological features. Am J Med 38:241–245

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Alexander F, Rossi RL, O’ Bryan M et al (1994) Biliary carcinoma: A review of 109 cases. Am J Surg 147:503–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Whelton MJ, Petrelli M, George P, Young WB, Sherlock S (1969) Carcinoma at the junction of the main hepatic ducts. Quart J Med 38:211–258

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Khan AZ, Makuuchi M (2007) Trends in the surgical management of Klatskin tumours. Br J Surg 94(4):393–294

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lygidakis NJ, Van der Henden MN, Houthoff HJ (1988) Surgical approaches to the management of primary biliary cholangiocarcinoma of the porta hepatis. The decision making dilemma. Hepatogastroenterology 35:261–267

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bismuth H, Nakache R, Diamond T (1992) Management strategies in resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg 215:31–38

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lopera JE, Soto JA, Munera F (2001) Malignant hilar and perihilar biliary obstruction: use of MR cholangiography to define the extent of biliary ductal involvement and plan percutaneous interventions. Radiology 220:90–96

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Vogl TJ, Schwarz WO, Heller M et al (2006) Staging of klatskin Tumours (hilar cholangiocarcinomas): comparison of MR cholangiography, MR imaging, and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Eur Radiol 16(10):2317–25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zech JC, Schoenberg SO, Reiser M, Helmeberger (2004) Cross-sectional imaging of biliary tumors:current clinical status and future developments Eur Radiol 14:1174–1187

  10. Manfredi R, Barbaro B, Masselli G, Vecchioli A, Marano P (2004) Magnetic Resonance imaging of cholangiocarcinoma. Seminar Liv Disease 24:155–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lim JH (2003) Cholangiocarcinoma: morphologic classification according to growth pattern and imaging findings. AJR 181:819–827

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bhuiya MR, Nimura Y, Kamiya J et al (1992) Clinicopathologic studies on perineural invasion of bile duct carcinoma. Ann Surg 215:344–349

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Fulcher AS, Turner MA (1997) HASTE MR cholangiography in the evaluation of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169:1501–1505

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Fulcher AS, Turner MA, Capps G, Zfass AM, Baker KM (1988) MR Cholangiopancreatography: experience in 300 subjects. Radiology 207:21–32

    Google Scholar 

  15. Manfredi R, Masselli G, Maresca G et al (2003) MR imaging and MRCP of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Abdom Imaging 28:319–325

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Guthrie JA, Ward J, Robinson PJ (1996) Hilar cholangiocarcinoma: T2-weighted spin-echo and gadolinium enhanced FLASH MR imaging. Radiology 201:347–351

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Dooms GC, Kerlan RK, Hricak H, Wall SD, Margulis AR (1986) Cholangiocarcinoma: imaging by MR. Radiology 159:89–94

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Rosai J (1996) Ackerman’s surgical pathology, 8th edn. Mosby, St. Louis, pp 914–915, 960

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bismuth H, Malt R (1979) Carcinoma of the biliary tract. N Engl J Med 301:704–706

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Nichols DA, MacCarty RL, Gaffey TA (1983) Cholangiographic evaluation of bile duct carcinoma. AJR 141:1291–1294

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Nesbit GM, Johnson CD, James EM, Mac Carty RL, Nagorney DM, Bender CE (1988) Cholangiocarcinoma: diagnosis and evaluation of resectability by CT and sonography as procedures complementary to cholangiography. AJR 151:933–938

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Adam A, Benjamin IS (1992) The staging of cholangiocarcinoma. Clin Radiol 46:299–303

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Tillich M, Mischinger HJ, Preisseiger KH, Rabl H, Szolar DH (1998) Multiphasic helical CT in diagnosis and staging of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. AJR 171(3):651–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Feidy A, Vilgrain V, Denys A, Sibert A, Belghiti J, Vullierme MP, Menu Y (1999) Helical CT assessment in hilar cholangiocarcinoma: correlation with surgical and pathologic findings. AJR 172(1):73–7

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lee HY, Kim SH, Lee JM et al (2006) Preoperative assessment of respectability of hepatic hilar cholangiocarcinoma:combined CT and cholangiography with revised criteria. Radiology 239:113–121

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Soto J, Barish M, Ferrucci J et al (1996) Magnetic Resonance cholangiography:comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gastroenterology 110:589–597

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Manfredi R, Brizi MG, Masselli G, Vecchioli A, Marano P (2001) Malignant Biliary Hilar stenosis. MR cholangiopancreatography compared with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Radiol Med 102:48–54

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kim HJ, Lee JM, Kim SH et al (2007) Evaluation of the Longitudinal Tumor extent of bile duct cancer: value of adding gadolinium-enhanced dynamic imaging to unhenhanced images and magnetic resonance cholangiography. J Comp Assist Tomogr 31(3):469–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Looser C, Stain SC, Baer HU, Triller J, Blungart LH (1992) Staging of hilar cholangiocarcinoma by ultrasound and duplex sonography: a comparison with angiography and operative findings. Br J Radiol 65:871–877

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Mcfarland EG, Kaufman JA, Saini S et al (1996) Preoperative staging of cancer of the pancreas: value of MR angiography versus conventional angiography in detecting portal venous invasion. AJR 166:37–43

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Yin L, Song B, Xu J, LI Y (2007) Hilar cholangiocarcinoma:preoperative evaluation with a three dimensional volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination magnetic resonance imaging sequence. Chin Med J 120:636–642

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Klatskin G, Conn HO (1993) Abnormalities of the hepatic parenchyma. In: Histopathology of the liver. Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gabriele Masselli.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Masselli, G., Manfredi, R., Vecchioli, A. et al. MR imaging and MR cholangiopancreatography in the preoperative evaluation of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: correlation with surgical and pathologic findings. Eur Radiol 18, 2213–2221 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-008-1004-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-008-1004-z

Keywords

Navigation